1887
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1932-2798
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2700
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In the Anglophone sphere, according to popular and most academic understandings, the term “ideograph” is regarded as an unproblematic synonym of 漢字 ‘Chinese character.’ On graphological grounds, i.e. as applied to writing systems, it can easily be shown that the concept of “ideograph” is both theoretically incoherent and practically unfeasible (McDonald 2016); while historically it is clear that the notion was founded on an imperfect understanding of Chinese characters as a writing system, and grew out of a European obsession with the notion of a “universal character” at a particular historical moment (Mungello 1985Saussy 2001). Nevertheless the concept has become deeply embedded in European understandings of Chinese language and culture, to the extent that it is, in effect, a valuable conceptual possession of Western modernity (Bush 2010), and promoted alike by those with a detailed knowledge of Chinese writing, such as H. G. Creel (1936), as by those in blissful ignorance of it, like Jacques Derrida (1967/1976). In the Sinophone sphere, while for most practical purposes, as well as in a large proportion of scholarly work, more grounded understandings of Chinese characters as a writing system operate either implicitly or explicitly, the traditional emphasis on characters as a link between civilization and the cosmos (O’Neill 2013), as well as a long tradition of pedagogical “just so stories” about the construction of individual characters (e.g., Zuo 2005), provide a key point of contact with Western notions of the “ideograph” as symbolizing not a word, but an idea or an object. The situation may thus be described involving a type of inversion of the phenomenon of or “false friends,” where two words are understood as being more or less synonymous; or alternatively as an example of Lydia Liu’s (2004) notion of a cross-lingual “supersign” where two comparable terms exercise an influence on each other across linguistic and cultural boundaries. This article will attempt to trace the genealogy of these complex and overlapping notions, and see what differing understandings of Chinese characters have to tell us about notions of cultural specificity, cultural production, and cross-cultural (mis-)communication in the contemporary globalized world.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/tis.00016.mcd
2018-10-12
2019-12-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ames, Roger T. and Henry Rosemont, Jr.
    1999The Analects of Confucius: A philosophical translation. New York: Ballantine Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bacon, Francis
    1605The Advancement of Learning. Renascence Editions: An Online Repository of Works Printed in English Between the Years 1477 and 1799. www.luminarium.org/renascence-editions/adv1.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1625De dignitate & augmentis scientiarum IX libri. Editio nova, cum indice rerum ac verborum locupletissimo 1645 Lugd. Batav. (Leiden): F. Moyardum & A. Wijngaerde.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boodberg, Peter A.
    1937 “Some Proleptical Remarks on the Evolution of Archaic Chinese.” Harvard Journal of Asian Studies2: 329–372.10.2307/2717943
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2717943 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bush, Christopher
    2010Ideographic Modernism: China, Writing, Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Champollion, Jean-François
    1822Lettre à M. Dacier relative à l’alphabet des hiéroglyphes phonétiques employés par les Égyptiens pour inscrire sur leurs monuments les titres, les noms et les surnoms de souverains grecs et romains. Paris: Firmin Didot.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang, Han-Liang
    1988 “Hallucinating the Other: Derridean Fantasies of Chinese Script.” Representations of Otherness: Cultural Hermeneutics, East and West. Center for Twentieth Century Studies UWM, April 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chao, Yuen Ren 趙元任
    1975 Rhythm and Structure in Chinese Word Conceptions. 漢語詞的概念及其結構和節奏.’ 王 洪君譯 。見 “中國現代語言學的開闊和發展 – 趙元任語言學論文選”。清華大學出版社 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Creel, Herrlee Glessner
    1936 “On the Nature of Chinese Ideography.” T’oung Paoxxxii: 85–161.10.1163/156853236X00056
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853236X00056 [Google Scholar]
  10. De Bono, Edward
    2000The De Bono Code Book. London: Viking.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Derrida, Jacques
    1967De la grammatologie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit 1976 Of Grammatology. Trans. by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Du Ponceau, Peter S.
    1828A Dissertation on the Nature and Character of the Chinese System of Writing. Published as 1838. Transactions of the Historical and Literary Committee of the American Philosophical Society. Vol.2
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Eco, Umberto
    1995The Search for the Perfect Language. Tr. James Fentress . Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fenollosa, Ernest
    1919 The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry. Ed. by Ezra Pound . reprinted 1936 San Francisco: City Lights Books. Fenollosa, Ernest & Ezra Pound 2008 New edition. Ed. by Haun Saussy , Jonathan Stalling , and Lucas Klein . The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry: A Critical Edition. Fordham University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gu, Ming Dong
    2005Chinese Theories of Reading and Writing: A Route to Hermeneutics and Open Poetics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2006Chinese Theories of Fiction: A Non-Western Narrative System. Albany, NY: University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2013 “Linguistic Sinologism.” Chapter 8 inSinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism, 187–215. London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2014 “Sinologism in Language Philosophy: A Critique of the Controversy over Chinese Language.” Philosophy East and West64(3): 692–717.10.1353/pew.2014.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2014.0041 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gu, Sharron
    2012A Cultural History of the Chinese Language. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall, David L. and Roger T. Ames
    1987Thinking Through Confucius. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hansen, Chad
    1983Language and Logic in Ancient China, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1993 “Chinese Ideographs and Western Ideas.” Journal of Asian Studies52(2): 373–399.10.2307/2059652
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2059652 [Google Scholar]
  23. Harris, Roy
    2000 What’s the code for ‘We’ve heard this one before’?Times Higher Education, August 20, 2000. Available at: www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/books/whats-the-code-for-weve-heard-this-one-before/155936.article. Last accessed18 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hodge, Bob & Kam Louie
    1998The Politics of Chinese Language and Culture: The Art of Reading Dragons. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kern, Robert
    1996Orientalism, Modernism, and the American Poem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511570469
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570469 [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, Lydia H.
    2004The Clash of Empires: The Invention of China in Modern World Making. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lü, Shuxiang
    1986 Hanyu jufa de linghuoxing. [The flexibility of Chinese syntax] Zhongguo Yuwen1986(1), 1–9. 呂叔湘 著漢語句法的靈活性《中國語文》1986年第1期,第1–9頁。
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lurie, David B.
    2006 “Language, writing and disciplinarity in the Critique of the ‘Ideographic Myth’: Some proleptical remarks.” Language and Communication26: 250–269.10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015 [Google Scholar]
  29. McDonald, Edward
    2000 “Review of Hodge, Bob & Kam Louie. 1998. The Politics of Chinese Language and Culture: The Art of Reading Dragons .” Modern Chinese Literature and Culture12(1)(Spring): 209–217.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2002 “‘Humanistic Spirit or Scientism?’: conflicting ideologies in Chinese language reform.” Histoire, Epistémologie, Langage24(2): 51–74.10.3406/hel.2002.2172
    https://doi.org/10.3406/hel.2002.2172 [Google Scholar]
  31. McDonald, Edward
    2009 “Getting over the Walls of Discourse: ‘Character Fetishization’ in Chinese Studies.” Journal of Asian Studies68(4): 1189–1213.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McDonald, Edward
    2011 “Ideolatry vs Phonolatry?: Chinese Characters as Disciplinary Identifier.” Chapter 5 inLearning Chinese, Turning Chinese: challenges to becoming sinophone in a globalised world. London: Routledge, 109–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2016 “The Chinese Script in the Chinese Scriptworld: Chinese Characters in Native and Borrowed Traditions.” Journal of World Literature1(2): 195–211. doi: 10.1163/24056480‑00102005.
    https://doi.org/10.1163/24056480-00102005 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mungello, David
    1985Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origins of Sinology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. O’Neill, Timothy
    2013 “Xu Shen’s Scholarly Agenda: A New Interpretation of the Postface of the Shuowen jiezi .” Journal of the American Oriental Society133(3): 413–440.10.7817/jameroriesoci.133.3.0413
    https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.133.3.0413 [Google Scholar]
  36. Oxford English Dictionary
    Oxford English Dictionary. www.oed.com.
  37. Porter, David
    2001Ideographia: The Chinese Cipher in Early Modern Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pound, Ezra
    1915Cathay: Translations by Ezra Pound for the most part from the Chinese of Rihaku, from the notes of the late Ernest Fenollosa, and the decipherings of the Professors Mori and Ariga. London: Elkin Matthews.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rosemont, Henry Jr.
    1974 “On Representing Abstractions in Archaic Chinese.” Philosophy East and West24(1): 71–88.10.2307/1397604
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1397604 [Google Scholar]
  40. Said, Edward
    1978Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient, New York: Pantheon; revised edition 1995 London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1916Cours de linguistique générale 1957 Tr. by Wade Baskin . Course in General Linguistics, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Saussy, Haun
    2001Great Walls of Discourse and Other Adventures in Cultural ChinaHarvard East Asian Monographs 212, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Asia Center.10.2307/j.ctt1tg5hz4
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1tg5hz4 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shen, Xiaolong
    1989 Renwen jingshen haishi kexuezhuyi?: 20 shiji Zhongguo yuyanxye de sibianlu. [Humanism or Scientism?: A Critique of 20th Century Chinese Linguistics]. Shanghai: Shulin. 申小龍 著《人文精神還是科學主義?:20世紀中國語言學的思辨录 》書林出版社,上海。
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Watters, T.
    1889Essays on the Chinese Language, Shanghai: Presbyterian Mission Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wilkins, John
    1668An Essay Towards a Real Character And a Philosophical Language, London: Sa. Gellibrand.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Xu, Tongqiang
    2001 Jichu yuyanxue jiaocheng/Foundations of Linguistics: A Course Book. Beijing: Peking University Press. 許通鏘 著《基礎語言學教程》北京大學出版社,北京。
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, Gongjin
    1998 Wenhua yuyanxue fafan [Overview of Cultural Linguistics]. Kunming: Yunnan University Press. 張公瑾 著《文化語言學發凡》云南大學出版社,昆明。
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhou, Gang
    2015 “Review of Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism by Ming Dong Gu.” Modern Chinese Literature and Culture. u.osu.edu/mclc/book-reviews/gangzhou/
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhou, Xian
    2015 “Between Knowledge and Politics: Reflections on Reading Ming Dong Gu’s Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism .” Philosophy East and West65(4): 1273–1279.10.1353/pew.2015.0094
    https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2015.0094 [Google Scholar]
  50. Zuo, Min’an
    2005Xishuo Hanzi: 1,000 ge hanzi de qiyuan yu yanbian [Chinese Characters in Detail: The origins and evolution of 1,000 Chinese Characters.] Beijing: Citic. 左民安 著《細說漢字:1000個漢字的起源與演變》中信出版社,北京。
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/tis.00016.mcd
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese characters , cultural nationalism , ideograph , nativised orientalism and writing systems
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error