1887
Volume 17, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1932-2798
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2700
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/tis.00055.hau
2023-03-10
2024-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Angelelli, Claudia V.
    2012 “The sociological turn in translation and interpreting studies.” Translation and Interpreting Studies7(2): 125–128. 10.1075/tis.7.2.09con
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.7.2.09con [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker Shenk, Charlotte
    1986 “Characteristics of oppressed and oppressor peoples.” InInterpreting: The art of cross-cultural mediation, ed. byMarina L. McIntire, 43–53. Silver Spring, MD: RID Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Best, Brett
    2019 “Is it time to accredit interpreting agencies?: Perspectives of BSL-English interpreters.” Journal of Interpretation27(1): article 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blankmeyer Burke, Teresa
    2017 “Choosing accommodations: Signed language interpreting and the absence of choice.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal27(2): 267–299. 10.1353/ken.2017.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2017.0018 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bienvenu, M. J.
    1987 “Third culture: Working together.” Journal of Interpretation41: 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brunson, Jeremy L.
    2007 “Your case will now be heard: Sign language interpreters as problematic accommodations in legal interactions.” The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education13(1): 77–91. 10.1093/deafed/enm032
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enm032 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brunson, Jeremy L.
    2015 “A sociology of interpreting.“ InSigned Language Interpretation and Translation Research, ed. byBrenda Nicodemus and Keith Cagle, 130–149. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2rh2b69.9
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh2b69.9 [Google Scholar]
  8. Caselli, Naomi. K., Wyatt C. Hall, and Jon Henner
    2020 “American Sign Language interpreters in public schools: An illusion of inclusion that perpetuates language deprivation.” Maternal Child Health Journal241: 1323–1329. 10.1007/s10995‑020‑02975‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-02975-7 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cokely, Dennis
    2005 “Shifting positionality: A critical examination of the turning point in the relationship of interpreters and the Deaf community.” InSign Language Interpreting and Interpreter Education. Directions for Research and Practice, ed. byMarc Marschark, Rico Peterson, and Elizabeth A. Winston, 3–28. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Corker, Mairian
    1997 “Deaf people and interpreting: The struggle in language.” Deaf Worlds13(3): 13–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Darroch, Emma
    2018 “An illusion of inclusion? – Can counselling psychology do more to ensure equality and access to psychological therapies for deaf people, through their work with interpreters?” The European Journal of Counselling Psychology7(1): 14–30. 10.5964/ejcop.v7i1.157
    https://doi.org/10.5964/ejcop.v7i1.157 [Google Scholar]
  12. De Meulder, Maartje, and Hilde Haualand
    2021 “Sign language interpreting services: A quick fix for inclusion?” Translation and Interpreting Studies16(1): 19–40. 10.1075/tis.18008.dem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.18008.dem [Google Scholar]
  13. De Meulder, Maartje, Jemina Napier, and Christopher Stone
    2018 “Designated or preferred? A presentation of best practice of a deaf academic and two signed language interpreters working together for a PhD defense.” International Journal of Interpreter Education10(2): 5–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gile, Daniel
    1995Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.8(1st)
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8(1st) [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall, Wyatt, Thomas Holcomb, and Marlene Elliott
    2016 “Using popular education with the oppressor class: Suggestions for sign language interpreter education.” Critical Education7(13). 10.14288/ce.v7i13.186129
    https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v7i13.186129 [Google Scholar]
  16. Haualand, Hilde
    2014 “Video interpreting services: Calls for inclusion or redialling exclusion?” Ethnos79(2): 287–305. 10.1080/00141844.2012.688756
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2012.688756 [Google Scholar]
  17. Holcomb, Thomas, and David Smith
    eds. 2019Deaf Eyes on Interpreting. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaplunov, Elizabeth
    2019 Towards better health communication among deaf people: A mixed methods approach to understanding the feasibility and efficacy of a novel m-health videoconferencing tool. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Health, University of Bath.
  19. Kusters, Annelies, Maartje De Meulder, and Dai O’Brien
    eds. 2017Innovations in Deaf Studies: The Role of Deaf Scholars. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Llewellyn Jones, Peter, and Robert G. Lee
    2014Redefining the Role of the Community Interpreter: The Concept of Role-space. Lincoln, UK: SLI Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McDade, Rita
    1995 “What can interpreters learn from professional footballers?” Paper presented atIssues in Interpreting 2, University of Durham, September, 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mellinger, Christopher D.
    2020 “Positionality in public service interpreting research.” FITISPos International Journal7(1): 92–109. 10.37536/FITISPos‑IJ.2020.7.1.250
    https://doi.org/10.37536/FITISPos-IJ.2020.7.1.250 [Google Scholar]
  23. Napier, Jemina
    2011 “‘It’s not what they say but the way they say it.’ A content analysis of interpreter and consumer perceptions of signed language interpreting in Australia.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language2071: 59–87. 10.1515/ijsl.2011.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2011.003 [Google Scholar]
  24. Nicodemus, Brenda, Janis Cole, and Laurie Swabey
    2021 “Storied classrooms: Narrative pedagogy in American Sign Language–English interpreter education.” International Journal of Interpreter Education7(2): article 6.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. O’Brien, Dai, Gab Hodge, Kate Rowley, Robert Adam, Sannah Gulamani, Steve Emery, and John Walker
    . (in preparation). Deaf professionals’ perceptions of trust in relationships with signed/spoken language interpreters.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Phillip, Marie-Jean
    1994 “Professionalism: From which cultural perspective?” Paper presented at theIssues in Interpreting conference, University of Durham, April, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Robinson, Octavian, Naomi Sheneman, and Jon Henner
    2019 “Toxic ableism among interpreters: Impeding deaf people’s linguistic rights through pathological posturing.” InHonouring the Past, Treasuring the Present, Shaping the Future: Conference Proceedings of the World Association of Sign Language Interpreters, ed. byCampbell McDermid, Suzanne Ehrlich, and Ashley Gentry, 14–41. Paris: WASLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Roy, Cynthia B.
    1989 A sociolinguistic analysis of the interpreter’s role in the turn exchanges of an interpreted event. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
  29. 2000Interpreting as a Discourse Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Roy, Cynthia B., and Jemina Napier
    eds. 2015Signed Language Interpreting Studies Reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.117 [Google Scholar]
  31. Roy, Cynthia B., Jeremy L. Brunson, and Christopher Stone
    2018Academic Foundations of Interpreting Studies. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2rh27sn
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh27sn [Google Scholar]
  32. Russell, Debra
    2007 “Inclusion or the illusion of inclusion: A study of interpreters working with deaf students in inclusive education settings.” Presentation given at theCritical Link 5: Interpreters in the Community Conference, Sydney, Australia, 12–14 April 2007.
  33. Russell, Debra, and Elizabeth B. Winston
    2014 “Tapping into the interpreting process: Using participant reports to inform the interpreting process in educational settings.” Translation & Interpreting6(1): 102–127. 10.12807/ti.106201.2014.a06
    https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.106201.2014.a06 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sheneman, Naomi
    2016 “Deaf interpreters’ ethics: Reflections on training and decision-making.” Journal of Interpretation25(1): 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sheneman, Naomi, and Octavian Robinson
    2021 “Helpers, professional authority, and pathologized bodies: Ableism in interpretation and translation.” InTranslating Asymmetry: Rewriting Power, ed. byOvidi Carbonell i Cortés and Esther Monzó-Nebot, 55–76. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.157.03she
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.157.03she [Google Scholar]
  36. Skaaden, Hanne
    2019 “Ethics and profession.” InEthics in public service interpreting, ed. byMary Phelan, Mette Rudvin, Hanne Skaaden, and Patrick Kermit, 147–201. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315715056‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715056-4 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sommer Lindsay, Mette
    2020 “Deaf people’s coping strategies in an everyday employment context.” Deaf Studies Digital Journal51. 10.3998/15499139.0005.011
    https://doi.org/10.3998/15499139.0005.011 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stone, Christopher, Robert Adam, Ronice Müller de Quadros, and Christian Rathmann
    eds. 2022The Routledge Handbook of Sign Language Translation and Interpreting. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003019664
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019664 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/tis.00055.hau
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error