The relative need for Comparative Translation Studies

References

1. Bachmann-Medick, Doris
   2013 “Translational Turn.” InHandbook of Translation Studies, Volume4, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer , 186–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hts.4.tra17
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.4.tra17 [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, Mona
   1993 “Corpus linguistics and Translation Studies. Implications and applications.” InText and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair, ed. by Mona Baker , 233–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.64.15bak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.15bak [Google Scholar]
3. Burak, Alexander
   2013 The Other in Translation: A Case for Comparative Translation Studies. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Casas-Tost, Helena
   2014 “Translating onomatopoeia from Chinese into Spanish: a corpus-based analysis.” Perspectives22(1): 39–55. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2012.712144
   https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2012.712144 [Google Scholar]
5. Chang, Nam Fung
   2015 “Does ‘translation’ reflect a narrower concept than ‘fanyi’? On the impact of Western theories on China and the concern about Eurocentrism.” Translation and Interpreting Studies10(2): 223–242. doi: 10.1075/tis.10.2.04cha
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.10.2.04cha [Google Scholar]
6. Chesterman, Andrew
   2011 “Translation Universals.” InHandbook of Translation Studies, volume2, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer , 175–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hts.2.tra12
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.2.tra12 [Google Scholar]
7. Cheung, Martha
   2009 “Introduction – Chinese Discourses on Translation. Positions and Perspectives.” The Translator15(2): 223–238. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2009.10799279
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2009.10799279 [Google Scholar]
8. Cronin, Michael
   1995 “Altered States. Translation and Minority Languages.” TTR8(1): 85–103. doi: 10.7202/037198ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/037198ar [Google Scholar]
9. Gambier, Yves , and Luc van Doorslaer
   (eds) 2015 Translation Studies Bibliography, 12th online release, approx. 28,000 items. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. www.benjamins.nl/online/tsb (accessed on27 May 2016).
   [Google Scholar]
10. González Núñez, Gabriel
    2016 “On Translation Policy.” Target28(1): 87–109. doi: 10.1075/target.28.1.04gon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.28.1.04gon [Google Scholar]
11. Italiano, Federico
    2016 Translation and Geography. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Koster, Cees
    2011 “Comparative approaches to translation.” InHandbook of Translation Studies, volume2, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer , 21–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hts.2.comp3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.2.comp3 [Google Scholar]
13. Kothari, Rita , and Judy Wakabayashi
    (eds.) 2009 Decentering Translation Studies. India and beyond. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lambert, José , and Hendrik van Gorp
    1985 “On Describing Translations.” InThe Manipulation of Literature. Studies in Literary Translation, ed. by Theo Hermans , 42–53. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Liu, Xiangyu
    2010 “Reflections on the crisis of comparative literature as a discipline.” Frontiers of Literary Studies in China4(3): 321–339. doi: 10.1007/s11702‑010‑0101‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11702-010-0101-y [Google Scholar]
16. Luo, Junjie
    2014 “Translating Jin Ping Mei: a preliminary comparison of The Golden Lotus and The Plum in the Golden Vase .” Perspectives22(1): 56–74. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2012.712145
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2012.712145 [Google Scholar]
17. Munday, Jeremy
    2012 Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. 3rd edition. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Nord, Christiane
    2005 Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-oriented Text Analysis. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pokorn, Nike K.
    2009 “In defence of fuzziness.” InThe Metalanguage of Translation, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer , 135–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.20.09pok
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.20.09pok [Google Scholar]
20. Reese, Stephen D.
    2007 “Theorizing a Globalized Journalism.” InGlobal Journalism Research. Theories, Methods, Findings, Future, ed. by Martin Löffelholz and David Weaver , 240–252. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Roscoe, Paul
    2008 “The Comparative Method.” Religion Compass2(4): 734–753. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑8171.2008.00093.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2008.00093.x [Google Scholar]
22. Saldanha, Gabriela and Sharon O’Brien
    2013 Research methodologies in translation studies. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Schweissinger, Marc J.
    2014 Translating German novellas into English. A Comparative Study. Bern: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑0353‑0575‑3
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0353-0575-3 [Google Scholar]
24. Semeryak, Olena
    2015 “Evolución Comparada del Lenguajes Jurídico Ruso y Español. Errores, Anacronismo y su Subsanació en la Interpretación [Comparison of the evolution of the Russian and Spanish legal language. Errors, anachronisms and how to correct them].” FITISPos International Journal2: 194–205.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty
    2003 Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Tan, Zaixi
    2001 “The Chinese and Western translation traditions in comparison.” Across Languages and Cultures2(1): 51–72. doi: 10.1556/Acr.2.2001.1.4
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.2.2001.1.4 [Google Scholar]
27. Toury, Gideon
    1995/2012 Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Revised edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.4 [Google Scholar]
28. Tse, Chung Alan
    2012 “Deconstructing comparative translation: facts, myths and limitations.” Translation Quarterly66: 77–85.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Tymoczko, Maria
    2007 Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Tymoczko, Maria
    2009 “Why Translators Should Want to Internationalize Translation Studies.” The Translator15(2): 401–421. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2009.10799287
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2009.10799287 [Google Scholar]
31. Tyulenev, Sergey
    2014 Translation and Society. An Introduction. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. van Doorslaer, Luc
    2009 “Risking conceptual maps: mapping as a keywords-related tool underlying the online Translation Studies Bibliography .” InThe Metalanguage of Translation, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer , 27–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.20.03doo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.20.03doo [Google Scholar]
33. van Doorslaer, Luc
    2010 “The side effects of the ‘Eurocentrism’ concept.” InSocio-cultural approaches to translation: Indian and European perspectives, ed. by Prabhakara Rao and Jean Peeters , 39–46. New Delhi: Excel India Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
34. van Doorslaer, Luc
    . (2017). “A Concept’s Coming of Age. Developments in the Use of the Concept of Culture in Translation Studies.” InKultur und Übersetzung. Studien zu einem begrifflichen Verhältnis ed. by Lavinia Heller . 37-50Bielefeld: transcript. doi: 10.14361/9783839429631‑004
    https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839429631-004 [Google Scholar]
35. van Doorslaer, Luc , and Peter Flynn
    (eds.) 2013 Eurocentrism in Translation Studies. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.54
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.54 [Google Scholar]
36. Venuti, Lawrence
    1998 The Scandals of Translation. Towards an Ethics of Difference. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203269701
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203269701 [Google Scholar]
37. Zornetta, Katia
    2014 “Maíra de Darcy Ribeiro em tradução italiana: análise e reflexão das estratégias tradutórias [The Italian translation of Darcy Ribeiro’s Maíra: analysis and consideration of translational strategies].” In-Traduções6(10): 384–396.
    [Google Scholar]