Exploring deaf sign language interpreting students’ experiences from joint sign language interpreting programs for deaf and hearing students in Finland

References

1. Adam, Robert,
   2014 “Deaf interpreters: An introduction.” InDeaf Interpreters at Work: International Insights, ed. byRobert Adam, , 1–18. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adam, Robert, Breda Carty, and Christopher Stone
   2011 “Ghostwriting: Deaf translators within the Deaf community.” Babel57 (4): 357–393. doi:  10.1075/babel.57.4.01ada
   https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.57.4.01ada [Google Scholar]
3. Böser, Ursula
   2015 “Interviews and focus groups.” InResearching Translation and Interpreting, ed. byClaudia V. Angelelli and Brian J. Baer, 236–246. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boudreault, Patrick
   2005 “Deaf interpreters.” InTopics in Signed Language Interpreting, ed. byTerry Janzen, 323–356. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.63.17bou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.63.17bou [Google Scholar]
5. Burr, Vivien
   2003 Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dahlberg, Karin and Maria Nyström
   2001 “Pre-understanding and openness: A relationship without hope?” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences15 (4): 339–346. doi:  10.1046/j.1471‑6712.2001.00043.x
   https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-6712.2001.00043.x [Google Scholar]
7. De Wit, Maya
   2016 A Comprehensive Guide to Sign Language Interpreting in Europe. Amsterdam: de Wit.
   [Google Scholar]
8. European Forum for Sign Language Interpreting
   European Forum for Sign Language Interpreting 2011 The Rights to Sign Language Interpreting Services When Working or Studying Abroad. EFSLI Report 1101.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fairclough, Norman
   1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Finnish Association of the Deaf
    Finnish Association of the Deaf 2015 Viittomakielen tulkkaus [Sign language interpreting]. www.kuurojenliitto.fi/fi/viittomakielet-ja-viittomakieliset/tulkkaus. Last accessed21 January 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Forestal, Eileen
    2005 “The emerging professionals: Deaf interpreters and their views and experience on training.” InSign Language Interpreting and Interpreter Education: Directions for Research and Practice, ed. byMarc Marschark, Rico Peterson, and Elizabeth A. Winston, 235–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
12. Forestal, Eileen
    2011 Deaf Interpreters: Exploring their Processes of Interpreting. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Minneapolis, MN, Capella University.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Friedner, Michele
    2018 “Negotiating legitimacy in American Sign Language interpreting education: Uneasy belonging in a community of practice.” Disability Studies Quarterly38(1). doi:  10.18061/dsq.v38i1.5836
    https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v38i1.5836 [Google Scholar]
14. Hale, Sandra
    1997 “The interpreter on trial: Pragmatics in court interpreting.” InThe Critical Link: Interpreters in the Community, ed. bySilvana. E. Carr, , 201–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.19.21hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.19.21hal [Google Scholar]
15. Hall, Stuart
    1996 “Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’?” InQuestions of Cultural Identity, ed. byStuart Hall and Paul du Gay, 1–17. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Holcomb, Thomas K.
    1997 “Development of Deaf bicultural identity.” American Annals of the Deaf142(2): 89–93. doi:  10.1353/aad.2012.0728
    https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2012.0728 [Google Scholar]
17. Honneth, Axel
    1996 The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jørgensen, Marianne W. and Louise Phillips
    2002 Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781849208871
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208871 [Google Scholar]
19. Kusters, Annelies, Maartje De Meulder, and Dai O’Brien
    2017 “Innovations in Deaf Studies: Critically mapping the field.” InInnovations in Deaf Studies: The Role of Deaf Scholars, ed. byAnnelies Kusters, Maartje De Meulder, and Dai O’Brien, 1–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe Chantal
    1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lai, Miranda
    2018 “Training deaf learners to become interpreters: A pilot project.” International Journal of Interpreter Education10 (1): 30–45.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Leigh, Irene W.
    2009 A Lens on Deaf Identities. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320664.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320664.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Lindsay, Mette Sommer
    2016 Deaf Interpreters in Europe: A Comprehensive European Survey of the Situation of Deaf Interpreters Today. Copenhagen: EU.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Marschark, Mark, Rico Peterson, and Elizabeth A. Winston
    eds. 2005 Sign Language Interpreting and Interpreter Education: Directions for Research and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
25. McDermid, Campbell
    2010 “Culture brokers, advocates, or conduits: Pedagogical considerations for deaf interpreter education.” International Journal of Interpreter Education2: 76–101.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mellinger, Christopher
    2020 “Positionality in public service interpreting research.” FITISPos International Journal: Public Service Interpreting and Translation7 (1): 92–109. doi:  10.37536/FITISPos‑IJ.2020.7.1.250
    https://doi.org/10.37536/FITISPos-IJ.2020.7.1.250 [Google Scholar]
27. Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees
    Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees 2016 The Norwegian Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology. 4th ed.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Olsen, Elisabet, Ingeborg Skaten, and Gro Hege Saltnes Urdal
    2018 “Grenseløs tolkning: Tolking mellom fremmedspråklige døve og norske talespråklige” [Borderless interpreting: Interpreting between foreign-language deaf and Norwegian hearing]. InTolking: Språkarbeid og profesjonsutøvelse [Interpreting: Language work and professional practice], ed. byAnna-Lena Nilsson, Eli Raanes, and Hilde Haualand, 222–241. Oslo: Gyldendal.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Patton, Michael Quinn
    2015 Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Rogers, Jeremy
    2016 “Deaf interpreter education: Stories and insights shared by working deaf interpreters and deaf interpreting students.” Unpublished MA thesis, University of Western Oregon.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Russell, Debra
    2017 “Deaf/Non-deaf interpreter teams: The complexity of professional practice.” InInterpreting and the Politics of Recognition, ed. byChristopher Stone and Lorraine Leeson, 138–159. Routledge: New York.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Sawyer, David
    2004 Fundamental Aspects of Interpreter Education: Curriculum and Assessment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.47
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.47 [Google Scholar]
33. Tester, Christopher
    2018 “How American Sign Language-English interpreters who can hear determine need for a deaf interpreter for court proceedings.” Journal of Interpretation26(1): article 3.
    [Google Scholar]