Lexical bundles in formulaic interpreting

References

1. Ädel, Annelie and Britt Erman
   2012 “Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach.” English for Specific Purposes31(2): 81–92.   10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004 [Google Scholar]
2. Anthony, Laurence
   2020 “AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software].” Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available fromhttps://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
3. Arnon, Inbal and Neal Snider
   2010 “More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases.” Journal of Memory and Language62(1): 67–82.   10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005 [Google Scholar]
4. Aston, Guy
   2016 “How the corporation can help the interpreter walk the tightrope.” InCorpus-based Approaches to Translation and Interpreting: From Theory to Applications, ed. byGloria Corpas Pastor and Miriam Seghiri, 219–238. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Aston, Guy
   2018 “Acquiring the language of interpreters: A Corpus-based Approach.” InMaking Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies, ed. byMariachiara Russo, Claudio Bendazzoli and Bart Defrancq, 83–96. Singapore: Springer.   10.1007/978‑981‑10‑6199‑8_5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6199-8_5 [Google Scholar]
6. Avner, Ehud Alexander, Noam Ordan, and Shuly Wintner
   2014 “Identifying translationese at the word and sub-word level.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities31(1): 163–175.   10.1093/llc/fqu047
   https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu047 [Google Scholar]
7. Biber, Douglas and Federica Barbieri
   2007 “Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers.” English for Specific Purposes26(3): 263–286.   10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003 [Google Scholar]
8. Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Viviana Cortes
   2004 “If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks.” Applied Linguistics25(3): 371–405.   10.1093/applin/25.3.371
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371 [Google Scholar]
9. Breeze, Ruth
   2013 “Lexical bundles across four legal genres.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18(2): 229–253.   10.1075/ijcl.18.2.03bre
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.2.03bre [Google Scholar]
10. Corpas Pastor, Gloria and Miriam Seghiri
    (ed) 2016 Corpus-based Approaches to Translation and Interpreting: From Theory to Applications. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.   10.3726/b10354
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b10354 [Google Scholar]
11. Cortes, Viviana
    2013 “The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes12(1): 33–43.   10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002 [Google Scholar]
12. Csomay, Eniko
    2013 “Lexical bundles in discourse structure: A corpus-based study of classroom discourse.” Applied Linguistics34(3): 369–388.   10.1093/applin/ams045
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams045 [Google Scholar]
13. Dam, Helle V.
    2001 “On the option between form-based and meaning-based interpreting: The effect of source text difficulty on lexical target text form in simultaneous interpreting.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter111: 27–55. hdl.handle.net/10077/2445
    [Google Scholar]
14. De Cock, Sylvie
    1998 “A recurrent word combination approach to the study of formulae in the speech of native and non-native speakers of English.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics3(1): 59–80.   10.1075/ijcl.3.1.04dec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.3.1.04dec [Google Scholar]
15. Ellis, Nick C.
    1996 “Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition18(1): 91–126.   10.1017/S0272263100014698
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014698 [Google Scholar]
16. Ellis, Nick C.
    2002 “Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition24(2): 143–188.   10.1017/S0272263102002024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
17. Ellis, Nick C., Rita Simpson-Vlach, and Carson Maynard
    2008 “Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL.” TESOL Quarterly42(3): 375–396.   10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00137.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00137.x [Google Scholar]
18. Ferraresi, Adriano and Maja Miličević
    2017 “Phraseological patterns in translation and interpreting. Similar or different?” InEmpirical Translation Studies: New Methodological and Theoretical Traditions, ed. byGert De Sutter, Marie-Aude Lefer and Isabelle Delaere, 157–182. Berlin: De Gruyter.   10.1515/9783110459586‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110459586-006 [Google Scholar]
19. Forchini, Pierfranca and Amanda Murphy
    2008 “N-grams in comparable specialized corpora: Perspectives on phraseology, translation, and pedagogy.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics13(3): 351–367.   10.1075/ijcl.13.3.06for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.3.06for [Google Scholar]
20. Fu, Rongbo
    2016 “Comparing modal patterns in Chinese-English interpreted and translated discourses in diplomatic setting.” Babel62(1): 104–121.   10.1075/babel.62.1.06fu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.62.1.06fu [Google Scholar]
21. Gile, Daniel
    (ed) 2009 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training (2nd edition), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   10.1075/btl.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8 [Google Scholar]
22. Henriksen, Line
    2007 “The song in the booth: Formulaic interpreting and oral textualisation.” Interpreting9(1): 1–20.   10.1075/intp.9.1.02hen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.9.1.02hen [Google Scholar]
23. Hu, Kaibao and Tao Qing
    2013 “The Chinese-English Conference Interpreting Corpus: Uses and Limitations.” Meta58(3): 626–642.   10.7202/1025055ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1025055ar [Google Scholar]
24. Hyland, Ken
    2008 “As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation.” English for Specific Purposes27(1): 4–21.   10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001 [Google Scholar]
25. Isham, William P.
    1994 “Memory for sentence form after simultaneous interpretation: Evidence both for and against deverbalization.” InBridging the Gap: Empirical research in Simultaneous Interpretation, ed. bySylvie Lambert and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 191–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   10.1075/btl.3.15ish
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.3.15ish [Google Scholar]
26. Jones, Roderick
    (ed) 1998 Conference Interpreting Explained. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Klaudy, Kinga and Krisztina Károly
    2005 “Implicitation in translation: Empirical evidence for operational asymmetry in translation.” Across Languages and Cultures6(1): 13–28.   10.1556/Acr.6.2005.1.2
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.6.2005.1.2 [Google Scholar]
28. Lederer, Marianne
    (ed) 1981 La Traduction Simultanée. Paris: Minard Lettres Modernes.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Li, Xin
    2018 “Mediation through modality shifts in Chinese-English government press conference interpreting.” Babel64(2): 269–293.   10.1075/babel.00036.li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00036.li [Google Scholar]
30. Li, Yang
    2016 “A corpus-based interpreting exploration into pragmatic functions of prefabricated chunks.” Modern Foreign Languages39(2): 246–256.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Li, Yang
    2017 “A corpus-based exploration into the use of lexical bundles and students’ interpreting proficiency: A study based on PACCEL.” Foreign Languages and Their Teaching296(5): 88–96.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Li, Yang and Sandra L. Halverson
    2020 “A Corpus-based Exploration into Lexical Bundles in Interpreting.” Across Languages and Cultures21(1): 1–22.   10.1556/084.2020.00001
    https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2020.00001 [Google Scholar]
33. Li, Yang and Wang Nan
    2012 “The exploration into the alleviating effects of prefabricated chunks on simultaneous interpreting.” Foreign Language World148(1): 61–67.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mauranen, Anna
    2013 “Speaking professionally in an L2: Issues of corpus methodology.” InVariation and Change in Spoken and Written Discourse, ed. byJulia Bamford, Silvia Cavalieri, and Giuliana Diani, 5–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.21.05mau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.21.05mau [Google Scholar]
35. Paquot, Magali
    2013 “Lexical bundles and L1 transfer effects.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18(3): 391–417.   10.1075/ijcl.18.3.06paq
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.3.06paq [Google Scholar]
36. Plevoets, Koen and Bart Defrancq
    2018 “The cognitive load of interpreters in the European Parliament: A corpus-based study of predictors for the disfluency uh(m).” Interpreting20(1): 1–32.   10.1075/intp.00001.ple
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00001.ple [Google Scholar]
37. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2016 Introducing Interpreting Studies (2nd Edition). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315649573
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315649573 [Google Scholar]
38. Russo, Mariachiara, Claudio Bendazzoli, and Bart Defrancq
    (eds) 2018 Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑6199‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6199-8 [Google Scholar]
39. Seleskovich, Danica
    (ed) 1975 Langage, langues et mémoire. Paris: Minard.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Setton, Robin
    (ed) 1999 Simultaneous Interpretation: A Cognitive-pragmatic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   10.1075/btl.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.28 [Google Scholar]
41. Shlesinger, Miriam and Noam Ordan
    2012 “More spoken or more translated?: Exploring a known unknown of simultaneous interpreting.” Target24(1): 43–60.   10.1075/target.24.1.04shl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.24.1.04shl [Google Scholar]
42. Shrefler, Nathan
    2011 “Lexical bundles and German bibles.” Literary and Linguistic Computing26(1): 89–106.   10.1093/llc/fqq014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq014 [Google Scholar]
43. Simpson-Vlach, Rita and Nick C. Ellis
    2010 “An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research.” Applied Linguistics31(4): 487–512.   10.1093/applin/amp058
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058 [Google Scholar]
44. Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna and Ron Martinez
    2014 “The idiom principle revisited.” Applied Linguistics36(5): 549–569.   10.1093/applin/amt054
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt054 [Google Scholar]
45. Stubbs, Michael and Isabel Barth
    2003 “Using recurrent phrases as text-type discriminators: A quantitative method and some findings.” Functions of Language10(1): 61–104.   10.1075/fol.10.1.04stu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.10.1.04stu [Google Scholar]
46. Vuorikoski, Anna-Riitta
    (ed) 2004 A Voice of its Citizens or a Modern Tower of Babel?Ph.D. dissertationUniversity of Tampere, Finland.
47. Wang, Binhua
    (ed) 2013 A descriptive study of norms in interpreting. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Wang, Wenyu and Yan Huang
    2011 “Investigating the use of chunks in Chinese-English interpretation by college English Majors.” Foreign Languages and Their Teaching260(5): 73–79.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wang, Wenyu and Yan Huang
    2013 “The use of chunks and the quality of oral interpretation: An empirical study.” Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education152(4): 28–35.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Wang, Ying
    2017 “Lexical bundles in spoken academic ELF.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics22(2): 187–211.   10.1075/ijcl.22.2.02wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.2.02wan [Google Scholar]
51. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1958 Philosophical Investigations, Trans. byG. E. M. Anscombe. USA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Wray, Alison
    2000 “Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice.” Applied linguistics21(4): 463–489.   10.1093/applin/21.4.463
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.463 [Google Scholar]
53. Zhong, Weihe
    (ed) 2006 A Coursebook of Interpreting between English and Chinese. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]