Interpreting is interpreting

References

1. Alexieva, Bistra
   1997 “A typology of interpreter-mediated events.” The Translator3 (2): 153–174. 10.1080/13556509.1997.10798996
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1997.10798996 [Google Scholar]
2. Al-Zahran, Aladdin
   2007 “The consecutive conference interpreter as intercultural mediator: A cognitive-pragmatic approach to the interpreter’s role.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Salford, UK. usir.salford.ac.uk/2060/
3. Angelelli, Claudia
   2004a Revisiting the Interpreter’s Role: A Study of Conference, Court, and Medical Interpreters in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.55
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.55 [Google Scholar]
4. Angelelli, Claudia
   2004b Medical Interpreting and Cross-Cultural Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486616
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486616 [Google Scholar]
5. Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian
   2015 Speak English or What?: Codeswitching and Interpreter Use in New York City Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337569.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337569.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
6. Antonini, Rachele
   2016 “Caught in the middle: Child language brokering as a form of unrecognised language service.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development37 (7): 710–725. 10.1080/01434632.2015.1127931
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1127931 [Google Scholar]
7. Apter, Emily
   2003 “Global translatio: The ‘invention’ of comparative literature, Istanbul, 1933.” Critical Inquiry29 (2): 253–281. 10.1086/374027
   https://doi.org/10.1086/374027 [Google Scholar]
8. Beaton, Morven
   2007 “Intertextuality and ideology in interpreter-mediated communication: The case of the European Parliament.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, Heriot-Watt University. www.ros.hw.ac.uk/handle/10399/2028
9. Bendazzoli, Claudio, and Annalisa Sandrelli
   2009 “Corpus-based interpreting studies: Early work and future prospects.” Revista tradumàtica7. www.fti.uab.cat/tradumatica/revista/num7/articles/08/08.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
10. Berk-Seligson, Susan
    2002 “The Miranda warnings and linguistic coercion: The role of footing in the interrogation of a limited-English speaking murder suspect.” InLanguage in the Legal Process, ed. byJanett Cotterill, 127–143. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230522770_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522770_8 [Google Scholar]
11. Braun, Sabine, and Judith Taylor
    2012 “Video-mediated interpreting: An overview of current practice and research.” InVideoconference and Remote Interpreting in Criminal Proceedings, ed. bySabine Braun and Judith Taylor, 33–68. Antwerp: Intersential.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chesterman, A.
    2008 “The status of interpretive hypotheses.” InEfforts and Models in Interpreting and Translation Research, ed. byGyde Hansen, Andrew Chesterman, and Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, 49–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Clifford, Andrew
    2004 “Is fidelity ethical? The social role of the healthcare interpreter.” TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction17 (2): 89–114. 10.7202/013273ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/013273ar [Google Scholar]
14. Collard, Camille and Bart Defrancq
    2019 “Predictors of ear-voice span: A corpus-based study with special reference to sex.” Perspectives27 (3): 431–454. 10.1080/0907676X.2018.1553199
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2018.1553199 [Google Scholar]
15. Dean, Robyn K. and Robert Q. Pollard
    2006 “From best practice to best practice process: Shifting ethical thinking and teaching.” InA New Chapter in Interpreter Education: Accreditation, Research and Technology: Proceedings of the 16th National Convention of the Conference of Interpreter Trainers, Monmouth, OR: CIT, ed. byElisa M. Maroney, 119–32. San Diego.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dean, Robyn K. and Robert Q. Pollard
    2009 “‘I don’t think we’re supposed to be talking about this”: Case conferencing and supervision for interpreters.” VIEWS26(4).
    [Google Scholar]
17. Diriker, Ebru
    2004 De-/Re-Contextualizing Conference Interpreting: Interpreters in the Ivory Tower?Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.53
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.53 [Google Scholar]
18. Downie, Jonathan
    2014 “Towards a homiletic of sermon interpreting.” Journal of the Evangelical Homiletics Society14 (2): 62–69.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Eraslan, Seyda
    2011 “International knowledge transfer in Turkey: The consecutive interpreter’s role in context.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Tarragona, Spain: Rovira i Virgili University.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ghignoli, Alessandro and María Gracia Torres Díaz
    2015 “Interpreting performed by professionals of other fields: The case of sports commentators.” InNon-Professional Interpreting and Translating in the Media, ed. byRachele Antonini and Chiara Bucaria, 193–208. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gile, D.
    1989 “Les flux d’information dans les réunions interlinguistiques et l’interprétation de conférence : Premières observations.” Meta34 (4): 649–660. 10.7202/002900ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/002900ar [Google Scholar]
22. Hatim, Basil and Ian Mason
    1997 The Translator as Communicator. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. He, He, Jordan Boyd-Graber, and Hal Daumé III
    2016 “Interpretese vs. translationese: The uniqueness of human strategies in simultaneous interpretation.” InProceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, ed. byKevin Knight, Ani Nenkova, and Owen Rambow, 971–976. ACL. 10.18653/v1/N16‑1111
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1111 [Google Scholar]
24. Hlavac, Jim
    2012 “Sociolinguistic profiles of users and providers of lay and professional interpreting services: The experiences of a recently-arrived Iraqi language community in Melbourne.” Translation & Interpreting3 (2): 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hokkanen, Sari
    2012 “Simultaneous church interpreting as service.” The Translator: Studies in Intercultural Communication18 (2): 291–309. 10.1080/13556509.2012.10799512
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2012.10799512 [Google Scholar]
26. Hokkanen, Sari
    2016 “To serve and to experience: An autoethnographic study of simultaneous church interpreting.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Tampere, Finland.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Karlik, Jill
    2010 “Interpreter-mediated scriptures: Expectation and performance.” Interpreting12 (2): 160–85. doi:  10.1075/intp.12.2.03kar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.12.2.03kar [Google Scholar]
28. Kaufmann, Francine
    2005 “Contribution à l’histoire de l’interprétation consécutive : Le metourguemane dans les synagogues de l’Antiquité.” Meta50 (3): 972–86. 10.7202/011608ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/011608ar [Google Scholar]
29. Killman, Jeffrey
    2020 “Interpreting for asylum seekers and their attorneys: The challenge of agency.” Perspectives28 (1): 73–89. doi:  10.1080/0907676X.2019.1615518
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1615518 [Google Scholar]
30. Kurz, Ingrid
    1993 “Conference interpretation: Expectations of different user groups.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter5: 13–21.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kurz, Ingrid
    1994 “What do different user groups expect from a conference interpreter?” The Jerome Quarterly9 (2): 3–7.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Luchner, Carmen Delgado, and Leïla Kherbiche
    2018 “Without fear or favour?: The positionality of ICRC and UNHCR interpreters in the humanitarian field.” Target30 (3): 408–29. doi:  10.1075/target.17108.del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17108.del [Google Scholar]
33. Martínez-Gómez, Aída
    2015 “Invisible, visible or everywhere in between? Perceptions and actual behaviours of non-professional interpreters and interpreting users.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter20: 175–94.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mason, Ian
    (ed) 2001 Triadic Exchanges: Studies in Dialogue Interpreting. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mathews, Elizabeth S.
    2011 “‘No sign language if you want to get him talking’: Power, transgression/resistance, and discourses of d/Deafness in the Republic of Ireland.” Population Space & Place17 (4): 361. 10.1002/psp.611
    https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.611 [Google Scholar]
36. Mellinger, Christopher D. and Thomas A. Hanson
    2018 “Interpreter traits and the relationship with technology and visibility.” Translation and Interpreting Studies13 (3): 366–392. doi:  10.1075/tis.00021.mel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00021.mel [Google Scholar]
37. Merlini, Raffaela and Roberta Favaron
    2003 “Community interpreting: Re-conciliation through power management.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter12: 205–29.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Mikkelson, Holly
    1999 “Interpreting is interpreting – Or is it?” Presented at theGSTI 30th Anniversary Conference.
39. Mizuno, Makiko
    2006 “The history of community interpreting studies in Japan.” Linguistica Antverpiensia5.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Moretti, Franco
    2000 “Conjectures on world literature.” New Left Review1: 54–68.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Napier, Jemina
    2017 “Not just child’s play: Exploring bilingualism and language brokering as a precursor to the development of expertise as a professional sign language interpreter.” InNon-Professional Interpreting and Translation: State of the Art and Future of an Emerging Field of Research, ed. byRachele Antonini , 381–410. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.129.19nap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.129.19nap [Google Scholar]
42. Ozolins, Uldis
    2016 “The myth of the myth of invisibility?” Interpreting18 (2): 273–84. doi:  10.1075/intp.18.2.06ozo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.18.2.06ozo [Google Scholar]
43. Phelan, Mary and Mayte Martín
    2010 “Interpreters and cultural mediators – Different but complementary roles.” Translocations6 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
44. Pöchhacker, Franz
    1995 “Simultaneous interpreting: A functionalist perspective.” Hermes, Journal of Linguistics14: 31–53.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2004 Introducing Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203504802
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203504802 [Google Scholar]
46. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2009 “Conference interpreting surveying the profession.” Translation and Interpreting Studies4 (2): 172–86. doi:  10.1075/tis.4.2.02poc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.4.2.02poc [Google Scholar]
47. Pokorn, Nike K. and Tamara Mikolič Južnič
    2020 “Community interpreters versus intercultural mediators. Is it really all about ethics?” Translation and Interpreting Studies15 (1): 81–108. doi:  10.1075/tis.20027.koc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.20027.koc [Google Scholar]
48. Pym, Anthony
    1999 “‘Nicole slapped Michelle.’” The Translator5 (2): 265–83. doi:  10.1080/13556509.1999.10799044
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1999.10799044 [Google Scholar]
49. Rayman, Jennifer
    2007 “Visions of equality: Translating power in a deaf sermonette.” The Sign Language Translator and Interpreter1 (1): 73–114.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Rothman, E. Natalie
    2009 “Interpreting dragomans: Boundaries and crossings in the early modern Mediterranean.” Comparative Studies in Society and History51 (4): 771–800. 10.1017/S0010417509990132
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417509990132 [Google Scholar]
51. Roy, Cynthia B.
    1992 “A sociolinguistic analysis of the interpreter’s role in simultaneous talk in a face-to-face interpreted dialogue.” Sign Language Studies74: 21–61. 10.1353/sls.1992.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1992.0018 [Google Scholar]
52. Roy, Cynthia B.
    1999 Interpreting as a Discourse Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Shlesinger, Miriam
    1995 “Shifts in cohesion in simultaneous interpreting.” The Translator1 (2): 193–214. 10.1080/13556509.1995.10798957
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1995.10798957 [Google Scholar]
54. Shlesinger, Miriam
    1998 “Corpus-based interpreting studies as an offshoot of corpus-based translation studies.” Meta43 (4): 486–493. 10.7202/004136ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/004136ar [Google Scholar]
55. Turner, Graham H.
    2005 “Towards real interpreting.” InSign Language Interpreting and Interpreter Education: Directions for Research and Practice, ed. byMarc Marschark, Rico Peterson, and Elizabeth A. Winston, 253–65. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
56. Tyulenev, Sergey and Binghan Zheng
    2017 “Introduction: Toward comparative translation and interpreting studies.” Translation and Interpreting Studies12 (2): 197–212. doi:  10.1075/tis.12.2.01tyu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.12.2.01tyu [Google Scholar]
57. Verrept, Hans
    2008 “Intercultural mediation at Belgian hospitals.” InCrossing Borders in Community Interpreting. Definitions and Dilemmas, ed. byCarmen Valero Garcés and Anne Martin, 187–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.76.10ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.76.10ver [Google Scholar]
58. Vigouroux, C. B.
    2010 “Double-mouthed discourse: Interpreting, framing, and participant roles.” Journal of Sociolinguistics14 (3): 341–369. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2010.00448.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00448.x [Google Scholar]
59. Vuorikoski, A. R.
    1998 “User responses to simultaneous interpreting.” InUnity in Diversity? Current Trends in Translation Studies, ed. byLynne Bowker, , 184–197. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Wadensjö, Cecilia
    1992 Interpreting as Interaction: On Dialogue-Interpreting in Immigration Hearings and Medical Encounters. Linköping University.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Wilcox, Sherman and Barbara Shaffer
    2005 “Towards a cognitive model of interpreting.” InTopics in Signed Languages Interpreting: Theory and Practice, ed. byTerry Janzen, 27–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.63.06wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.63.06wil [Google Scholar]
62. Wurm, Svenja
    2010 “Translation across modalities: The practice of translating written text into recorded signed language: An ethnographic case study.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland. www.ros.hw.ac.uk/handle/10399/2407
63. Zwischenberger, Cornelia
    2015 “Simultaneous conference interpreting and a supernorm that governs it all.” Meta60 (1): 90–111. 10.7202/1032401ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1032401ar [Google Scholar]