Steering ethics toward social justice

References

1. AIIC
   AIIC 1999 “Practical Guide for Professional Conference Interpreters.” https://aiic.org/document/547/AIICWebzine_Apr2004_2_Practical_guide_for_professional_conference_interpreters_EN.pdf
2. Angelelli, Claudia
   2004 Revisiting the Interpreter’s Role: A Study of Conference, Court, and Medical Interpreters in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.55
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.55 [Google Scholar]
3. Baer, Brian, and Christina Schäffner
   2021 “Ethics in socialist translation theories.” InRoutledge Handbook of Translation and Ethics, ed. byKaisa Koskinen and Nike Pokorn, 42–57. London: Routledge.   10.4324/9781003127970‑5
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127970-5 [Google Scholar]
4. Bahadır, Şebnem
   2010 “The task of the interpreter in the struggle of the Other for empowerment: Mythical utopia or sine qua non of professionalism?” Translation and Interpreting Studies5(1): 124–38.   10.1075/tis.5.1.08bah
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.5.1.08bah [Google Scholar]
5. Bahadır, Şebnem
   2017 “The interpreter as observer, participant and agent of change: The irresistible entanglement between interpreting ethics, politics and pedagogy.” InThe Changing Role of the Interpreter: Contextualizing Norms, Ethics and Quality Standards, ed. byMarta Biagini, Michael Boyd, and Claudia Monacelli, 122–45. London: Routledge.   10.4324/9781315621531‑7
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621531-7 [Google Scholar]
6. Baker, Mona
   2011 In Other Words: A Course Book in Translation. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203832929
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832929 [Google Scholar]
7. Baker, Mona, and Carol Maier
   2011 “Ethics in interpreter & translator training: Critical perspectives.” Interpreter and Translator Trainer5(1): 1–14.   10.1080/13556509.2011.10798809
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2011.10798809 [Google Scholar]
8. Beauchamp, Tom L. Childress, James, F.
   2012 Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bhabha, Homi
   1994 The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Boéri, Julie
    2008 “A narrative account of the Babels vs. Naumann controversy.” The Translator14(1): 21–50.   10.1080/13556509.2008.10799248
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2008.10799248 [Google Scholar]
11. Boéri, Julie
    2010 “Emerging narratives of conference interpreters’ training: a case study of ad hoc training in Babels and the Social Forum.” Puentes91: 61–70.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Boéri, Julie
    2012 “Translation/interpreting politics and praxis.” The Translator18(2): 269–90.   10.1080/13556509.2012.10799511
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2012.10799511 [Google Scholar]
13. Boéri, Julie
    2013 “Le défi de la traduction dans les forums sociaux : Plusieurs langues pour un autre monde.” Le Monde Diplomatique7151 (October): 9. www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2013/10/BOERI/49730
    [Google Scholar]
14. Boéri, Julie
    2014 “Vers une approche communicationnelle de l’engagement : Les récits des traducteurs-interprètes du réseau Babels dans le mouvement altermondialiste.” Revue Française Des Sciences de l’information et de La Communication5(5).   10.4000/rfsic.1172
    https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.1172 [Google Scholar]
15. Boéri, Julie
    2015 “Key internal players in the development of the interpreting profession.” InRoutledge Handbook of Interpreting, ed. byHolly Mikkelson and Renée Jourdenais, 29–44. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Boéri, Julie, and Carmen Delgado Luchner
    2021 “The ethics of activist translation and interpreting.” InThe Routledge Handbook on Translation and Ethics, ed. byKaisa Koskinen and Nike K. Pokorn, 261–245. London: Routledge.   10.4324/9781003127970‑19
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127970-19 [Google Scholar]
17. Boéri, Julie, and Jesús De Manuel Jerez
    2011 “From training skilled conference interpreters to educating reflective citizens.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer5(1): 27–50.   10.1080/13556509.2011.10798811
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2011.10798811 [Google Scholar]
18. Boéri, Julie, and Carol Maier
    (eds) 2010 Compromiso social y traducción/interpretación – Translation/Interpreting and Social Activism. Granada: ECOS.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Böhm, Steffen, Sian Sullivan, and Oscar Reyes
    2005 “The organization and politics of social forums.” Ephemera5(2). www.ephemerajournal.org/issue/organisation-and-politics-social-forums
    [Google Scholar]
20. Butler, Judith
    1997 Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Camayd-Freixas, Erik
    2008 “Interpreting after the largest ICE raid in US history: A personal account.” dll.fiu.edu/people/faculty/erik-camayd-freixas/interpreting_the_largest_ice.pdf
22. Clifford, Andrew
    2005 “Healthcare interpreting and informed consent: What is the interpreter’s role in treatment decision-making?” TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction. Special Issue: Traduction Engagée / Translation and Social Activism18(2): 225–46.   10.7202/015772ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/015772ar [Google Scholar]
23. Cokely, Dennis
    2005 “Shifting positionality: A critical examination of the turning point of the relationship between interpreters and the Deaf community.” InSign Language Interpreting and Interpreter Education: Directions for Research and Practice, ed. byMarc Marschark, Rico Peterson, and Elizabeth A. Winston, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
24. Dean, Robyn
    2015 Sign Language Interpreters’ Ethical Discourse and Moral Reasoning Patterns. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Heriot-Watt University.
25. Dean, Robyn, and Robert Pollard
    2011 “Context-based ethical reasoning in interpreting: A demand control schema perspective.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer5(1): 155–82.   10.1080/13556509.2011.10798816
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2011.10798816 [Google Scholar]
26. Dean, Robyn, and Robert Pollard
    2022 “Improving interpreters’ normative ethics discourse by imparting principled reasoning through case analysis.” Interpreting and Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal.   10.1177/27523810211068449
    https://doi.org/10.1177/27523810211068449 [Google Scholar]
27. Delgado Luchner, Carmen, and Leïla Kherbiche
    2018 “Without fear or favour? The positionality of ICRC and UNHCR interpreters in the humanitarian field.” Target30(3): 409–29.   10.1075/target.17108.del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17108.del [Google Scholar]
28. Diriker, Ebru
    2004 De-/Re-Contextualising Conference Interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.53
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.53 [Google Scholar]
29. Doerr, Nicole
    2018 Political Translation: How Social Movement Democracies Survive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   10.1017/9781108355087
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108355087 [Google Scholar]
30. Donovan, Clare
    2011 “Ethics in the teaching of conference interpreting.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer5(1): 109–128.   10.1080/13556509.2011.10798814
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2011.10798814 [Google Scholar]
31. Downie, Jonathan
    2017 “Finding and critiquing the invisible interpreter – a response to Uldis Ozolins.” Interpreting19(2): 260–70.   10.1075/intp.19.2.05dow
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.19.2.05dow [Google Scholar]
32. Drugan, Joanna, and Rebecca Tipton
    2017 “Translation, ethics and social responsibility.” The Translator23(2): 119–25.   10.1080/13556509.2017.1327008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2017.1327008 [Google Scholar]
33. Fant, Lou
    1990 Silver Threads: A Personal Look at the First Twenty-Five Years Ofthe Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf. Silver Spring, MD: RID Publications. Silver Spring, MD: RID Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Fisher, Andrew
    2011 Metaethics: An Introduction. Durham: Acumen Publishing Limited. 10.1017/UPO9781844652594
    https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844652594 [Google Scholar]
35. Fraser, Nancy, and Axel Honneth
    2003 Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
36. García-Beyaert, Sofía
    2015a “Key external players in the development of the interpreting profession.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Interpreting, ed. byHolly Mikkelson and Renée Jourdenais, 45–61. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
37. García-Beyaert, Sofía
    2015b “The role of the community interpreter.” InThe Community Interpreter: An International Textbook, ed. byMarjory A. Bancroft, , 359–442. Columbia, MD: Culture & Language Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. García-Beyaert, Sofía
    2016 “Cross-linguistic communication and public policy: The institutionalization of community interpreting.” Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/383765
39. García-Beyaert, Sofía,
    2015 “Ethics and standards for The Community Interpreter® – An international training tool.” InThe Community Interpreter: An International Textbook. Columbia, MD: Culture and Language Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hyunhye Cho, Eunice,
    2004 Bridge: A Popular Education Resource for Immigrant and Refugee Community Organizers. Oakland: National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Inghilleri, Moira
    2005 “Mediating zones of uncertainty.” The Translator11(1): 69–85.   10.1080/13556509.2005.10799190
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2005.10799190 [Google Scholar]
42. Inghilleri, Moira
    2006 “Aligning macro- and micro- dimensions in interpreting research.” InTranslation Research and Interpreting Research, ed. byChristina Schäffner, 71–76. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.   10.21832/9781853597350‑009
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597350-009 [Google Scholar]
43. Inghilleri, Moira
    2008 “The ethical task of the translator in the geo-political arena.” Translation Studies1(2): 212–23.   10.1080/14781700802113556
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700802113556 [Google Scholar]
44. Inghilleri, Moira
    2012 Interpreting Justice: Ethics, Politics and Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
45. James, William
    1896/1912 The Will to Believe. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Johnson, Alice
    2002 Interpretation and translation: Power tools for sharing power in grassroots leadership development. Durham, NC: The Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Juris, Jeffrey
    2008 “Spaces of intentionality: Race, class, and horizontality at the United States Social Forum.” Mobilization: An International Journal13(4): 353–71.   10.17813/maiq.13.4.232j1557h7658813
    https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.13.4.232j1557h7658813 [Google Scholar]
48. Keiser, Walter
    1999 “L’histoire de l’Association Internationale d’Interprètes de Conférence (AIIC).” Interpreting4(1): 81–95.   10.1075/intp.4.1.09kei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.4.1.09kei [Google Scholar]
49. Koskinen, Kaisa
    2010 “Agency and causality: towards explaining by mechanisms in translation studies.” InTranslators’ Agency, ed. byTuija Kinnunen and Kaisa Koshinen, 165–187. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Koskinen, Kaisa, and Nike Pokorn
    2021 “Ethics and translation: An introduction.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation and Ethics, ed. byKaisa Koskinen and Nike Pokorn. London and Routledge: Routledge.   10.4324/9781003127970
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127970 [Google Scholar]
51. Mackintosh, Jennifer
    1999 “Interpreters are made, not born.” Interpreting4(1): 67–80.   10.1075/intp.4.1.08mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.4.1.08mac [Google Scholar]
52. Maeckelbergh, Marianne
    2009 The Will of the Many: How the Alterglobalisation Movement Is Changing the Face of Democracy. London: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Manuel Jerez, Jesús De
    2010 “From ethics to politics: Toward a new generation of citizen interpreters.” InCompromiso Social y Traducción/Interpretación – Translation/Interpreting and Social Activism, ed. byJulie Boéri and Carol Maier, Translatio, 134–45. Granada: ECOS.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Mellinger, Christopher D., and Brian Baer
    2021 “Research ethics in translation and interpreting studies.” InRoutledge Handbook of Translation and Ethics, ed. byKaisa Koskinen and Nike Pokorn, 365–87. London: Routledge.   10.4324/9781003127970‑27
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127970-27 [Google Scholar]
55. Mikkelson, Holly
    2000 “Interpreter ethics: A review of the traditional and electronic literature.” Interpreting5(1): 49–56.   10.1075/intp.5.1.05mik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.5.1.05mik [Google Scholar]
56. Morris, Ruth
    2010 “Images of the court interpreter: Professional identity, role and self-image.” Translation and Interpreting Studies5(1): 20–40.   10.1075/tis.5.1.02mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.5.1.02mor [Google Scholar]
57. Naumann, Peter
    2005 “Babels and Nomad – Observations on the barbarising of communication at the 2005 World Social Forum.” Communicate!aiic.net/page/1800/babels-and-nomad-observations-on-the-barbarising-of-communication-at-the-2005-world-social-forum/lang/1
    [Google Scholar]
58. Ozolins, Uldis
    2016 “The myth of the myth of invisibility?” Interpreting18(2): 273–84.   10.1075/intp.18.2.06ozo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.18.2.06ozo [Google Scholar]
59. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2004 Introducing Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203504802
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203504802 [Google Scholar]
60. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2006 “Interpreters and ideology: From ‘between’ to ‘within.’” Across Languages and Cultures7(2): 191–207.   10.1556/Acr.7.2006.2.3
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.7.2006.2.3 [Google Scholar]
61. Pöchhacker, Franz, and Cornelia Zwischenberger
    2010 “Survey on quality and role: Conference interpreters’ expectations and self-Perceptions.” Communicate!https://aiic.net/page/3405/survey-on-quality-and-role-conference-interpreters-expectations-and-self-perceptions/lang/1
    [Google Scholar]
62. Roy, Cynthia
    2002 “The Problem with definitions, descriptions and the role metaphors of interpreters.” InThe Interpreting Studies Reader, ed. byFranz Pöchhacker and Miriam Shlesinger, 345–353. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Saldanha, Gabriela, and Sharon O’Brien
    2013 Research Methodologies in Translation Studies. Manchester: Saint Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Schäffner, Christina
    2017 “Socialist translation studies – Theoretical justification and implications for training.” InGoing East: Discovering New and Alternative Traditions in Translation Studies, ed. byLarisa Schippel and Cornelia Zwischenberger, 405–26. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Seleskovitch, Danièle, and Marianne Lederer
    1984 Interpréter Pour Traduire. Paris: Didier Erudition.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Sen, Amartya
    2009 The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. 10.2307/j.ctvjnrv7n
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrv7n [Google Scholar]
67. Stoljar, Natalie
    2013 “Feminist perspectives on autonomy.” InStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. byEdward N. Zalta, (Winter 2018 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/feminism-autonomy
    [Google Scholar]
68. Swabey, Laurie, and Paula Gajewski Mickelson
    2008 “Role definition: A perspective on forty years of professionalism in sign language interpreting.” InCrossing Borders in Community Interpreting: Definitions and Dilemma, ed. byCarmen Valero-Garcés and Anne Martin, 51–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   10.1075/btl.76.04swa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.76.04swa [Google Scholar]
69. Tijerina, Roberto
    2009 “What did they say? Interpreting for social justice: An introductory curriculum.” New Market, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Wadensjö, Cecilia
    1998 Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Wood, Linda, and Rolf Kroger
    2000 Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781452233291
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233291 [Google Scholar]
72. Zwischenberger, Cornelia
    2015 “Simultaneous conference interpreting and a supernorm that governs it all.” Meta: Journal Des Traducteurs60(1): 90–111.   10.7202/1032401ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1032401ar [Google Scholar]