How should metaphors be rendered in audiovisual translation?

References

1. Alvarez, Antonia
   1993 “On translating metaphor.” Meta38(3): 479–490. 10.7202/001879ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/001879ar [Google Scholar]
2. Antonini, Rachele
   2005 “The perception of subtitled humor in Italy.” International Journal of Humor Research18(2): 209–225. 10.1515/humr.2005.18.2.209
   https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2005.18.2.209 [Google Scholar]
3. Bazzi, Samia
   2014 “Foreign metaphors and Arabic translation: An empirical study in journalistic translation practice.” Journal of Language and Politics13(1): 120–151. 10.1075/jlp.13.1.06baz
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.1.06baz [Google Scholar]
4. Borghetti, Claudia, and Jennifer Letorla
   2014 “Interlingual subtitling for intercultural language education: A case study.” Language and Intercultural Communication14(4): 423–440. 10.1080/14708477.2014.934380
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2014.934380 [Google Scholar]
5. Božović, Petar
   2022 “How are metaphors rendered in legal translation? A corpus-based study of the European Court of Human Rights judgments.” JoSTrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation381: 277–297.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Božović, Petar
   2021 “Anglophone culture through the Western Balkan lens: A corpus-based study on the strategies used for rendering extralinguistic elements of culture in Montenegrin subtitling.” Círculo de Lingüistica Aplicada a la Comunicación851: 9–19. 10.5209/clac.73536
   https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.73536 [Google Scholar]
7. Božović, Petar
   2019a “How should culture be rendered in subtitling and dubbing? A reception study of preferences and attitudes of end-users.” Babel65(1): 81–95. 10.1075/babel.00082.boz
   https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00082.boz [Google Scholar]
8. Božović, Petar
   2019b Audiovizuelno prevođenje i elementi kulture: komparativna analiza transfera sa studijom recepcije u Crnoj Gori [Audiovisual translation and the elements of culture: A comparative analysis of transfer cum reception study in Montenegro]. Ph.D. thesis, University of Montenegro.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Caffrey, Colm
   2009 “Relevant abuse? Investigating the effects of an abusive procedure on the perception of TV anime using eye-tracker and questionnaire.” Ph.D. Thesis, Dublin City University.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chiaro, Delia
    2009 “Issues in audiovisual translation.” InRoutledge Companion to Translation Studies, ed. byJeremy Munday, 141–165. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dagut, Menachem
    1976 “Can “metaphor” be translated?” Babel22(1): 21–33. 10.1075/babel.22.1.05dag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.22.1.05dag [Google Scholar]
12. Di Giovanni, Elena, and Yves Gambier
    eds. 2018 Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.141
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.141 [Google Scholar]
13. Díaz Cintas, Jorge, and Agnieszka Szarkowska
    2020 “Introduction: Experimental research in audiovisual translation – Cognition, reception, production.” JoSTrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation331: 3–16.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Díaz Cintas, Jorge, and Aline Remael
    2007 Audiovisual Translation: Subtitling. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dickins, James
    2005 “Two models for metaphor translation.” Target17(2): 227–273. 10.1075/target.17.2.03dic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17.2.03dic [Google Scholar]
16. Dobrzyńska, Teresa
    1995 “Translating metaphor: Problems of meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics24(6): 595–604. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00022‑K
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00022-K [Google Scholar]
17. Fabregat, Laura Vegara
    2015 “Legal metaphors in translation: The great chain of being.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies2(2): 330–348. 10.1075/cogls.2.2.06veg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.2.2.06veg [Google Scholar]
18. Gambier, Yves, and Luc van Doorslaer
    2019 “Translation Studies Bibliography.”
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gambier, Yves
    2018 “Translation studies, audiovisual translation and reception.” InReception Studies and Audiovisual Translation, ed. byElena Di Giovanni and Yves Gambier, 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.141.04gam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.141.04gam [Google Scholar]
20. Ghanooni, Ali Reza
    2014 “A cross-cultural study of metaphoric imagery in Shakespeare’s Macbeth.” Translation and Interpreting Studies9(2): 239–256. 10.1075/tis.9.2.05gha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.9.2.05gha [Google Scholar]
21. Goatly, Andrew
    1997 The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203210000
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203210000 [Google Scholar]
22. Gottlieb, Henrik
    2009 “Subtitling against the current: Danish concepts, English minds.” InNew Trends in Audiovisual Translation, ed. byJorge Diaz Cintas, 21–43. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691552‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691552-004 [Google Scholar]
23. Gražytė, Rasa, and Nijolė Maskaliūnienė
    2009 “Translation of conceptual metaphor in the legal discourse of EU White Papers.” Vertimo Studijos, 71–87. 10.15388/VertStud.2009.2.10604
    https://doi.org/10.15388/VertStud.2009.2.10604 [Google Scholar]
24. Heilmann, Arndt, Tatiana Serbina, Daniel Couto Vale, and Stella Neumann
    2019 “Shorter than a text, longer than a sentence: Source text length for ecologically valid translation experiments.” Target31(1): 98–124. 10.1075/target.17122.hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17122.hei [Google Scholar]
25. Kloepfer, Rolf
    1967 Die Theorie der literarischen Übersetzung. Romanisch-deutscher Sprachbereich. Munich: W. Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lahiani, Raja
    2009 “The relevance of the glance of the roe of Wajra: A comparative study of the translation of a culture-based metaphor.” Translation and Interpreting Studies4(1): 31–46. 10.1075/tis.4.1.02lah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.4.1.02lah [Google Scholar]
27. Lindqvist, Yvonne
    2002 “Översättning som social praktik: Tony Morrison och Harlequinserien på svenska.” Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, Stockholm Studies in Scandinavian Philology New Series261, 146–189. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mason, Kirsten
    1982 “Metaphor and translation.” Babel28(3): 140–149. 10.1075/babel.28.3.05mas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.28.3.05mas [Google Scholar]
29. Mellinger, Christopher D., and Thomas A. Hanson
    2022 “Considerations of ecological validity in cognitive translation and interpreting.” Translation, Cognition & Behavior5(1): 1–26. 10.1075/tcb.00061.mel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00061.mel [Google Scholar]
30. Newmark, Peter
    1980 “The translation of metaphor.” Babel26(2): 93–100. 10.1075/babel.26.2.05new
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.26.2.05new [Google Scholar]
31. Newmark, Peter
    1988 A Textbook on Translation. New York: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Nikolić, Kristijan
    2018 “Reception studies in audiovisual translation – interlingual subtitling.” InReception Studies and Audiovisual Translation, ed. byElena Di Giovanni and Yves Gambier, 179–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.141.10nik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.141.10nik [Google Scholar]
33. O’Sullivan, Carol
    2016 “Imagined spectators: The importance of policy for audiovisual translation research.” Target28(2): 261–275. 10.1075/target.28.2.07osu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.28.2.07osu [Google Scholar]
34. Orrego-Carmona, David
    2014 “Where is the audience? Testing the audience reception of non-professional subtitles.” InTranslation Research Project 5, ed. byEsther Torres-Simón and David Orrego-Carmona, 77–92. Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Orrego-Carmona, David
    2016 “A reception study on non-professional subtitling: Do audiences notice any difference?” Across Languages and Cultures17(2): 163–181. 10.1556/084.2016.17.2.2
    https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2016.17.2.2 [Google Scholar]
36. Pedersen, Jan
    2011 Subtitling Norms for Television: An Exploration Focusing on Extralinguistic Cultural References. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.98
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.98 [Google Scholar]
37. Pedersen, Jan
    2015 “On the subtitling of visualised metaphors.” JoSTrans: Journal of Specialized Translation231: 162–180.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Pedersen, Jan
    2017 “How metaphors are rendered in subtitles.” Target29(3): 416–439. 10.1075/target.16038.ped
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.16038.ped [Google Scholar]
39. Pena, Carmen, and María Dolores Porto
    2008 “Interpreting doctors and patients’ mental images of illness in community healthcare.” InInvestigación y práctica en traducción e interpretación en los servicios públicos: desafíos y alianzas, ed. byCarmen Valero-Garcés, Carmen Pena and Raquel Lázaro Gutiérrez, 276–284. UAH.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Perego, Elisa
    2016 “History, development, challenges and opportunities of empirical research in audiovisual translation.” Across Languages and Cultures17(2): 155–162. 10.1556/084.2016.17.2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2016.17.2.1 [Google Scholar]
41. Pérez-González, Luis
    2014 Audiovisual Translation: Theories, Methods, Issues. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315762975
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315762975 [Google Scholar]
42. Schäffner, Christina, and Mark Shuttleworth
    2013 “Metaphor in translation: Possibilities for process research.” Target25(1): 93–106. 10.1075/target.25.1.08shu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.1.08shu [Google Scholar]
43. Schmidt, Goran
    2014 “Metaphor translation in subtitling.” InLinguistics, Culture and Identity in Foreign Language Education, ed. byAzmat Akbarov, 832–840. Sarajevo: IBU.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Schutze, Carson T., and Jon Sprouse
    2013 “Judgement data.” InResearch Methods in Linguistics, ed. byRobert J. Podesva and Devyani Sharma, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139013734.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013734.004 [Google Scholar]
45. Stefanì, Paolo
    2016 “Hidden cultures in law: Metaphor and translation in legal discourse.” Semiotica 2016(209): 357–370. 10.1515/sem‑2016‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0020 [Google Scholar]
46. Szarkowska, Agnieska
    2016 “Report on the results of an online survey on subtitle presentation times and line breaks in interlingual subtitling.” London.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Szarkowska, Agnieska, Jorge Díaz Cintas, and Olivia Gerber-Morón
    2021 “Quality is in the eye of the stakeholders: What do professional subtitlers and viewers think about subtitling?” Universal Access in the Information Society201: 661–675. 10.1007/s10209‑020‑00739‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00739-2 [Google Scholar]
48. Szarkowska, Agnieska, and Olivia Gerber-Morón
    2019 “Two or three lines: A mixed-methods study on subtitle processing and preferences.” Perspectives27(1): 144–164. 10.1080/0907676X.2018.1520267
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2018.1520267 [Google Scholar]
49. Toury, Gideon
    1995 Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.4 [Google Scholar]
50. Vermeer, Hans, and Katharina Reiss
    1984 Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Williams, Jenny, and Andrew Chesterman
    2002 The Map: A Beginner’s Guide to Doing Research in Translation Studies. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]