Barrier-free and interpreter-free

References

1. Attfield, Kate
   2013 The Deaf Collective: Opposition, Organization and Difference. Ph.D. dissertation, Cardiff University.
2. Bauman, Dirksen
   2015, March. On becoming hearing: lessons, limitations, loss, and respect. TEDx Gallaudet, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC. Available athttps://youtu.be/yCuNYGk3oj8
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brunson, Jeremy
   2011 Video Relay Service Interpreting: The Intricacies of Sign Language Access. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2rh27qm
   https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh27qm [Google Scholar]
4. Brunson, Jeremy
   2015 “A sociology of interpreting.” InSigned Language Interpretation and Translation Research, ed. byBrenda Nicodemus and Keith Cagle, 130–149. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2rh2b69.9
   https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh2b69.9 [Google Scholar]
5. Cameron, Deborah,
   1992 “Introduction.” InResearching Language: Issues of Power and Method, ed. byDeborah Cameron , 1–28. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429436246‑1
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436246-1 [Google Scholar]
6. Caselli, Naomi K., Wyatte C. Hall, and Jonathan Henner
   2020 “American Sign Language interpreters in public schools: An illusion of inclusion that perpetuates language deprivation.” Maternal and Child Health Journal24(11): 1323–1329. 10.1007/s10995‑020‑02975‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-02975-7 [Google Scholar]
7. Cokely, Dennis
   1992 Interpretation: A Sociolinguistic Model. Burtonsville, MD: Linstok Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. De Meulder, Maartje
   2016 The Power of Language Policy. The Legal Recognition of Sign Languages and The Aspirations of Deaf Communities. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Jyväskylä.
9. De Meulder, Maartje, and Hilde Haualand
   2021 “Sign language interpreting services: A quick fix for inclusion?” Translation and Interpreting Studies16(1): 19–40. 10.1075/tis.18008.dem
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.18008.dem [Google Scholar]
10. Emery, Steve
    2006 Citizenship and the Deaf Community. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Central Lancashire.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Esmark, Anders, and Peter Triantafillou
    2009 “A macro level perspective on governance of the self and others.” InThe Politics of Self-Governance, ed. byEva Sorensen and Peter Triantafillou, 25–41. Surrey: Ashgate. 10.4324/9781315554259‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315554259-2 [Google Scholar]
12. Etherington, Kim
    2004 Becoming a Reflexive Researcher: Using Our Selves in Research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Flynn, Peter
    2010 “Ethnographic approaches.” InHandbook of Translation Studies, Vol. 1, ed. byYves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 116–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hts.1.eth2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.1.eth2 [Google Scholar]
14. Gile, Daniel
    [1995] 2009 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8 [Google Scholar]
15. Gile, Daniel, and Jemina Napier
    2020 “Spoken language interpreters and signed language interpreters: towards cross-fertilization.” International Journal of Interpreter Education12(1): 62–71.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Harris, Jennifer, and Clare Bamford
    2001 “The uphill struggle: Services for deaf and hard of hearing people – issues of equality, participation and access.” Disability & Society16(7): 969–979. 10.1080/09687590120097854
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590120097854 [Google Scholar]
17. Heyerick, Isabelle
    2021 A Descriptive Study of Linguistic Interpreting Strategies in Dutch – Flemish Sign Language Interpreting. Exploring Interpreters’ Perspectives to Understand the What, How and Why. Ph.D. dissertation. KU Leuven.
18. Kusters, Annelies
    2017 “Gesture-based customer interactions: Deaf and hearing Mumbaikars’ multimodal and metrolingual practices.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development14(3): 283–302. 10.1080/14790718.2017.1315811
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315811 [Google Scholar]
19. Kusters, Annelies, Maartje De Meulder, and Dai O’Brien
    2017 “Innovations in Deaf Studies: Critically mapping the field.” InInnovations in Deaf Studies: The Role of Deaf Scholars, ed. byAnnelies Kusters, Maartje De Meulder, and Dai O’Brien, 1–53. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kusters, Annelies, Maartje De Meulder, Michele Friedner, and Steve Emery
    2015 “On ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’: Exploring paradigms for achieving sign language peoples’ rights.” MMG Working Paper 15–02. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Moriarty Harrelson, Erin
    2019 “Deaf people with “no language”: Mobility and flexible accumulation in languaging practices of deaf people in Cambodia.” Applied Linguistics Review10(1): 55–72. 10.1515/applirev‑2017‑0081
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0081 [Google Scholar]
22. Napier, Jemina
    2002a Sign Language Interpreting. Linguistic Coping Strategies. Coleford: Douglas McLean.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Napier, Jemina
    2002b “The D/deaf-H/hearing debate.” Sing Language Studies2(2): 141–149. 10.1353/sls.2002.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2002.0006 [Google Scholar]
24. Napier, Jemina, and Lorraine Leeson
    2016 Sign Language in Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137309778
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137309778 [Google Scholar]
25. Pöchhacker, Franz
    1995 “Simultaneous interpreting: A functionalist perspective.” HERMES Journal of Language and Communication in Business141: 31–53. 10.7146/hjlcb.v8i14.25094
    https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v8i14.25094 [Google Scholar]
26. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2004 Introducing Interpreting Studies. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203504802
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203504802 [Google Scholar]
27. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2019 “Reflective discussion panel.” InDialog 3: Interpreter Practice, Research and Training: The Impact of Context, Antwerp, Belgium, 21–22 November 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Reagan, Timothy
    2010 Language Policy and Planning for Sign Languages. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Roy, Cynthia B., Jeremy L. Brunson, and Christopher A. Stone
    2018 The Academic Foundations of Interpreting Studies: An Introduction to its Theories. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2rh27sn
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh27sn [Google Scholar]
30. Russell, Debra
    2007 “Inclusion or the illusion of inclusion: A study of interpreters working with deaf students in inclusive education settings.” Critical Link 5: Interpreters in the Community Conference, Sydney, Australia, 12–14 April 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Russell, Debra, and Betsy Winston
    2014 “Tapping into the interpreting process: Using participant reports to inform the interpreting process in educational settings.” Translation & Interpreting6(1): 102–121. 10.12807/ti.106201.2014.a06
    https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.106201.2014.a06 [Google Scholar]
32. Setton, Robin
    1999 Simultaneous Interpretation: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.28 [Google Scholar]
33. Sheneman, Naomi
    2020, May9. Interpreters are the uninvited guests in deaf people’s private lives [Blog post]. Retrieved fromhttps://manualists.com/interpreters-are-the-uninvited-guests-in-deaf-peoples-private-lives/
34. Solow, Sharon Neumann
    1981 Sign Language Interpreting: A Basic Resource Book. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Subak, Leah
    2016 “Becoming HEARING: Describing co-construction of expert ASL/English interpreter Deaf-World cultural competence.” International Journal of Interpreter Education8(2): 5–19.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Tapio, Elena
    2019 “The patterned ways of interlinking linguistic and multimodal elements in visually oriented communities.” Deafness and Education International21(2–3): 133–150. 10.1080/14643154.2018.1561781
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2018.1561781 [Google Scholar]
37. Turner, Graham, and Jemina Napier
    2014 “On the importance of professional sign language interpretation to political participation.” InUNCRPD Implementation in Europe – A Deaf Perspective: Article 29: Participation in Political and Public Life, ed. byAnnika Pabsch, 54–71. European Union of the Deaf.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wilcox, Sherman, and Barbara Shaffer
    2005 “Towards a cognitive model of interpreting.” InTopics in Signed Language Interpreting: Theory and Practice, ed. byTerry Janzen, 27–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.63.06wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.63.06wil [Google Scholar]
39. World Federation of the Deaf
    World Federation of the Deaf 2022 Statement on the right of deaf people to equal treatment in the context of the Global Covid-19 pandemic. Retrieved fromhttps://wfdeaf.org/news/resources/statement-on-the-right-of-deaf-people-to-equal-treatment-in-the-context-of-the-global-covid-19-pandemic-english-version-2/
40. World Federation of the Deaf
    World Federation of the Deaf 2019 WFD Charter on Sign Language Rights for All. Retrieved fromwfdeaf.org/news/resources/wfd-charter-on-sign-language-rights-for-all/
41. Young, Alys, Rosemary Oram, and Jemina Napier
    2019 “Hearing people perceiving deaf people through sign language interpreters at work: on the loss of self through interpreted communication.” Journal of Applied Communication Research47(1): 90–110. 10.1080/00909882.2019.1574018
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1574018 [Google Scholar]