Volume 17, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1932-2798
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2700



In the UK, police reforms to meet needs of a diverse society have been limited in the case of deaf signers to an increase in sign language interpreting services (SLIS). This article explores the consequences of this dependence on SLIS by the UK police. We consider how deaf signers’ contact with the police may be inaccessible, despite national frameworks that ‘guarantee’ accessibility through the provision of BSL-English interpreting. We draw on qualitative data from focus groups and interviews with police officers and custody sergeants who describe their experiences of having contact with deaf signers (or other minority language users) through interpreters. We examine and contrast their perceptions and experiences concerning if, when, and how SLIS provided access, as well as its impact on their contact with deaf signers. We compare these findings with UK police reform policies to identify the current state of these provisions along with potential divergences.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Bartkowiak-Théron, Isabelle, and Nicole L. Asquith
    2015 “Policing diversity and vulnerability in the post-Macpherson era: Unintended consequences and missed opportunities.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice9(1): 89–100. 10.1093/police/pau038
    https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pau038 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bendazzoli, Claudio
    2016 “The ethnography of interpreter-mediated communication: Methodological challenges in fieldwork.” InAddressing Methodological Challenges in Interpreting Studies Research, ed. byClaudia Monacelli, 3–30. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berk-Seligson, Susan
    2009Coerced Confessions: The Discourse of Bilingual Police Interrogations. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213492
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213492 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowling, Ben, and Coretta Phillips
    2012 “Policing ethnic minority communities.” InHandbook of Policing, ed. byTim Newburn, 528–555. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brennan, Mary
    1999 “Signs of injustice.” The Translator5(2): 221–246. 10.1080/13556509.1999.10799042
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1999.10799042 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brennan, Mary, and Richard Brown
    1997Equality before the Law: Deaf People’s Access to Justice. Deaf Studies Research Unit Durham, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brien, David, Richard Brown, and Judith Collins
    2002The organisation and provision of British Sign Language/English interpreters in England, Scotland and Wales. Unpublished Research Report. University of Durham.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brunson, Jeremy L.
    2007 “Your case will now be heard: Sign language interpreters as problematic accommodations in legal interactions.” The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education13(1): 77–91. 10.1093/deafed/enm032
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enm032 [Google Scholar]
  9. College of Policing
    College of Policing 2020 “Briefing note: Using language services.” www.ciol.org.uk/sites/default/files/Language-Services-v1.0.pdf
  10. Coon, Julie Kiernan
    2016 “Police officers’ attitudes toward diversity issues: Comparing supervisors and non-supervisors on multicultural skills, values, and training.” International Journal of Police Science & Management18(2): 115–25. 10.1177/1461355716643091
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355716643091 [Google Scholar]
  11. De Meulder, Maartje, and Hilde Haualand
    2021 ‘Sign language interpreting services: A quick fix for inclusion?’ Translation and Interpreting Studies16(1): 19–40. 10.1075/tis.18008.dem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.18008.dem [Google Scholar]
  12. Gilbert, Emma
    2016 “Interpreting in police settings – The police perspective.” Linguist PD, November. linguistpd.thinkific.com/courses/Interpreting-in-police-settings-the-police-perspective
  13. Goodman-Delahunty, Jane
    2010 “Four ingredients: New recipes for procedural justice in Australian policing.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice4(4): 403–10. 10.1093/police/paq041
    https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paq041 [Google Scholar]
  14. Goodman-Delahunty, Jane, and Loene M. Howes
    2019 “High-stakes interviews and rapport development: Practitioners’ perceptions of interpreter impact.” Policing and Society29(1): 100–117. 10.1080/10439463.2017.1293051
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1293051 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hale, Sandra, and Jemina Napier
    2013Research Methods in Interpreting: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hanmer, Jalna, Jill Radford, and Elizabeth A. Stanko
    1989Women, Policing, and Male Violence (Routledge Revivals): International Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HMICS
    HMICS 2018 “Inspection of custody centres across Scotland.” HMICS/2019/04. Improving Policing Across Scotland. HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland. www.hmics.scot/sites/default/files/publications/HMICS20181019PUB.pdf
  18. HMICS
    HMICS 2019 ‘Inspection of the Strategic Arrangements for the Delivery of Police Custody’. HMICS/2019/04. Improving Policing Across Scotland. HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland. www.hmics.scot/sites/default/files/publications/HMICS20190606PUB.pdf
  19. Howes, Loene M.
    2020 “Interpreted investigative interviews under the PEACE Interview Model: Police interviewers’ perceptions of challenges and suggested solutions.” Police Practice and Research21(4): 333 – 350. 10.1080/15614263.2019.1617145
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2019.1617145 [Google Scholar]
  20. ImPLI
    ImPLI 2012 ‘ImPLI – Improving Police and Legal Interpreting 2011–2012.’ Final Report. impli.sitlec.unibo.it/pdf/ImPLI_Final_Report_wAnnexes_web.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kredens, Krzysztof
    2016 “Conflict or convergence? Interpreters’ and police officers’ perceptions of the role of the public service interpreter.” Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito3(2): 65–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Krippendorff, Klaus
    2004Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Second edition. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Leahy, Anne
    . in prep. “Twentieth-century debates on British law enforcement personnel as interpreters for Deaf people in UK courts.”
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Leeson, Lorraine, Jemina Napier, Robert Skinner, Teresa Lynch, Lucia Venturi and Haaris Sheikh,
    2017 “Conducting research with deaf sign language users.” InDoing Research in Applied Linguistics: Realities, Dilemmas, and Solutions, ed. byJim McKinley and Heath Rose, 134–145. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315389608‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315389608-13 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lumsden, Karen, and Alex Black
    2017 “Police Link Officers for Deaf People (PLOD) and video relay services in the East Midlands: Evaluating “what works” and best practice – Unpublished Report.” Victims, Witnesses and Public Protection Network. Loughbrough University.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2022 ‘“Sorry, I’m dead, it’s too late now’: Barriers faced by D/deaf citizens when accessing police services.” Disability & Society37(3): 476–495. 10.1080/09687599.2020.1829555
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1829555 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mason, Jennifer
    2002Qualitative Researching. Second edition. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mazerolle, Lorraine,
    2014Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Policing. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑04543‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04543-6 [Google Scholar]
  29. McCay, Vernon, and Katrina Miller
    2001 ‘Linguistic incompetence to stand trial: A unique condition in some deaf defendants.’ Journal of Interpretation 8: 99–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mellinger, Christopher
    2020 “Positionality in public service interpreting research.” FITISPos International Journal7(1): 92–109. 10.37536/FITISPos‑IJ.2020.7.1.250
    https://doi.org/10.37536/FITISPos-IJ.2020.7.1.250 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mertens, Donna M.
    2017 “Transformative research: Personal and societal.” International Journal for Transformative Research4(1): 18–24. 10.1515/ijtr‑2017‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijtr-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Monteoliva-Garcia, Eloisa
    2020 “Interpreting or other forms of language support? Experiences and decision-making among response and community police officers in Scotland.” Translation & Interpreting12(1): 37–54. 10.12807/ti.112201.2020.a03
    https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.112201.2020.a03 [Google Scholar]
  33. Napier, Jemina
    2011 “If a tree falls in the forest, does it make a noise? The merits of publishing interpreting research.” InAdvances in Interpreting Research: Inquiry in Action, 121–152. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.99.09nap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.99.09nap [Google Scholar]
  34. Napier, Jemina, Robert Skinner, Robert Adam, Christopher Stone, Sandra Pratt, Daniel Hinton, and Chijioke Obasi
    2022 “Representation and diversity in the sign language translation & interpreting profession in the United Kingdom.” Interpreting & Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal2(2): 119–130. 10.1177/27523810221127596
    https://doi.org/10.1177/27523810221127596 [Google Scholar]
  35. Napier, Jemina, and Tobias Haug
    2016 “Justisigns: A European Overview of Sign Language Interpreting Provision in Legal Settings.” Law, Social Justice & Global Development20(2). www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/lgd_issue_2016_2/napier__haug_20162.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Napier, Jemina, Robert Skinner, Graham H. Turner, Lorraine Leeson, Teresa Lynch, Haaris Sheikh, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Heidi Salaets, Carolien Doggen, Tobias Haug, Barbara Bucher, Barbara Rossier, Michele Berger, and Flurina Krähenbühl,
    2022 “Justisigns: Developing research-based training resources on sign language interpreting in police settings in Europe.” InLegal Interpreting: Teaching, Research, and Practice, ed. byJeremy L. Brunson, 154–190. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2rh2bwn.12
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh2bwn.12 [Google Scholar]
  37. Perez, Isabelle A., and Christine W. L. Wilson
    2007 “Interpreter-mediated police interviews: Working as a professional team.” InThe Critical Link 4, edited byCecilia Wadensjö, Birgitta Englund Dimitrova, and Anna-Lena Nilsson, 79–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.70.11per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.70.11per [Google Scholar]
  38. Police Scotland
    Police Scotland 2018 ‘Interpreting and Translating Services – Standard Operation Procedure’. Police Scotland. Specialist Crime Division – Safer Communities. 6.00 (Publication Scheme). www.scotland.police.uk/assets/pdf/151934/184779/interpreting-and-translating-services-sop
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Race, Leanne, and Todd E. Hogue
    2017 ‘“You have the right to remain silent”: Current provisions for D/deaf people within regional police forces in England and Wales.” The Police Journal91(1): 64–88. 10.1177/0032258X16689689
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X16689689 [Google Scholar]
  40. Russell, Debra
    2021 “Critical perspectives on education mediated by sign language interpreters: Inclusion or the illusion of inclusion?” InCritical Perspectives on Plurilingualism in Deaf Education, ed. byKristin Snoddon and Joanne Weber, 217–238. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781800410756‑013
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800410756-013 [Google Scholar]
  41. Silvestri, Marisa, Stephen Tong, and Jennifer Brown
    2013 “Gender and police leadership: Time for a paradigm shift?” International Journal of Police Science & Management15(1): 61–73. 10.1350/ijps.2013.15.1.303
    https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2013.15.1.303 [Google Scholar]
  42. Skinner, Robert
    2020 Approximately There – Positioning Video-Mediated Interpreting in Frontline Police Services. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Edinburgh, Heriot-Watt University.
  43. Skinner, Robert, Jemina Napier, and Nicholas R. Fyfe
    2021 “The social construction of 101 non-emergency video relay services for deaf signers.” International Journal of Police Science & Management23(2): 145–156. 10.1177/1461355720974703
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355720974703 [Google Scholar]
  44. Skolnick, Jerome H.
    2011Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. Fourth Edition. New Orleans: Quid Pro Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Stone, Christopher, and Bencie Woll
    2008 “Dumb O Jemmy and others: Deaf people, interpreters and the London courts in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.” Sign Language Studies8(3): 226–240. 10.1353/sls.2008.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2008.0009 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tiselius, Elisabet
    2019 “The (un-) ethical interpreting researcher: Ethics, voice and discretionary power in interpreting research.” Perspectives27(5): 747–60. 10.1080/0907676X.2018.1544263
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2018.1544263 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wakefield, Shellee J.,
    2014 “Perceptions and profiles of interviews with interpreters: A police survey.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology48(1): 53–72. 10.1177/0004865814524583
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865814524583 [Google Scholar]
  48. Whitfield, James
    2004Unhappy Dialogue: The Metropolitan Police and London’s West Indian Community. Willan.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wurm, Svenja, and Jemina Napier
    2017 “Rebalancing power: Participatory research methods in interpreting studies.” Translation & Interpreting9(1): 102–120. 10.12807/ti.109201.2017.a08
    https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.109201.2017.a08 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): accommodations; criminal justice; deaf; interpreter; language access; police
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error