Interpreters as agents of language planning

References

1. Adam, Robert, Christopher Stone, Steven D. Collins, and Melanie Metzger
   eds. 2014 Deaf Interpreters at Work: International Insights. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2t5xgm8
   https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2t5xgm8 [Google Scholar]
2. Ager, Dennis
   2005 “Image and prestige planning.” Current Issues in Language Planning6(1): 1–43. 10.1080/14664200508668271
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200508668271 [Google Scholar]
3. Albury, Nathan John
   2014 “Your language or ours? Inclusion and exclusion of non-indigenous majorities in Māori and Sámi language revitalization policy.” Current Issues in Language Planning16(3): 315–334. 10.1080/14664208.2015.984581
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2015.984581 [Google Scholar]
4. Bell, Allan
   1984 “Language style as audience design.” Language in Society13(2): 145–204. 10.1017/S004740450001037X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
5. Best, Brett A.
   2016 “E-professionalism and signed language interpreters: Considering social media, online disclosure, and small world ethics.” Journal of Interpretation25(1): Article 2.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Berezkina, Maimu
   2018 “‘Language is a costly and complicating factor’: A diachronic study of language policy in the virtual public sector.” Language Policy17(1): 55–75. 10.1007/s10993‑016‑9422‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-016-9422-2 [Google Scholar]
7. Brunson, Jeremy L.
   2008 “Your case will now be heard: Sign language interpreters as problematic accommodations in legal interactions.” Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education13(1): 77–91. 10.1093/deafed/enm032
   https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enm032 [Google Scholar]
8. Brunson, Jeremy
   2015 “A sociology of interpreting.” InSigned Language Interpretation and Translation Research, ed. byBrenda Nicodemus and Keith Cagle, 130–149. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2rh2b69.9
   https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh2b69.9 [Google Scholar]
9. Debevc, Matjaž, Danijela Milošević, and Ines Kožuh
   2015 “A comparison of comprehension processes in sign language interpreter videos with or without captions.” PLoS ONE10(5): e0127577. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127577
   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127577 [Google Scholar]
10. De Bres, Julia
    2008 “Planning for tolerability in New Zealand, Wales and Catalonia.” Current Issues in Language Planning9(4): 464–482. 10.1080/14664200802354435
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200802354435 [Google Scholar]
11. De Meulder, Maartje
    2017 “The influence of deaf people’s dual category status on sign language planning: The British Sign Language (Scotland) Act (2015).” Current Issues in Language Planning18(2): 215–32. 10.1080/14664208.2016.1248139
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1248139 [Google Scholar]
12. De Meulder, Maartje, and Joseph J. Murray
    2017 “Buttering their bread on both sides?” Language Problems & Language Planning41(2): 136–58. 10.1075/lplp.41.2.04dem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.41.2.04dem [Google Scholar]
13. De Meulder, Maartje, and Hilde Haualand
    2021 “Sign language interpreting services: A quick fix for inclusion?” Translation and Interpreting Studies16(1): 19–40. 10.1075/tis.18008.dem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.18008.dem [Google Scholar]
14. De Meulder, Maartje, and Isabelle Heyerick
    2013 “(Deaf) interpreters on television: Challenging power and responsibility.” InSign Language Research, Uses and Practices, ed. byLaurence Meurant , 111–136. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614511472.111
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511472.111 [Google Scholar]
15. De Meulder, Maartje, Joseph J. Murray, and Rachel McKee
    2019 “Epilogue. Claiming multiple positionalities: Lessons from the first two decades of sign language recognition.” InLegal Recognition of Sign Languages: Advocacy and Outcomes around the World, ed. byMaartje De Meulder, Joseph J. Murray, and Rachel McKee, 301–312. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788924016‑021
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788924016-021 [Google Scholar]
16. Ellcessor, Elizabeth
    2015 “Is there a sign for that? Media, American Sign Language interpretation, and the paradox of visibility.” Perspectives. Studies in Translatology23(4): 586–598. 10.1080/0907676X.2015.1056814
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2015.1056814 [Google Scholar]
17. Frishberg, Nancy
    1990 Interpreting: An Introduction. Silver Spring, MD: RID Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gras, Victòria
    2008 “Can signed language be planned? Implications for interpretation in Spain.” InSign Bilingualism: Language Development, Interaction, and Maintenance in Sign Language Contact Situations, ed. byCarolina Plaza-Pust and Esperanza Morales-López, 165–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.38.09gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.38.09gra [Google Scholar]
19. Grin, François
    2017 “Translation and language policy in the dynamics of multilingualism.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2017(243): 155–181. 10.1515/ijsl‑2016‑0051
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2016-0051 [Google Scholar]
20. Haualand, Hilde, and Ingela Holmström
    2019 “When language recognition and language shaming go hand in hand – sign language ideologies in Sweden and Norway.” Deafness and Education International21(2–3): 99–115. 10.1080/14643154.2018.1562636
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2018.1562636 [Google Scholar]
21. Haualand, Hilde, and Anna-Lena Nilsson
    . (under review). Sign language interpreting: Education and professionalization in Norway. InInternational Perspectives on Interpreter Education ed. by Jemina Napier, Stacey Webb, and Robert Adam. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hodge, Gabrielle, and Della Goswell
    2021 “Deaf signing diversity and signed language translations.” Applied Linguistics Review. 10.1515/applirev‑2020‑0034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0034 [Google Scholar]
23. Hou, Lynn, and Octavian Robinson
    2020 “Sign languages as disaster entertainment.” Anthropology News. 10.1111/AN.1444
    https://doi.org/10.1111/AN.1444 [Google Scholar]
24. Hult, Francis M.
    2018 “Language policy and planning and linguistic landscapes.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning, ed. byJames W. Tollefson and Miguel Pérez-Milans, 1–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.013.35
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.013.35 [Google Scholar]
25. Kaufmann, Judith
    2012 “The darkened glass of bilingualism? Translation and interpreting in Welsh language planning” Translation Studies5(3): 327–344. 10.1080/14781700.2012.701942
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2012.701942 [Google Scholar]
26. Leeson, Lorraine
    2019 “Ophelia, Emma, and the beast from the east effortful engaging and the provision of sign language interpreting in emergencies.” Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal29(2): 187–199. 10.1108/DPM‑01‑2019‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-01-2019-0007 [Google Scholar]
27. Lenihan, Aoife
    2018 “Language policy and new media: An age of convergence culture.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning, ed. byJames W. Tollefson and Miguel Pérez-Milans, 654–674. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.013.33
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.013.33 [Google Scholar]
28. May, Stephen
    2001 “Uncommon languages: The challenges and possibilities of minority language rights.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development21(5): 366–385. 10.1080/01434630008666411
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630008666411 [Google Scholar]
29. Mellinger, Christopher D.
    2020 “Positionality in public service interpreting research.” FITISPos International Journal7(1): 92–109. 10.37536/FITISPos‑IJ.2020.7.1.250
    https://doi.org/10.37536/FITISPos-IJ.2020.7.1.250 [Google Scholar]
30. McKee, Rachel
    2011 “Action pending: Four years on from the NZSL Act 2006.” VUW Law Review42(2): 277–97. 10.26686/vuwlr.v42i2.5133
    https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v42i2.5133 [Google Scholar]
31. McKee, Rachel
    2014 “Breaking news: Sign Language interpreters on television during natural disasters.” Interpreting16(1): 107–130. 10.1075/intp.16.1.06kee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.16.1.06kee [Google Scholar]
32. McKee, Rachel, and Kirsten Smiler
    2017 “Family language policy for deaf children and the vitality of New Zealand Sign Language.” InFamily Language Policies in a Multilingual World: Opportunities, Challenges, and Consequences, ed. byJohn Macalister and Seyed Hadi Mirvahedi, 30–55. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Office for Disability Issues
    Office for Disability Issues 2016 “New Zealand Disability Strategy 2016–2026.” https://www.odi.govt.nz/nz-disability-strategy/
34. Office for Disability Issues
    Office for Disability Issues 2018 “NZSL Strategy 2018–2023.”
    [Google Scholar]
35. QSR International
    QSR International 2021 “NVivo.” www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home/
36. Reffell, Hayley, and Rachel McKee
    2009 “Motives and outcomes of New Zealand Sign Language legislation: A comparative study between New Zealand and Finland.” Current Issues in Language Planning10(3): 272–292. 10.1080/14664200903116295
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200903116295 [Google Scholar]
37. Remael, Aline
    2012 “Media accessibility.” InHandbook of Translation Studies, Vol. 3, ed. byYves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 95–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hts.3.med3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.3.med3 [Google Scholar]
38. Russell, Debra
    2007 “Inclusion or the illusion of inclusion: A study of interpreters working with deaf students in inclusive education settings.” Critical Link 5: Interpreters in the Community Conference. Sydney, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Schluter, Jessica, Philippa Seaton, and Wendy Chaboyer
    2008 “Critical incident technique: A user’s guide for nurse researchers.” Journal of Advanced Nursing61(1): 107–14. 10.1111/j.1365‑2648.2007.04490.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04490.x [Google Scholar]
40. Schmitt, Pierre
    2017 “Representations of sign language, deaf people, and interpreters in the arts and the media.” Sign Language Studies18(1): 130–47. 10.1353/sls.2017.0023
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2017.0023 [Google Scholar]
41. Spolsky, Bernard
    2011 “Language academies and other language management agencies.” Language Policy10(4): 285–87. 10.1007/s10993‑011‑9218‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9218-3 [Google Scholar]
42. Stortinget
    Stortinget 2021 Vedtak til lov om språk (språklova) [Decision on Language Act]. https://www.stortinget.no/no/Saker-og-publikasjoner/Vedtak/Beslutninger/Lovvedtak/2020-2021/vedtak-202021-089/
43. Straniero Sergio, Francesco
    2003 “Norms and quality in media interpreting: The case of Formula One press conferences.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter121: 135–74.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Vonen, Arnfinn Muruvik, and Paal Richard Peterson
    2019 “Sign language legislation in Norway.” InLegal Recognition of Sign Languages: Advocacy and Outcomes around the World, ed. byMaartje De Meulder, Joseph J. Murray, and Rachel McKee, 191–205. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788924016‑014
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788924016-014 [Google Scholar]
45. World Federation of the Deaf
    World Federation of the Deaf 2019 “Complementary or diametrically opposed: Situating deaf communities within ‘disability’ vs ‘cultural and linguistic minority’ constructs: Position Paper.” Retrieved5 February 2022at: https://wfdeaf.org/news/resources/wfd-position-paper-complementary-diametrically-opposed-situating-Deaf-communities-within-disability-vs-cultural-linguistic-minority-constructs/