“Please make sure we don’t get this interpreter again”

References

1. Ahmad, Muneer I.
   2006 “Interpreting communities: Lawyering across language difference.” UCLA Law Review541: 999–1086.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bancroft, Marjory A., Lola Bendana, Jean Bruggeman, and Lois Feuerle
   2013 “Interpreting in the grey zone: Where community and legal interpreting intersect.” Translation and Interpreting5(1): 94–113. 10.12807/ti.105201.2013.a05
   https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.105201.2013.a05 [Google Scholar]
3. Benmaman, Virginia
   2000 “The Spanish speaker+ interpreter services= Equal access to the judicial system: Is the equation accurate?” InResearch on Spanish in the United States: Linguistic Issues and Challenges, ed. byAna Roca, 95–109. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berk-Seligson, Susan
   2002 The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Biagini, Marta
   2016 “Revisiting ethnography for dialogue interpreting research.” InAddressing Methodological Challenges in Interpreting Studies Research, ed. byClaudio Bendazzoli and Claudia Monacelli, 61–84. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bryant, Susan
   2001 “The five habits: Building cross-cultural competence in lawyers.” Clinical Law Review81: 33–107.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Carver, Natasha
   2014 “Displaying genuineness: Cultural translation in the drafting of marriage narratives for immigration applications and appeals.” Families, Relationships and Societies3(2): 271–286. 10.1332/204674313X669937
   https://doi.org/10.1332/204674313X669937 [Google Scholar]
8. Cruz, Christine Zuni
   1998 “[On the] road back in: Community lawyering in indigenous communities.” American Indian Law Review24(1): 229–273. 10.2307/20070630
   https://doi.org/10.2307/20070630 [Google Scholar]
9. De Pedro Ricoy, Raquel
   2017 “To interview or not to interview: A critical approach to assessing end-users’ perceptions of the role of 21st century indigenous interpreters in Peru.” Translation & Interpreting9(1): 36–50. 10.12807/ti.109201.2017.a04
   https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.109201.2017.a04 [Google Scholar]
10. Felstiner, William. L. F., and Austin Sarat
    1992 “Enactments of power: Negotiating reality and responsibility in lawyer-client interactions.” Cornell Law Review77(6): 1447–1498.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gramajo, Catherine
    2016 “The multi-purpose attorney: The interpreting attorney-mediator.” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal16(3): 493.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hale, Sandra
    2004 The Discourse of Court Interpreting: Discourse Practices of the Law, the Witness, and the Interpreter. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.52
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.52 [Google Scholar]
13. Hale, Sandra
    2008 “Controversies over the role of the court interpreter.” InCrossing Borders in Community Interpreting: Definitions and Dilemmas, ed. byCarmen Valero-Garcés and Anne Martin, 99–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.76.06hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.76.06hal [Google Scholar]
14. Hale, Sandra
    2011 Interpreter Policies, Practices and Protocols in Australian Courts and Tribunals: A National Survey. Melbourne: Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration Incorporated.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hale, Sandra, Ignacio Garcia, Jim Hlavac, Mira Kim, Miranda Lai, Barry Turner, and Helen Slatyer
    2012 Improvements to NAATI Testing: Development of a Conceptual Overview for a New Model for NAATI Standards, Testing and Assessment. https://www.naati.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Improvements-to-NAATI-Testing.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hale, Sandra, and Jemina Napier
    2013 Research Methods in Interpreting: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hale, Sandra, Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Natalie Martschuk, and Julie Lim
    2022 “Does interpreter location make a difference? A study of remote vs face-to-face interpreting in simulated police interviews.” Interpreting24(2): 221–253. 10.1075/intp.00077.hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00077.hal [Google Scholar]
18. Hosticka, Carl J.
    1979 “We don’t care about what happened, we only care about what is going to happen: Lawyer-client negotiations of reality.” Social Problems26(5): 599–610. 10.2307/800044
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800044 [Google Scholar]
19. Inghilleri, Moira
    2013 Interpreting Justice: Ethics, Politics and Language. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203147962
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203147962 [Google Scholar]
20. Kaczmarek, Lukasz
    2016 “Towards a broader approach to the community interpreter’s role.” Interpreting18(1): 57–88. 10.1075/intp.18.1.03kac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.18.1.03kac [Google Scholar]
21. Killman, Jeffrey
    2019 “Interpreting for asylum seekers and their attorneys: The challenge of agency.” Perspectives28(1): 79–89. 10.1080/0907676X.2019.1615518
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1615518 [Google Scholar]
22. Maley, Yon, Christopher Candlin, Jonathan Crichton, and Pieter Koster
    1995 “Orientation in lawyer-client interviews.” Forensic Linguistics2(1): 42–55. 10.1558/ijsll.v2i1.42
    https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v2i1.42 [Google Scholar]
23. Mellinger, Christopher D.
    2020 “Positionality in public service interpreting research.” FITISPos International Journal7(1): 92–109. 10.37536/FITISPos‑IJ.2020.7.1.250
    https://doi.org/10.37536/FITISPos-IJ.2020.7.1.250 [Google Scholar]
24. Morris, Ruth
    1995 “The moral dilemmas of court interpreting.” The Translator1(1): 25–46. 10.1080/13556509.1995.10798948
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1995.10798948 [Google Scholar]
25. Morris, Ruth
    1999 “The gum syndrome: Predicaments in court interpreting.” Forensic Linguistics6(1): 6–29. 10.1558/sll.1999.6.1.6
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.1999.6.1.6 [Google Scholar]
26. Ozolins, Uldis
    2011 “Telephone interpreting: Understanding practice and identifying research needs.” Translation & Interpreting3(2): 33–47.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pecol, Nidia
    2017 “Reflections on interpreting: Help for the criminal practitioner.” Criminal Justice32(3): 28–33.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Piatt, Bill
    1990 “Attorney as interpreter: A return to babble.” New Mexico Law Review20(1): 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Reynolds, Judith
    2020 “Investigating the language-culture nexus in refuges legal advice meetings.” Multilingua39(4): 395–429. 10.1515/multi‑2019‑0048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2019-0048 [Google Scholar]
30. Roberts-Smith, Len
    2009 “Forensic interpreting: Trial and error.” InCritical Link 5. Quality in Interpreting: A Shared Responsibility, ed. bySandra Hale, Uldis Ozolins, and Ludmila Stern, 13–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.87.03rob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.87.03rob [Google Scholar]
31. Sandys, Marla, and Heather Pruss
    2016 “Correlates of satisfaction among clients of a public defender agency.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law141: 431–461.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Silverman, David
    2015 Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Smith-Khan, Laura
    2017 “Negotiating narratives, accessing asylum: Evaluating language policy as multi-level practice, beliefs and management.” Multilingua36(1): 31–57. 10.1515/multi‑2015‑0072
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2015-0072 [Google Scholar]
34. Smith-Khan, Laura
    2020 “Migration practitioners’ roles in communicating credible refugee claims.” Alternative Law Journal45(2): 119–124. 10.1177/1037969X19884205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X19884205 [Google Scholar]
35. Stern, Ludmila, and Xin Liu
    2019 “See you in court: How do Australian institutions train legal interpreters?” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer13(4): 361–389. 10.1080/1750399X.2019.1611012
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2019.1611012 [Google Scholar]
36. Tebble, Helen
    2012 “Interpreting or interfering?” InCoordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting, ed. byClaudio Baraldi and Laura Gavioli, 23–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.102.02teb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.102.02teb [Google Scholar]
37. Tryuk, Malgorzata
    2012 “The judge, the doctor, the immigration officer and the interpreter. Community interpreters’ role perception: A Polish perspective.” The Interpreter’s Newsletter171: 117–138.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Vernon, Kia H.
    2011 “No se habla español: Ethical and practical considerations for non Spanish-speaking attorneys representing Spanish-speaking clients.” Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development26(2): 223–251.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Xu, Han
    2021a “Interprofessional relations in interpreted lawyer-client interviews. An Australian case study.” Perspectives29(4): 608–624. 10.1080/0907676X.2020.1769150
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2020.1769150 [Google Scholar]
40. Xu, Han
    2021b “Roles, ethics and lawyers’ reactions: An ethnographic study of interpreters’ role performance in interpreted lawyer-client interviews.” Multilingua40(5): 617–646. 10.1515/multi‑2020‑0108
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0108 [Google Scholar]
41. Xu, Han, Sandra Hale, and Ludmina Stern
    2020 “Telephone interpreting in lawyer-client interviews: An observational study.” Translation & Interpreting12(1): 18–36. 10.12807/ti.112201.2020.a02
    https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.112201.2020.a02 [Google Scholar]