Peripheral vision and challenging invisibilities

References

1. Akashi, Motoko
   2018 Contesting Invisibility: Japanese Celebrity Translators and the Impact of their Fame. PhD diss. University of East Anglia.
2. Atefmehr, Zahra, and Farzaneh Farahzad
   2022 “Microhistorical Research in Translator Studies: An Archival Methodology.” The Translator28 (3): 251–262. 10.1080/13556509.2021.1944022
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2021.1944022 [Google Scholar]
3. Bardet, Mary
   2021 “Literary Detection in the Archives: Revealing Jeanne Heywood (1856–1909).” InLiterary Translator Studies, edited byKlaus Kaindl, Waltraud Kolb, and Daniela Schlager, 41–54. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.156.01bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.156.01bar [Google Scholar]
4. Ben-Ari, Nitsa
   2021 “The Translator’s Note Revisited.” InLiterary Translator Studies, edited byKlaus Kaindl, Waltraud Kolb, and Daniela Schlager, 157–182. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.156.08ben
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.156.08ben [Google Scholar]
5. Bhabha, Homi K.
   1994 The Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. boyd, danah, and Kate Crawford
   2012 “Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for A Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon.” Information, Communication and Society15 (5): 662–679. 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
   https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878 [Google Scholar]
7. Chesterman, Andrew
   2009 “The Name and Nature of Translator Studies.” Hermes421. https://tidsskrift.dk/her/article/view/96844/145601
   [Google Scholar]
8. Claus, Peter, and John Marriott
   eds. 2012 History: An Introduction to Theory, Method and Practice. Harlow: Pearson.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Constanza Guzmán, María
   2020 “(Re)Visiting the Translator’s Archive: Toward a Genealogy of Translation in the Americas.” Palimpsestes: Revue de traduction341: 45–58. 10.4000/palimpsestes.5538
   https://doi.org/10.4000/palimpsestes.5538 [Google Scholar]
10. Cordingley, Anthony, and Patrick Hersant
    2021 “Translation Archives: An Introduction.” Meta66 (1): 9–27. 10.7202/1079318ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1079318ar [Google Scholar]
11. Dam, Helle V., and Karen Korning Zethsen
    2012 “Translators in International Organizations: A Special Breed of High-status Professionals? Danish EU Translators as A Case in Point.” Translation and Interpreting Studies7 (2): 211–232. 10.1075/tis.7.2.07dam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.7.2.07dam [Google Scholar]
12. Delisle, Jean, and Judith Woodsworth
    2012 “Introduction.” InTranslators Through History, edited byJean Delisle, and Judith Woodsworth, xiii–xxv. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.101
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.101 [Google Scholar]
13. Desjardins, Renée
    2017 Translation and Social Media: In Theory, in Training and in Professional Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑52255‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52255-9 [Google Scholar]
14. Feltrin-Morris, Marella
    2018 “Welcome Intrusions: Capturing the Unexpected in Translators’ Prefaces to Dante’s Divine Comedy.” Tusaaji: A Translation Review6 (1): 1–10. 10.25071/1925‑5624.40348
    https://doi.org/10.25071/1925-5624.40348 [Google Scholar]
15. Fornalczyk-Lipska, Anna
    2021 “Translators of Children’s Literature and Their Voice in Prefaces and Interviews.” InLiterary Translator Studies, edited byKlaus Kaindl, Waltraud Kolb, and Daniela Schlager, 183–198. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.156.09for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.156.09for [Google Scholar]
16. Gallagher, Catherine, and Stephen Greenblatt
    2000 Practicing New Historicism. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226772561.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226772561.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
17. Galleti, Chiara
    2013 “Four-Handed Performances in Children’s Literature: Translation and Adaptation in the Italian and English Editions of Tove Jansson’s Picture Books.” InAuthorial and Editorial Voices in Translation 1 – Collaborative Relationships between Authors, Translators, and Performers, edited byHanne Jansen, and Anna Wegener, 143–164. Montréal: Éditions québécoises de l’oeuvre.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Garde-Hansen, Joanne
    2009 “MyMemories? Personal Digital Archive Fever and Facebook.” InSave As… Digital Memories, edited byJoanne Garde-Hansen, Andrew Hoskins, and Anna Reading, 135–150. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230239418_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239418_8 [Google Scholar]
19. Ginzburg, Carlo
    1976 The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-century Miller. Translated byJohn Tedeschi, and Anne C. Tedeschi. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gold, Nicolas
    2020 Using Twitter Data in Research: Guidance for Researchers and Ethics Reviewers. Accessed28 March 2023. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/data-protection/sites/data-protection/files/using-twitter-research-v1.0.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
21. Grigg, Susan
    1991 “Archival Practice and the Foundations of Historical Method.” The Journal of American History78 (1): 228–239. 10.2307/2078095
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2078095 [Google Scholar]
22. Hajek, Andrea
    2012 Facebook and the Digital (R)evolution of a Protest Generation. Accessed28 March 2023. https://www.deliberatelyconsidered.com/2012/07/facebook-and-the-digital-revolution-of-a-protest-generation/
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hitchcock, Tim
    2015 Voices of Authority: Towards a History from below in Patchwork. Accessed20 March 2023. historyonics.blogspot.com/2015/04/voices-of-authority-towards-history.html
    [Google Scholar]
24. Holmes, James
    2004 “The Name and Nature of Translation Studies.” InThe Translation Studies Reader, 2nd ed, edited byLawrence Venuti, 180–192. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hu, Gengshen
    2004 “Translator-Centredness.” Perspectives12 (2): 106–117. 10.1080/0907676X.2004.9961494
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2004.9961494 [Google Scholar]
26. Jaillant, Lise
    2022 “How Can We Make Born-digital and Digitised Archives More Accessible? Identifying Obstacles and Solutions.” Archival Science221: 417–436. 10.1007/s10502‑022‑09390‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09390-7 [Google Scholar]
27. Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke
    2017 “Translation Process Research.” InThe Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited byJohn W. Schweiter, and Aline Ferreira: 19–49. Hoboken, NJ and Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119241485.ch2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch2 [Google Scholar]
28. Jansen, Hanne
    2017 “Unraveling Multiple Translatorship through An E-mail Correspondence: Who Is Having A Say?” InTextual and Contextual Voices of Translation, edited byCecilia Alvstad, Annjo K. Greenall, Hanne Jansen, and Kristiina Taivalkoski-Shilov, 133–157. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.137.08jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.137.08jan [Google Scholar]
29. Kaindl, Klaus, Waltraud Kolb, and Daniela Schlager
    eds. 2021 Literary Translator Studies. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.156
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.156 [Google Scholar]
30. Kassouf, Ana Lúcia, and Lucas Ronconi
    2022 “Obstacles that Southern Researchers Face in Publishing in Economics Journals, and Why the Research Community Should Care.” Partnership for Economic Policy Working Papers Series: 2022–23. https://portal.pep-net.org/public/project/20605
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kilian, Jörg
    2010 “T@stentöne. Geschriebene Umgangssprache in computervermittelter Kommunikation. Historisch-kritsche Ergänzungen zu einem neuen Feld der linguistischen Forschung.” InDeutsche Gegenwartssprache: Globalisierung, Neue Medien, Sprachkritik, edited byIris Forster, and Tobias Heinz, 63–96. Stuttgart: Reclam.
    [Google Scholar]
32. King, Michelle T.
    2012 “Working with/in the Archives.” InResearch Methods for History, edited bySimon Gunn and Lucy Faire, 13–29. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kolb, Waltraud
    2021 “‘Hemingway’s priorities were just different’: Self-concepts of literary translators.” InLiterary Translator Studies, edited byKlaus Kaindl, Waltraud Kolb, and Daniela Schlager, 107–122. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.156.05kol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.156.05kol [Google Scholar]
34. Koskinen, Kaisa
    2008 Translation Institutions: An Ethnographic Study of EU Translation. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Laite, Julia
    2020 “The Emmet’s Inch: Small History in a Digital Age.” Journal of Social History53 (4): 963–989. 10.1093/jsh/shy118
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shy118 [Google Scholar]
36. Lambert, Joseph
    2023 Translation Ethics. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003148265
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003148265 [Google Scholar]
37. Levi, Giovanni
    1992 “On Microhistory.” InNew Perspectives on Historical Writing, edited byPeter Burke, 97–119. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Levi, Giovanni
    2012 “Microhistory and the Recovery of Complexity.” InHistorical Knowledge: In Quest of Theory, Method and Evidence, edited bySusanna Fellman and Marjatta Rahikainen, 121–132. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
39. López, Belén Santana, and Críspulo Travieso Rodríguez
    2021 “Staging the Literary Translator in Bibliographic Catalogs.” InLiterary Translator Studies, edited byKlaus Kaindl, Waltraud Kolb, and Daniela Schlager, 89–104. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.156.04lop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.156.04lop [Google Scholar]
40. Magnússon, Sigurður Gylfi, and István M. Szijártó
    2013 What Is Microhistory? Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203500637
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203500637 [Google Scholar]
41. Magnússon, Sigurður Gylfi
    2006 “Social History – Cultural History – Alltagsgeschichte – Microhistory: In-Between Methodologies and Conceptual Frameworks.” Journal of Microhistory. web.archive.org/web/20110727083357/www.microhistory.org/pivot/entry.php?id=20
    [Google Scholar]
42. Meylaerts, Reine
    2013 “The Multiple Lives of Translators.” TTR: traduction, terminologie, redaction26 (2): 103–128. 10.7202/1037134ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1037134ar [Google Scholar]
43. Moorkens, Joss, and David Lewis
    2019 “Copyright and the Reuse of Translation as Data.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation and Technology, edited byMinako O’Hagan, 469–481. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315311258‑28
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315311258-28 [Google Scholar]
44. Munday, Jeremy
    2014 “Using Primary Sources to Produce A Microhistory of Translation and Translators: Theoretical and Methodological Concerns.” The Translator20 (1): 64–80. 10.1080/13556509.2014.899094
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2014.899094 [Google Scholar]
45. Niranjana, Tejaswini
    1992 Siting Translation: History, Post-Structuralism, and the Colonial Context. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520911369
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520911369 [Google Scholar]
46. Putnam, Lara
    2016 “The Transnational and the Text-Searchable: Digitized Sources and the Shadows They Cast.” The American Historical Review121 (2): 377–402. 10.1093/ahr/121.2.377
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/121.2.377 [Google Scholar]
47. Pym, Anthony
    1998 Method in Translation History. Manchester: St Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Pym, Anthony
    2009 “Humanizing Translation History.” HERMES – Journal of Language and Communication in Business22 (42): 23–48. 10.7146/hjlcb.v22i42.96845
    https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v22i42.96845 [Google Scholar]
49. Raspin, Angela
    1996 “Private Papers.” InThe Contemporary History Handbook, edited byBrian Brivati, Julia Buxton, and Anthony Seldon, 219–229. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Romein, C. Annemieke, Max Kemman, James Baker, Michel De Gruijter, Albert Meroño-Peñuela, Thorsten Ries, Ruben Ros, and Stefania Scagliola
    2020 “State of the Field: Digital History.” History: The Journal of the Historical Association105 (365): 291–312. 10.1111/1468‑229X.12969
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-229X.12969 [Google Scholar]
51. Roser, Max, Hannah Ritchie, and Esteban Ortiz-Ospina
    2020 Internet. Accessed20 March 2023. https://ourworldindata.org/internet
    [Google Scholar]
52. Schlager, Daniela
    2021 “Translators’ Multipositionality, Teloi and Goals: The Case of Harriet Martineau.” InLiterary Translator Studies, edited byKlaus Kaindl, Waltraud Kolb, and Daniela Schlager, 199–214. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.156.10sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.156.10sch [Google Scholar]
53. Sharpe, Jim
    1991 “History from Below.” InNew Perspectives on Historical Writing, edited byPeter Burke, 25–42. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Stock, Mechtild
    2016 “Facebook: A Source for Microhistory?” InFacets of Facebook: Use and Users, edited byKathrin Knautz, and Katsiaryna S. Baran, 210–240. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110418163‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110418163-009 [Google Scholar]
55. Strowe, Anna
    2021 “Archive, Narrative, and Loss.” Meta66 (1): 178–191. 10.7202/1079326ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1079326ar [Google Scholar]
56. Tachtiris, Corine, and Priscilla Layne
    2023 “Special Focus Introduction: Centering Black Cultural Production in Translation.” Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature47 (1). 10.4148/2334‑4415.2257
    https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.2257 [Google Scholar]
57. Townsend, Leanne, and Claire Wallace
    2016 Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics. Accessed28 March 2023. https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_487729_smxx.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
58. Turkel, William
    2006 Methodology for the Infinite Archive. Accessed20 March 2023. digitalhistoryhacks.blogspot.com/2006/04/methodology-for-infinite-archive.html
    [Google Scholar]
59. Vanacker, Beatrijs
    2021 “Mediating the Female Transla(u)t(h)orial Posture: Elisabeth Wolff-Bekker.” InLiterary Translator Studies, edited byKlaus Kaindl, Waltraud Kolb, and Daniela Schlager, 215–232. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/btl.156.11van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.156.11van [Google Scholar]
60. Venuti, Lawrence
    1995/2008/2018 The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Wakabayashi, Judy
    2019 “Digital Approaches to Translation History.” Translation and Interpreting11 (2). https://www.trans-int.org/index.php/transint/article/view/977
    [Google Scholar]
62. Walker, Callum
    2022 Translation Project Management. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003132813
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003132813 [Google Scholar]
63. Williams, Caroline
    2008 “Personal Papers: Perceptions and Practices.” InWhat are Archives? Cultural and Theoretical Perspectives: A Reader, edited byLouise Craven, 53–70. Aldershot & Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]