Role making in translational contexts

References

1. Angelelli, Claudia
   2004a Medical Interpreting and Cross-cultural Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486616
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486616 [Google Scholar]
2. Angelelli, Claudia
   2004b Revisiting the Interpreter’s Role: A Study of Conference, Court, and Medical Interpreters in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.55
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.55 [Google Scholar]
3. Angelelli, Claudia
   ed. 2014 The Sociological Turn in Translation and Interpreting Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Mona, and Gabriela Saldanha
   eds. 2020 Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. 3rd ed.London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berk-Seligson, Susan
   2017 The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. 2nd ed.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226329475.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226329475.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
6. Capus, Nadja, and David Gilbert
   . “Intercept Evidence from Foreign Language Communications: Reliability and Minimum Standards in the Interests of Justice.” The International Journal of Evidence and Proof (forthcoming).
   [Google Scholar]
7. Capus, Nadja, and Cornelia Griebel
   2021 “The (In-)Visibility of Interpreters in Legal Wiretapping. A Case Study: How the Swiss Federal Court Clears or Thickens the Fog.” International Journal of Language and Law: –.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Capus, Nadja, and Ivana Havelka
   2021 “Interpreting Intercepted Communication: A Sui Generis Translational Activity.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law (): –. 10.1007/s11196‑021‑09876‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09876-0 [Google Scholar]
9. Chakhachiro, Raymond
   2016 “Contribution of Prosodic and Paralinguistic Cues to the Translation of Evidentiary Audio Recordings.” Translation and Interpreting (): –. 10.12807/ti.108202.2016.a04
   https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.108202.2016.a04 [Google Scholar]
10. Dahrendorf, Ralf
    2006 Homo Sociologicus. Ein Versuch zur Geschichte, Bedeutung und Kritik der Kategorie der sozialen Rolle. 16th ed.Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Drugan, Joanna, and Krzysztof Kredens
    2018 “Translation in Superdiverse Legal Contexts.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity, edited byAngela Creese, and Adrian Blackledge, –. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315696010‑29
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696010-29 [Google Scholar]
12. Elaad, Eitan
    2022 “Tunnel Vision and Confirmation Bias Among Police Investigators and Laypeople in Hypothetical Criminal Contexts.” Sage Open (). 10.1177/21582440221095022
    https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221095022 [Google Scholar]
13. Europol
    Europol. n.d.Accessed20 May 2024. https://www.europol.europa.eu/media-press/newsroom/news/dismantling-of-encrypted-network-sends-shockwaves-through-organised-crime-groups-across-europe
14. European Commission Decision
    European Commission Decision 2021 European Commission Decision C(2021)4200 of 15 June 2021, Horizon Europe Work Programme 2021–2022. Accessed4 November 2023. https://www.statewatch.org/news/2021/august/eu-5-million-for-new-wiretapping-technologies/
    [Google Scholar]
15. Filipović, Luna
    2021 “Evidence-gathering in Police Interviews: Communication Problems and Possible Solutions.” InPolice Interviews: Communication Challenges and Solutions, edited byLuna Filipović, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.118.02fil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.118.02fil [Google Scholar]
16. Filipović, Luna, and Suzanne Abad Vergara
    2018 “Juggling Investigation and Interpretation: The Problematic Dual Role of Police Officer-interpreter.” Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gilbert, David, and Georgina Heydon
    2021 “Translated Transcripts from Covert Recordings Used for Evidence in Court: Issues of reliability.” Frontiers in Communication. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.779227
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.779227 [Google Scholar]
18. Goffman, Erving
    1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
19. González, Roseann D., Victoria F. Vásquez, and Holly Mikkelson
    2012 Fundamentals of Court Interpretation: Theory, Policy, and Practice. 2nd ed.Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gradinčević-Savić, Dragoslava
    2020 “Anforderungsprofil für Polizei, Staatsanwaltschaft, Rechtspflege und Gericht zum Erkennen und Umsetzen des Dolmetsch — und Übersetzungsbedarfs.” Babel. Revue Internationale De La Traduction / International Journal of Translation (): –. 10.1075/babel.00155.gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00155.gra [Google Scholar]
21. Griebel, Cornelia, and Ivana Havelka
    2024 “Interpreter, Translator or Investigator? Framing the Competences of a Hybrid Translational Field: Intercept Interpreting.” Perspectives–. 10.1080/0907676X.2024.2305376
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2024.2305376 [Google Scholar]
22. Griebel, Cornelia, and Franziska Hohl Zürcher
    2023 “The Work of Intercept Interpreters in Lawful Communication Surveillance: A Daily Trade-off between Formal Requirements and Informal Needs.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice: –. 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100609
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100609 [Google Scholar]
23. Hale, Sandra B., and Jemina Napier
    2016 “‘We’re Just Kind of There’: Working Conditions and Perceptions of Appreciation and Status in Court Interpreting.” Target (): –. 10.1075/target.28.3.01hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.28.3.01hal [Google Scholar]
24. Herrmann, Thomas, and Isa Jahnke
    2012 “Role Making and Role Taking in Learning.” InEncyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, edited byN. Seel, –. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑1428‑6_1768
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1768 [Google Scholar]
25. Hsieh, Elaine
    2008 “‘I Am Not a Robot!’ Interpreters’ Views of Their Roles in Health Care Settings.” Qualitative Health Research (): –. 10.1177/1049732308323840
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308323840 [Google Scholar]
26. Inghilleri, Moira
    2023 “Sociological Approaches.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation Theory and Concepts, edited byKobus Marais, and Reine Meylaerts, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003161448‑17
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003161448-17 [Google Scholar]
27. Kadrić, Mira
    2019 Gerichts — und Behördendolmetschen: Prozessrechtliche und translatorische Perspektiven. Wien: Facultas.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kelle, Udo, and Susann Kluge
    2010 Vom Einzelfall zum Typus: Fallvergleich und Fallkontrastierung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. 2nd ed.Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. 10.1007/978‑3‑531‑92366‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92366-6 [Google Scholar]
29. Kuckartz, Udo
    2018 Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. 4th ed.Weinheim: Beltz Verlagsgruppe.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lai, Miranda
    2023 “Transcribing and Translating Forensic Speech Evidence Containing Foreign Languages — An Australian Perspective.” Frontiers in Communication. 10.3389/fcomm.2023.1096639
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1096639 [Google Scholar]
31. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    2003 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
32. Lee, Jieun, and Jiun Huh
    2021 “A Need for Building an Ethical and Trusting Partnership between Police Officers and Interpreters: Findings from South Korea.” Translation and Interpreting (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mayfield, Katrina, and Alex Krouglov
    2019 “Some Aspects of the Role of Interpreters in Investigative Interviews.” Training Language and Culture (): –. 10.29366/2019tlc.3.1.6
    https://doi.org/10.29366/2019tlc.3.1.6 [Google Scholar]
34. Merton, Robert K.
    [1957] 1995 Soziologische Theorie und soziale Struktur. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mulayim, Sedat, Miranda Lai, and Caroline Norma
    2015 Police Investigative Interviews and Interpreting: Context, Challenges, and Strategies. Advances in Police Theory and Practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. NAJIT
    NAJIT 2019 General Guidelines and Requirements for Position Paper. Transcription Translations in a Legal Setting for User and Practitioners. Accessed4 July 2024. https://najit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Guidelines-and-Requirements-for-Transcription-Translation.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pöllabauer, Sonja
    2015 “Role.” InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited byFranz Pöchhacker, Nadja Grbic, Peter Mead, and Robin Setton, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Reiss, Katharina, and Hans J. Vermeer
    [1984] 2014 Towards a General Theory of Translational Action: Skopos Theory Explained. Translated byChristiane Nord. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Roy, Cynthia
    2002 “The Problem with Definitions, Descriptions, and the Role Metaphors of Interpreters.” InThe Interpreting Studies Reader, edited byFranz Pöchhacker, and Miriam Shlesinger, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Salaets, Heidi, Abied Alsulaiman, and Silke Biesbrouck
    2015 “Tap Interpreting: From Practice to Norm. A Belgian Case Study.” Turjuman (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Schwabe, Johannes
    2019 Role-taking Theory and its Application to Interpersonal Conflicts. PhD diss. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
42. Turner, Ralph H.
    1962 “Role-Taking: Process versus Conformity.” InHuman Behaviour and Social Processes. An Interactionist Approach, edited byArnold M. Rose, –. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Walsh, David, Gavin E. Oxburgh, and Tyson Amurun
    2020 “Interpreter-Assisted Interviews: Examining Investigators’ and Interpreters’ Views on Their Practice.” Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology (): –. 10.1007/s11896‑020‑09366‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09366-2 [Google Scholar]
44. Wilson, Lauren, and Dave Walsh
    2019 “Striving for Impartiality: Conflicts of Role, Trust and Emotion in Interpreter-assisted Police Interviews.” Pragmatics and Society (): –. 10.1075/ps.00018.wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.00018.wil [Google Scholar]