Deontic modality in English-Thai legislative translation

References

1. Aijmer, Karin
   2016 “Modality and Mood in Functional Linguistic Approaches.” The Oxford Handbook of Mood and Modality, edited by Jan Nuyts and Johan van der Auwera , 495–513. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Becher, Viktor
   2010 “Abandoning the Notion of ‘Translation-inherent’ Explicitation. Against a Dogma of Translation Studies.” Across Languages and Cultures11 (1): 1–28. 10.1556/Acr.11.2010.1.1
   https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.11.2010.1.1 [Google Scholar]
3. Becher, Viktor
   2011 “Explicitation and Implicitation in Translation. A Corpus-based Study of English-German and German-English Translations of Business Texts.” PhD Thesis, University of Hamburg.
4. Biel, Łucja
   2014 Lost in the Eurofog: The Texual Fit of Translated Law. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑03986‑3
   https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03986-3 [Google Scholar]
5. Bowker, Lynne , and Jennifer Pearson
   2002 Working with Specialized Language: A Practical Guide to Using Corpora. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203469255
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469255 [Google Scholar]
6. Cao, Deborah
   2007 Translating Law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853599552
   https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599552 [Google Scholar]
7. Carter, Ronald , and Michael McCarthy
   2006 Cambridge Grammar of English. A Comprehensive Guide. Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Catford, John Cunnison
   1965 A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An Essay in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chesterman, Andrew
   2007 “What Is a Unique Item?” Doubts and Directions in Translation Studies, edited by Yves Gambier , Miriam Schlesinger , and Radegundis Stolze , 3–13. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.72.04che
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.72.04che [Google Scholar]
10. Dullion, Valérie
    2000 “Du document à l’instrument : les fonctions de la traduction des lois.” Actes du Colloque International : La traduction juridique. Histoire, théorie(s) et pratique, 233–253. Berne : ASTTI.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Garzone, Giuliana
    2000 “Legal Translation and Functionalist Approaches: A Contradiction in Terms?” Actes du Colloque International : La traduction juridique. Histoire, théorie(s) et pratique, 395–414. Berne : ASTTI.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Halliday, Michael , and Christian Matthiessen
    2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hermans, Theo
    2007 The Conference of the Tongues. Manchester: St Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Huddleston, Rodney
    2002 “The Verb.” The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, edited by Rodney Huddleston , and Geoffrey K. Pullum , 71–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530.004 [Google Scholar]
15. Iwasaki, Shoichi
    1998 “Causative and Benefactive Constructions in Thai.” Papers from the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, edited by Shobhana L. Chellian , and Willem J. De Reuse , 201–210. Arizona State University: Program for Southeast Asian Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Iwasaki, Shoichi , and Ingkaphirom, Preeya
    2005 A Reference Grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kenny, Dorothy , and Mali Satthachai
    2018 “Explicitation, Unique Items and the Translation of English Passives in Thai Legal Texts.” Meta63 (3): 604–626.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kilgarriff, Adam , Vít Baisa , Jan Bušta , Miloš Jakubíček , Vojtěch Kovář , Jan Michelfeit , Pavel Rychlý , and Vít Suchomel
    2014 “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years on.” Lexicography1 (1): 7–36. doi:  10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
19. Knežević, Božana , and Irena Brdar
    2011 “Modals and Modality in Translation: A Case Study Based Approach.” Jezikoslovlje, 12 (2): 117–145.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kurzon, Dennis
    1986 It Is Hereby Performed… Explorations in Legal Speech Acts. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.vii.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vii.6 [Google Scholar]
21. Loos, Tamara
    2005 Subject Siam: Family, Law, and Colonial Modernity in Thailand. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Martikainen, Hanna
    2016 “A Functional Approach to Translation Quality Assessment: Categorizing Sources of Translation Bias in Medical Abstracts.” Linguistica Antverpiensia, 14: 153–174.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Narrog, Heiko
    2009 Modality in Japanese. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.109
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.109 [Google Scholar]
24. Narrog, Heiko
    2016 “The Expression of Non-epistemic Modal Categories.” The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, edited by Jan Nuyts , and Johan van der Auwera , 89–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Palmer, Frank R.
    1986 Mood and Modality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Salkie, Raphael
    2010 “Will: Tense or Modal or Both?” English Language and Linguistics. 14 (2): 187–215. doi:  10.1017/S1360674310000055
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000055 [Google Scholar]
27. Satthachai, Mali
    2019 “Passive, Deontic Modality and Cohesive Conjunction in English-Thai Legislative Texts: A Corpus-Based Study.” PhD Thesis, Dublin City University.
28. Srioutai, Jiranthara
    2004 “The Thai Cla: A Marker of Tense or Modality?” Camling2: 100–107.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Šarčević, Susan
    1997 New Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Teich, Elke
    2003 Cross-Linguistic Variation in System and Text; A Method for the Investigation of Translations and Comparable Texts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. 10.1515/9783110896541
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110896541 [Google Scholar]
31. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja
    2002 “Translationese – A Myth or an Empirical Fact?” Target14 (2): 207–220. doi:  10.1075/target.14.2.02tir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.14.2.02tir [Google Scholar]
32. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja
    2004 “Unique Items – Over- or Under-represented in Translated Language?” Translation Universals: Do They Exist?, edited by Anna Mauranen , and Pekka Kujamäki , 177–184. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.48.14tir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.48.14tir [Google Scholar]
33. Toury, Gideon
    1995 Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.4 [Google Scholar]
34. Uwanno, Borwornsak
    2000 Administrative Law. Bangkok: Netibhandisapa.
    [Google Scholar]
35. von Fintel, Kai
    2006 “Modality and Language.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edition, edited by Donald M. Borchert , 10: 20–27. Detroit: MacMillan Reference USA.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wilcox, Sherman , and Barbara Shaffer
    2008 “Modality in American Sign Language.” The Expression of Modality, edited by William Frawley , 207–234. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Williams, Christopher
    2009 “Legal English and the Modal Revolution.” Modality in English: Theory and Description, edited by Raphael Salkie , Pierre Busuttil , and Johan van der Auwera , 199–210. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213331.199
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213331.199 [Google Scholar]