The impact of post-editing and machine translation on creativity and reading experience

References

1. Aziz, Wilker , Sheila Castilho , and Lucia Specia
   2012 “PET: A Tool for Post-Editing and Assessing Machine Translation.” LREC, 3982–3987.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bayer-Hohenwarter, Gerrit
   2009 “Translational Creativity: How to Measure the Unmeasurable.” InBehind the Mind: Methods, Models and Results in Translation Process Research, edited by Susanne Göpferich , Arnt Lykke Jakobsen , and Inger M. Mees , 37: 39–59. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bayer-Hohenwarter, Gerrit
   2010 “Comparing Translational Creativity Scores of Students and Professionals: Flexible Problem-Solving and/or Fluent Routine Behaviour.” InNew Approaches in Translation Process Research, edited by Susanne Göpferich , Fabio Alves , and Inger M. Mees , 39: 83–113. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bayer-Hohenwarter, Gerrit
   2011 “Creative Shifts as a Means of Measuring and Promoting Translational Creativity.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators’ Journal56 (3): 663–692. doi:  10.7202/1008339ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/1008339ar [Google Scholar]
5. Bayer-Hohenwarter, Gerrit
   2013 “Triangulating Translational Creativity Scores.” InTracks and Treks in Translation Studies: Selected Papers from the EST Congress, Leuven 2010, edited by Catherine Way , Sonia Vandepitte , Reine Meylaerts , and Magdalena Bartłomiejczyk , 108: 63–85. New York, Amsterdam: Benjamins. AccessedAugust 2020. https://benjamins.com/catalog/btl.108. 10.1075/btl.108.04bay
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.108.04bay [Google Scholar]
6. Besacier, Laurent , and Lane Schwartz
   2015 “Automated Translation of a Literary Work: A Pilot Study.” InProceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature, 114–122. Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:  10.3115/v1/W15‑0713
   https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W15-0713 [Google Scholar]
7. Bojar, Ondřej , Rajen Chatterjee , Christian Federmann , Yvette Graham , Barry Haddow , Matthias Huck , Antonio Jimeno Yepes ,
   2016 “Findings of the 2016 Conference on Machine Translation.” InProceedings of the First Conference on Machine Translation: Volume 2, Shared Task Papers, 131–198. Berlin, Germany: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:  10.18653/v1/W16‑2301
   https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-2301 [Google Scholar]
8. Busselle, Rick , and Helena Bilandzic
   2009 “Measuring Narrative Engagement.” Media Psychology12 (4): 321–347. doi:  10.1080/15213260903287259
   https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259 [Google Scholar]
9. Cadwell, Patrick , Sheila Castilho , Sharon O’Brien , and Linda Mitchell
   2016 “Human Factors in Machine Translation and Post-Editing among Institutional Translators.” Translation Spaces5 (2): 222–243. doi:  10.1075/ts.5.2.04cad
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.5.2.04cad [Google Scholar]
10. Castilho, Sheila
    2016 “Acceptability of Machine Translated Enterprise Content.” Ph.D. Thesis, Dublin City University.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cordingley, Anthony , and Céline Frigau Manning
    2016 Collaborative Translation: From the Renaissance to the Digital Age. Bloomsbury Advances in Translation Series. London and New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Daems, Joke , and Lieve Macken
    2019 “Interactive Adaptive SMT versus Interactive Adaptive NMT: A User Experience Evaluation.” Machine Translation33 (1): 117–34. doi:  10.1007/s10590‑019‑09230‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-019-09230-z [Google Scholar]
13. Dixon, Peter , Marisa Bortolussi , Leslie C. Twilley , and Alice Leung
    1993 “Literary Processing and Interpretation: Towards Empirical Foundations.” Poetics22 (1): 5–33. doi:  10.1016/0304‑422X(93)90018‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(93)90018-C [Google Scholar]
14. Doherty, Stephen , and Sharon O’Brien
    2014 “Assessing the Usability of Raw Machine Translated Output: A User-Centered Study Using Eye Tracking.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction30 (1): 40–51. doi:  10.1080/10447318.2013.802199
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.802199 [Google Scholar]
15. Dunne, Ciarán
    2017 “Can Intercultural Experiences Foster Creativity? The Relevance, Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Intercultural Studies38 (2): 189–212. doi:  10.1080/07256868.2017.1291495
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2017.1291495 [Google Scholar]
16. Göpferich, Susanne
    2013 “Translation Competence: Explaining Development and Stagnation from a Dynamic Systems Perspective.” Target25 (1): 61–76. 10.1075/target.25.1.06goe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.1.06goe [Google Scholar]
17. Göpferich, Susanne , Gerrit Bayer-Hohenwarter , Friederike Prassl , and Stadlober Johanna
    2011 “Exploring Translation Competence Acquisition: Criteria of Analysis Put to the Test.” InCognitive Explorations of Translation, edited by Sharon O’Brien , Continuum Studies in Translation Series, 57–85. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Green, Melanie C. , and Timothy C. Brock
    2000 “The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79 (5): 701–721. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.701
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 [Google Scholar]
19. Green, Melanie C. , Timothy C. Brock , and Geoff F. Kaufman
    2004 “Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds.” Communication Theory14 (4): 311–327. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2004.tb00317.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x [Google Scholar]
20. Guerberof-Arenas, Ana
    2012 “Productivity and Quality in the Post-Editing of Outputs from Translation Memories and Machine Translation.” TDX (Tesis Doctorals En Xarxa). Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Rovira i Virgili. AccessedAugust 2020. www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/90247
    [Google Scholar]
21. Guerberof-Arenas, Ana
    2017 “Chapter 7. Quality Is in the Eyes of the Reviewer.” InTranslation in Transition: Between Cognition, Computing and Technology, edited by Arnt Lykke Jakobsen and Bartolomé Mesa-Lao , 188–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. AccessedAugust 2020. https://benjamins.com/catalog/btl.133.07gue. 10.1075/btl.133.07gue
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.133.07gue [Google Scholar]
22. Guerberof-Arenas, Ana , Joss Moorkens , and Sharon O’Brien
    2019 “What Is the Impact of Raw MT on Japanese Users of Word: Preliminary Results of a Usability Study Using Eye-Tracking.” InProceedings of XVII Machine Translation Summit, 11. Dublin: European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT).
    [Google Scholar]
23. Guildford, Joy Paul
    1950 “Creativity.” American Psychologist, 5: 444–454. 10.1037/h0063487
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487 [Google Scholar]
24. Hakemulder, Jemeljan F.
    2004 “Foregrounding and Its Effect on Readers’ Perception’.” Discourse Processes38 (2): 193–218. doi:  10.1207/s15326950dp3802_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_3 [Google Scholar]
25. Hewson, Lance
    2016 “Creativity in Translator Training: Between the Possible, the Improbable and the (Apparently) Impossible.” Linguaculture 2016 (2): 9–25. doi:  10.1515/lincu‑2016‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lincu-2016-0010 [Google Scholar]
26. Kenny, Dorothy
    2000 “Lexical Hide-and-Seek: Looking for Creativity in a Parallel Corpus.” InIntercultural Faultliness. Research Models in Translation Studies I: Textual and Cognitive Aspects, edited by Maeve Olohan , 93–104. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kenny, Dorothy , and Marion Winters
    2020 “Machine Translation, Ethics and the Literary Translator’s Voice.” Translation Spaces, Fair MT: Towards ethical, sustainable Machine Translation9 (1): 123–49. doi:  10.1075/ts.00024.ken
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.00024.ken [Google Scholar]
28. Kuijpers, Moniek
    2014 “Absorbing Stories: The Effects of Textual Devices on Absorption and Evaluative Responses.” Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kussmaul, Paul
    1991 “Creativity in the Translation Process: Empirical Approaches.” InTranslation Studies: The State of the Art. Proceedings from the First James S. Holmes Symposium on Translation Studies, edited by Kitty M. van Leuven-Zwart and Ton Naaijkens , Approaches to Translation Studies Series, 9: 91–101. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kussmaul, Paul
    1995 “Chapter 2. Creativity in Translation.” InTraining the TranslatorBenjamins Translation Library, 10: 39–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/btl.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.10 [Google Scholar]
31. Kussmaul, Paul
    2000a “A Cognitive Framework for Looking at Creative Mental Processes.” InIntercultural Faultlines: Research Models in Translation Studies: V. 1: Textual and Cognitive Aspects, edited by Maeve Olohan , 59–71. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kussmaul, Paul
    2000b “Types of Creative Translating.” InTranslation in Context: Selected Papers from the EST Congress, Granada 1998, edited by Andrew Chesterman , Natividad Gallardo San Salvador , and Yves Gambier , 39: 117–126. Benjamins Translation Library. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/btl.39.14kus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.39.14kus [Google Scholar]
33. Kussmaul, Paul , and Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit
    2007 “Think-Aloud Protocol Analysis in Translation Studies.” TTR : Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction8 (1): 177–99. doi:  10.7202/037201ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/037201ar [Google Scholar]
34. Kuzman, Taja , Špela Vintar , and Mihael Arčan
    2019 “Neural Machine Translation of Literary Texts from English to Slovene.” InProceedings of the Qualities of Literary Machine Translation, 1–9. Dublin, Ireland: European Association for Machine Translation. AccessedAugust 2020. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-7301
    [Google Scholar]
35. Malmkjær, K.
    2019 Translation and Creativity. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315648958
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315648958 [Google Scholar]
36. Mangen, Anne , and Don Kuiken
    2014 “Lost in an iPad: Narrative Engagement on Paper and Tablet.” Scientific Study of Literature4 (2): 150–77. doi:  10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man [Google Scholar]
37. Matusov, Evgeny
    2019 “The Challenges of Using Neural Machine Translation for Literature.” InProceedings of the Qualities of Literary Machine Translation, 10–19. Dublin, Ireland: European Association for Machine Translation. AccessedAugust 2020. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-7302
    [Google Scholar]
38. Moorkens, Joss , Antonio Toral , Sheila Castilho , and Andy Way
    2018 “‘Translators’ Perceptions of Literary Post-Editing Using Statistical and Neural Machine Translation.” Translation Spaces7 (2): 240–62. doi:  10.1075/ts.18014.moo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.18014.moo [Google Scholar]
39. O’Brien, Sharon
    2011 “Towards Predicting Post-Editing Productivity.” Machine Translation25 (3): 197. doi:  10.1007/s10590‑011‑9096‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-011-9096-7 [Google Scholar]
40. Rojo, Ana
    2017 “The Role of Creativity.” InThe Handbook of Translation and Cognition, 350–368. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:  10.1002/9781119241485.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch19 [Google Scholar]
41. Rojo, Ana , and Purificación Meseguer
    2018 “Creativity and Translation Quality: Opposing Enemies or Friendly Allies?” HERMES – Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 57 (June): 79. doi:  10.7146/hjlcb.v0i57.106202
    https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v0i57.106202 [Google Scholar]
42. Rojo, Ana , and María Ramos Caro
    2016 “Can Emotion Stir Translation Skill? Defining the Impact of Positive and Negative Emotions on Translation Performance.” InReembedding Translation Process Research, edited by Ricardo Muñoz , Benjamins Translation Library, 128: 107–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. doi:  10.1075/btl.128.06roj
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.128.06roj [Google Scholar]
43. Rojo, Ana , and Marina Ramos Caro
    2018 “The Role of Expertise in Emotion Regulation.” InInnovation and Expansion in Translation Process Research, edited by Isabel Lacruz and Riita Jääskeläinen , American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series XVIII, 105–29. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ata.18.06roj
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.18.06roj [Google Scholar]
44. Runco, Mark A. , and Garrett J. Jaeger
    2012 “The Standard Definition of Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal24 (1): 92–96. doi:  10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092 [Google Scholar]
45. Saldanha, Gabriela
    2005 “Style of Translation: An Exploration of Stylistic Patterns in the Translations of Margaret Jull Costa and Peter Bush.” Ph.D. Thesis, Dublin City University. AccessedAugust 2020. doras.dcu.ie/17624/
46. Schmidtke, Dag , and Declan Groves
    2019 “Automatic Translation for Software with Safe Velocity.” InProceedings of Machine Translation Summit XVII Volume 2: Translator, Project and User Tracks, 159–166. Dublin: European Association for Machine Translation. AccessedAugust 2020. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-6729
    [Google Scholar]
47. Snover, Matthew , Bonnie Dorr , Richard Schwartz , Linnea Micciulla , and John Makhoul
    2006 “A Study of Translation Edit Rate with Targeted Human Annotation.” Proceedings of Association for Machine Translation in the Americas200: 223–231.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Toral, Antonio
    2019 “Post-Editese: An Exacerbated Translationese.” 17th Machine Translation Summit. AccessedAugust 2020. arxiv.org/abs/1907.00900
    [Google Scholar]
49. Toral, Antonio , and Andy Way
    2015a “Translating Literary Text between Related Languages Using SMT.” InProceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature, 123–32. Denver: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:  10.3115/v1/W15‑0714
    https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W15-0714 [Google Scholar]
50. Toral, Antonio , and Andy Way
    2015b “Machine-Assisted Translation of Literary Text: A Case Study.” Translation Spaces4 (2): 240–267. doi:  10.1075/ts.4.2.04tor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.4.2.04tor [Google Scholar]
51. Toral, Antonio , Antoni Oliver , and Pau Ribas-Bellestín
    2020 “Machine Translation of Novels in the Age of Transformer.” InMaschinelle Übersetzung für Übersetzungsprofis, edited by Jörg Porsiel , 276–296. Berlin: BDÜ Fachverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Toral, Antonio , Martijn Wieling , and Andy Way
    2018 “Post-Editing Effort of a Novel With Statistical and Neural Machine Translation.” Frontiers in Digital Humanities5: 1–11. doi:  10.3389/fdigh.2018.00009
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2018.00009 [Google Scholar]
53. Vanmassenhove, Eva , Dimitar Shterionov , and Andy Way
    2019 “Lost in Translation: Loss and Decay of Linguistic Richness in Machine Translation.” 17th Machine Translation Summit (MTSummit2019), Dublin, Ireland, August 2019, AccessedAugust 2020. arxiv.org/abs/1906.12068
    [Google Scholar]
54. Vaswani, Ashish , Noam Shazeer , Niki Parmar , Jakob Uszkoreit , Llion Jones , Aidan N. Gomez , Łukasz Kaiser , and Illia Polosukhin
    2017 “Attention Is All You Need.” InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, edited by I. Guyon , U. V. Luxburg , S. Bengio , H. Wallach , R. Fergus , S. Vishwanathan , and R. Garnett , 5998–6008. Curran Associates, Inc.AccessedAugust 2020. papers.nips.cc/paper/7181-attention-is-all-you-need.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
55. Venuti, Lawrence
    1998 The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of Difference. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203269701
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203269701 [Google Scholar]
56. Vieira, Lucas , Xiaochun Zhang , Roy Yodaule , and Michael Carl
    2020 “Machine Translation and Literary Texts: A Network of Possibilities.” Presented at theCreative Translation and Technologies Expert Meeting, University of Surrey, May 29. AccessedAugust 2020. https://surrey-ac.zoom.us/rec/play/uJcodr2u-zM3HtSRsgSDCv5xW420eqOs1CQb_KFfxEm8B3IDNValMLYTM7FO1h7mhKk4iDA5fD0Ac0Ah
    [Google Scholar]
57. Vinay, Jean Paul , and Jean Darbelnet
    1958 Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais: Méthode de traduction. Paris: Didier.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Youdale, Roy
    2019 Using Computers in the Translation of Literary Style: Challenges and Opportunities. Routledge Advances in Translation and Interpreting Studies Series. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429030345
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030345 [Google Scholar]