Maze-walkers and echoborgs

References

1. Baudrillard, Jean
   [1981] 1994 Simulacra and Simulation. Translated bySheila Glaser. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Benshalom, Yotam
   2010 “Performing Translation.” InThinking Through Translation with Metaphors, edited byJames St. André, 47–74. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Borges, Jorge
   [1941] 1962 “The Garden of Forking Paths.” Translated byAnthony Boucher. InFicciones. New York: Grove.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boyd, Richard
   1979 “Metaphor and Theory Change: What is ‘Metaphor’ a Metaphor for?” InMetaphor and Thought, edited byAndrew Ortony, 356–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chesterman, Andrew
   2009 “The Name and Nature of Translator Studies.” Hermes: Journal of Language and Communication Studies421, 13–22.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Corti, Kevin and Alex Gillespie
   2015 “A Truly Human Interface: Interacting Face-to-face with Someone Whose Words are Determined by a Computer Program.” Frontiers in Psychology61, 1–18. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00634
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00634 [Google Scholar]
7. Dastyar, Vorya
   2017 Dictionary of Metaphors in Translation and Interpreting Studies. Tehran: Rahnama Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fisher, Adrian and George Gerster
   [1990] 2000 The Art of the Maze. London: Seven Dials.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
   1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Levý, Jiři
    1967 “Translation as a Decision Process.” InTo Honor Roman JakobsonVol.21. The Hague/Paris: DeGruyter Mouton, 1171–1182.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Martín de León, Celia and Maria Presas
    2011 “Metaphern als Ausdruck subjektiver Theorien zum Übersetzen [metaphors as expressions of subjective theories of translation].” Target23 (2), 272–310.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Mossop, Brian
    2010 “Translating what might have been written”. InText and Context: Essays on Translation and Interpreting in Honour of Ian Mason, edited byMona Baker, Maeve Olohan and María Calzada Pérez, 95–113. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Phillips, Anthony
    1992 “The Topology of Roman Mosaic Mazes.” Leonardo25 (3/4), 321–29. 10.2307/1575858
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1575858 [Google Scholar]
14. Reed Doob, Penelope
    1990 The idea of the labyrinth from classical antiquity through the Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Schleiermacher, Friedrich
    [1813] 2012 “On the Different Methods of Translating.” InThe Translation Studies Reader3rd ed., edited byLawrence Venuti, 43–62. Translated bySusan Bernofsky. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. St. André, James
    2010a “Translation and Metaphor: Setting the Terms.” InThinking Through Translation with Metaphors, edited byJames St. André, 1–16. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
17. St. André, James
    2010b “Translation as Cross-identity Performance.” InThinking Through Translation with Metaphors, edited byJames St. André, 275–294. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
18. St. André, James
    2019 “List of Metaphors for Translation.” traserver.tra.cuhk.edu.hk/tc/ctt.php?id=19
19. Taivalkoski-Shilov, Kristiina
    2010 “When Two Become One: Reported Discourse Viewed through a Translatological Perspective.” InTranslation effects. Leuven: CETRA, edited byOmid Azadibougar, 16pp.https://www.arts.kuleuven.be/cetra/papers/files/kristiina-taivalkoski-shilov-when-two-become-one.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
20. Taivalkoski-Shilov, Kristiina
    2013 “Voice in the field of translation studies.” InLa traduction des voix intra-textuelles / Intratextual voices in translation, edited byKristiina Taivalkoski-Shilov and Myriam Suchet, 1–10. Montréal: Éditions québécoises de l’oeuvre.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Tatarella, Francesca
    2016 Labyrinths & Mazes: a journey through art, architecture, and landscape. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Turchi, Peter
    2014 A Muse and a Maze: writing as puzzle, mystery, and magic. San Antonio, Texas: Trinity University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ullyatt, Tony
    2010 “‘An Abstract Model of Conjecturality’: Prolegomenon to an Understanding of Labyrinths and Mazes as Metaphors.” Journal of Literary Studies26 (4), 73–97. 10.1080/02564718.2010.529310
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02564718.2010.529310 [Google Scholar]
24. Williams, Hollis
    2020 “The mathematics of mazes.” To appear in Mathematics Today. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343615560_The_Mathematics_of_Mazes
    [Google Scholar]