Concurrent translation on collaborative platforms

References

1. Abdallah, K.
   2014 “Social Quality: Key to Collective Problem Solving in Translation Production Networks” InTranslation, Quality, Costs, edited byG. Ločmele and A. Veisbergs, –. Riga: University of Latvia Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alfer, Alexa
   2017 “Entering the Translab.” Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts (): –.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Andriessen, E. J. H.
   (2003) Working with groupware. Understanding and Evaluating Collaboration Technology. London: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4471‑0067‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0067-6 [Google Scholar]
4. CIOL- Chartered Institute of Linguistics & Institute of Translation and Interpreting
   CIOL- Chartered Institute of Linguistics & Institute of Translation and Interpreting 2011 Rates and Salaries Survey for Translators and Interpreters. https://docplayer.net/14742908-2011-rates-and-salaries-survey-for-translators-and-interpreters.html. AccessedApril 2022.
5. Cordingley, Anthony, and Cèline Frigau Manning
   2016 “What is Collaborative Translation?” InCollaborative Translation: From the Renaissance to the Digital Age, edited byAnthony Cordingley and Cèline Frigau Manning, –. London: Bloomsbury.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Courtney, Jennifer and Phelan, Mary
   2019 ‘Translators’ experiences of occupational stress and job satisfaction’, Translation and Interpreting, (), pp.–. 10.12807/ti.111201.2019.a06
   https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.111201.2019.a06 [Google Scholar]
7. CSA Research
   CSA Research 2020 “The State of the Linguist Supply Chain: Translators and Interpreters 2020” (January 2020), Hélène Pielmeier and Paul O’Mara.
   [Google Scholar]
8. CSA Research
   CSA Research 2021 “Collaborative Translation Platforms: The Reality of Sharing Language Projects” (May 2021), Alison Toon and Hélène Pielmeier.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dam, H. V. and Zethsen, K. K.
   2016 ‘“I think it is a wonderful job” on the solidity of the translation profession’, Journal of Specialised Translation, (), pp.–.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. L.
    1991 “Groupware: Some issues and experiences.” Communications of the ACM(): –. 10.1145/99977.99987
    https://doi.org/10.1145/99977.99987 [Google Scholar]
11. Fırat, Gökhan
    2021 “Uberization of Translation: Impacts on Working Conditions.” The Journal of Internationalization and Localization (JIAL) (): –. 10.1075/jial.20006.fir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jial.20006.fir [Google Scholar]
12. Fuks, H., Raposo, A., Gerosa, M. A., Pimental, M. and Lucena, C. J. P.
    2008 “The 3C Collaboration Model.” InEncyclopedia of E-Collaboration, edited byNed Kock, –. Hershey and New York. 10.4018/978‑1‑59904‑000‑4.ch097
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-000-4.ch097 [Google Scholar]
13. García, Ignacio
    2015 “Cloud Marketplaces: Procurement of Translators in the Age of Social Media.” Journal of Specialised Translation (): –. www.jostrans.org/issue23/art_garcia.pdf. AccessedDecember 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
14. García, Ignacio
    2017 “Translating in the Cloud Age: Online Marketplaces.” HERMES – Journal of Language and Communication in Business, (): –. 10.7146/hjlcb.v0i56.97202
    https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v0i56.97202 [Google Scholar]
15. Goodman, L. A.
    1961 “Snowball sampling.” The annals of mathematical statistics: –. 10.1214/aoms/1177705148
    https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148 [Google Scholar]
16. Gough, Joanna and Katerina Perdikaki
    2018 “Concurrent Translation – Reality or Hype?” InTranslating and The Computer, AsLing Proceedings, –. London. 15–16 November 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gough, Joanna
    2018 “Concurrent Translation – Pedagogical Implications”. PP Presentation, 1st APTIS Conference, Birmingham. 23 November 2018.
18. Gough, Joanna
    2019 “Concurrent Translation – implications for translation process, product and the human translator”. PP Presentation, LECTIS Seminar Series, Leicester. 07 November 2019.
19. Inbox Translation-Freelance translator survey
    Inbox Translation-Freelance translator survey 2020 Key findings & demographics: From business practices to rates, everything you wanted to know about your peers. https://inboxtranslation.com/resources/research/freelance-translator-survey-2020/AccessedApril 2022.
20. Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel A.
    2017 Crowdsourcing and Online Collaborative Translations: Expanding the Limits of Translation Studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.131
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.131 [Google Scholar]
21. Kreutzer, J.
    (2022) ‘Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasets’, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, , pp.–. 10.1162/tacl_a_00447
    https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00447 [Google Scholar]
22. Moorkens, Joss
    2020a “A Tiny Cog in a Large Machine: Digital Taylorism in the Translation Industry.” InTranslation Spaces: Fair MT – Towards Ethical, Sustainable Machine Translation, (): –. John Benjamins. 10.1075/ts.00019.moo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.00019.moo [Google Scholar]
23. Moorkens, Joss
    2020b ‘Comparative satisfaction among freelance and directly-employed Irish-language translators’, Translation and Interpreting, (), pp.–. 10.12807/ti.112201.2020.a04
    https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.112201.2020.a04 [Google Scholar]
24. Morera Mesa, Aram, John J. Collins, and David Filip
    2013 “Selected Crowdsourced Translation Practices.” InProceedings of ASLIB Translating and the Computer 34. https://www.mt-archive.info/10/Aslib-2013-Morera-Mesa.pdf. AccessedDecember 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Nimdzi Language Technology Atlas
    Nimdzi Language Technology Atlas 2022 https://www.nimdzi.com/language-technology-atlas/AccessedOctober 2022.
26. O’Brien, Sharon & Schäler, Reinhard
    2010 “Next generation translation and localization: Users are taking charge.” InProceedings of Translating and the Computer 32. London: Aslib.
    [Google Scholar]
27. O’Brien, Sharon
    2011 “Collaborative Translation.” InHandbook of Translation Studies, edited byYves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hts.2.col1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.2.col1 [Google Scholar]
28. O’Hagan, Minako
    2009 “Evolution of user-generated translation: Fansubs, translation hacking, and crowdsourcing.” The Journal of Translation and Localisation: –.
    [Google Scholar]
29. O’Hagan, Minako
    2011 “Community Translation: Translation as a Social Activity and Its Possible Consequences in the Advent of Web 2.0 and Beyond.” Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series – Themes in Translation Studies, . 10.52034/lanstts.v10i.275
    https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v10i.275 [Google Scholar]
30. Ruokonen, M. and Mäkisalo, J.
    (2018) “Middling-status profession, high-status work: Finnish translators status perceptions in the light of their backgrounds, working conditions and job satisfaction”, Translation and Interpreting, (), pp.–. 10.12807/ti.110201.2018.a01
    https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.110201.2018.a01 [Google Scholar]
31. TAUS
    TAUS 2020 Real-time Translation Analytics. Translation Automation User Society. Accessed10 February 2022. https://www.taus.net/data/dqf
32. Trzeciak-Huss, Joanna
    2018 “Collaborative Translation.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Literary Translation (1st ed.), edited byWashbourne, K., & Wyke, B. V., 10.4324/9781315517131‑30
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517131-30 [Google Scholar]
33. Vieira, Lucas Nunes, Valentina Ragni, and Elisa Alonso
    2021 “Translator autonomy in the age of behavioural data.” Translation, Cognition & Behavior. 10.1075/tcb.00052.nun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00052.nun [Google Scholar]
34. Zwischenberger, Cornelia
    2021 “Online collaborative translation: its ethical, social, and conceptual conditions and consequences.” Perspectives(): –. 10.1080/0907676X.2021.1872662
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2021.1872662 [Google Scholar]