oa How production and distribution processes shape translations in organisations

References

1. Armstrong, Guyda
   2016 “Response by Armstrong to ‘Translation and the materialities of communication.’” Translation Studies9 (1): 102–106. 10.1080/14781700.2015.1101710
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2015.1101710 [Google Scholar]
2. Bateman, John A., Janina Wildfeuer, and Tuomo Hiippala
   2017 Multimodality: Foundations, Research and Analysis. A Problem-Oriented Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110479898
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110479898 [Google Scholar]
3. Brannen, Mary Yoko, Rebecca Piekkari, and Susanne Tietze
   2014 “The Multifaceted Role of Language in International Business: Unpacking the Forms, Functions and Features of a Critical Challenge to MNC Theory and Performance.” Journal of International Business Studies45 (5): 495–507. 10.1057/jibs.2014.24
   https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.24 [Google Scholar]
4. Buzelin, Hélène
   2005 “Unexpected Allies: How Latour’s Network Theory Could Complement Bourdieusian Analyses in Translation Studies.” The Translator11 (2): 193–218. 10.1080/13556509.2005.10799198
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2005.10799198 [Google Scholar]
5. Calvo, Elisa
   2015 “Scaffolding Translation Skills through Situated Training Approaches: Progressive and Reflective Methods.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer9 (3): 306–322. 10.1080/1750399X.2015.1103107
   https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2015.1103107 [Google Scholar]
6. Coldiron, A. E. B.
   2016 “Response by Coldiron to ‘Translation and the materialities of communication.’” Translation Studies9 (1): 96–102. 10.1080/14781700.2015.1085433
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2015.1085433 [Google Scholar]
7. Cronin, Michael
   2013 Translation in the Digital Age. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. García, Álvaro Marín
   2021 “Bridging the Epistemological Gap: Issues in CTS Knowledge Application to Training.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies8 (2): 462–481. 10.1075/cogls.00086.gar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00086.gar [Google Scholar]
9. Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich
   2004 Production of Presence. What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Haapaniemi, Riku
    2023 “Translation as meaning-construction under co-textual and contextual constraints: A model for a material approach to translation.” Translation Studies, 1–17. 10.1080/14781700.2022.2147988
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2022.2147988 [Google Scholar]
11. Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel A.
    2020 “The ‘Technological Turn’ in Translation Studies: Are We There yet? A Transversal Cross-Disciplinary Approach.” Translation Spaces9(2): 314–41. 10.1075/ts.19012.jim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.19012.jim [Google Scholar]
12. Kirschenbaum, Matthew G.
    2008 Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Littau, Karin
    2016 “Translation and the materialities of communication.” Translation Studies9 (1): 82–96. 10.1080/14781700.2015.1063449
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2015.1063449 [Google Scholar]
14. Littau, Karin
    2022 “Media, materiality and the possibility of reception. Anne Carson’s Catullus.” InUnsettling Translation. Studies in Honour of Theo Hermans, edited byMona Baker, 125–141. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003134633‑12
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003134633-12 [Google Scholar]
15. Marais, Kobus
    2019 A (Bio)Semiotic Theory of Translation: The Emergence of Social-Cultural Reality. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Martín de León, Celia, and Alba Fernández Santana
    2021 “Embodied Cognition in the Booth: Referential and Pragmatic Gestures in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies8 (2): 277–306. 10.1075/cogls.00079.mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00079.mar [Google Scholar]
17. Merrell, Floyd
    2000 Change through Signs of Body, Mind and Language. Prospect Heights: Waveland.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Montgomery, Scott L.
    2009 “English and Science: Realities and Issues for Translation in the Age of an Expanding Lingua Franca.” The Journal of Specialised Translation111: 6–16.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Nieminen, Tommi
    2017 “Joukkoistetun kotoistamisen luonteesta kääntämisenä [Crowdsourced localisation as translation]”. MikaEL101: 88–100.
    [Google Scholar]
20. O’Brien, Sharon
    2012 “Translation as Human-Computer Interaction.” Translation Spaces11: 101–122. 10.1075/ts.1.05obr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.1.05obr [Google Scholar]
21. Peirce, Charles Sanders,
    1994 The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Charlottesville: Intelex.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Pettersson, Anders
    2017 The Idea of a Text and the Nature of Textual Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/fillm.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fillm.7 [Google Scholar]
23. Prieto Ramos, Fernando
    2021 “Assessing Practices in Institutional Translation and Interpreting.” InInstitutional Translation and Interpreting: Assessing Practices and Managing for Quality, edited byFernando Prieto Ramos, 1–7. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pym, Anthony
    2004 The Moving Text: Localization, Translation, and Distribution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.49
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.49 [Google Scholar]
25. Pym, Anthony
    2007 “Natural and Directional Equivalence in Theories of Translation.” Target19 (2): 271–294. 10.1075/target.19.2.07pym
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.19.2.07pym [Google Scholar]
26. Pym, Anthony
    2011 “What Technology Does to Translating.” The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research3(1): 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Reiß, Katharina, and Hans J. Vermeer
    1984 Towards a General Theory of Translational Action: Skopos Theory Explained. Translated byChristiane Nord 2013 Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Risku, Hanna, Florian Windhager, and Matthias Apfelthaler
    2013 “A Dynamic Network Model of Translatorial Cognition and Action.” Translation Spaces21: 151–182. 10.1075/ts.2.08ris
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.2.08ris [Google Scholar]
29. Risku, Hanna, Regina Rogl, and Jelena Milošević
    (ed.) 2019 Translation Practice in the Field: Current Research on Socio-Cognitive Processes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.105
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.105 [Google Scholar]
30. Risku, Hanna, and Regina Rogl
    2021 “Translation and situated, embodied, distributed, embedded and extended cognition.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited byFabio Alves and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 478–499. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Risku, Hanna, and Regina Rogl
    2022 “Praxis and Process Meet Halfway: The Convergence of Sociological and Cognitive Approaches in Translation Studies.” The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research14(2): 32–49. 10.12807/ti.114202.2022.a03
    https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.114202.2022.a03 [Google Scholar]
32. Ruokonen, Minna, and Minna Hjort
    2019 “O Translator, Where Art Thou? In-House Translators’ Physical Location and Organisational Position.” VAKKI Publications101: 95–108.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sannholm, Raphael
    2021 Translation, Teamwork, and Technology. The Use of Social and Material Scaffolds in the Translation Process. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Short, T. L.
    2007 Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511498350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498350 [Google Scholar]
35. Teixeira, Carlos S. C., and Sharon O’Brien
    2017 “Investigating the Cognitive Ergonomic Aspects of Translation Tools in a Workplace Setting.” Translation Spaces6(1): 79–103. 10.1075/ts.6.1.05tei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.6.1.05tei [Google Scholar]