Affect as a hinge

References

1. Angelelli, Claudia
   2004 Medical Interpreting and Cross-Cultural Communication. London: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486616
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486616 [Google Scholar]
2. Bahadır, Şebnem
   2004 “Moving in-between: The Interpreter as Ethnographer and the Interpreting-Researcher as Anthropologist.” Meta49 (4): 805–821. doi: 10.7202/009783ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/009783ar [Google Scholar]
3. Baraldi, Claudio , and Laura Gavioli
   2007 “Dialogue Interpreting as Intercultural Mediation: An Analysis in Healthcare Multicultural Settings”. InDialogue and Culture, edited by Marion Grein , and Edda Weigand , 155–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.1.12bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.1.12bar [Google Scholar]
4. Bochner, Arthur P. , and Carolyn Ellis
   (eds) 2002 Ethnographically Speaking: Autoethnography, Literature, and Aesthetics. Walnut Creek: AltaMira.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bontempo, Karen , and Karen Malcolm
   2012 “An Ounce of Prevention Is Worth a Pound of Cure: Educating Interpreters about the Risk of Vicarious Trauma in Healthcare Settings.” InIn Our Hands: Educating Healthcare Interpreters, edited by Laurie Swabey , and Karen Malcolm , 105–130. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cirillo, Letizia
   2010 “Managing Affect in Interpreter-Mediated Institutional Talk: Examples from the Medical Setting.” Journal of Specialised Translation14: 55–79.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Diriker, Ebru
   2011 “Agency in Conference Interpreting: Still a Myth?” Gramma: Journal of Theory and Criticism19: 27–36.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ellis, Carolyn , and Arthur P. Bochner
   2000 “Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject.” InHandbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., edited by Norman K. Denzin , and Yvonna S. Lincoln , 733–768. Thousand Oaks, London & New Delhi: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Haakana, Markku
   1999 Laughing Matters. A Conversation Analytical Study of Laughter in Doctor-Patient Interaction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hokkanen, Sari
    2013 “Tulkki keskellä hengellistä kokemusta: Simultaanitulkkaus Tampereen helluntaiseurakunnan kokouksessa [The interpreter amidst religious experience: Simultaneous interpreting in the Tampere Pentecostal Church]”. InTulkattu Tampere, edited by Kaisa Koskinen , 263–284. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hokkanen, Sari
    . Forthcoming. To Serve and to Experience: An Autoethnographic Study of Simultaneous Church Interpreting. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Holmes, Janet
    2000 “Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace.” Discourse Studies2 (2): 159–185. doi: 10.1177/1461445600002002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002 [Google Scholar]
13. Holstein, James A. , and Jaber F. Gubrium
    2000 The Self We Live By: Narrative Identity in a Postmodern World. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hubscher-Davidson, Séverine
    2011 “A Discussion of Ethnographic Research Methods and Their Relevance for the Translation Process.” Across Languages and Cultures12 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1556/Acr.12.2011.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.12.2011.1.1 [Google Scholar]
15. Hubscher-Davidson, Séverine
    2013a “The Role of Intuition in the Translation Process: A Case Study.” Translation and Interpreting Studies8 (2): 211–232. doi: 10.1075/tis.8.2.05hub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.8.2.05hub [Google Scholar]
16. Hubscher-Davidson, Séverine
    2013b “Emotional Intelligence and Translation Studies: A New Bridge.” Meta58 (2): 324–346. doi: 10.7202/1024177ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1024177ar [Google Scholar]
17. Jacobsen, Bente
    2013 “Training the Trainers: Dealing with Interpreting Ethics.” InTraining the Trainers: Nordic Seminar on Interpreter Education, edited by Cecilia Wadensjö , 38–47. Stockholm: Tolk- och översättarinstitutet, Stockholm University.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kangasharju, Helena , and Tuija Nikko
    2009 “Emotions in Organizations: Joint Laughter in Workplace Meetings.” International Journal of Business Communication46 (1): 100–119. doi: 10.1177/0021943608325750
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608325750 [Google Scholar]
19. Koskinen, Kaisa
    2008 Translating Institutions: An Ethnographic Study of EU Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Koskinen, Kaisa
    2012 “Domestication, Foreignization and the Modulation of Affect.” InDomestication and Foreignization in Translation Studies, edited by Hannu Kemppanen , Marja Jänis , Alexandra Belikova , 13–32. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Koskinen, Kaisa , and Minna Ruokonen
    . In press. “Love Letters or Hate Mail? Translators’ Technology Acceptance in the Light of their Emotional Narratives.” InHuman Issues in Translation Technology, IATIS Yearbook 2015 edited by Dorothy Kenny . London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lehr, Caroline
    2014 “The Relevance of Emotion for Professional Translation and Translation Studies.” In Man vs. Machine? The Future of Translators, Interpreters and Terminologists: Proceedings of the XXth FIT World Congress, Berlin 2014 , edited by Wolfram Baur , Brigitte Eichner , Sylvia Kalina , Norma Keßler , Felix Mayer , and Jeannette Ørsted , 601–606. Berlin: BDÜ Fachverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Mead, George H
    1937/1967 Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Meyerson, Debra E
    1991 “’Normal Ambiguity?’ A Glimpse of an Occupational Culture.” InReframing Organizational Culture, edited by Peter J. Frost , Larry F. Moore , Meryl Reis Luis , Craig C. Lundberg , and Joanne Martin , 131–156. Newbury Park: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Minh-ha, Trinh
    1992 Framer Framed. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. O’Brien, Sharon
    2011 “Introduction.” InCognitive Explorations in Translation: Eyes, Keys, TAPs. IATIS Yearbook 2010, edited by Sharon O’Brien , 1–14. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ottenberg, Simon
    1990 “Thirty Years of Fieldnotes: Changing Relationships to the Text.” InFieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology, edited by Roger Sanjek , 139–160. Ithaca, NY & London: Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pérez González, Luis
    2012 “Amateur Subtitling and the Pragmatics of Spectatorial Subjectivity.” Language and Intercultural Communication12 (4): 335–352. doi: 10.1080/14708477.2012.722100
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2012.722100 [Google Scholar]
29. Polkinghorne, Donald
    1988 Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Risku, Hanna
    2002 “Situatedness in Translation Studies.” Cognitive Systems Research3: 523–533. doi: 10.1016/S1389‑0417(02)00055‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0417(02)00055-4 [Google Scholar]
31. Risku, Hanna
    2010 “A Cognitive Scientific View on Technical Communication and Translation: Do Embodiment and Situatedness Really Make a Difference?” Target22 (1): 94–111. doi: 10.1075/target.22.1.06ris
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.22.1.06ris [Google Scholar]
32. Robinson, Douglas
    1991 The Translator’s Turn. Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Rosaldo, Michelle. Z
    1984 “Toward an Anthropology of Self and Feeling.” InCulture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, edited by Richard A. Shweder and Robert A. LeVine , 135–157. Cambridge, London, New York, New Rochelle, Melbourne & Sydney: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Rossini, Linda , and Delia Chiaro
    2010 “Audiences and Translated Humour: An Empirical Study.” InTranslation, Humour and the Media, Vol 2, edited by Delia Chiaro , 121–137. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Spry, Tami
    2001 “Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis.” Qualitative Inquiry7: 706–732. doi: 10.1177/107780040100700605
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700605 [Google Scholar]
36. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja , and Johanna Laukkanen
    1996 “Evaluations — A Key towards Understanding the Affective Dimension of Translational Decisions.” Meta41 (1): 45–59. doi: 10.7202/002360ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/002360ar [Google Scholar]
37. Wadensjö, Cecilia
    1998 Interpreting as Interaction. London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wetherell, Margaret
    2012 Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446250945
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250945 [Google Scholar]
39. Willis, Paul
    2000 The Ethnographic Imagination. Cambridge & Malden: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]