“Yo intenté defenderme y se mecayó desnuca’”

References

1. Atkinson, Maxwell, and Paul Drew
   1979 Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Behavior in Legal Settings. London: MacMillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑04057‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04057-5 [Google Scholar]
2. Bellucci, Patrizia, and María Cristina Torchia
   2013 “La regia del discorso in tribunale: il potere delle domande.” InLingua e diritto. Scritto e parlato nelle professioni legali, ed. byAlarico Mariani Marini, and Federigo Bambi, 79–106. Pisa: Pisa University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berk-Seligson, Susan
   2007 “The Elicitation of a Confession: Admitting Murder but Resisting an Accusation of Attempted Rape.” InThe Language of Sexual Crime, ed. byJanet Cotterill, 16–41. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230592780_2
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592780_2 [Google Scholar]
4. Briz, Antonio
   2010 El español coloquial. Situación y uso. Madrid: ArcoLibros.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bromwich, William
   2013 “‘Mrs Buckley, you’re telling a pack of lies’: Cross-examination in the High Court of Justiciary in Edinburgh.” InLanguage in the Negociation of Justice, ed. byChris Williams and Girolamo Tessuto, 15–31. Burlington: Ashgate.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Calvo, José
   1993 El discurso de los hechos: narrativismo en la interpretación operativa. Madrid: Tecnos.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Calvo, José
   2002 “Modelo narrativo del juicio de hecho; inventio y ratiocinatio.” InHorizontes de la Filosofía del Derecho, ed. byVirgilio Zapatero Gómez, 93–103. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Capps, Lisa, and Elinor Ochs
   1995 Constructing Panic: The Discourse of Agoraphobia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cotterill, Janet
   2003 Language and Power in Court. A Linguistic Analysis of the O.J. Simpson Trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cotterill, Janet
    ed. 2007 The Language of Sexual Crime. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230592780
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592780 [Google Scholar]
11. Drew, Paul
    1992 “Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-examination: the Case of a Trial for Rape.” InTalk at Work, ed. byPaul Drew, and John Heritage, 470–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Duranti, Alessandro
    1994 From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Western Samoan Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Duranti, Alessandro
    1997 Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511810190
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810190 [Google Scholar]
14. Ehrlich, Susan
    2001 Representing Rape. Language and Sexual Consent. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Estalella del Pino, Jordi
    2014 El abogado eficaz. Cómo convencer, persuadir e influir en los juicios. Madrid: La Ley.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gómez Torrego, Leonardo
    1992 Valores gramaticales de ‘SE’. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gómez Torrego, Leonardo
    1998 La impersonalidad gramatical: descripción y norma. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador
    1997 “/Se/ y construcciones inacusativas.” Moenia3: 171–191.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador
    1999 “Los dativos.” InGramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, ed. byIgnacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, 1855–1930. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Haegeman, Liliane, and Jacqueline Gueron
    1999 English Grammar: A Generative Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hyden, Margareta, and Imelda Colgan McCarthy
    1994 “Women Battering and Father-Daughter Incest Disclosure: Discourses of Denial and Acknowledgement.” Discourse & Society5: 543–65. 10.1177/0957926594005004006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005004006 [Google Scholar]
22. Iglesias Bango, Manuel
    1991 La voz en la gramática española. León: Universidad de León.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lakoff, George
    2007 No pienses en un elefante. Lenguaje y debate político. Madrid: Complutense.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Matoesian, Gregory M.
    1993 Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in Courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Matoesian, Gregory M.
    2001 Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. NGLE = Real Academia Española, and Asociación de Academias de Lengua Española
    NGLE = Real Academia Española, and Asociación de Academias de Lengua Española 2009 Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
27. NGLE = Real Academia Española, and Asociación de Academias de Lengua Española
    NGLE = Real Academia Española, and Asociación de Academias de Lengua Española 2010 Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Manual. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
28. O’Connor, Patricia E.
    1995 “Speaking of Crime: ‘I don’t Know what Made me Do it.’” Discourse & Society6: 429–56. doi:  10.1177/0957926595006003008
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006003008 [Google Scholar]
29. Rymes, Betsy
    1995 “The Construction of Moral Agency in the Narratives of High School Drop-outs.” Discourse & Society6: 495–516. 10.1177/0957926595006004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006004003 [Google Scholar]
30. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Scheglogg, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turntaking in Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
31. Saeed, John I.
    2009 Semantics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
32. STSJ = Sentencia Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana 2/2015
    STSJ = Sentencia Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana 2/2015, 3de febrero 2015 https://tsj.vlex.es/vid/563125710 [16/02/2018]