Developing digital health literacy amidst the Covid-19 infodemic

References

1. Australian Broadcasting Commission
   Australian Broadcasting Commission. AccessedSeptember 3, 2022. https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/coronacast
2. Baker, Paul
   2010 Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bennett, Peter
   1999 “Understanding Responses to Risk: Some Basic Findings.” InRisk Communication and Public Health, ed. byPeter Bennett, and Kenneth Calman, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bhatia, Vijay K.
   1993 Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cook, John, Stephan Lewandowsky, and Ullrich K. H. Ecker
   2017 “Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence.” PLoS ONE12(5): e0175799. 10.1371/journal.pone.0175799
   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799 [Google Scholar]
6. Coulter, Angela
   2002 “Patients’ Views of the Good Doctor.” British Medical Journal325(7366): 668–669. 10.1136/bmj.325.7366.668
   https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7366.668 [Google Scholar]
7. Del Vicario, Michela, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi
   2016 “The Spreading of Misinformation Online.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America113(3): 554–559. 10.1073/pnas.1517441113
   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113 [Google Scholar]
8. Earnshaw, Valerie, Lisa A. Eaton, Seth C. Kalichman, Natalie M. Brousseau, Carly Hill, and Annie B. Fox
   2020 “Covid-19 Conspiracy Theory, Health Behaviors, and Policy Support.” Translational Behavioral Medicine10 (4): 850–856. 10.1093/tbm/ibaa090
   https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaa090 [Google Scholar]
9. Ecker, Ullrich K., Stephan Lewandowsky, Olivia Fenton, and Kelsey Martin
   2014 “Do People Keep Believing Because They Want to? Preexisting Attitudes and the Continued Influence of Misinformation.” Memory and Cognition42 (2): 292–304. 10.3758/s13421‑013‑0358‑x
   https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0358-x [Google Scholar]
10. Freeman, Daniel, Felicity Waite, Laina Rosebrock, Ariane Petit, Chiara Causier, Anna East, Lucy Jenner, Ashley-Louise Teale, Lydia Carr, Sophie Mulhall, Emily Bold, and Sinéad Lambe
    2022 “Coronavirus Conspiracy Beliefs, Mistrust, and Compliance with Government Guidelines in England.” Psychological Medicine52 (2): 251–263. 10.1017/S0033291720001890
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001890 [Google Scholar]
11. Grimes, David R.
    2020 “Health Disinformation & Social Media. The Crucial Role of Information Hygiene in Mitigating Conspiracy Theory and Infodemics.” Embo Reports (11) 211: e51819. 10.15252/embr.202051819
    https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202051819 [Google Scholar]
12. Hyland, Ken
    2014 Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Johnson, Thomas, Shannon Bichard, and Weiwu Zhang
    2009 “Communication Communities or ‘Cyberghettos?’: A Path Analysis Model Examining Factors that Explain Selective Exposure to Blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication15 (1): 60–82. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2009.01492.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01492.x [Google Scholar]
14. Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr
    2012 How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
15. OECD
    OECD 2021 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World, PISA. Pisa: OECD Publishing. 10.1787/a83d84cb‑en
    https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en [Google Scholar]
16. Orvell, Ariana, Ethan Kross, and Susan Gelman A.
    2020 “‘You’ speaks to me: Effects of Generic-you in Creating Resonance Between People and Ideas.” PNAS, 117 (49): 31038–31045. 10.1073/pnas.2010939117
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010939117 [Google Scholar]
17. Pariser, Eli
    2011 The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Richardson, Kay P.
    2003 “Health Risks on the Internet: Establishing Credibility Online.” Health, Risk and Society5 (2): 171–184. 10.1080/1369857031000123948
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369857031000123948 [Google Scholar]
20. Romiti, Giulio F., and Giovanni Talerico
    2021 “Embracing the Uncertainty: An Important Lesson from Covid-19.” Journal of General Internal Medicine36 (11): 3562–3564. 10.1007/s11606‑021‑06809‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06809-2 [Google Scholar]
21. Sarangi, Srikant, and Angus Clarke
    2002 “Zones of Expertise and the Management of Uncertainty in Genetics Risk Communication.” Research on Language and Social Interaction35(2): 139–171. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2 [Google Scholar]
22. Scherer, Laura, and Gordon Pennycook
    2020 “Who Is Susceptible to Online Health Misinformation?” American Journal of Public Health110 (3): S276–S277. 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305908
    https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305908 [Google Scholar]
23. Scott, Michael
    2016 WordSmith Tools version71. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Suarez-Alvarez, Javier
    2021 “Are 15-year-olds Prepared to Deal with Fake News and Misinformation?” PISA in Focus, 1131: 1–8. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/are-15-year-olds-prepared-to-deal-with-fake-news-and-misinformation_6ad5395e-en10.1787/6ad5395e‑en
    https://doi.org/10.1787/6ad5395e-en [Google Scholar]
25. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
26. van Dijk, Teun
    2016 “Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 62–85. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
27. van Leeuwen, Teun
    2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tool for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
28. Wason, Peter
    1960 “On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology12 (3): 129–140. 10.1080/17470216008416717
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717 [Google Scholar]
29. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
    eds. 2016 Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
30. World Health Organization [WHO]
    World Health Organization [WHO] 2021 Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025. Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
    [Google Scholar]