Studying the curricular objectives by Q-methodology

References

1. Alcaraz, Enrique , Brian Hughes , and Anthony Pym
   2014 Legal Translation Explained. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Benmaman, Virginia
   1989 “Towards Standardization of Legal Terminology: The Search for Appropriate Linguistic/Conceptual Equivalents.”InProceedings of the Northeast Conference on Legal Interpretation and Translation, ed.byAdalberto Aguirre, 75–81. Jersey City: Consortium on Legal Interpretation & Translation.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Benmaman, Virginia
   1992 “Legal Interpreting: An Emerging Profession.”The Modern Language Journal76 (4), 445–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1992.tb05391.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb05391.x [Google Scholar]
4. Biel, Łucja
   2011 “Professional Realism in the Legal Translation Classroom: Translation Competence and Translator Competence.”Meta: Translators’ Journal56 (1), 162–178. doi: 10.7202/1003515ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/1003515ar [Google Scholar]
5. Bloom, Benjamin S. , Max D. Engelhart , Edward J. Furst , Walker H. Hill , and David R. Krathwohl
   1956 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brown, Steven R.
   1993 “A Primer on Q-methodology.”Operant Subjectivity16 (3/4): 91–138.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bygate, Martin
   2001 “Speaking.”InThe Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of other Languages, ed.byNunan, David, and Ronald CarterGermany: Ernst Klett Sprachen. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667206.003
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.003 [Google Scholar]
8. Cao, Deborah
   2007 Translating Law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   [Google Scholar]
9. De Jongh, Elena M.
   1992 An Introduction to Court Interpreting: Theory & Practice. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Du, Jinbang , Fu Zhang , and Liang Yuan
    2004 “Translation of Chinese Law: Problems and Solutions.”Chinese Translators Journal25 (3): 72–76.
    [Google Scholar]
11. EMT expert group
    EMT expert group 2009 “Competences for Professional Translators, Experts in Multilingual and Multimedia Communication.”ec.europa.eu/ dgs/translation/programmes/emt/key_documents/emt_competences_translators_en.pdf
12. Exel, Job Van , and Gjalt de Graaf
    2005 Q-methodology: A Sneak Preview. www.jobvanexel.nl
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gao, Lianhong
    2013 “The Transfer of the Foreign Language Curricular Goals and the Implications for ELP Curricular Development.”International Journal of Legal English1 (1): 104–121.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Geeroms, Sofie M.
    2002 “Comparative Law and Legal Translation: Why the Terms Cassation, Revision and Appeal Should Not Be Translated.”The American Journal of Comparative Law50 (1): 201–228. doi: 10.2307/840834
    https://doi.org/10.2307/840834 [Google Scholar]
15. Hughes, Arthur
    2003 Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kelly, Diana
    2005 A Handbook for Translator Trainers. Manchester: St Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Khoshgooyanfard, Alireza
    2011 “How People Think about a TV Program: A Q-methodology Approach.”The Qualitative Report16 (2): 482–493. www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR16-2/khoshgooyanfard.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
18. Krathwohl, David R.
    2002 “A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview.”Theory into Practice41 (4): 212–218. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 [Google Scholar]
19. Li, Defeng , and Mu Hu
    2006 “Research on Legal Translation: Achievements and Future Research.”Chinese Science and Technology Translators Journal19 (3): 47–51.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Liu, Liguang
    2014 “Categorizing College Students by Academic Attitudes: An Application of Q-Methodology Approach.”InProceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Education and Management, ed.byMohamed A. Seedat, 237–243. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Luebke, Stephen , and James Lorié
    2013 “Use of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Developing Reading Comprehension Specifications.”Journal of Applied Testing Technology14 (1): 1–27. www.jattjournal.com/index.php/atp/article/view/45250/36643
    [Google Scholar]
22. Marinetti, Cristina
    2008 “Review of Translating Law by Deborah Cao (2007).”International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law15 (1): 121–125.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Neubert, Albrecht
    2000 “Competence in Language, in Languages, and in Translation.”InDeveloping Translation Competence, ed.byChristina Schäffner, and Beverly Adab, 3–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.38.03neu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.38.03neu [Google Scholar]
24. PACTE
    PACTE 2005 “Investigating Translation Competence: Conceptual and Methodological Issues.”Meta50 (2): 609–619. doi: 10.7202/011004ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/011004ar [Google Scholar]
25. Piecychna, Beata
    2013 “Legal Translation Competence in the Light of Translational Hermeneutics.”Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric34 (1): 141–159. doi: 10.2478/slgr‑2013‑0027
    https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2013-0027 [Google Scholar]
26. Prieto Ramos, Fernando
    2009 “Interdisciplinariedad y ubicación macrotextual en traducción jurídica.”Translation Journal 13 (4). translationjournal.net/ journal/50legal.htm
    [Google Scholar]
27. Prieto Ramos, Fernando
    2011 “Developing Legal Translation Competence: An Integrative Process-Oriented Approach.”Comparative Legilinguistics – International Journal for Legal Communication5: 7–21. doi: 10.14746/cl.2011.5.01
    https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2011.5.01 [Google Scholar]
28. Šarčević, Susan
    1994 “Translation and the Law: An Interdisciplinary Approach.”InTranslation Studies: An Interdiscipline, ed.byMary Snell-Hornby, Franz Pochhacker, and Klaus Kaindl, 301–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.2.36sar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.2.36sar [Google Scholar]
29. Šarčević, Susan
    1997 New Approach to Legal Translation. Hague: Kluwer Law International.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Stolze, Radegundis
    2013 “The Legal Translator’s Approach to Texts.”Humanities2: 56–71. doi: 10.3390/h2010056
    https://doi.org/10.3390/h2010056 [Google Scholar]
31. Supreme Court Task Force on Interpreter & Translator Services
    Supreme Court Task Force on Interpreter & Translator Services 1984 Background Report 21: Interpreting and Translating as Professions. Trenton, NJ: Court Interpreting, Legal Translating & Bilingual Services Section, Administrative Office of the Courts.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Tao, Youlan
    2013 On the Making of Translation Textbooks for Translation Majors in China: Theoretical Construction and Suggested Solutions. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Wang, Shuhuai
    2013 On Translation Teaching. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]