1887
Volume 3, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2352-1805
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1813
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Decision-making is said by researchers from many disciplines to be the outstanding characteristic of modern societies ( Schimank 2005 , 51–53). Yet, a decision’s consequences often seem inconceivable or even absurd to an uninvolved bystander. Sociologists call this phenomenon “decision-making under conditions of limited rationality” ( Schimank 2005 , 127ff.). Examples include parliamentarians passing a law ‘just’ to get it over and done with before an upcoming election; or a buyer under pressure to purchase ‘any machine tool as long as it costs under € 500,000’.

This article takes a closer look at such phenomena, utilizing an empirical, linguistic approach to decision-making and communication. It argues that the most desired options are often the hardest to convey, and the ideas that are realised are often those that are easily expressed and already well-established. This is underlined by previous findings that many institutional outcomes are shaped by momentary (instantaneous) necessities and opportunities (cf. Schimank, 2005 , 27; Zehrer, 2014 ).

The article first gives an overview of previous studies on decision-making from different disciplines. It then sets out to explain in how far decision-making can be considered as ‘translaboration’, a new term introduced in 2015 by researchers from Westminster University in London (cf. Alfer, Cranfield, Kathrani, 2015 ). For the purposes of this article, the concept of ‘translaboration’ shall include first a tacit (from the addressees’ point of view) and non-deliberate (from the acting parties’ point of view) translation-like practice and, secondly, put special emphasis on the multimodal negotiation practice forming the basis of many organisational decisions. Examples from the economic world and politics will be used to demonstrate what the ‘translaboration’ concept means, and how a method rooted in it can reveal practices of organisational decision-making.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ttmc.3.3.04zeh
2017-10-16
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alfer, Alexa , Steven Cranfield , and Paresh Kathrani
  2. Atkin, Albert
    2013 “Peirce’s Theory of Signs.” InThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Edward N. Zalta . Summer 2013 Edition. plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=peirce-semiotics.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin, John L.
    1962How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreements. CETA. Canada; European Union
    Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreements. CETA. Canada; European Union. September 2014www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/ceta-aecg/index.aspx?lang=eng
  5. Comprehensive Ecomomic Trade Agreement. CETA. Canada; European Union
    Comprehensive Ecomomic Trade Agreement. CETA. Canada; European Union. July 2016eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1467909007204&uri=COM:2016:443:FIN#document2
  6. Clark, Herbert H.
    1997Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 2014Plenarprotokoll12.032014.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 2014Plenarprotokoll25.092014.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 2015Plenarprotokoll01.102015.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 2016Plenarprotokoll06.072016.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 2016Plenarprotokoll09.092016.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 2016Plenarprotokoll22.092016.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DG Trade
    DG Trade 2016 “In Focus: EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).” AccessedOctober 12, 2016. ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ceta/index_en.htm
  14. Engberg, Jan
    2007 “Wie und warum sollte die Fachkommunikationsforschung in Richtung Wissensstrukturen erweitert werden?” Fachsprache: International Journal of LSP29 (1–2): 2–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eppler, Martin J.
    2004 “Knowledge Communication Problems between Experts and Managers: An Analysis of Knowledge Transfer in Decision Processes.” ICA Working Papers#1: unpaginated.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Global Affairs Canada
    Global Affairs Canada 2016 “Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA): modifications to investment protection provisions.” AccessedOctober 10, 2016. international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/ceta-aecg/invest_faq.aspx?lang=eng
  17. Global Affairs Canada
    Global Affairs Canada 2016 “Trade Agreement (CETA): Chronology of Events and Key Milestones.” AccessedOctober 10, 2016. international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/ceta-aecg/understanding-comprendre/chronology-chronologie.aspx?lang=eng
  18. Jakobs, Eva-Maria
    2008 “Unternehmenskommunikation: Arbeitsfelder, Trends, Defizite.” InProfession & Kommunikation, ed. by Susanne Niemeier and Hajo Diekmannshenke , 13–31. Forum angewandte Linguistik 49. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jakobs, Eva-Maria , Reinhard Fiehler , Denise Eraßme , and Anne Kursten
    2011 “Industrielle Prozessmodellierung als kommunikativer Prozess: Eine Typologie zentraler Probleme.” Gesprächsforschung (12): 223–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mayntz, Renate , and Fritz W. Scharpf
    1995 “Kapitel 2: Der Akteurszentrierte Institutionalismus.” InGesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung, ed. by Renate Mayntz and Fritz W. Scharpf , 39–72. Schriften des Max-Planck-Instituts für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln 23. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nickl, Markus
    2005 “Industrialisierung des Schreibens.” InSchreiben am Arbeitsplatz, ed. by Eva-Maria Jakobs , Katrin Lehnen , and Kirsten Schindler , 43–56. Schreiben – Medien – Beruf. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑80777‑9_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80777-9_3 [Google Scholar]
  22. Nonaka, Ikujiro , Ryoko Toyama , and Noburu Konno
    2000 “SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation.” Long Range Planning33: 5–34. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑6301(99)00115‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6 [Google Scholar]
  23. Rehbein, Jochen
    1999 “Zum Modus von Äußerungen.” InGrammatik und Mentale Prozesse, ed. by Angelika Redder and Jochen Rehbein , 91–138. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Scharpf, Fritz W.
    2000Interaktionsformen: Akteurzentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung. UTB für Wissenschaft Uni-Taschenbücher Politikwissenschaft 2136. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Schimank, Uwe
    2005Die Entscheidungsgesellschaft: Komplexität und Rationalität der Moderne. Hagener Studientexte zur Soziologie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑80606‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80606-2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Schröder, Peter
    2002 “Exemplarische Analyse eines Bewerbungsbriefs.” InUnternehmenskommunikation, ed., by Michael Becker-Mrotzek and Reinhard Fiehler , 145–77. Forum für Fachsprachen-Forschung 58. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schubert, Klaus
    2007Wissen, Sprache, Medium, Arbeit: Ein integratives Modell der ein- und mehrsprachigen Fachkommunikation. Forum für Fachsprachen-Forschung 76. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Shannon, Claude E. , and Warren Weaver
    1964The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stoll, Peter-Tobias , Douma, Wybe Th. , Sadeleer, Nicolas de , and Patrick Abel
    2016 “CETA, TTIP and the EU precautionary principle: Legal analysis of selected parts of the draft CETA agreement and the EU TTIP proposals.” Unpublished manuscript. AccessedMay 02, 2017. https://www.foodwatch.org/fileadmin/Themen/TTIP_Freihandel/Dokumente/2016-06-21_foodwatch-study_precautionary-principle.pdf
  30. University of Westminster
  31. Viaggio, Sergio
    2006A General Theory of Interlingual Mediation. Sprachwissenschaft 1. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Vierbergen-Schuit, Kàto , and Jan D. ten Thije
    2008 “Key to Knowledge: Knowledge Accumulation and Cumulative Interviews in Professional Communication.” InOrganisationskommunikation: Grundlagen und Analysen der sprachlichen Inszenierung von Organisation, ed. by Florian Menz and Andreas Müller . 1st edn., 269–91. Managementkonzepte Bd. 34. München: Hampp.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Weick, Karl E.
    1995Sensemaking in Organizations. Foundations for Organizational Science. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zehrer, Christiane
    2014Wissenskommunikation in der technischen Redaktion: Die situierte Gestaltung adäquater Kommunikation. Forum für Fachsprachenforschung 114. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ziegler, Philip , and Michael Stuerzenhofecker
    2016 “Wiviel TTIP steckt in CETA?” Die Zeit, August31. AccessedOctober 09, 2016. www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2016-08/freihandelsabkommen-ttip-ceta-faq/seite-4
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ttmc.3.3.04zeh
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ttmc.3.3.04zeh
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error