‘Kandinsky-fying’ the law

References

1. Brand, Juliane , and Christopher Hailey
   1997 Constructive Dissonance: Arnold Schoenberg and the Transformations of Twentieth-Century Culture. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Campen, Crétien van
   1997 “Synesthesia and Artistic Experimentation.” Psyche3 (6). www.theassc.org/files/assc/2290.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carlson, Maria
   2015 No Religion Higher Than Truth: A History of the Theosophical Movement in Russia, 1875–1922. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1515/9781400872794
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400872794 [Google Scholar]
4. Carneiro, Maria Francisca , Eliseu Raphael Venturi , and Laércio A. Becker
   2014 “What is the Smell of Law? First Assumptions for the Semiotics of Juridical ‘Matter’. Social Sciences Research Network (SSRN), October6 2014 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2506265 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.2506265 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2506265
   https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2506265 [Google Scholar]
5. Criminal Justice Act
   Criminal Justice Act 1967 London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/80/pdfs/ukpga_19670080_en.pdf.
6. DeGroff, Eric A.
   2012 “Training Tomorrow’s Lawyers: What Empirical Research Can Tell Us About the Effect of Law School Pedagogy on Law Student Learning Styles.” Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 251: 251–254.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Easteal, Patricia
   2008 “Teaching about the Nexus between Law and Society: From Pedagogy to Andragogy.” Legal Education Review18 (1&2): 163–172.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Feliú, Vicenç , and Helen Frazer
   2012 “Outcomes Assessment and Legal Research Pedagogy.” Legal Reference Services Quarterly31 (2): 188–203. doi: 10.1080/0270319X.2012.682938
   https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2012.682938 [Google Scholar]
9. Gordon, Sara
   2013 “Through the Eyes of Jurors: The Use of Schemas in the Application of ‘Plain-Language’ Jury Instructions.” Hastings Law Journal64 (3): 643–678.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hubbard, Edward M. , and Vilayanur S. Ramachandran
    2005 “Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Synaesthesia.” Neuron48 (3): 509–520. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.012 [Google Scholar]
11. Jakobson, Roman
    1959 “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.” InOn Translation, ed. by Reuben Arthur Brower , 30–39. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674731615.c18
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674731615.c18 [Google Scholar]
12. Kandinsky, Wassily
    1979 Point and Line to Plane: Contribution to the Analysis of the Pictorial Elements. Translated by Howard Dearstyne and Hilla Rebay . New York: Dover.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kandinsky, Wassily
    2011 Concerning the Spiritual in Art. Translated with an introduction by Michael T. H. Sadler . New York: Dover.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lindahl, Lars
    2004 “Deduction and Justification in the Law: The Role of Legal Terms and Concepts.” Ratio Juris17 (2): 182–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9337.2004.00263.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2004.00263.x [Google Scholar]
15. Lynch, Mary A.
    2011 “An Evaluation of Ten Concerns About Using Outcomes in Legal Education.” William Mitchell Law Review38 (3): 986–1016.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Macagno, Fabrizio
    2010 “Definitions in Law.” Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée2: 199–217.
    [Google Scholar]
17. O’Sullivan, Simon
    2001 “The Aesthetics of Affect: Thinking Art Beyond Representation.” Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities6 (3): 125–135. doi: 10.1080/09697250120087987
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09697250120087987 [Google Scholar]
18. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas
    2015 Spatial Justice: Body, Lawscape, Atmosphere. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Poling, Clark V.
    1986 Kandinsky’s Teaching at the Bauhaus. New York: Rizzoli.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Regina v Woollin
    Regina v Woollin (1998) Judgments, 22July 1998 London: UK House of Lords. https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199798/ldjudgmt/jd980722/wool.htm.
21. Ringbom, Sixten
    1966 “Art in ‘The Epoch of the Great Spiritual’: Occult Elements in the Early Theory of Abstract Painting.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes29: 386–418. doi: 10.2307/750725
    https://doi.org/10.2307/750725 [Google Scholar]
22. Sartor, Giovanni
    2008 “Legal Concepts: An Inferential Approach.” European University Institute Law Working PaperNo.2008/03. San Domenico di Fiesole: Department of Law, European University Institute. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1093627. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1093627
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1093627 [Google Scholar]
23. Scruton, Roger
    1998 Art and Imagination: A Study in the Philosophy of Mind. South Bend, IN: St Augustine’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Shusterman, Richard
    2000 Pragmatic Ethics: Living, Beauty, Rethinking Art. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Spaak, Torben
    2014 “Alf Ross on the Concept of a Legal Right.” Ratio Juris27 (4): 461–476. doi: 10.1111/raju.12054
    https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12054 [Google Scholar]
26. Tomas, Vincent
    1969 “Kandinsky’s Theory of Painting.” The British Journal of Aesthetics9 (1): 19–38. doi: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/9.1.19
    https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/9.1.19 [Google Scholar]
27. Zalesne, Deborah , and David Nadvorney
    2011 “Why Don’t They Get It: Academic Intelligence and the Under-Prepared Student as Other.” Journal of Legal Education61 (2): 264–279.
    [Google Scholar]