A computational model of the discovery of writing

References

1. Barbeau, Marius
   (1950) Totem Poles. Anthropology Series 30, National Museum of Canada Bulletin 119, vol.1–2. Ottawa: National Museum of Canada.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baxter, William
   (1992) A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, no.64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110857085
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857085 [Google Scholar]
3. Baxter, William , & Sagart, Laurent
   (2014) Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Baxter-Sagart_Old_Chinese_reconstruction. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Bliss, Charles
   (1965) Semantography. Sydney: Semantography (Blissymbolics) Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Boltz, William
   (1994) The Origin and Early Development of the Chinese Writing System. American Oriental Series, no. 78. New Haven: American Oriental Society.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boltz, William
   (2000) Monosyllabicity and the origin of the Chinese script. Tech. rept. 143. Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Buckley, Eugene
   (2008) Monosyllabicity and the origins of syllabaries. In: Linguistic Society of America. www.ling.upenn.edu/~gene/papers/monosyllabicity.pdf.
8. Dalley, Stephanie
   (2005) The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumerby Jean-Jacques Glassner ; Translated by Zainab Bahrani and Marc Van De Mieroop . Technology and Culture, 46(2), 408–409.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Daniels, Peter
   (1992) The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. Pages83–110of: Downing, Pamela , Lima, Susan , & Noonan, Michael (eds), The Linguistics of Literacy. Typological Studies in Language, no. 21. Amsterdan and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.21.10dan
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.21.10dan [Google Scholar]
10. Darwin, Charles
    (1859) The Origin of Species. New York: Mentor. Mentor edition (1958).
    [Google Scholar]
11. DeFrancis, John
    (1984) The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. DeFrancis, John
    (1989) Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. DeHaene, Stanislas
    (2009) Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention. New York: Viking.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Englund, Robert
    (2005) The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumerby Jean-Jacques Glassner ; Translated by Zainab Bahrani and Marc Van De Mieroop . Journal of the American Oriental Society, 125(1), 113–116.
    [Google Scholar]
15. ETCSL
    ETCSL (2006) Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature. etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/edition2/signlist.php.
16. Farmer, Steve , Henderson, John and Witzel, Michael
    (2002) Neurobiology, Layered Texts, and Correlative Cosmologies: A Cross-Cultural Framework for Premodern History. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities. 72. 48–90.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Farmer, Steve , Sproat, Richard , & Witzel, Michael
    (2004) The Collapse of the Indus-Script Thesis: The Myth of a Literate Harappan Civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gelb, Ignace
    (1963) A Study of Writing. Second edition, University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Glassner, Jean-Jacques
    (2000) Écrire à Sumer: L’invention du cunéiforme. Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Glassner, Jean-Jacques
    (2003) The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Translated by Zainab Bahrani and Marc van de Mieroop .
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goody, Jack
    (1977) The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Themes in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Goody, Jack , & Watt, Ian
    (1968) The consequences of literacy. Pages27–68of: Goody, J. (ed), Literacy in Traditional Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gorman, Kyle
    (2016) Pynini: A Python library for weighted finite-state grammar compilation. In: StatFsm.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gould, Stephen Jay
    (1974) Ever Since Darwin: Reflections on Natural History. New York: W. W. Norton. Chapter 12, pages103–110.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Jackson, Anthony
    (1990) The Pictish Trail. Orkney Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Keightley, David
    (1978) Sources of Shang History: The Oracle-Bone Inscriptions of Bronze Age China. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kirby, Simon
    (1999) Function, Selection and Innateness: the Emergence of Language Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Levenshtein, Vladimir
    (1966) Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8), 707–710.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Li, Hsiao-Ting
    (1968) 從六書的觀點看甲骨文 (Viewing the Oracle Bone inscriptions from the point of view of the ‘Six Writings’). 南洋大學學報, 2, 84–106.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mallery, Garrick
    (1883) Pictographs of the North American Indians: A Preliminary Paper. Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, no. 4. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. Available from Google Books.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Morris, Henry
    (1974) Scientific Creationism. San Diego: Institute for Creation Research.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Niyogi, Partha
    (2006) The Computational Nature of Language Learning and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Oppenheim, A. Leo
    (1959) On an operational device in Mesopotamian bureaucracy. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 18(121–128). doi: 10.1086/371519
    https://doi.org/10.1086/371519 [Google Scholar]
34. Paley, William
    (1826) Natural Theology or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity. Oxford: J. Vincent.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Perfetti, Charles , Nelson, Jessica , Liu, Ying , Fiez, Julie , & Tan, Li-Hai
    (2010) The neural bases of reading: Universals and writing system variations. Chapter 6, pages147–172of: Cornelissen, P. , Kringelback, M. , & Hansen, P. (eds), The Neural Basis of Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300369.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300369.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
36. Powell, Barry
    (2009) Writing: Theory and History of the Technology of Civilization. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Roark, Brian , Sproat, Richard , Allauzen, Cyril , Riley, Michael , & Jeffrey, Sorensen
    (2012) The OpenGrm open-source finite-state grammar software libraries. Pages61–66of: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Robson, Eleanor
    (2005) The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer by Jean-Jacques Glassner; Translated by Zainab Bahrani and Marc Van De Mieroop. American Journal of Archaeology, 110(1), 171–172.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sampson, Geoffrey
    (1985) Writing Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schmandt-Besserat, Denise
    (1996) How Writing Came About. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Seidl, Ursula
    (1989) Die babylonischen Kudurru- Reliefs. Symbole mesopotamischer Gottheiten. Universitätsverlag Freiburg.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sproat, Richard
    (2000) A Computational Theory of Writing Systems. ACL Studies in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sproat, Richard
    (2010) Language, Technology, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sproat, Richard
    (2014) A Statistical Comparison of Written Language and Nonlinguistic Symbol Systems. Language, 90(2), 457–481. doi: 10.1353/lan.2014.0031
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0031 [Google Scholar]
45. Stauder, Andréas
    (2010) The earliest Egyptian writing. Pages137–147of: Woods, Christopher , Teeter, Emily , & Emberling, Geoff (eds), Visible Language: Inventions of Writing in the Ancient Middle East and Beyond. Oriental Institute Museum Publications, no. 32. Chicago: Oriental Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Steels, Luc
    (2012) Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ais.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.3 [Google Scholar]
47. Steinthal, Heyman
    (1852) Die Entwicklung der Schrift, nebst einem offenen Sendschreiben an Herrn Professor Pott. Berlin: Ferd. Dümmler’s Verlagsbuchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Wang, Haicheng
    (2014) Writing and the Ancient State: Early China in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139235709
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235709 [Google Scholar]
49. Whittaker, Gordon
    (2009) The Principles of Nahuatl Writing. Göttinger Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 16, 47–81.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Wieger, Léon
    (1965) Chinese Characters: Their Origin, Etymology, History, Classification and Signification. A Thorough Study from Chinese Documents. New York: Dover Publications. Translated by L. Davrout.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Woods, Christopher , Teeter, Emily , & Emberling, Geoff
    (eds) (2010) Visible Language: Inventions of Writing in the Ancient Middle East and Beyond. Oriental Institute Museum Publications, no. 32. Chicago: Oriental Institute.
    [Google Scholar]