Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6732
  • E-ISSN: 1570-6001
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Whether spelling is phonemic is only one factor in whether a writing system is suitable for a given language; another consideration is "lexical distinctiveness" of spelling, in two separate senses, and the importance of lexical distinctiveness grows as a writing system matures. Seen in this light, the increasing irregularity of English spelling, over the period when English has been a written language, has been a desirable response to the changing needs of the English-speaking world.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Andoni Duñabeita, Jon and Eduardo Vidal-Abarca
    2008 “Children like dense neighborhoods: orthographic neighborhood density effects in novel readers”. The Spanish Journal of Psychology11.26–35.10.1017/S113874160000408X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S113874160000408X [Google Scholar]
  2. Cahill, Michael
    2014 “Non-linguistic factors in orthographies”. InCahill and Rice, eds 2014: 9–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cahill, Michael and Keren Rice
    eds. 2014Developing Orthographies for Unwritten Languages. SIL International (Dallas, Texas).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chomsky, Carol
    1970 “Reading, writing, and phonology”. Harvard Educational Review40.287–310.10.17763/haer.40.2.y7u0242x76w05624
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.40.2.y7u0242x76w05624 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle
    1968The Sound Pattern of English. Harper & Row (New York).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cole, Michael and Jennifer
    2006 Rethinking the Goody myth. InD. R. Olson and M. Cole, eds, Technology, Literacy, and the Evolution of Society: implications of the work of Jack Goody, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Mahwah, N.J.).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DeFrancis, John
    1984The Chinese Language: fact and fantasy. University of Hawai’i Press (Honolulu).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1989Visible Speech: the diverse oneness of writing systems. University of Hawai’i Press (Honolulu).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Frantz, Donald G.
    1978 “Abstractness of phonology and Blackfoot orthography design”. InWilliam C. McCormack and Stephen A. Wurm, eds, Approaches to Language: anthropological issues, pp.307–26. Mouton (the Hague).10.1515/9783110800036.307
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800036.307 [Google Scholar]
  10. Goody, Jack
    1977The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Goody, Jack and Ian Watt
    1963 The consequences of literacy. Comparative Studies in Society and History5.304–45. Reprinted inGoody, ed., Literacy in Traditional Societies, Cambridge University Press 1968, and inP. P. Giglioli, ed., Language and Social Context: selected readings, Penguin (Harmondsworth, Mddx) 1972.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Halle, Morris
    1959The Sound Pattern of Russian. Mouton (the Hague).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hannas, William
    1997Asia’s Orthographic Dilemma. University of Hawai’i Press (Honolulu).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2003The Writing on the Wall: how Asian orthography curbs creativity. University of Pittsburgh Press (Philadelphia).10.9783/9780812202168
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812202168 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones, Daniel
    1944The Phonetic Aspect of Spelling Reform. Simplified Spelling Society pamphlet no. 8. Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons (London).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1967The Phoneme: its nature and use (3rd edn). Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. McBride, Catherine, Xiuhong Tong, and Jianhong Mo
    2015 Developmental dyslexia in Chinese. InW. S. -Y. Wang and Chaofen Sun, eds, The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mattingly, Ignatius
    1972 Reading, the linguistic process, and linguistic awareness. InJ. F. Kavanagh and I. G. Mattingly, eds, Language by Ear and Eye, MIT Press (Cambridge, Mass.).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. OECD
    OECD 2016PISA 2015: results in focus. Online at www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf, accessed7 Dec 2016.10.1787/aa9237e6‑en
    https://doi.org/10.1787/aa9237e6-en [Google Scholar]
  20. Peng, Dan-ling and Jiang, Hua
    2006 “Naming of Chinese phonograms: from cognitive science to cognitive neuroscience”. InPing Li et al., eds 2006: 346–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Perea, Manuel and Eva Rosa
    2000 “The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification tasks: a review”. Psicológica21.327–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pike, Kenneth L.
    1947Phonemics: a technique for reducing languages to writing. University of Michigan Press (Ann Arbor).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ping, Li et al.
    eds. 2006The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics, vol. 1: Chinese. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Powell, Barry
    1991Homer and the Origin of the Greek Alphabet. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511552700
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511552700 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ripman, Walter and William Archer
    1948New Spelling (6th edn). Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons (London).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sampson, Geoffrey
    1994 Chinese script and the diversity of writing systems. Linguistics32.117–32.10.1515/ling.1994.32.1.117
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.1.117 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2015Writing Systems (2nd edn). Equinox (Sheffield).
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schuessler, Axel
    2007ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. University of Hawai’i Press (Honolulu).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Shu, Hua and Wu, Ningning
    2006 “Growth of orthography-phonology knowledge in the Chinese writing system”. InPing Li et al., eds 2006: 103–13. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
  30. Snider, Keith
    2014 “Orthography and phonological depth”. InCahill and Rice 2014: 27–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Taylor, Insup and M. Martin
    1983The Psychology of Reading. Academic Press (New York).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Trudgill, Peter
    2011Sociolinguistic Typology: social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Yeshaya, Joachim J. M. S.
    2014 “In the name of the God of Israel: Judeo-Arabic language and literature”. InJohannes den Heijer, Andrea Schmidt, and Tamara Pataridze, eds, Scripts Beyond Borders: a survey of allographic traditions in the Euro-Mediterranean world, 527–38. Institut Orientaliste de l’Université Catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhao, Jing, Li Qing-Lin, and Bi Hong-Yan
    2012 “The characteristics of Chinese orthographic neighborhood size effect for developing readers”. PLOS ONE8Oct 2012; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046922.
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046922 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error