1887
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6732
  • E-ISSN: 1570-6001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper addresses two closely related topics for understanding the highly fungible nature of written Japanese. The first is to consider the relative merits of the notions of graphematic representation and orthography with respect to the Japanese writing system (JWS). The second issue is to advocate an inclusive notion of intentionality, which together with the notion of conventionality, provides an approach to thinking about the pervasive nature of graphematic variation within the JWS. Accordingly, the principle Japanese orthographic conventions are outlined in Part 3, while the more substantive Part 4 presents a tentative classification of the various factors of intentionality that also exert considerable influence over contemporary written Japanese.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00028.joy
2020-03-30
2020-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ariga, Chieko
    (1989) The playful gloss: Rubi in Japanese literature. Monumenta Nipponica, 44(3), 309–335. 10.2307/2384611
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2384611 [Google Scholar]
  2. Asahi, Shimbun
    (2019) Asahi shimbun no yōgo no tebiki: Kaitei shinpan [Asahi Newspaper’s terminology handbook: Revised edition]. Tokyo: Asahi Shimbun Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Backhaus, Peter
    (2018, November5). A hiragana-kanji mix can make reading a lot easier. Japan Times. Retrieved fromhttps://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2018/11/05/language/hiragana-kanji-mix-can-make-reading-lot-easier/#.W-H4ZJMzaMp
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Backhouse, A. E.
    (1984) Aspects of the graphological structure of Japanese. Visible Language, 18(3), 219–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brumberger, Eva R.
    (2003) The rhetoric of typography: The persona of typeface and text. Technical Communication, 50(2), 206–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bunkachō [Agency for Cultural Affairs]
    Bunkachō [Agency for Cultural Affairs] (2010) Jōyōkanjihyō [Jōyō kanji list]. Available atkokugo.bunka.go.jp/kokugo_nihongo/joho/kijun/naikaku/pdf/joyokanjihyo_20101130.pdf (13 September, 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coulmas, Florian
    (1996) The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2013) Writing and society: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies, Eirlys E.
    (1987) Eyeplay: On some uses of non-standard spelling. Language and Communication, 7(1), 47–58. 10.1016/0271‑5309(87)90013‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(87)90013-9 [Google Scholar]
  10. Desbordes, Françoise
    (1997) The notion of orthography: A Latin inheritance. InClotilde Pontecorvo (ed.), Writing development: An interdisciplinary view, 117–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.6.10des
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.6.10des [Google Scholar]
  11. Gottlieb, Nanette
    (1995) Kanji politics: Language policy and Japanese script (Japanese Studies). London: Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Igarashi, Yuko
    (2007) The changing role of katakana in the Japanese writing system: Processing and pedagogical dimensions for native speakers and foreign learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. International Phonetic Alphabet
    International Phonetic Alphabet. www.internationalphoneticalphabet.org/
  14. Iwahara, Akihiko, Takeshi Hatta, & Aiko Maehara
    (2003) The effects of a sense of compatibility between type of script and word in written Japanese. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 377–397. 10.1023/A:1023668804595
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023668804595 [Google Scholar]
  15. Joyce, Terry
    (2011) The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. doi:  10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [Google Scholar]
  16. (2016) Writing systems and scripts. InAndrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (eds.), Verbal communication, 287–308. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:  10.1515/9783110255478‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016 [Google Scholar]
  17. Joyce, Terry, & Susanne R. Borgwaldt
    (2011) Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. doi:  10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy [Google Scholar]
  18. Joyce, Terry, Bor Hodošček, & Kikuko Nishina
    (2012) Orthographic representation and variation within the Japanese writing system: Some corpus-based observations. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 254–278. doi: 10.1075/wll.15.2.97joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.97joy [Google Scholar]
  19. Joyce, Terry, Bor Hodošček, & Hisashi Masuda
    (2017) Constructing an ontology and database of Japanese lexical properties: Handling the orthographic complexity of the Japanese writing system. Written Language & Literacy, 20(1), 27–51. doi:  10.1075/wll.20.1.03joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.20.1.03joy [Google Scholar]
  20. Joyce, Terry, & Hisashi Masuda
    (2018) Introduction to the multi-script Japanese writing system and word processing. InHye Pae (ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages, 179–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bpa.7.09joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.7.09joy [Google Scholar]
  21. Katz, Leonard, & Ram Frost
    (1992) The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. InRam Frost & Leonard Katz (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning, 67–84. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 10.1016/S0166‑4115(08)62789‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62789-2 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kess, Joseph F., & Tadao Miyamoto
    (1999) The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Konno, Shinji
    (2013) Seishohō no nai nihongo [The Japanese language lacks orthography]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lurie, David B.
    (2012) The development of writing in Japan. InS. D. Houston (ed.), The shape of script: How and why writing systems change, 159–185. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Maekawa, Kikuo, Makoto Yamazaki, Toshinobu Ogiso, Takeiko Maruyama, Hideki Ogura, Wakako Kashino, Hanae Koiso, Masaya Yamaguchi & Yasuharu Den
    (2013) Balanced corpus of contemporary written Japanese. Language Resources and Evaluation, 1–27. doi:  10.1007/s10579‑013‑9261‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-013-9261-0 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mainichi Shimbun
    Mainichi Shimbun (2015) Mainichi shimbun yōgoshū [Mainichi Newpaper’s glossary]. Tokyo: Mainichi Shimbun.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Miller, Laura
    (2011) Subversive script and novel graphs in Japanese girls’ culture. Language & Communication, 31(1), 16–26. doi:  10.1016/j.langcom.2010.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2010.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology-Japan
    Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology-Japan (1954) Rōmaji no tsudurikata [Rōmaji spelling]. Available atwww.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/nc/k19541209001/k19541209001.html (13 September, 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology-Japan
    Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology-Japan (1986) Gendai kanazukai [Modern kana usage]. Available atwww.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/nc/t19860701002/t19860701002.html (13 September, 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Neef, Martin
    (2012) Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4(2), 214–228. doi:  10.1080/17586801.2012.706658
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.706658 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2015) Writing systems as modular objects: Proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics, 1, 708–721. doi:  10.1515/opli‑2015‑0026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0026 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ogura, Hideki, Toshinobu Ogiso, Hanae Koiso, Yutaka Hara, & Sayaka Miyauchi
    (2010, March). Keitaiso kaiseki jisho UniDic ni okeru goiso midashi no rikkō hōshin [Criteria for the lemmatization of UniDic], Tokuteiryōiki kenkyū “nihongo kōpasu” heisei 21 nendo kōkai wākushoppu (Kenkyū seika hōkokukai) yokōshū [Priority-Area Research “Japanese Corpus”: Proceedings of the 2010 public workshop]. Tokyo: General Headquarters, Priority-Area Research “Japanese Corpus”.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Robertson, Wes
    (2015) Orthography, foreigners, and fluency: Indexicality and script selection in Japanese manga. Japanese Studies, 35(2), 205–222. doi:  10.1080/10371397.2015.1080594
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2015.1080594 [Google Scholar]
  34. Robertson, Wesley C.
    (2017) He’s more katakana than kanji: Indexing identity and self-presentation through script selection in Japanese manga (comics). Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(4), 497–520. doi:  10.1111/josl.12246
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12246 [Google Scholar]
  35. Rogers, Henry
    (2005) Writing systems: A linguistic approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sampson, Geoffrey
    (2015) Writing systems (Second edn.). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanseidō
    Sanseidō (2016) Jisho o amu hito ga erabu ‘Kotoshi no shingo 2016’ [This year’s new words 2016: People who edit dictionaries selected]. Retrieved fromhttps://dictionary.sanseido-publ.co.jp/topic/shingo2016/2016Best10.html
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sebba, Mark
    (2007) Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486739
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486739 [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, Janet S.
    (1996) Japanese writing. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 209–217. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Smith, Janet S. (Shibamoto), & David L. Schmidt
    (1996) Variability in written Japanese: Towards a sociolinguistics of script choice. Visible Language, 30(1), 47–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Taylor, Insup, & M. Martin Taylor
    (2014) Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edn.) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy, 14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tranter, Nicolas
    (2008) Nonconventional script choice in Japan. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 133–151. doi:  10.1515/IJSL.2008.040
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.040 [Google Scholar]
  43. Weingarten, Rüdiger
    (2011) Comparative graphematics. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 12–38. doi:  10.1075/wll.14.1.02wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.02wei [Google Scholar]
  44. Wetzel, Patricia J.
    (2018) Resonance in Japanese advertising: The union of text and image. International Journal of the Image, 9(2), 7–22. doi:  10.18848/2154‑8560/CGP/v09i02/7‑22
    https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8560/CGP/v09i02/7-22 [Google Scholar]
  45. Yomiuri Shimbun
    Yomiuri Shimbun (2017) Yomiuri shimbun yōjiyōgo no tebiki: Dai-5-han [Yomiuri Newspaper’s shimbun character and terminology handbook: 5th edn.]. Tokyo: Chūōkōron Shinsha.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00028.joy
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00028.joy
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error