Connective frequencies in child-directed texts

References

1. Alfonseca, Enrique, Slaven Bilac & Stefan Pharies
   (2008) German Decompounding in a Difficult Corpus. InAlexander Gelbukh (ed.), Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, 9th International Conference CICLing 2008 Proceedings, 128–139. Berlin: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arina, Sonia, Susan Gathercole & Giacomo Stella
   (2015) The role of working memory in early phases of learning to read. Applied Psychology Bulletin273(64): 31–52.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baayen, R. Harald, Rudolf Piepenbrock & Leon Gulikers
   (1995) CELEX2 LDC96L14. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baques, Joseph & Dolores Saiz
   (1999) Simple and complex measures of working memory related with learning to read. Psicotema11(4): 737–745.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bloom, Lois, Margaret Lahey, Lois Hood, Karin Lifter & Kathleen Fiess
   (1980) Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language7(02): 235–261. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900002610
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900002610 [Google Scholar]
6. Brown, R.
   (1973) A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674732469
   https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 [Google Scholar]
7. Cain, Kate & Hannah M. Nash
   (2011) The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology103(2): 429–441. doi:  10.1037/a0022824
   https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022824 [Google Scholar]
8. Cain, Kate, Jane Oakhill & Kate Lemmon
   (2004) Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology96(4): 671–681. 10.1037/0022‑0663.96.4.671
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671 [Google Scholar]
9. Cain, Kate, Nikole Patson & Leanne Andrews
   (2005) Age- and ability-related differences in young readers’ use of conjunctions. Journal of Child Language32(04): 877–892. doi:  10.1017/S0305000905007014
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000905007014 [Google Scholar]
10. Collins COBUILD English dictionary
    Collins COBUILD English dictionary (1995) London: Harper Collins.
11. Degand, Liesbeth & Ted J. Sanders
    (2002) The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing15(7/8): 739–757. doi:  10.1023/A:1020932715838
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020932715838 [Google Scholar]
12. De Zeeuw, Marlies, Franc Grootjen, Gerrit Jan Kootstra, & Agnes Tellings
    (2019) Lexical characteristics of written language input across primary grades: An analysis of a Dutch corpus based lexicon. Linguistics and education, 49: 11–21. 10.1016/j.linged.2018.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.12.002 [Google Scholar]
13. Diessel, Holger
    (2004) The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486531
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486531 [Google Scholar]
14. Divjak, Dagmar S., Ewa Dabrowska & Antti Arppe
    (2016) Machine meets man. Evaluating the psychological reality of corpus-based probabilistic models. Cognitive Linguistics27(1): 1–33. doi:  10.1515/cog‑2015‑0101
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0101 [Google Scholar]
15. E-ANS
    E-ANS (2017) Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, een grammatica van het Nederlands. https://ans.ruhosting.nl/
16. Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline & Ted J. Sanders
    (2009) The emergence of Dutch connectives; how cumulative cognitive complexity explains the order of acquisition. Journal of Child Language36(04): 829–854. doi:  10.1017/S0305000908009227
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908009227 [Google Scholar]
17. Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline & Ted J. Sanders
    (2011) Discovering domains – On the acquisition of causal connectives. Journal of Pragmatics43(6): 1645–1662. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.015 [Google Scholar]
18. Fayol, Michel
    (1991) Stories: A psycholinguistic and ontogenic approach to the acquisition of narrative abilities. InGilberte Pierraut Le Bonniec & Marlene Dolitsky (eds), From basic language to discourse basis processing, 229–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.17.18fay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.17.18fay [Google Scholar]
19. Fayol, Michel & Serge Mouchon
    (1997) Production and comprehension of connectives in the written modality: A study of written French. InClotilde Pontecorvo (ed.), Writing development: An interdisciplinary view, 193–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.6.15fay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.6.15fay [Google Scholar]
20. Frishkoff, Gwen A., Charles A. Perfetti & Kevyn Collins-Thompson
    (2011) Predicting robust vocabulary growth from measures of incremental learning. Scientific Studies of Reading15(1): 71–91. 10.1080/10888438.2011.539076
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.539076 [Google Scholar]
21. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan, R.
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kail, Michèle & Jürgen Weissenborn
    (1984) A developmental cross-linguistic study of adversative connectives: French ‘mais’ and German ‘aber/sondern’. Journal of Child Language11(01): 143–158. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900005638
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900005638 [Google Scholar]
23. Keller-Cohen, Deborah
    (1986) Context and strategy in acquiring temporal connectives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research16(2): 165–183. 10.1007/BF01072000
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072000 [Google Scholar]
24. Knoepke, Julia, Tobias Richter, Maj-Britt Isberner, Johannes Naumann, Yvonne Neeb & Sabine Weinert
    (2017) Processing of positive-causal and negative-causal coherence relations in primary school children and adults: a test of the cumulative cognitive complexity approach in German. Journal of child language44(2): 297–328. 10.1017/S0305000915000872
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000872 [Google Scholar]
25. Massaro, Dominic
    (2015) Two different communication genres and implications for vocabulary development and learning to read. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(4): 505–527. 10.1177/1086296X15627528
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X15627528 [Google Scholar]
26. McCabe, Allyssa & Carole Peterson
    (1985) A naturalistic study of the production of causal connectives by children. Journal of Child Language12(01): 145–159. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900006280
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900006280 [Google Scholar]
27. McClure, Erica & Esther Geva
    (1983) The development of the cohesive use of adversative conjunctions in discourse. Discourse Processes6(4): 411–432. doi:  10.1080/01638538309544575
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538309544575 [Google Scholar]
28. McKee, Gerard, David Malvern & Brian Richards
    (2000) Measuring vocabulary diversity using dedicated software. Literary and Linguistic Computing15(3): 323–338. 10.1093/llc/15.3.323
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/15.3.323 [Google Scholar]
29. Miller, Paul F.
    (2000) Syntactic and semantic processing in Hebrew readers with prelingual deafness. American Annals of the Deaf145(5): 436–451. 10.1353/aad.2012.0116
    https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2012.0116 [Google Scholar]
30. Peterson, Carole
    (1986) Semantic and pragmatic uses of ‘but’. Journal of Child Language13(03): 583–590. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900006905
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900006905 [Google Scholar]
31. Peterson, Carole & Mccabe, Allyssa
    (1987) The connective ‘and’: Do older children use it less as they learn other connectives?Journal of Child Language14(02): 375–381. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900012988
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012988 [Google Scholar]
32. Sanders, Ted J., Spooren, W. P. & Leo G. Noordman
    (1992) Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes15(1): 1–35. doi:  10.1080/01638539209544800
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544800 [Google Scholar]
33. Sanders, Ted J., Wilbert P. Spooren & Leo G. Noordman
    (1993) Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Cognitive Linguistics4(2): 93–134. doi:  10.1515/cogl.1993.4.2.93
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.2.93 [Google Scholar]
34. Spooren, Wilbert P. & Ted J. Sanders
    (2008) The acquisition order of coherence relations: On cognitive complexity in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics40(12): 2003–2026. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.021 [Google Scholar]
35. Stahl, Steven A.
    (2003) Words are learned incrementally over multiple exposures. American Educator27(spring): 18–22.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Stevenson, Rosemary J. & Caroline Pollitt
    (1987) The acquisition of temporal terms. Journal of Child Language14(03): 533–545. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900010278
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900010278 [Google Scholar]
37. Taylor, Talbot J. & Stuart Shanker
    (2003) Rethinking language acquisition: what the child learns. InHayley G. Davis & Talbot J. Taylor (eds.), Rethinking linguistics, 151–170. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tellings, Agnes E. J. M., Micha Hulsbosch, Anne Vermeer & Antal van den Bosch
    (2014) BasiLex: an 11.5 million word corpus of Dutch texts written for children. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands, 4: 191–208.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tomasello, M.
    (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Van Dale Groot Woordenboek van de Nederlandse Taal, 14e edition
    Van Dale Groot Woordenboek van de Nederlandse Taal, 14e edition (2005) Utrecht: Van Dale Lexicografie. [Van Dale Large Dictionary of the Dutch Language]
41. Van den Bosch, Antal, Bertjan Busser, Sander Canisius & Walter Daelemans
    (2007) An efficient memory-based morphosyntactic tagger and parser for Dutch. InF. van Eynde, P. Dirix, Ineke Schuurman & Vincent Vandeghinste (eds.), Selected Papers of the 17th Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Meeting, 99–114. Leuven, Belgium.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Van Veen, Rosie, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, Ted J. Sanders & Huub van den Bergh
    (2009) Parental input and connective acquisition: A growth curve analysis. First Language29(3): 266–288. doi:  10.1177/0142723708101679
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723708101679 [Google Scholar]
43. Verhoeven, Ludo, Jan van Leeuwe & Anne Vermeer
    (2011) Vocabulary growth and reading development across the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading15(1): 8–25. 10.1080/10888438.2011.536125
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.536125 [Google Scholar]
44. Verhoeven, Ludo & Anne Vermeer
    (1992) Woordenschat van leerlingen in het basis- en MLK-onderwijs. Pedagogische Studieën69(3): 218–234.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Vermeer, Anne
    (2017) Acquisition order of connectives in stories of Dutch L1 and L2 children from 4 to 8. InElena Tribushinina, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Laurent Rasier (eds.), Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and language teaching, 191–206. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501505492‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505492-009 [Google Scholar]
46. Wald, Benji
    (1986) Syntactic development after childhood: beyond the vernacular?InDavid Sankoff (ed.), Diversity and Diachrony, 153–172. Amsterdam; John Benjamins Publishing co.. 10.1075/cilt.53.15wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.53.15wal [Google Scholar]
47. Whaley, Lindsay J.
    (1997) Introduction to typology: the unity and diversity of language. Newbury Park: Sage. 10.4135/9781452233437
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233437 [Google Scholar]
48. Wing, Clara S. & Ellin Kofsky Scholnick
    (1981) Children’s comprehension of pragmatic concepts expressed in ‘because’, ‘although’, ‘if’ and ‘unless’. Journal of Child Language8(02): 347–365. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900003238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900003238 [Google Scholar]