1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6732
  • E-ISSN: 1570-6001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present study examines unintentional spelling errors on past participles produced by Flemish teenagers in private online writing. Previous psycholinguistic research on verb spelling errors in Dutch mainly focused on homophones (Bosman 2005Frisson & Sandra 2002Sandra et al. 1999). The present study, however, deals with past participles that are only partially homophonous with other forms in the inflectional paradigm and investigates whether the spelling of these verbs is affected by whole-word frequency, paradigmatic and bigram support for the correct spelling and the token frequency of the past participles’ morphological family. The error rates reflect the effect of both paradigmatic and bigram support. Moreover, the unique database makes it possible to analyze the impact of three social factors ( and ). Our results reveal an effect on the error rates of all social variables. Finally, these social factors do not interact with paradigmatic and bigram support.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00046.sur
2021-12-10
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, J.
    (2011) Language change and digital media: a review of conceptions and evidence. InT. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp.145–161). Oslo: Novus.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, R. H.
    (2014) Multivariate Statistics. InR. Podesva, & D. Sharma (Eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics (pp.337–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139013734.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013734.018 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L.
    (1995) The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67: 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bosman, A. M. T.
    (2005) Development of rule-based verb spelling in Dutch students. Written Language & Literacy8: 1–18. 10.1075/wll.8.1.01bos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.01bos [Google Scholar]
  6. Chamalaun, R., Bosman, A., & Ernestus, M.
    (2021) The Role of Grammar in Spelling Homophonous Regular Verbs. Written Language & Literacy. 10.1075/wll.00047.cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00047.cha [Google Scholar]
  7. Coates, J.
    (1993) Woman, men and language. A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cumming, G.
    (2012) Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Routledge / Taylor & Francis Group. differences in language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ernestus, M., & Mak, W. M.
    (2005) Analogical effects in reading Dutch verb forms. Memory & Cognition33: 1160–1173. 10.3758/BF03193220
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193220 [Google Scholar]
  10. Falkauskas, K., & Kuperman, V.
    (2015) When experience meets language statistics: Individual variability in processing English compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition41: 1607.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fox, J., & Monette, G.
    (1992) Generalized collinearity diagnostics. JASA, 87: 178–183. 10.1080/01621459.1992.10475190
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475190 [Google Scholar]
  12. Frisson, S., & Sandra, D.
    (2002) Homophonic Forms of Regularly Inflected Verbs Have Their Own Orthographic Representations: A Developmental Perspective on Spelling Errors. Brain and Language81: 545–554. 10.1006/brln.2001.2546
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2546 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gahl, S., & Plag, I.
    (2019) Spelling errors in English derivational suffixes reflect morphological boundary strength: A case study. The Mental Lexicon14: 1–36. 10.1075/ml.19002.gah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.19002.gah [Google Scholar]
  14. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L.
    (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed.New York: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hastie, T. J., Tibshirani, R., & Tibshirani, R. J.
    (2017) Extended Comparisons of Best Subset Selection, Forward Stepwise Selection, and the Lasso.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hilte, L.
    (2019) The social in social media writing: The impact of age, gender and social class indicators on adolescents’ informal online writing practices. Antwerp: University of Antwerp (doctoral thesis).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hilte, L., Daelemans, W., & Vandekerckhove, R.
    (2020a) Lexical patterns in adolescents’ online writing: The impact of age, gender, and education. Written Communication37: 365–400. 10.1177/0741088320917921
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320917921 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R., & Daelemans, W.
    (2018) Adolescents’ social background and non-standard writing in online communication. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics7: 2–25. 10.1075/dujal.17018.hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.17018.hil [Google Scholar]
  19. Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R. & Daelemans, W.
    (2020b) Modeling adolescents’ online practices: The sociolectometry of non-standard writing on social media. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik87: 173–201. 10.25162/zdl‑2020‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2020-0007 [Google Scholar]
  20. Holmes, J.
    (1992) An introduction to sociolinguistics. London / New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
    (2010) SUBTLEX-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods42: 643–650. 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.643 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuperman, V.,
    (2021) Prevalence of spelling errors affect reading behavior across languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 1–61. 10.1037/xge0001038
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001038 [Google Scholar]
  23. Labov, W.
    (2001) Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ouellette, G., Martin-Chang, S., & Rossi, M.
    (2017) Learning from our mistakes: Improvements in spelling lead to gains in reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21: 350–357. 10.1080/10888438.2017.1306064
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1306064 [Google Scholar]
  25. Perfetti, C. A.
    (2007) Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension. Scientific studies of reading11: 357–383. 10.1080/10888430701530730
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730 [Google Scholar]
  26. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L.
    (2002) The lexical quality hypothesis. Precursors of functional literacy11: 67–86. 10.1075/swll.11.14per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.11.14per [Google Scholar]
  27. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rahmanian, S., & Kuperman, V.
    (2019) Spelling errors impede recognition of correctly spelled word forms. Scientific Studies of Reading23: 24–36. 10.1080/10888438.2017.1359274
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1359274 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rossi, M., Martin-Chang, S., & Ouellette, G.
    (2019) Exploring the space between good and poor spelling: Orthographic quality and reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading23: 192–201. 10.1080/10888438.2018.1508213
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1508213 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sandra, D.
    (2010) Homophone Dominance at the Whole-word and Sub-word Levels: Spelling Errors Suggest Full-form Storage of Regularly Inflected Verb Forms. Language and Speech53: 405–444. 10.1177/0023830910371459
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910371459 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sandra, D., & Van Abbenyen, L.
    (2009) Frequency and analogical effects in the spelling of full-form and sublexical homophonous patterns by 12 year-old children. The Mental Lexicon4: 239–275. 10.1075/ml.4.2.04san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.4.2.04san [Google Scholar]
  32. Sandra, D., Frisson, S., & Daems, F.
    (1999) Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: the influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch. Brain and Language68: 277–283. 10.1006/brln.1999.2108
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2108 [Google Scholar]
  33. Schmitz, T., Chamalaun, R., & Ernestus, M.
    (2018) The Dutch verb-spelling paradox in social media. A corpus study. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 111–124. 10.1075/avt.00008.sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00008.sch [Google Scholar]
  34. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
    (1997) How Complex Simplex Words can be. Journal of Memory and Language37: 118–139. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2510
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2510 [Google Scholar]
  35. Surkyn, H., Vandekerckhove, R., & Sandra, D.
    (2019) Errors Outside the Lab: The Interaction of a Psycholinguistic and a Sociolinguistic Variable in the Production of Verb Spelling Errors in Informal Computer-Mediated Communication. InJ. Longhi & C. Marinica (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities (CMC-Corpora2019) (pp.59–62). Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2020) From experiment to real-life data: social factors determine the rate of spelling errors on rule-governed verb homophones but not the size of the homophone dominance effect. The Mental Lexicon15: 422–463. 10.1075/ml.20006.sur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20006.sur [Google Scholar]
  37. Tagliamonte, S.
    (2011) Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2016) Teen talk: The language of adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139583800
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583800 [Google Scholar]
  39. Van den Bergh, H. & van Es, A., & Spijker, S.
    (2011) Spelling op verschillendeniveaus: werkwoordspelling aan het einde van de basisschool en het einde van het voorgezet onderwijs. [Spelling at different levels: verb spelling at the end of primary school and at the end of secondary education]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift12: 3–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Van der Horst, M., van den Bergh, H., & Evers-Vermeul, J.
    (2012) Kunnen leerlingen wat ze moeten kunnen? Onderzoek naar de doorlopende leerlijn op het gebied van werkwoordspelling. [Can students do what they need to be able to do? Research into the continuous learning line in the field of verb spelling]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift2: 33–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Vandekerckhove, R., & Nobels, J.
    (2010) Code eclecticism: linguistic variation and code alternation in the chat language of Flemish teenagers. Journal of sociolinguistics14: 657–677. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2010.00458.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00458.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Verhaert, N., & Sandra, D.
    (2016) Homofoondominantie veroorzaakt dt-fouten tijdens het spellen en maakt er ons blind voor tijdens het lezen. [Homophone dominance causes dt-errors during spelling and makes us blind to them while reading]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift17: 37–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Verhaert, N., Danckaert, E., & Sandra, D.
    (2016) The dual role of homophone dominance. Why homophone intrusions on regular verb forms so often go unnoticed. The Mental Lexicon11: 1–25. 10.1075/ml.11.1.01ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.11.1.01ver [Google Scholar]
  44. VVKSO
    VVKSO (2006) Leerplan Nederlands secundair onderwijs bso. [Curriculum Dutch secondary education bso]. Brussel: Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Secundair Onderwijs. Retrieved from: ond.vvkso-ict.com/leerplannen/doc/Nederlands-2006-020.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  45. VVKSO
    VVKSO (2014) Leerplan Nederlands secundair onderwijs aso-kso-tso. [Curriculum Dutch secondary education aso-kso-tso]. Brussel: Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Secundair Onderwijs. Retrieved from: ond.vvkso-ict.com/leerplannen/doc/Nederlands-2014-001.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Zipf, G. K.
    (1949) Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00046.sur
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00046.sur
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error