1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6732
  • E-ISSN: 1570-6001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper discusses the impact of several spelling changes in Croatian on the level of the literacy of native speakers. Since 1986, there have been five official recommendations for usage that pertain to five different orthographic manuals. This research focuses on three spelling points with considerable identity-related repercussions among the public and the media, which are sometimes named the spelling symbols of Croatian. A questionnaire-survey comprised of 36 tests was completed among 1063 students on a technical study programme each year for eight consecutive academic years. Eight generations of first-year undergraduates, who do not study language in an educational setting, have accepted the new spellings, contingent on a frequency principle. The more frequent a spelling variant occurs, the less the chance that the new spelling variant is accepted, and vice versa. Given the lack of established and enduring spelling norms, combined with ideological oppositions between the old and new spelling forms, students have been guided mainly by their capacity to write the most common form.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00049.sto
2021-12-10
2022-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aladrović, Katarina
    (2008) Kompetencije učenika prvog razreda u poznavanju pravopisa na kraju školske godine. In: Metodika: časopis za teoriju i praksu metodikâ u predškolskom odgoju, školskoj i visokoškolskoj izobrazbi 2008:9(16), 39–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alerić, Marko & Gazdić-Alerić, Tamara
    (2009) Pozitivan stav prema hrvatskome standardnom jeziku kao uvjet njegova uspješnijega ovladavanja. In: Lahor : časopis za hrvatski kao materinski, drugi i strani jezik, 1(7), Zagreb: Hrvatsko filološko društvo, 5–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anić, Vladimir
    (2004) Veliki rječnik hrvatskoga jezika [The Great Dictionary of Croatian]. Edited byLjiljana Jojić. Zagreb: Novi Liber.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Aram, Dorit, Korat, Ofra
    (eds.) (2010) Literacy Development and Enhancement across Orthographies and Cultures. New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑0834‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6 [Google Scholar]
  5. AS: Anić, Vladimir & Silić, Josip
    (1986) Pravopisni priručnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika, Sveučilišna naklada Liber – Školska knjiga, Zagreb 11986, 21987, 31990, Pravopis hrvatskoga jezika, Novi Liber – Školska knjiga: Zagreb 42001.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Asmussen, Jørg
    (2006) Towards a methodology for corpus-based studies of linguistic change. Contrastive observations and their possible diachronic interpretations in the Korpus 2000 and Korpus 90 Corpora of Danish. InD. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson (eds.), Corpus linguistics around the world, Amsterdam/New York: Brill
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Babić, Stjepan
    (2005) Temelji Hrvatskomu pravopisu [Foundations to the Croatian Orthographic manual]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Babić, Stjepan & Ham, Sanda
    (2004) Pravopisni rat. Komentirana bibliografija publicističkih članaka o hrvatskom pravopisu objavljenih u 2000. i 2001. godini [The Orthographic War. Commented Bibliography of Newspaper Articles about the Croatian Orthography Published in 2000 and 2001]. In: Jezik51(3)-52(3). Zagreb: Hrvatsko filološko društvo
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Badurina, Lada
    (2018) Pravopisne studije [Studies on Orthography]. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bakota, Lidija
    (2011) Pravopisna norma u udžbenicima. In: Jezik58(4). Zagreb: Hrvatsko filološko društvo, 135–149
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Barbaroša-Šikić, Mirela & Češi, Marijana
    (2010) Praćenje, vrednovanje i ocjenjivanje pisanih radova učenika. InHrvatski jezik u kontekstu suvremenog obrazovanja. Edited byM. Češi. Zagreb: Naklada Slap
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bašić, Nataša
    (2014) Jezični identiteti nesrpskih naroda u velikosrpskom programu državnoga sjedinjenja. In: Hrvatska revija3. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, 28–37
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bermel, Nigel
    (2007) Linguistic Authority, Language Ideology and Metaphor. The Czech Orthography Wars. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bežen, Ante
    (2005) Problem različitosti i standarda u početnom pisanju. In: Metodika: časopis za teoriju i praksu metodikâ u predškolskom odgoju, školskoj i visokoškolskoj izobrazbi 2005:6(2), 210–227
    [Google Scholar]
  15. BFM: Babić, Stjepan & Finka, Božidar & Moguš, Milan
    (1994) Hrvatski pravopis, 2nd ed., Zagreb 11971 (forbidden). Reprints: London 1972, 1984 and Zagreb: Školska knjiga 1990 Further editionsZagreb: Školska knjiga 31995, 41996, 52000, 62002, 72003, 82004, 92006.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. BHM: Babić, Stjepan & Ham, Sanda & Moguš, Milan
    (2005) Hrvatski školski pravopis, 1st ed.Zagreb: Školska knjiga22008, 32009, 42012.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BM: Babić, Stjepan & Moguš, Milan
    (2010) Hrvatski pravopis : usklađen sa zaključcima Vijeća za normu hrvatskoga standardnog jezika [Croatian Orthograpy : complied with the conclusions of the Council for the Norms of the Croatian Standard Language]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga 22011
    [Google Scholar]
  18. BMM: Badurina, Lada & Marković, Ivan & Mićanović, Krešimir
    (2007) Hrvatski pravopis [The Croatian Orthography], 1st ed.Zagreb: Matica hrvatska22008.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Coulmas, Florian & Guerini, Federica
    (2012) Literacy and writing reform. InCambridge Handbooks of Language Policy. Edited byB. Spolsky. Cambridge University Press, 437–460. 10.1017/CBO9780511979026.027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979026.027 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ćužić, Tomislav
    (2015) Pravopisna norma. Teorijsko-metodološki problemi hrvatske pravopisne norme [The Orthographic Norm. Theoretical and methodological problems of the Croatian orthographic norm]. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Daskalov, Roumen & Marinov, Tchavdar
    (eds.) (2013) Entangled Histories of the Balkans. Volume One: National Ideologies and Language Policies. Leiden – Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004250765
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004250765 [Google Scholar]
  22. Eaden, Jayne & Mayberry, Margaret K. & Mayberry, John F.
    (1999) Questionnaires: the use and abuse of social survey methods in medical research. In: Postgraduate Medical Journal75(885), 397–400. 10.1136/pgmj.75.885.397
    https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.75.885.397 [Google Scholar]
  23. Garcez, Pedro M.
    (1995) The Debatable 1990 Luso-Brazilian Orthographic Accord. In: Language Problems and Language Planning19:2(1995), John Benjamins, 151–178. doi:  10.1075/lplp.19.2.03gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.19.2.03gar [Google Scholar]
  24. Greenberg, Robert D.
    (2004) Language and Identity in the Balkans. Serbo-Croatian and its Disintegration. Oxford University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Grgić, Ana & Udier, Sanda L.
    (2012) Pravopisna kompetencija na razini B1 u hrvatskome kao inome jeziku. In: Lahor: časopis za hrvatski kao materinski, drugi i strani jezik, 2(14), Zagreb: Hrvatsko filološko društvo, 204–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. HAZU
    HAZU: Ljetopis Hrvatske akademija za godinu 2017. [The Yearbook of the Croatian Academy for the year 2017]. Volume121(2018) Principal editor Pavao Rudan. Zagreb: Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hekman, Jelena
    (ed.) (2005) Jezik na križu. Križ na jeziku. Rasprava o pravopisnim pravilima [Language on the Cross. The Cross on language. Debate on orthographic rules]. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hudeček, Lana
    (2010) Pregled suvremenih hrvatskih pravopisa (različita rješenja i terminološka neusklađenost). InHrvatski jezik u kontekstu suvremenog obrazovanja. Edited byM. Češi. Zagreb: Naklada Slap. 42–55
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hudeček, Lana & Mihaljević, Milica
    (2015) Relations between description and prescription in Croatian language manuals. In: Obdobja 34: Slovnica in slovar – aktualni jezikovni opis (1. del) / Grammar and Dictionary – Current language description (Part 1). Ed.Mojca Smolej, ISBN978-961-237-787-8, 299–307
    [Google Scholar]
  30. IHJJ/ŠK
    IHJJ/ŠK 2012: Školski rječnik hrvatskoga jezika [The School Dictionary of Croatian]. Principal editorDunja Brozović Rončević. Zagreb: Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje i Školska knjiga
    [Google Scholar]
  31. IHJJ
    IHJJ 2013: Hrvatski pravopis [Croatian Orthography]. Principal editorŽeljko Jozić. Editors: Goranka Blagus Bartolec, Lana Hudeček, Kristian Lewis, Milica Mihaljević, Ermina Ramadanović. Authors: Željko Jozić, Goranka Blagus Bartolec, Lana Hudeček, Kristian Lewis, Milica Mihaljević, Ermina Ramadanović, Matea Birtić, Jurica Budja, Barbara Kovačević, Ivana Matas Ivanković, Alen Milković, Irena Miloš, Tomislav Stojanov, Kristina Štrkalj Despot. Zagreb: Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Jacobs, Dirk
    (1997) Alliance and Betrayal in the Dutch Orthography Debate. InLanguage Problems and Language Planning21:2(1997), J. Benjamins, 103–118. doi:  10.1075/lplp.21.2.01jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.21.2.01jac [Google Scholar]
  33. Johnson, Sally
    (2005) Spelling Trouble? Language, Ideology and the Reform of German Orthography. Clevedon, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853597862
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597862 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kenjar, Kevin
    (2020) Linguistic Landscapes and Ideological Horizons: Language and Ideology in Post-Yugoslav Space. PhD thesis. Committee in charge: Charles Briggs, Ronelle Alexander, William Hanks. University of California, Berkeley
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Langston, Keith; Peti-Stantić, Anita
    (2011) A language academy by any other name(s) – the case of Croatia. Language Policy (2011) 10:343–360. doi:  10.1007/s10993‑011‑9212‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9212-9 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2014) Language Planning and National Identity in Croatia. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137390608
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137390608 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ljubešić, Nikola; Erjavec, Tomaž
    (2011) hrWaC and slWac: Compiling Web Corpora for Croatian and Slovene. Text, Speech and Dialogue: 14th International Conference, TSD 2011, Pilsen, Czech Republic, September 1–5, 2011. Proceedings. Edited byIvan Habernal and Vaclav Matousek. Springer-Verlag, 395–402
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lydeard, S.
    (1991) The questionnaire as a research tool. Family Practice8(1), 84–91. 10.1093/fampra/8.1.84
    https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/8.1.84 [Google Scholar]
  39. Malatesha Joshi, R. & Aaron, P. G.
    (eds.) (2006) Handbook of orthography and literacy. Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  40. McEnery, Tony
    (2003) Corpus Linguistics. InThe Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Edited byR. Mitkov. Oxford University Press, 448–463
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Moguš, Milan & Bratanić, Maja & Tadić, Marko
    (1999) Hrvatski čestotni rječnik [The Croatian Frequency Dictionary]. Zagreb: Zavod za lingvistiku Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu i Školska knjiga
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Páll, Sándor
    (2009) Beleške uz jedno davno zaboravljenu anketu (Srpski književni glasnik: Anketa o srpsko-hrvatskim odnosima). In: Riječ. Časopis za filologiju15(2), Rijeka: Hrvatsko filološko društvo, 253–267
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Patekar, Jakob
    (2016) Razlike u uporabi pravopisnih znakova u hrvatskome i engleskome jeziku. In: Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje42/I (2016.) Zagreb, 147–166
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Peti-Stantić, Anita & Langston, Keith
    (2013) Hrvatsko jezično pitanje danas. Identiteti i ideologije. Zagreb: srednja europa
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Reljac Fajs, Emilija & Jerković, Tamara
    (2014) Pravopis u razrednoj nastavi hrvatskoga jezika. In: Hrvatski: časopis za teoriju i praksu nastave hrvatskoga jezika, književnosti, govornoga i pismenoga izražavanja te medijske kulture1(XII), 37–55
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sebba, Mark
    (2007) Spelling and societyl. The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486739
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486739 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sinclair, John
    (1982) Reflections on computer corpora in English language research. InComputer corpora in English language research1–6. Edited byS. Johansson. Bergen.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Stojanov, Tomislav
    (2020) A case study in the termination of the pluricentricity of a language: the Serbo-Croatian linguonym. In: European Pluricentric Languages in Contact and Conflict. Edited byRudolf Muhr, Josep Àngel Mas Castells and Jack Rueter. Peter Lang, 155–170
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Stone, D. H.
    (1993) Design a questionnaire. In: British Medical Journal, 307(6914), 1264–1266. 10.1136/bmj.307.6914.1264
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6914.1264 [Google Scholar]
  51. Street, Brian
    (2013) Literacy in Theory and Practice: Challenges and Debates Over 50 Years. In: Theory Into Practice52, 52–62. 10.1080/00405841.2013.795442
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.795442 [Google Scholar]
  52. Škarić, Ivo
    (2005) Ije je je. InJezik na križu. Križ na jeziku. Rasprava o pravopisnim pravilima. Edited byJ. Hekman. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, 80–87
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Šonje
    Šonje 2000: Rječnik hrvatskoga jezika [The Dictionary of Croatian]. Principal editor Jure Šonje. Zagreb: Leksikografski zavod Miroslav Krleža & Školska knjiga
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tadijanović, Dragutin
    (2005) Svi moji pravopisi. InJezik na križu. Križ na jeziku. Rasprava o pravopisnim pravilima. Edited byJ. Hekman. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, 103–105
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Templeton, Shane & Bear, D. R.
    (2013) Development of Orthographic Knowledge and the Foundations of Literacy. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315044545
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315044545 [Google Scholar]
  56. Udier, Sanda L.
    (2016) Glotodidaktički pogled na hrvatski pravopis. In: Strani jezici44(2016) vol2. Zagreb: Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 110–128
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Volenec, Veno
    (2015) Sociolingvističko istraživanje hrvatskoga pravopisa: društveni stavovi o eksplicitnoj normi. In: Jezikoslovlje16.1 (2015), 69–102
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00049.sto
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00049.sto
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error