Areal script form patterns with Chinese characteristics

References

1. Ahn, Jinsu
   (2017) The dynamism of Hangeul’s vertical strokes and the flow of its lines of writing. Visible Language51(3–1): 56–73.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   (2001) Areal diffusion, genetic inheritance, and problems of subgrouping: A North Arawak case study. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, 167–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aronoff, Mark
   (1994) Spelling as culture. InW. C. Watt (ed.), Writing systems and cognition, 67–86. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8285‑8_5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8285-8_5 [Google Scholar]
4. Beckman, Mary E. & Jan Edwards
   (1990) Lengthening and shortening and the nature of prosodic constituency. InJohn Kingston & Mary E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech, 152–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627736.009
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627736.009 [Google Scholar]
5. Berent, Iris
   (2013) The phonological mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences17(7): 319–327. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.004 [Google Scholar]
6. Blevins, Juliette
   (2017) Areal sound patterns: From perceptual magnets to stone soup. InRaymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 88–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107279872.006
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.006 [Google Scholar]
7. Brentari, Diane
   (2011) Sign language phonology. InJohn Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C. L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory (second edition), 691–721. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444343069.ch21
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch21 [Google Scholar]
8. Changizi, Mark A., Qiong Zhang, Hao Ye, & Shinsuke Shimojo
   (2006) The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. The American Naturalist167(5): E117–E139. 10.1086/502806
   https://doi.org/10.1086/502806 [Google Scholar]
9. Daniels, Peter T.
   (2001) Writing systems. InMark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (eds.), The handbook of linguistics, 43–80. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.
    (2001) Areal diffusion versus genetic inheritance: An African perspective. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, 358–392. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Evertz, Martin
    (2018) Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110583441
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441 [Google Scholar]
12. Fuhrhop, Nanna, Franziska Buchmann & Kristian Berg
    (2011) The length hierarchy and the graphematic syllable: Evidence from German and English. Written Language & Literacy14(2): 275–292. 10.1075/wll.14.2.05fuh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.05fuh [Google Scholar]
13. Galambos, Imre
    (2015) Translating Chinese tradition and teaching Tangut culture: Manuscripts and printed books from Khara-Khoto. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110453959
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110453959 [Google Scholar]
14. Gelb, Ignace J.
    (1963) A study of writing (revised edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gong, Hwang-Cherng
    (1982) Chinese elements in the Tangut script. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica53(1): 167–187.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Handel, Zev
    (2019) Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004352223
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223 [Google Scholar]
17. Hansell, Mark
    (2002) Functional answers to structural problems in thinking about writing. InMary S. Erbaugh (ed.), Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing, 124–264. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hargus, Sharon & Ellen M. Kaisse
    (eds.) (1993) Studies in lexical phonology. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jakobson, Roman
    (1931) Über die phonologischen Sprachbünde. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague4: 234–240.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kim, Zong-Su
    (2005) The history and future of Hangeul: Korea’s indigenous script [translated byRoss King]. Folkestone: Global International, Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
21. King, Ross
    (1996) Korean writing. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.) The world’s writing systems, 218–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kohrt, Manfred
    (1986) The term ‘grapheme’ in the history and theory of linguistics. InGerhard Augst (ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography, 80–96. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kychanov, E. I.
    (1996) Tangut. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 228–230, 237. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lee, Chia-Ying, Jie-Li Tsai, Yu-Chin Chiu, Ovid J. L. Tzeng & Daisy L. Hung
    (2006) The early extraction of sublexical phonology in reading Chinese pseudocharacters: An event-related potentials study. Language and Linguistics7(3): 619–636.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lee, Sang-Oak
    (2009) The Korean alphabet: an optimal featural system with graphical ingenuity. Written Language & Literacy12(2): 202–212. 10.1075/wll.12.2.05lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.05lee [Google Scholar]
26. Li, Fanwen
    (1997) Xià-Hàn Zìdiǎn [Tangut-Chinese dictionary] (first edition). Beijing: China Society Science Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Li, Fanwen
    (2008) Xià-Hàn Zìdiǎn [Tangut-Chinese dictionary] (second edition). Beijing: China Society Science Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McCawley, James D.
    (1994) Some graphotactic constraints. InW. C. Watt (ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics, 115–127. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8285‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8285-8_7 [Google Scholar]
29. Meletis, Dimitrios
    (2018) What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics. Written Language & Literacy21(1) 52–88. 10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel [Google Scholar]
30. Meletis, Dimitrios
    (2019) The grapheme as a universal basic unit of writing. Writing Systems Research11(1) 26–49. 10.1080/17586801.2019.1697412
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2019.1697412 [Google Scholar]
31. Miyake, Marc
    (2017a) Minority languages: Traditional and modern writing systems. InRint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T. James Huang & James Myers (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol.III, 35–40. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Miyake, Marc
    (2017b) Tangut language. InRint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T. James Huang & James Myers (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol.IV, 267–274. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Morin, Olivier
    (2018) Spontaneous emergence of legibility in writing systems: The case of orientation anisotropy. Cognitive Science42(2): 664–677. 10.1111/cogs.12550
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12550 [Google Scholar]
34. Myers, James
    (2019) The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthographic system. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315265971
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315265971 [Google Scholar]
35. Ninio, Anat & Amia Lieblich
    (1976) The grammar of action: ‘Phrase structure’ in children’s copying. Child Development47(3): 846–850. 10.2307/1128205
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1128205 [Google Scholar]
36. Pacton, Sébastien, Pierre Perruchet, Michel Fayol & Axel Cleeremans
    (2001) Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General130(3): 401–426. 10.1037/0096‑3445.130.3.401
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.401 [Google Scholar]
37. Peng, Xuanwei
    (2017) Stroke systems in Chinese characters: A systemic functional perspective on simplified regular script. Semiotica2017 (218): 1–19. 10.1515/sem‑2015‑0111
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0111 [Google Scholar]
38. Primus, Beatrice
    (2004) A featural analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet. Written Language & Literacy7(2): 235–274. 10.1075/wll.7.2.06pri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.06pri [Google Scholar]
39. Qiu, Xigui
    (2000) Chinese writing [Compiled and translated byGilbert L. Mattos & Jerry Norman]. Berkeley: The Society for the Study of Early China and The Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sandler, Wendy
    (1993) A sonority cycle in American Sign Language. Phonology10(2): 243–279. 10.1017/S0952675700000051
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000051 [Google Scholar]
41. Seidenberg, Mark S., David C. Plaut, Alan S. Petersen, James L. McClelland & Ken McRae
    (1994) Nonword pronunciation and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20(6): 1177–1196.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Shi, Dingxu
    (1996) The Yi Script. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 239–243. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Song, Ki Joong
    (1998) The writing systems of Northeast Asia and the origin of the Korean alphabet, Han’gŭl. Seoul Journal of Korean Studies11: 3–50.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman
    (1988) Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520912793
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912793 [Google Scholar]
45. Tranter, Nicolas
    (2001) Script ‘borrowing’, cultural influence and the development of the written vernacular in East Asia. InThomas E. McAuley (ed.), Language change in East Asia, 180–204. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Tranter, Nicolas
    (2002) The ‘ideal square’ of logographic scripts and the structural similarities of Khitan script and han’gŭl. InSang-oak Lee, Gregory K. Iverson, with Sang-cheol Ahn & Young-mee Yu Cho (eds.), Pathways into Korean language and culture: Essays in honor of Young-key Kim-Renaud, 503–522. Seoul: Pagijong Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Tsai, Kuan-Chan & Terezinha Nunes
    (2003) The role of character schema in learning novel Chinese characters. InCatherine McBride-Chang & Hsuan-Chih Chen (eds.), Reading development in Chinese children, 109–125. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Tseng, Yuho
    (1993) A history of Chinese calligraphy. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Tsukishima, Hiroshi
    (1977) Dairokushō katakana no jigen [Chapter 6: The origin of katakana]. InHiroshi Tsukishima, Kokugo no rekishi [History of Japanese], 81–108. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Tsukishima, Hiroshi
    (1997) Katakana no rekishi-teki kenkyū [Historical study of Japanese ‘kata-kana’ characters]. Nihon Gakushiin Kiyō [Transactions of the Japan Academy] 51(3): 227–251. 10.2183/tja1948.51.227
    https://doi.org/10.2183/tja1948.51.227 [Google Scholar]
51. Unseth, Peter
    (2005) Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy8(1): 19–42. 10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns [Google Scholar]
52. Van Esch
    (2017) Nǚshū (Women’s script). InRint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T. James Huang & James Myers (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol.III, 262–267. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Venezky, Richard L.
    (1967) English orthography: Its graphical structure and its relation to sound. Reading Research Quarterly2(3): 75–105. 10.2307/747031
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747031 [Google Scholar]
54. Wang, Jason Chia-Sheng
    (1983) Toward a generative grammar of Chinese character structure and stroke order. University of Wisconsin-MadisonPh.D. thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Watt, W. C.
    (1975) What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? I: Desiderata. Visible Language9(4): 293–327.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Watt, W. C.
    (2015) What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? VII: Sleight of hand. Semiotica2015 (207): 65–88. 10.1515/sem‑2015‑0064
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0064 [Google Scholar]
57. Whitman, John
    (2011) The ubiquity of the gloss. Scripta3: 95–121.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Wiedenhof, Jeroen
    (2017) Script reform (20th Century): History and analysis. InRint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T. James Huang & James Myers (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol.III, 671–676. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Wiese, Richard
    (2004) How to optimize orthography. Written Language & Literacy7(2): 305–331. 10.1075/wll.7.2.08wie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.08wie [Google Scholar]
60. Wu, Yingzhe & Juha Janhunen
    (2014) New materials on the Khitan small script: A critical edition of Xiao Dilu & Yelü Xiangwen. Folkestone: Global Oriental.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Zhao, Liming
    (1998) Nüshu: Chinese women’s characters. International Journal of the Sociology of Language129: 127–137. 10.1515/ijsl.1998.129.127
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1998.129.127 [Google Scholar]