1887
Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6732
  • E-ISSN: 1570-6001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper we propose a formalized and expandable approach to the taxonomy of writing systems. Taking the mixed nature of writing systems fully into account, our approach focuses on the classification of functionally homogenous subsystems, which together and in interaction with each other constitute an overall writing system. Such subsystems make use of a script or a subset of a script, which is understood here as an inventory of graphs that is (conventionally considered to be) graphically homogeneous. A basic distinction is made into phonographic and morphographic systems, but complemented by an in principle open number of subtypes, building and expanding on Gnanadesikan (2017) and Poser (1992, 2004) for segmental and syllabic systems respectively. Types are designated by a notation that employs a set of symbols, relating to both form (boundedness of graphs and their organization into segmental spaces) and function (mapping type), but by separate means.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00071.ost
2024-04-25
2024-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bennett, Emmett L.
    (1996) Aegean Scripts. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 125–133. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bright, William
    (1999) A Matter of Typology: Alphasyllabaries and Abugidas. Written Language & Literacy2.1: 45–55. 10.1075/wll.2.1.03bri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.03bri [Google Scholar]
  3. Buckley, Eugene
    (2018) Core syllables vs. moraic writing. Written Language & Literacy21.1: 26–51. 10.1075/wll.00009.buc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00009.buc [Google Scholar]
  4. Coblin, W. South
    (2007) A Handbook of ’Phags-pa Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coulmas, Florian
    (1996) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2003) Writing Systems. An Introduction to their Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Daniels, Peter T.
    (1990) Fundamentals of Grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society110.4: 727–731. 10.2307/602899
    https://doi.org/10.2307/602899 [Google Scholar]
  8. (1992) The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. InPamela A. Downing, Susan D. Lima & Michael Noonan (eds.), The Linguistics of Literacy, 83–110. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.21.10dan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.21.10dan [Google Scholar]
  9. (1996) The Study of Writing Systems. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 3–17. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2009) Two notes on terminology. Written Language & Literacy12.2: 277–281. 10.1075/wll.12.2.09dan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.09dan [Google Scholar]
  11. Daniels, Peter T. & William Bright
    (eds.) (1996) The World’s Writing Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DeFrancis, John
    (1989) Visible Speech. The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. 10.1515/9780824841621
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824841621 [Google Scholar]
  13. Faber, Alice
    (1992) Phonemic segmentation as epiphenomenon. Evidence from the history of alphabetic writing. InPamela A. Downing, Susan D. Lima & Michael Noonan (eds.), The Linguistics of Literacy, 111–134. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.21.11fab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.21.11fab [Google Scholar]
  14. Gelb, I. J.
    (1963) A Study of Writing. Revised Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gnanadesikan, Amalia E.
    (2017) Towards a Typology of Phonemic Scripts. Writing Systems Research9.1: 14–35. 10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2021) Brahmi’s children: Variation and stability in a script family. Written Language & Literacy24.2: 303–335. 10.1075/wll.00057.gna
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00057.gna [Google Scholar]
  17. Gronemeyer, Sven
    (2014) The Orthographic Conventions of Maya Hieroglyphic Writing: Being a Contribution to the Phonemic Reconstruction of Classic Mayan. PhD Dissertation, La Trobe University.
  18. Joyce, Terry
    (2016) Writing systems and scripts. InAndrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (eds.), Verbal communication, 287–308. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110255478‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016 [Google Scholar]
  19. Justeson, John S. & Laurence D. Stephens
    (1994) The evolution of syllabaries from alphabets: Transmission, language contrast, and script typology. Die Sprache35.1: 2–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuipers, Joel C. & Ray McDermott
    (1996) Insular Southeast Asian Scripts. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 474–484. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu Zhuangzhang
    Lu Zhuangzhang (1892) Yimu liaoran chujie. (Reprint, Beijing: Wenzi gaige chubanshe 1956.)
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Meletis, Dimitrios
    (2019) The grapheme as a universal basic unit of writing. Writing Systems Research11.1: 26–49. 10.1080/17586801.2019.1697412
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2019.1697412 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2020) The Nature of Writing: A Theory of Grapholinguistics. Brest: Fluxus Editions. 10.36824/2020‑meletis
    https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-meletis [Google Scholar]
  24. Nam, Pung-hyun
    (2012) Old Korean. InNicolas Tranter (ed.), The Languages of Japan and Korea, 41–72. London, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Osterkamp, Sven & Gordian Schreiber
    (2021a) Challenging the Dichotomy Between Phonography and Morphography: Transitions and Gray Areas. InYannis Haralambous (ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st Century […] 2020, Proceedings, Part I, 47–82. Brest: Fluxus Editions. 10.36824/2020‑graf‑oste
    https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-oste [Google Scholar]
  26. (2021b) 〈Th〉e Ubi〈qu〉ity of Polygra〈ph〉y and its Significan〈ce〉 for 〈th〉e Typology of 〈Wr〉iti〈ng〉 Systems. Written Language & Literacy24.2: 171–197. 10.1075/wll.00052.ost
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00052.ost [Google Scholar]
  27. Payne, Annick
    (2010) Hieroglyphic Luwian. An Introduction with Original Texts. 2nd Revised Edition. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Poser, William J.
    (1992) The Structural Typology of Phonological Writing. Handout (Linguistic Society of America, Philadelphia, 12 Jan 1992).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2004) Phonological Writing and Phonological Representation. Handout (Harvard University, 10 Dec 2004).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ratcliffe, Robert R.
    (2001) What do “phonemic” writing systems represent? Arabic huruuf, Japanese kana, and the Moraic Principle. Written Language & Literacy4.1: 1–14. 10.1075/wll.4.1.02rat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.4.1.02rat [Google Scholar]
  31. Rogers, Henry
    (1995) Optimal Orthographies. InInsup Taylor & David R. Olson (eds.), Scripts and Literacy. Reading and Learning to Read Alphabets, Syllabaries and Characters, 31–43. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1162‑1_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1162-1_3 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2005) Writing Systems. A Linguistic Approach. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sampson, Geoffrey
    (1985) Writing Systems. A Linguistic Introduction. London: Hutchinson.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Schreiber, Gordian
    (2022) Japanese Morphography. Deconstructing hentai kanbun. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004504936
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004504936 [Google Scholar]
  35. Share, David L. & Peter T. Daniels
    (2015) Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research8.1: 17–31. 10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395 [Google Scholar]
  36. Sproat, Richard
    (2000) A Computational Theory of Writing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Swank, Heidi
    (2008) It all hinges on the vowels. Reconsidering the Alphasyllabary Classification. Written Language & Literacy11.1: 73–89. 10.1075/wll.11.1.06swa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.06swa [Google Scholar]
  38. van der Kuijp, Leonard W. J.
    (1996) The Tibetan Script and Derivatives. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 431–441. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Whittaker, Gordon
    (2011) Writing Systems. InPatrick Colm Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, 935–939. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00071.ost
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00071.ost
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): morphography; phonography; segmentary; syllabary; taxonomy of writing systems
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error