1887
Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6732
  • E-ISSN: 1570-6001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Since their coinage a quarter-century ago, the terms and (Bright 1999; Daniels & Bright 1996) have revolutionised our conceptualisation of writing systems. Together with , these terms have proven invaluable in classifying subtypes of segmentaries–writing systems whose grain size is the phonological segment (Gnanadesikan 2017). Nevertheless, there remain areas of ambiguity. Segmentaries that are either abugidas or alphasyllabaries–but not both–may be classified under various labels, and inconsistently so. Moreover, certain minoritised writing systems such as those based on Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics or Braille are only rarely covered in typological studies, despite the potential insights they offer.

In this paper, I use Bright’s (1999) and Gnanadesikan’s (2017) typology of vowelled segmentaries as the point of departure to propose an augmented classification based on specific graphematic criteria. Aside from illustrating the proposed typology by applying it to various writing systems, I also identify avenues for further refinement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00072.iye
2024-04-25
2024-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altmann, Gabriel & Fan Fengxiang
    (eds.) (2008) Analyses of script: Properties of characters and writing systems. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110207101
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207101 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Gregory D., K. David Harrison & K. C. Naik Biruli
    (2007) The story of Ho writing. Retrieved fromThe Ho Language :: Swarthmore College Laboratory for Endangered Languages Research and Documentation: https://web.archive.org/web/20220924165344/https://langhotspots.swarthmore.edu/Ho/alphabet/Ho_writing_story.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aronson, Howard I.
    (1996) Yiddish. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 735–742. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bright, W.
    (1999) A Matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas. Written Language & Literacy2(1): 45–55. 10.1075/wll.2.1.03bri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.03bri [Google Scholar]
  5. Bunčić, Daniel, Sandra L. Lippert & Achim Rabus
    (eds.) (2016) Biscriptality: A sociolinguistic typology. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coulmas, Florian
    (1996) The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2003) Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Daniels, Peter T.
    (1996) The study of writing systems. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 3–17. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2001) Writing systems. InM. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (eds.), The handbook of linguistics, 43–80. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2018) An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Daniels, Peter T. & William Bright
    (1996) Abbreviations, conventions, and definitions. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, xxxix–xlv. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Diringer, David
    (1948) The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind (2nd revised ed.). London: Hutchinson’s.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Duval, Jean Rahman & Waris Abdulkerim Janbaz
    (2006) An introduction to Latin-script Uyghur. Paper presented at the Middle East & Central Asia Politics, Economics, and Society conference (September 7–9, 2006). University of Utah. Retrieved fromhttps://web.archive.org/web/20061022113840/www.uyghurdictionary.org/excerpts/An%20Introduction%20to%20LSU.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Everson, Michael
    (2003, October5). Revised final proposal for encoding the Lontara (Buginese) script in the UCS. Retrieved from Unicode: https://www.unicode.org/wg2/docs/n2633r.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2012, April19). Final proposal for encoding the Warang Citi script in the SMP of the UCS. Retrieved from Unicode: https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12118-n4259-warang-citi.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gelb, Ignace J.
    (1963) A study of writing (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gill, Harjeet Singh
    (1996) The Gurmukhi script. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 395–398. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gnanadesikan, Amalia E.
    (2017) Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research9(1): 14–35. Retrieved from10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2021) Brahmi’s children. Variation and stability in a script family24(2): 303–335. 10.1075/wll.00057.gna
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00057.gna [Google Scholar]
  20. Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. & Anna P. Judson
    (2021) Diversity in writing systems: Embracing multiple perspectives. Written Language & Literacy24(2): 167–170. 10.1075/wll.00051.int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00051.int [Google Scholar]
  21. Goerwitz, Richard L.
    (1996) The Jewish scripts. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 487–498. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gragg, Gene B.
    (1996) Mesopotamian cuneiform: Other languages. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 58–72. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hamut, Bahargül & Agnieszka Joniak-Lüthi
    (2015) The language choices and script debates among the Uyghur in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China. Linguistik Online70(1): 111–125. Retrieved fromhttps://scholar.archive.org/work/z2wqj2e4mzcqlkffvru63eskga/access/wayback/https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/download/1745/2962/
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Haralambous, Yannis
    (2019, March26–28). Phonocentrism in Greece: Side effects of two centuries of diglossia. Poster presented at the 12th AWLL International Workshop on writing systems and literacy. Cambridge University: Association for Written Language and Literacy. Retrieved fromfaculty-sgs.tama.ac.jp/terry/awll/WS/12/2019​D1​P1​P2​-Haral​ambous.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harvey, Christopher
    (2003) Some general aspects of the Syllabics orthography – The nature of syllabics. Retrieved from Languagegeek: https://www.languagegeek.com/typography/syllabics/syl2.html
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2006) Is Syllabics an abugida. Retrieved from Languagegeek: https://www.languagegeek.com/typography/syllabics/syllabicsAbugida.html
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hary, Benjamin
    (1996) Adaptations of Hebrew script. InP. T. Daniels & W. Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 727–734. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hill, Nathan W.
    (2005) Once more on the letter འ. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 28(2): 107–137. Retrieved fromhttps://eprints.soas.ac.uk/5632/1/once_more_on_the_letter.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2009) Tibetan 〈ḥ〉 as a plain initial and its place in Old Tibetan phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area32(1), 115–140. Retrieved fromhttps://eprints.soas.ac.uk/7625/1/04-Hill-Dialect-reflexes-of-Tib-v.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Honda, Keisuke
    (2021) A modular theoretic approach to the Japanese writing system: Possibilities and challenges. InY. Haralambous (ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st Century 2020. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications Vol. 5), 621–643. Brest: Fluxus Editions. 10.36824/2020‑graf‑hond
    https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-hond [Google Scholar]
  31. IIT Madras
    IIT Madras (2020, July27). Introduction to Bharati Braille. Retrieved fromAcharya: Multilingual Computing for Literacy and Education: https://web.archive.org/web/20200727032543/www.acharya.gen.in:8080/disabilities/bh_brl.php
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Iyengar, Arvind V.
    (2018) Variation in Perso-Arabic and Devanāgarī Sindhī orthographies: An overview. Written Language & Literacy21(2): 169–197. 10.1075/wll.00014.iye
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00014.iye [Google Scholar]
  33. (2023) The akshara as a graphematic unit. InY. Haralambous (ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st Century 2022. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications Vol. 9), 299–316. Brest: Fluxus Editions. 10.36824/2022‑graf‑iyen
    https://doi.org/10.36824/2022-graf-iyen [Google Scholar]
  34. Joshi, R. Malatesha & Catherine McBride
    (eds.) (2019) Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑05977‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4 [Google Scholar]
  35. Joyce, Terry & Susanne R. Borgwaldt
    (2013) Typology of writing systems: Introduction. InSusanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (eds.), Typology of Writing Systems, 1–11. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.51.01joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.51.01joy [Google Scholar]
  36. Joyce, Terry & Hisashi Masuda
    (2019) On the notions of graphematic representation and orthography from the perspective of the Japanese writing system. Written Language & Literacy22(2): 247–279. 10.1075/wll.00028.joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00028.joy [Google Scholar]
  37. Joyce, Terry & Dimitrios Meletis
    (2021) Alternative criteria for writing system typology. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft40(3): 257–277. 10.1515/zfs‑2021‑2030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2021-2030 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kahn, Lily
    (2012) Colloquial Yiddish: The complete course for beginners. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kalelkar, Kakasaheb, M. Satyanarayana & Babu Ram Saksena
    (1951) Report of the Finalising Committee of the Hindustani Shorthand and Hindi Typewriter Standardisation Committee. Government of India. New Delhi: Parliament Secretariat. Retrieved fromhttps://archive.org/details/dli.csl.2140/
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kaye, Alan S.
    (1996) Adaptations of Arabic script. InThe world’s writing systems, 743–762. New York: Oxford Unversity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. King, Ross
    (1996) Korean writing. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 218–227. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kuipers, Joel C. & Ray McDermott
    (1996) Insular Southeast Asian scripts. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 474–484. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Meletis, Dimitrios
    (2020) The nature of writing. A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications. Vol. 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions. Retrieved fromwww.fluxus-editions.fr/meletis-the-nature-of-writing-2020.pdf. 10.36824/2020‑meletis
    https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-meletis [Google Scholar]
  44. Mountford, John
    (1996) A functional classification. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 627–632. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Nag, Sonali & Charles Perfetti
    (eds.) (2014) Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia (special issue). Writing Systems Research6(1). 10.1080/17586801.2014.883787
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.883787 [Google Scholar]
  46. National Archives of India
    National Archives of India (2018, February21). Sindhi education in Dev Nagri scripts for displaced (Identifier no. PR_000003041490). Retrieved fromAbhilekh Patal: https://www.abhilekh-patal.in/jspui/handle/123456789/2744415
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Neef, Martin
    (2015) Writing systems as modular objects: proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics1(1): 708–721. Retrieved from10.1515/opli‑2015‑0026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0026 [Google Scholar]
  48. Nichols, John D.
    (1996) The Cree syllabary. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 599–611. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. O’Connor, M.
    (1996) Epigraphic semitic scripts. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 88–107. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Osterkamp, Sven, & Gordian Schreiber
    (2021a) 〈Th〉e ubi〈qu〉ity of polygra〈ph〉y and its significan〈ce〉 for 〈th〉e typology of 〈wr〉iti〈ng〉 systems. Written Language & Literacy, 24(2): 171–197. 10.1075/wll.00052.ost
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00052.ost [Google Scholar]
  51. Osterkamp, Sven & Gordian Schreiber
    (2021b) A proposal for a formalized, expandable approach to the taxonomy of writing systems. Paper presented atthe AWLL-13 conference (October 21–23, 2021). University of North Carolina: Association for Written Language and Literacy. Retrieved fromfaculty-sgs.tama.ac.jp/terry/awll/WS/13/2021​D1​B1​O1H.pdf
  52. Pae, Hye K.
    (2011) Is Korean a syllabic alphabet or an alphabetic syllabary?Writing Systems Research31: 103–115. 10.1093/wsr/wsr002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr002 [Google Scholar]
  53. Poser, William J.
    (2003) Dʌlk’wahke: The first Carrier writing system. Unpublished ms. Retrieved fromhttps://www.billposer.org/Papers/dulkwah.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Raymond, Martin
    (2020, December14). Presenting writing system information. Retrieved fromScriptSource: https://scriptsource.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=entry_detail&uid=r7jbnbjkfw
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Salomon, Richard G.
    (2007) Writing systems of the Indo-Aryan languages. InGeorge L. Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 75–114. Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Sampson, Geoffrey
    (2015) Writing systems (2nd ed.). Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sproat, Richard W.
    (2000) A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. (2010) Language, technology, and society. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Taylor, Insup & David R. Olson
    (1995) An introduction to reading the world’s scripts. InInsup Taylor & David R. Olson (eds.), Scripts and Literacy, 1–15. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1162‑1_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1162-1_1 [Google Scholar]
  60. Unicode
    Unicode (2021) Americas. InThe Unicode® Standard: Version 14.0 – Core Specification (pp. 805–814). Mountain View, CA: The Unicode Consortium. Retrieved fromhttps://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/ch20.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Vaid, Jyostna
    (2022) Biscriptality: a neglected construct in the study of bilingualism. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science. 10.1007/s41809‑022‑00101‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-022-00101-3 [Google Scholar]
  62. Vaid, Jyotsna & Prakash Padakannaya
    (eds.) (2004) Reading and writing In semi-syllabic scripts (special issue). Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal17(1–2). 10.1023/B:READ.0000013861.42512.b0
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013861.42512.b0 [Google Scholar]
  63. Weingarten, Rüdiger
    (2013) Comparative graphematics. InSusanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (eds.), Typology of Writing Systems, 13–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.51.02wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.51.02wei [Google Scholar]
  64. Winskel, Heather & Prakash Padakannaya
    (eds.) (2014) South and Southeast Asian Psycholinguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Zide, Norman
    (1996) Scripts for Munda languages. InPeter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 612–618. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00072.iye
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00072.iye
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): abugida; akshara; alphabet; alphasyllabary; plenary; typology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error