1887
Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-6732
  • E-ISSN: 1570-6001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper seeks to reassess the balance between chaos and systematicity within the Japanese writing system (JWS), which is noted for its complexity. As potential factors for chaos, Section 2 focuses on two important conventions. The first is the simultaneous use of multiple scripts as components of a largely systematic whole, even though it also affords considerable levels of graphematic variation. The second convention of dual-readings turns on kanji graphematically mapping to both Native-Japanese (NJ) and Sino-Japanese (SJ) morphemes, which yields the JWS’s intriguing form of morphography. However, as a factor that is, to a considerable degree, a major source of systematicity, Section 3 outlines the graphematic representation of SJ compound words. More specifically, starting from the morphological structures of two-kanji compound words (2KCWs), Section 3 introduces the dominant morphological patterns of three-kanji (3KCWs) and four-kanji compound words (4KCWs), which underscore the significance of 2KCWs within the Japanese mental lexicon, and concludes by noting Hatano, Kuhara, and Akiyama’s (1981) study about inferring the meanings of SJ compound words.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00073.joy
2024-04-25
2026-05-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Backhouse, A. E.
    (1984) Aspects of the graphological structure of Japanese. Visible Language18(3): 219–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Coulmas, Florian
    (1989) The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1994) Writing systems and literacy: The alphabetic myth revisited. InLudo Verhoeven (ed.), Functional literacy: Theoretical issues and educational implications, 305–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.1.23cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.1.23cou [Google Scholar]
  4. (2013) Writing and society: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063 [Google Scholar]
  5. Daniels, Peter T.
    (2018) An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davies, Eirlys E.
    (1987) Eyeplay: On some uses of non-standard spelling. Language and Communication7(1): 47–58. 10.1016/0271‑5309(87)90013‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(87)90013-9 [Google Scholar]
  7. DeFrancis, John
    (1989) Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press. 10.1515/9780824841621
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824841621 [Google Scholar]
  8. Desbordes, Françoise
    (1997) The notion of orthography: A Latin inheritance. InClotilde Pontecorvo (ed.), Writing development: An interdisciplinary view, 117–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.6.10des
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.6.10des [Google Scholar]
  9. Gelb, Ignace J.
    (1952) A study of writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gnanadesikan, Amalia E.
    (2009) The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the Internet. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hatano, Giyoo
    (1995) The psychology of Japanese literacy: Expanding ‘the practice account’. InLaura M. W. Martin, Katherine Nelson & Ethel Tobach (eds.) Sociocultural psychology: Theory and practice of doing and knowing, 250–275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511896828.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896828.013 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hatano, Giyoo, Kuhara, Keiko & Akiyama, Michael
    (1981) Kanji help readers of Japanese infer the meaning of unfamiliar words. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition3(2): 30–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Igarashi, Yuko
    (2007) The changing role of katakana in the Japanese writing system: Processing and pedagogical dimensions for native speakers and foreign learners. Doctoral dissertation. University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
  14. Joyce, Terry
    (2002) Constituent-morpheme priming: Implications from the morphology of two-kanji compound words. Japanese Psychological Research, 44(2): 79–90. 10.1111/1468‑5884.00009
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5884.00009 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2004) Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. InSerge P. Shohov (ed.), Advances in psychological research: Volume 31, 27–61. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2011) The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing-systems. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1): 58–81. 10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [Google Scholar]
  17. (2016) Writing systems and scripts. InAndrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (eds.), Verbal communication, 287–308). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110255478‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2023) Typologies of writing systems. InMarco Condorelli & Hanna Rutkowska (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of historical orthography, 138–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108766463.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108766463.007 [Google Scholar]
  19. Joyce, Terry, Hodošček, Bor, & Nishina, Kikuko
    (2012) Orthographic representation and variation within the Japanese writing system: Some corpus-based observations. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2): 254–278. 10.1075/wll.15.2.07joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.07joy [Google Scholar]
  20. Joyce, Terry, & Masuda, Hisashi
    (2018) Introduction to the multi-script Japanese writing system and word processing. InHye K. Pae (ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages, 179–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bpa.7.09joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.7.09joy [Google Scholar]
  21. (2019) On the notions of graphematic representation and orthography from the perspective of the Japanese writing system. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2): 247–279. 10.1075/wll.00028.joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00028.joy [Google Scholar]
  22. (2021) Constructing databases of Japanese three- and four-kanji compound words: Some observations concerning their morphological structures. InYannis Haralambous (ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II, 579–619. Brest: Fluxus Editions. 10.36824/2020‑graf‑joyc
    https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-joyc [Google Scholar]
  23. Joyce, Terry, Masuda, Hisashi, & Ogawa, Taeko
    (2014) Jōyō kanji as core building blocks of the Japanese writing system: Some observations from database construction. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2): 173–194. 10.1075/wll.17.2.01joy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.2.01joy [Google Scholar]
  24. Joyce, Terry, & Meletis, Dimitrios
    (2021) Alternative criteria for writing system typology: Cross-linguistic observations from the German and Japanese writing systems. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 40(3): 257–277. 10.1515/zfs‑2021‑2030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2021-2030 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kageyama, Taro & Saito, Michiaki
    (2016) Vocabulary strata and word formation processes. InTaro Kageyama & Hideki Kishimoto (eds.), Handbook of Japanese lexicon and word formation, 11–50. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614512097‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512097-005 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kobayashi, Hideki, Yamashita, Kiyo & Kageyama, Taro
    (2016) Sino-Japanese words. InTaro Kageyama & Hideki Kishimoto (eds.), Handbook of Japanese lexicon and word formation, 93–131. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614512097‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512097-007 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lurie, David B.
    (2012) The development of writing in Japan. InStephen D. Houston (ed.), The shape of script: How and why writing systems change, 159–185. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nomura, Masaaki
    (1988) Niji kango no kōzō [The structure of two-kanji Sino-Japanese words]. Nihongogaku7(5): 44–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Powell, Barry B.
    (2009) Writing: Theory and history of the technology of civilization. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rastle, Kathleen
    (2019) EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology72(4): 677–692. 10.1177/1747021819829696
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sampson, Geoffrey
    (1985) Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2018) From phonemic spelling to distinctive spelling. Written Language & Literacy21(1): 3–25. 10.1075/wll.00008.sam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00008.sam [Google Scholar]
  33. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    (1990) The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Shinmura, Izuru
    (2008) Kōjien [Japanese dictionary] (6th ed.). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sproat, Richard
    (2010) Language, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Suzuki, Takao
    (1975) On the twofold phonetic realization of basic concepts: In defense of Chinese characters in Japanese. InF. C. C. Peng (ed.), Language in Japanese society, 175–192. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Taylor, Insup & Park, Kwonsaeng
    (1995) Differential processing of content words and function words: Chinese characters vs. phonetic scripts. InInsup Taylor & David R. Olson (eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters, 185–195. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1162‑1_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1162-1_12 [Google Scholar]
  38. Taylor, Insup & Taylor, M. Martin
    (2014) Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tranter, Nicolas
    (2008) Nonconventional script choice in Japan. International Journal of the Sociology of Language1921: 133–151. 10.1515/IJSL.2008.040
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.040 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00073.joy
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00073.joy
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error