Latin < XS >: Seeing double

References

1. Abbi, Anvita
   (2021) Social Cohesion and Emerging Standards of Hindi in a Multilingual Context. InWendy Ayres-Bennett & John Bellamy (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of language standardization, 157–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108559249.005
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559249.005 [Google Scholar]
2. Adams, James N.
   (2007) The regional diversification of Latin 200 BC-AD 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511482977
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482977 [Google Scholar]
3. Adams, James N.
   (2013) Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511843433
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511843433 [Google Scholar]
4. Agresti, Alan
   (2007) An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. New Jersey: John Willey & Sons. 10.1002/0470114754
   https://doi.org/10.1002/0470114754 [Google Scholar]
5. Benedetti, Marina & Marotta, Giovanna
   (2014) Monottongazione e geminazione in latino: nuovi elementi a favore dell’isocronismo sillabico. InPiera Molinelli, Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Chiara Fedriani (eds.), Latin vulgaire – Latin tardif X. Actes du Xe colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, 25–43. Bergamo: Sestante Edizioni.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bertinetto, Pier Marco
   (2004) On the undecidable syllabification of/sC/clusters in Italian: Converging experimental evidence. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 16(2), 349–372.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bertocci, Davide
   (2016) Remarks on the type faxō/faxim. InPaolo Poccetti (ed.), Latinitatis Rationes: Descriptive and Historical Accounts for the Latin Language, 22–37. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431896‑004
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431896-004 [Google Scholar]
8. Bisang, Walter
   (1998) Grammaticalization and language contact constructions and positions. Typological studies in language, 371, 13–58. 10.1075/tsl.37.02bis
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.37.02bis [Google Scholar]
9. Buck, Carl D.
   (1955) The Greek dialects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Clackson, James
    (2011) The Forms of Latin: Inflectional Morphology. InJames Clackson (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language, 105–117. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444343397.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343397.ch8 [Google Scholar]
11. Clackson, James
    (2015) Latinitas, Ἑλληνισμός and standard languages. Studi e saggi linguistici, 53(2), 309–330.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Consani, Carlo
    (2016) The Greek of Italy between Archaism, Internal Evolution and Contact Phenomena. Graeco-Latina Brunensia21(2): 99–115. 10.5817/GLB2016‑2‑9
    https://doi.org/10.5817/GLB2016-2-9 [Google Scholar]
13. Coseriu, Eugenio
    (1952) Sistema, norma y habla. Montevideo: Universidad de la República.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cotugno, Francesca & Marotta, Giovanna
    (2017) Geminated Consonants in the Vindolanda Tablets. Empirical Data and Sociolinguistic Remarks. InPiera Molinelli (ed.), Language and Identity in Multilingual Mediterranean Settings. Challenges for Historical Sociolinguistics, 269–288. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110554274‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110554274-015 [Google Scholar]
15. Crawford, Michael H.
    (1985) Coinage and money under the Roman Republic: Italy and the Mediterranean economy. London: Metheun.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cser, András
    (1999) Diphthongs in the syllable structure of Latin. Glotta, 172–193.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cser, András
    (2012) The role of sonority in the phonology of Latin. InSteve Parker (ed.), The sonority controversy, 39–53. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110261523.39
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261523.39 [Google Scholar]
18. Cser, András
    (2016) Aspects of the phonology and morphology of Classical Latin. PhD Thesis. Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cser, András
    (2020) Prefix Allomorphy and the Phonologisation of s-Deletion in Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society, 118(1), 159–171. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12178
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12178 [Google Scholar]
20. Degrassi, Attilio
    (1957–1963) Inscriptiones latinae liberae rei publicae. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
    [Google Scholar]
21. de Vaan, Michiel A. C.
    (2008) Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Donati, Margherita
    (2015) Variazione e tipologia testuale nel corpus epigrafico CLaSSES I. Studi e Saggi linguistici, 53(2): 21–38.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Dosuna, Julián M.
    (2017) Methone of Pieria: a reassessment of epigraphical evidence (with a special attention to Pleonastic Sigma). InJenny Strauss Clay, Irad Malkin & Yannis Z. Tzifopoulos (eds.), Panhellenes at Methone: Graphê in Late Geometric and Protoarchaic Methone, Macedonia (ca 700 BCE), 242–258. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110515695‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110515695-013 [Google Scholar]
24. Dressler, Wolfgang U.
    (2002) Latin inflection classes, inMachtelt Bolkestein, Caroline Kroon, Harm Pinkster, Wilm Remmelink & Rodie Risselada (eds.), Theory and Description in Latin Linguistics, 91–110. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004409057_008
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004409057_008 [Google Scholar]
25. Dubois, Laurent
    (1989) Inscriptions grecques dialectales de Sicile. Contribution à l’étude du vocabulaire grec colonial. Rome: École Française de Rome.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dunkel, George
    (1980) Ennian atque atque; prope. Glotta, 58(1./2. H), 97–103.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Evertz, Martin & Primus, Beatrice
    (2013) The graphematic foot in English and German. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 1–23. 10.1080/17586801.2013.765356
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.765356 [Google Scholar]
28. Evertz, Martin
    (2018) Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110583441
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441 [Google Scholar]
29. Fulk, Robert D.
    (1996) Consonant doubling and open syllable lengthening in the Ormulum. Anglia, 1141: 481–513. 10.1515/angl.1996.114.4.481
    https://doi.org/10.1515/angl.1996.114.4.481 [Google Scholar]
30. García, Violeta G. & Corrochano, Araceli S.
    (2017) Los grupos de consonantes oclusivas labiales y velares seguidas de silbante en los dialectos griegos. InFelicia Logozzo & Paolo Poccetti (ed.), Ancient Greek Linguistics: New Approaches, Insights, Perspectives, 19–34. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110551754‑031
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110551754-031 [Google Scholar]
31. Gast, Volker
    (2007) From phylogenetic diversity to structural homogeneity – on right-branching constituent order in Mesoamerica. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 201. 171–202
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gignac, Francis
    (1976) A Grammar of the Greek Papyri of the Roman and Byzantine Periods, I: Phonology, Milan: Istituto editoriale Cisalpino – La Goliardica.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Gregori, Gian Luca & Nonnis, David
    (2013) Il contributo dell’epigrafia allo studio delle cinte murarie dell’Italia repubblicana. Scienze dell’Antichità19(2/3): 491–524.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Haspelmath, Martin
    (1999) Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 18(2): 180–205. 10.1515/zfsw.1999.18.2.180
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.1999.18.2.180 [Google Scholar]
35. Haugen, Einar
    (1966) Linguistics and Language Planning. InWilliam Bright (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference, 1964, 50–71. The Hauge: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kaye, Jonathan
    (1992) Do you believe in magic? The story of s+C sequences. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics21: 293–313.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Keller, Rudy
    (1994) On language Change: The invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge (translation and expansion ofSprachwandel: von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. Tübingen: Francke 1990).
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lazzeroni, Romano
    (2005–2006) Arealità italica e riorganizzazione degli allomorfi: induzione di morfemi o induzione di regole?Studi e Saggi Linguistici43/441: 141–149.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lazzeroni, Romano
    (1956) «La geminatio vocalium» nelle iscrizioni latine. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Lettere, Storia e Filosofia25(1/2): 124–135.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lehmann, Christian
    (2005) La structure de la syllabe latine. Essais de phonologie latine, 2–49.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Leumann, Manu
    (1977) Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre, 51. Aufl. Neuausg. München: Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Loporcaro, Marco
    (2015) Vowel length from Latin to Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
43. Manacorda, Daniele
    (2006) Maestranze alessandrine nella Puglia di età repubblicana. InMaria G. Angeli Bertinelli & Angela Donati (eds.), Le vie della storia: Migrazioni di popoli, viaggi di individui, circolazione di idee nel Mediterraneo antico. Atti del II Incontro Internazionale di Storia Antica (Genova 6–8 october 2004), 209–222. Roma: Bretschneider.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Mancini, Marco
    (2006) “Dilatandis litteris”: uno studio su Cicerone e la pronunzia rustica. InRaffaella Bombi, Guido Cifoletti, Fabiana Fusco, Lucia Innocente & Vincenzo Orioles (eds.), Studi linguistici in onore di Roberto Gusmani, 1023–1046. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Mancini, Marco
    (2019a) Lucilius and Nigidius Figulus on orthographic iconicity. Journal of Latin Linguistics, 18(1–2), 1–34. 10.1515/joll‑2019‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2019-0005 [Google Scholar]
46. Mancini, Marco
    (2019b) Repertori grafici e regole d’uso: il caso del latino 〈xs〉, inLucia Agostiniani & Maria P. Marchese (eds.), Lingua, testi, storia. Atti della Giornata di Studi in ricordo di Aldo Luigi Prosdocimi (Florence, 6 june 2017), 13–53. Roma: Giorgio Bretschneider.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Maras, Daniele F.
    (2009) Interferenze culturali arcaiche etrusco-latine: la scrittura, Annali della fondazione per il Museo C. Faina di Orvieto, 141: 309–331.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Marotta, Giovanna
    (1995) Coda condition in Italian and underspecification theory. InKjell Elenius & Peter Branderud (eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth Int. Congr. Phon. Sciences, vol.31: 378–381, Stockholm.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Marotta, Giovanna
    (1999) The Latin Syllable. InHarry van der Hulst & Nancy A. Ritter (eds.), The Syllable: Views and facts, 285–310. Berlin-New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Marotta, Giovanna
    (2018) Sul contrasto di quantità vocalica in latino. Sul contrasto di quantità vocalica in latino, 397–412.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Matras, Yaron & Sakel, Jeanette
    (2007) Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”31(4): 829–865. 10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat [Google Scholar]
52. Mayser, Edwin
    (1906) Grammatik der griechischen Papyri aus der Ptolemäerzeit. Leipzig: Leipzig B.G. Teubner.
    [Google Scholar]
53. McCullagh, Matthew
    (2011) The sounds of Latin: Phonology. InJames Clackson (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language, 83–91. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444343397.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343397.ch6 [Google Scholar]
54. McDonald, Katherine
    (2015) Oscan in Southern Italy and Sicily: Evaluating language contact in a fragmentary corpus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316218457
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316218457 [Google Scholar]
55. Meyerhoff, Miriam
    (2006) Introducing Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 10.4324/9780203966709
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966709 [Google Scholar]
56. Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley
    (2012) Authority in language: Investigating standard English (4th ed.) [1st ed. 1985] London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 10.4324/9780203124666
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203124666 [Google Scholar]
57. Nava, Maria L. & Pocetti, Paolo
    (2001) Il santuario lucano di Rossano di Vaglio. Una nuova dedica osca ad Ercole. Mélanges de l’école française de Rome113(1): 95–122. 10.3406/mefr.2001.10662
    https://doi.org/10.3406/mefr.2001.10662 [Google Scholar]
58. Neef, Martin
    (2005) Die Graphematik des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110914856
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110914856 [Google Scholar]
59. Neef, Martin
    (2015) Writing systems as modular objects: proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics, 1(1). 10.1515/opli‑2015‑0026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0026 [Google Scholar]
60. Nikitina, Veronika
    (2015) Standardisation and Variation in Latin Orthography and Morphology (100 BC – AD 100). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford, Trinity Term.
61. Nishimura, Kanehiro
    (2001) Superlative suffixes in Indo-European and Latin: Relation to ordinal numbers and process of variation. 京都大学言語学研究, 201, 37–50.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Pellegrini, Matteo
    (2023) Paradigm Structure and Predictability in Latin Inflection: An Entropy-based Approach. Cham: Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑24844‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24844-3 [Google Scholar]
63. Pillière, Linda, & Lewis, Diana
    (2018) Revisiting standardisation and variation. E-rea. Revue électronique d’études sur le monde anglophone, (15.2). 10.4000/erea.6391
    https://doi.org/10.4000/erea.6391 [Google Scholar]
64. Poccetti, Paolo
    (2001) La Tabula Bronzea di Roccagloriosa. InMaurizio Gualtieri & Helena Fracchia (eds.), Roccagloriosa II. L’oppidum Lucano e il territorio (Napoli 2001), 197–274.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Poccetti, Paolo
    (2012) Reflexes of variations in Latin and Greek through neither Latin nor Greek documentation: names of Greek religion and mythology in the languages of ancient Italy. InMartti Leiwo, Hilla Halla-aho & Marja Vierros (eds.). Variation and change in Greek and Latin, 71–96. Helsinki: Suomen Ateenan-Instituutin säätiö.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Primus, Beatrice
    (2010) Strukturelle Grundlagen des deutschen Schriftsystems. Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch–didaktisch–empirisch, 9–45. 10.1515/9783110232257.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110232257.9 [Google Scholar]
67. Prosdocimi, Aldo L.
    (2002) Le riforme ortografiche e il (ri)farsi della lingua poetica: da scriba a poeta, inLoretta Del Tutto Palma, Aldo L. Prosdocimi, & Giovanna Rocca (eds.), Lingua e cultura intorno al 295 a.C.: tra Roma e gli Italici del Nord, 226–251. Roma: Il Calamo.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Prósper, Blanca M.
    (2020) The Sabellic accusative plural endings and the outcome of the Indo-European sibilants in Italic. Journal of Language Relationship, 18(1–2), 41–79. 10.31826/jlr‑2020‑181‑206
    https://doi.org/10.31826/jlr-2020-181-206 [Google Scholar]
69. Ritschl, Friedrich W.
    (1867) Grammatisches bei Quintilian. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie221: 598–614.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Roberts, David
    (2010) Exploring written ambiguities can help assess where to mark tone. Writing Systems Research, 2(1), 25–40. 10.1093/wsr/wsq003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq003 [Google Scholar]
71. Rogers, Everett M.
    (1995) Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.) [1st ed. 1962] New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Roth, Roman
    (2018) Beyond Romanisation: Settlement, networks and material culture in Italy, c. 400–90 BC. InGary D. Farney & Guy Bradley (eds.), The Peoples of Ancient Italy, 295–317. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Rovai, Francesco
    (2020) Alcune osservazioni sul nome dei Papirii. InPatrizia Del Puente, Lucia Molinu & Simone Pisano (eds.), Tra etimologia romanza e dialettologia, Studi in onore di Franco Fanciullo, 453–464. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Rovai, Francesco
    (2021) On the standardisation of the Latin language and writing in the Late Republic. Studi classici e orientali67(1): 435–458. 10.12871/978883339503620
    https://doi.org/10.12871/978883339503620 [Google Scholar]
75. Salerno, Francesco
    (2004) Un praefectus a Cassino. Collection de l’Institut des Sciences et Techniques de l’Antiquité, 934(1), 322–325.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Salmon, Edward T.
    (1969) Roman Colonization under the Republic. London: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Schmidt, Kristen
    (2014) Morphophonographic regularities in German: the graphematic syllable boundary: A non-linear graphematic approach. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 253–281. 10.1075/wll.17.2.04sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.2.04sch [Google Scholar]
78. Sen, Ranjan
    (2011) Diachronic phonotactic development in Latin: the work of syllable structure or linear sequence?InCharles E. Cairns and Eric Raimy (eds.), Handbook of the syllable, 417–441. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004187405.i‑464.123
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004187405.i-464.123 [Google Scholar]
79. Sen, Ranjan
    (2015) Syllable and segment in Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660186.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660186.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
80. Sewell, Jamie P.
    (2010) The Formation of Roman Urbanism, 338–200 B.C.: Between Contemporary Foreign Influence and Roman Tradition. Portsmouth: Journal of Roman Archaeology.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Sharpe, Donald
    (2015) Chi-Square Test is Statistically Significant: Now What?. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation20(8): 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Sickinger, James P.
    (2017) New ostraka from the Athenian Agora. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens American School of Classical Studies at Athens86(3): 443–508. 10.2972/hesperia.86.3.0443
    https://doi.org/10.2972/hesperia.86.3.0443 [Google Scholar]
83. Stek, Tesse D.
    (2018) The impact of Roman expansion and colonization on ancient Italy in the Republican period. From diffusionism to networks of opportunity. InGary D. Farney & Guy Bradley (eds.), The peoples of ancient Italy, 269–294. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Sturtevant, Edgar H.
    (1911) Latin ss Instead of Intervocalic r. Classical Philology, 6(2), 221–221. 10.1086/359522
    https://doi.org/10.1086/359522 [Google Scholar]
85. Tagliapietra, Livia
    (2020) Mobility and Orthography: A Contextualization of Variant Spellings in the Oscan Inscriptions in the Greek Alphabet. InJames Clackson, Patrick James, Katherine McDonald, Livia Tagliapietra & Nicholas Zair (eds.), Migration, Mobility and Language Contact in and around the Ancient Mediterranean, 122–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108763943.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108763943.006 [Google Scholar]
86. Threatte, Leslie
    (1980) The Grammar of Attic Inscriptions: Phonology. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Tribulato, Olga
    (2015) Interferenza grafemica ed interferenza linguistica nella Sicilia antica. InDaniele Baglioni & Olga Tribulato (eds.), Contatti di lingue – contatti di scritture: Multilinguismo e multigrafismo dal Vicino Oriente Antico alla Cina contemporanea, 59–83. Venice.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Tribulato, Olga
    (2012) Siculi bilingues? Latin in the inscriptions of early Roman Sicily. InOlga Tribulato (ed.), Language and linguistic contact in ancient Sicily, 318–352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139248938.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139248938.016 [Google Scholar]
89. Vineis, Edoardo
    (1998) Latin. InAnna G. Ramat & Paolo Ramat (eds.), The Indo-European languages, 261–321. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Wachter, Rudolf
    (1987) Altlateinische Inschriften: Sprachliche und epigraphische Untersuchungen zu den Dokumenten bis etwa 150 v. Chr. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Wachter, Rudolf
    (2013) Die Entstehung der lateinischen Orthographie im 3. bis 1. Jh. v. Chr. InFederico Biddau (ed.), Die Geheimen Mächte hinter der Rechtschreibung. L’ortografia e i suoi poteri forti. Erfahrungen im Vergleich. Esperienze a confronto, 13–33. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Warmington, Eric H.
    (1940) Remains of Old Latin. Vol. 4, Archaic inscriptions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press-Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Weiss, Michael
    (2010) Observations on the littera rule. Paper presented at the29th East Coast Indo-European Conference, June 19, Cornell University.
94. Woodard, Roger D., & Scott, David A.
    (2014) The textualization of the Greek alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139235693
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235693 [Google Scholar]
95. Woodard, Roger D.
    (2017) Alphabet and Phonology at Methone: Beginning a Typology of Methone Alphabetic Symbols and an Alternative Hypothesis for Reading Hακεσάνδρō. InJenny Strauss Clay, Irad Malkin & Yannis Z. Tzifopoulos (eds.), Panhellenes at Methone: Graphê in Late Geometric and Protoarchaic Methone, Macedonia (ca 700 BCE), 182–218. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110515695‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110515695-010 [Google Scholar]
96. Zair, Nicholas
    (2016) Oscan in the Greek alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107706422
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107706422 [Google Scholar]