Handwritten letters and grammatical structures in German

References

1. Alston, Jean & Jane Taylor
   (1987) Beginning to Write: The Development of Grapho-Motor Skills. InJean Alston & Jane Taylor (eds.), Handwriting: Theory, Research and Practice, 9–23. Croom Helm.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Althaus, Hans P.
   (1980) Graphetik. InHans. P. Althaus, Helmut Henne & Herbert E. Wiegand (eds.), Lexikon der germanistischen Linguistik, 138–142. Niemeyer.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Altmann, Gabriel
   (2004) Script Complexity. Glottometrics81: 68–74.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beier, Sofie & Kevin Larson
   (2010) Design Improvements for Frequently Misrecognized Letters. Information Design Journal181: 118–137. 10.1075/idj.18.2.03bei
   https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.18.2.03bei [Google Scholar]
5. Berg, Kristian
   (2019) Die Graphematik der Morpheme im Deutschen und Englischen. de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Berg, Kristian
   (2019–2021) GraphVar: Das Klausurenkorpus. https://graphvar.uni-bonn.de
   [Google Scholar]
7. Berg, Kristian, Beatrice Primus & Lutz Wagner
   (2016) Buchstabenmerkmal, Buchstabe, Graphem. InUlrike Domahs & Beatrice Primus (eds.), Handbuch Laut, Gebärde, Buchstabe, 337–355. de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110295993‑019
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295993-019 [Google Scholar]
8. Bredel, Ursula
   (2008) Die Interpunktion des Deutschen: Ein kompositionelles System zur Online-Steuerung des Lesens. Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783484970502
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484970502 [Google Scholar]
9. Brekle, Herbert E.
   (1994) Die Buchstabenformen westlicher Alphabetschriften in ihrer historischen Entwicklung. In: Hartmut Günther, Otto Ludwig and Jürgen Baurmann (eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung, Volume11, 171–204. de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bugarski, Ranko
    (1993) Graphic Relativity and Linguistic Constructs. InRobert J. Scholes (ed.), Literacy and Language Analysis, 5–18. Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Busch, Florian
    (2021) Digitale Schreibregister. Kontexte, Formen und metapragmatische Reflexionen. de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Changizi, Mark A., Qiong Zhang, Hao Ye & Shinsuke Shimojo
    (2006) The Structures of Letters and Symbols Throughout Human History are Selected to Match Those Found in Objects in Natural Scenes. The American Naturalist167(5): E117–E139. 10.1086/502806
    https://doi.org/10.1086/502806 [Google Scholar]
13. Chen, Lin
    (1982) Topological Structure in Visual Perception. Science218(4573): 699–700. 10.1126/science.7134969
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7134969 [Google Scholar]
14. Darcy, R. & Hans Aigner
    (1980) The Uses of Entropy in the Multivariate Analysis of Categorical Variables. American Journal of Political Science24(1): 155–174.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dehaene, Stanislas, Laurent Cohen, Mariano Sigman & Fabien Vinckier
    (2005) The Neural Code for Written Words: A Proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences9(7): 335–341. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004 [Google Scholar]
16. Edelman, Shimon, Tamar Flash & Shimon Ullman
    (1990) Reading Cursive Handwriting by Alignment of Letter Prototypes. International Journal of Computer Vision (5): 303–331.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Eden, Murray & Morris Halle
    (1961) The Characterization of Cursive Writing. InColin Cherry (ed.), Information Theory, 287–299. Butterworth.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Eisenberg, Peter
    (2020) Das Wort: Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Metzler. 10.1007/978‑3‑476‑05096‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05096-0 [Google Scholar]
19. Fuhrhop, Nanna
    (s. a.). Ikonizität in der Schrift: Zur Form von Minuskeln und Majuskeln. Oldenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fuhrhop, Nanna
    (2018) Graphematik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich. InAngelika Wöllstein, Peter Gallmann, Mechthild Habermann & Manfred Krifka (eds.), Grammatiktheorie und Empirie in der germanistischen Linguistik, 587–616. de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110490992‑020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110490992-020 [Google Scholar]
21. Fuhrhop, Nanna
    (2020) Orthografie. Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fuhrhop, Nanna, & Franziska Buchmann
    (2009) Die Längenhierarchie: Zum Bau der graphematischen Silbe. Linguistische Berichte2181: 127–155.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fuhrhop, Nanna, & Franziska Buchmann
    (2016) Graphematische Silbe. InUlrike Domahs & Beatrice Primus (eds.), Handbuch Laut, Gebärde, Buchstab, 356–376. de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Fuhrhop, Nanna & Jörg Peters
    (2013) Einführung in die Phonologie und Graphematik. Metzler.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Glaser, Barney G.
    (1978) Theoretical sensitivity. Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gosse, Claire, Simon Carbonnelle, Christophe de Vleeschouwer & Marie van Reybroeck
    (2018) Specifying the Graphic Characteristics of Words that Influence Children’s Handwriting. Reading and Writing31(5): 1181–1207. 10.1007/s11145‑018‑9834‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9834-9 [Google Scholar]
27. Kanbe, Fumio
    (2013) On the Generality of the Topological Theory of Visual Shape Perception. Perception42(8): 849–872. 10.1068/p7497
    https://doi.org/10.1068/p7497 [Google Scholar]
28. Lanthier, Sophie N., Evan F. Risko, Jennifer A. Stolz & Derek Besner
    (2009) Not All Visual Features are Created Equal: Early Processing in Letter and Word Recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review16(1): 67–73. 10.3758/PBR.16.1.67
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.67 [Google Scholar]
29. Ludwig, Otto
    (2007) Skripte: Konturen einer Konzeption. Zeitschrift Für Germanistische Linguistik35(3): 367–396. 10.1515/zgl.2007.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl.2007.025 [Google Scholar]
30. Mai, Norbert, Christian Marquardt & Irmina Quenzel
    (1997) Wie kann die Flüssigkeit von Schreibbewegungen gefördert werden?InHeiko Balhorn & Heide Niemann (eds.), Sprachen werden Schrift: Mündlichkeit – Schriftlichkeit – Mehrsprachigkeit, 220–230. Libelle.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Meletis, Dimitrios
    (2015) Graphetik: Form und Materialität von Schrift. Werner Hülsbusch.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Meletis, Dimitrios
    (2020a) The Nature of Writing: A Theory of Grapholinguistics. Fluxus. 10.36824/2020‑meletis
    https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-meletis [Google Scholar]
33. Meletis, Dimitrios
    (2020b) Types of Allography. Open Linguistics6(1): 249–266. 10.1515/opli‑2020‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0006 [Google Scholar]
34. Morin, Olivier
    (2018) Spontaneous Emergence of Legibility in Writing Systems: The Case of Orientation Anisotropy. Cognitive Science42(2): 664–677. 10.1111/cogs.12550
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12550 [Google Scholar]
35. Primus, Beatrice
    (2004) A Featural Analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet. Written Language & Literacy7(2): 235–274.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Primus, Beatrice
    (2006) Buchstabenkomponenten und ihre Grammatik. InUrsula Bredel & Hartmut Günther (eds.), Orthographietheorie und Rechtschreibunterricht, 5–43. Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rapp, Brenda, & Jeremy Purcell
    (2019) Understanding How We Produce Written Words. InGreig I. de Zubicaray & Niels O. Schiller (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Neurolinguistics, 424–448. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190672027.013.17
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190672027.013.17 [Google Scholar]
38. Rastle, Kahtleen
    (2018) Visual Word Recognition. InShirley-Anne Rueschemeyer & M. Gareth Gaskell (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 48–70. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Reinken, Niklas
    (2018) Die Längenhierarchie in Hand- und Unterschriften, Deutsche Sprache46(4): 336–365.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Reinken, Niklas
    (2022a) Funktionalisierte Variation in Handschriften, Linguistische Berichte2691: 55–88.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Reinken, Niklas
    (2022b) How can complex graphemes be identified in German?Linguistics Vanguard8(1): 321–330. 10.1515/lingvan‑2022‑0055
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0055 [Google Scholar]
42. Rezec, Oliver
    (2009) Zur Struktur des deutschen Schriftsystems. Dissertation. https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10730/1/Rezec_Oliver.pdf
43. Shannon, Claude E.
    (1948) A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal27(3): 379–592.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Spitzmüller, Jürgen
    (2013) Graphische Variation als soziale Praxis: Eine soziolinguistische Theorie skripturaler „Sichtbarkeit“. de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110334241
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110334241 [Google Scholar]
45. Teulings, Hans-Leo & Lambert R. B. Schomaker
    (1993) Invariant Properties between Stroke Features in Handwriting. Acta Psychologica82(1–3): 69–88. 10.1016/0001‑6918(93)90005‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(93)90005-C [Google Scholar]
46. Viviani, Pablo & Carlo Terzuolo
    (1982) Trajectory Determines Movement Dynamics. Neuroscience7(2): 431–437. 10.1016/0306‑4522(82)90277‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(82)90277-9 [Google Scholar]
47. Wiebelt, Alexandra
    (2004) Do Symmetrical Letter Pairs Affect Readability? A Cross-Linguistic Examination of Writing Systems with Specific Reference to the Runes. Written Language & Literacy7(2): 275–304. 10.1075/wll.7.2.07wie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.07wie [Google Scholar]
48. Wolfe, Jeremy M.
    (2000) Visual Attention. InKaren K. de Valois (ed.), Seeing, 335–386. Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑012443760‑9/50010‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012443760-9/50010-6 [Google Scholar]
49. Wong, Kimberley, Frempongma Wadee, Gali Ellenblum & Michael McCloskey
    (2018) The Devilʼs in the g-Tails: Deficient Letter-Shape Knowledge and Awareness Despite Massive Visual Experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology44(9): 1324–1335. 10.1037/xhp0000532
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000532 [Google Scholar]