1887
Volume 26, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6732
  • E-ISSN: 1570-6001
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper compares the little-known writing system Thaana, used for the Maldivian language, with Hangeul, used for Korean. Both were intentional inventions by native speakers in early modern times, and both contain some unique features. Both are segmental in their representation while also arranging their letters into higher-order structures: syllables or CV groupings. These structures obey well-formedness constraints that are well known from the study of phonological (spoken) syllables. This paper argues that the operation of these constraints is evidence that these writing systems employ a grammar, which is analyzed here using Optimality Theory. Thaana and Hangeul use the same syllabification constraints, but the rankings differ between the two systems. The rankings also differ between each writing system and its related spoken language. This paper adds to the growing body of research that applies the tools of linguistic analysis to writing systems and finds evidence of grammar in their structure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00079.gna
2024-10-04
2025-06-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baroni, Antonio
    2013 “Eye Dialect and Casual Speech Spelling: Orthographic Variation in OT.” Writing Systems Research5(1):24–53. 10.1080/17586801.2013.808155
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.808155 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2015 “Constraint Interaction and Writing System Typology.” Pp.296–309inÉcriture(s) et représentations du langage et des langues: Les dossiers d’HEL 9 – 2015, edited byJ. Lefebvre, J. Léon, and C. Puech.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bashir, Elena, Thomas J. Conners, and Brook Hefright
    2019A Descriptive Grammar of Hindko, Panjabi, and Saraiki. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614512257
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512257 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bassetti, Benedetta
    2013 “Bilingualism and Writing Systems.” Pp.649 – 670inThe Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism, edited byT. K. Bhatia and W. C. Ritchie. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer, Thomas
    1996 “Arabic Writing.” Pp.559–64inThe World’s Writing Systems, edited byP. T. Daniels and W. Bright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1933Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bright, William
    1999 “A Matter of Typology: Alphasyllabaries and Abugidas.” Written Language & Literacy2(1):45–55. 10.1075/wll.2.1.03bri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.03bri [Google Scholar]
  8. Buckley, Eugene
    2018 “Core Syllables vs. Moraic Writing.” Written Language & Literacy21(1):26–51. 10.1075/wll.00009.buc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00009.buc [Google Scholar]
  9. Cho, Sungdai, and John Whitman
    2020Korean: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chrisomalis, Stephen
    2010Numerical Notation: A Comparative History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511676062
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676062 [Google Scholar]
  11. Coulmas, Florian
    1989The Writing Systems of the World. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Daniels, Peter T.
    1990 “Fundamentals of Grammatology.” Journal of the American Oriental Society1101:727–31. 10.2307/602899
    https://doi.org/10.2307/602899 [Google Scholar]
  13. 1996 “The Invention of Writing.” Pp.579–86inThe World’s Writing Systems, edited byP. T. Daniels and W. Bright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2018An Exploration of Writing. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2019 “Indic Scripts: History, Typology, Study.” Pp.11–42inHandbook of Literacy in Akshara Orthography, edited byR. M. Joshi and C. McBride. Springer Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑05977‑4_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Daniels, Peter T., and William Bright
    1996The World’s Writing Systems. edited byP. T. Daniels and W. Bright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. DeSilva, M. W. Sugathapala
    1969 “The Phonological Efficiency of the Maldivian Writing System.” Anthropological Linguistics11(7):199–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Evertz, Martin
    2018Visual Prosody: The Graphematic Foot in English and German. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110583441
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441 [Google Scholar]
  19. Evertz, Martin, and Beatrice Primus
    2013 “The Graphematic Foot in English and German.” Writing Systems Research5(1):1–23. 10.1080/17586801.2013.765356
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.765356 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gair, James W., and Bruce D. Cain
    1996 “Dhivehi Writing.” Pp.564–68inThe World’s Writing Systems, edited byP. T. Daniels and W. Bright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ganada Korean Language Institute
    Ganada Korean Language Institute 2005Korean For Foreigners. Seoul: Language PLUS.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Geilfuß-Wolfgang, Jochen
    2002 “Optimal Hyphenation.” Pp.115–30inThe relation of writing to spoken language, edited byM. Neef, A. Neijt, and R. Sproat. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783110918601.115
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110918601.115 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gill, Harjeet Singh
    1996 “The Gurmukhi Script.” Pp.395–98inThe World’s Writing Systems, edited byP. T. Daniels and W. Bright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gnanadesikan, Amalia E.
    2009The Writing Revolution: Cuneiform to the Internet. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2012 “Maldivian Thaana, Japanese Kana, and the Representation of Moras in Writing.” Writing Systems Research4(1):91–102. 10.1080/17586801.2012.693459
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.693459 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2017aDhivehi: The Language of the Maldives. edited byA. B. David. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2017b “Towards a Typology of Phonemic Scripts.” Writing Systems Research9(1):14–35. 10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2021a “Brahmi’s Children: Variation and Stability in a Script Family.” Written Language & Literacy24(2):303–35. 10.1075/wll.00057.gna
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00057.gna [Google Scholar]
  29. 2021b “S1: The Native Script Effect.” Pp.103–23inGrapholinguistics in the 21st Century – 2020, edited byY. Haralambous. Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hamann, Silke, and Ilaria E. Colombo
    2017A Formal Account of the Interaction of Orthography and Perception: English Intervocalic Consonants Borrowed into Italian. Vol.351. The Author(s).
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Handel, Zev
    2019Sinography: The Borrowing and Adaptation of the Chinese Script. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004352223
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223 [Google Scholar]
  32. Healey, John J.
    1998 “The Early Alphabet.” Pp.197–257inReading the Past: Ancient Writing from Cuneiform to the Alphabet, edited byJ. T. Hooker. New York: Barnes & Noble Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Iyengar, Arvind
    . Forthcoming “The Akshara as a Graphematic Unit.” forthcoming inGrapholinguistics in the 21st Century – 2022 edited by Y. Haralambous. Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Justeson, John S.
    1976 “Universals of Language and Universals of Writing.” Pp.57–94inLinguistic Studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, edited byA. G. Juilland, A. M. Devine, and L. D. Stephens. Anma Libri.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim-Cho, Sek Yen
    2002The Korean Alkphabet of 1446 (Hwunmin Cengum): Exposition, OPA, the Visible Speech Sounds, Annotated Translation, Future Applicability. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, Jeongsu
    2005The History and Future of Hangeul: Korea’s Indigenous Script. edited byR. (trans.King. Folkestone, Kent: Global Oriental.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim, Ji Yea
    2022 “Why [s]? An Analogical Account of the Epenthetic Consonant Quality in Non-Standard Korean.” Pp.71–81inJapanese/Korean Linguistics291, edited byK. Horie, K. Akita, Y. Kubota, D. Y. Oshima, and A. Utsugi. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ledyard, Gari K.
    1966 “The Korean Language Reform of 1446: The Origin, Background, and Early History of the Korean Alphabet.” University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 1997 “The International Linguistic Background of the Correct Sounds for the Instruction of the People.” Pp.31–87inThe Korean alphabet: Its history and structure, edited byY.-K. Kim-Renaud. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. 10.1515/9780824845278‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824845278-004 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee, Hyun Bok
    1999 “Korean.” Pp.120–23inHandbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet, edited byInternational Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee, Kee-Moon
    1997 “The Inventor of the Korean Alphabet.” Pp.11–30inThe Korean alphabet: Its history and structure, edited byY.-K. Kim-Renaud. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. 10.1515/9780824845278‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824845278-003 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lee, Sang-Oak
    1997 “Graphical Ingenuity in the Korean Writing System: With New Reference to Calligraphy.” Pp.107–16inThe Korean alphabet: Its history and structure, edited byY.-K. Kim-Renaud. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. 10.1515/9780824845278‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824845278-006 [Google Scholar]
  43. Maloney, Clarence
    1980People of the Maldive Islands. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince
    1993 “Generalized Alignment.” P.79–153inYearbook of Morphology, edited byG. Booij and J. van Marle. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 1999 “Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology.” Pp.218–309inThe Prosody-Morphology Interface, edited byR. Kager, H. van der Hulst, and W. Zonneveld. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627729.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627729.008 [Google Scholar]
  46. Meletis, Dimitrios
    2019 “The Grapheme as a Universal Basic Unit of Writing.” Writing Systems Research11(1):26–49. 10.1080/17586801.2019.1697412
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2019.1697412 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2020The Nature of Writing : A Theory of Grapholinguistics. Vol.31.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mohamed, Naseema
    1999Dhivehi Writing Systems. Malé: National Centre for Linguistic and Historical Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Myers, James
    2019The Grammar of Chinese Characters: Productive Knowledge of Formal Patterns in an Orthograhic System. 10.4324/9781315265971
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315265971 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pae, Hye K.
    2011 “Is Korean a Syllabic Alphabet or an Alphabetic Syllabary?” Writing Systems Research3(2):103–15. 10.1093/wsr/wsr002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr002 [Google Scholar]
  51. Primus, Beatrice
    2004 “A Featural Analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet.” Written Language & Literacy7(2):235–74. 10.1075/wll.7.2.06pri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.06pri [Google Scholar]
  52. Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky
    2004Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470759400
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470759400 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rimzhim, Anurag, Leonard Katz, and Carol A. Fowler
    2014 “Brāhmī-Derived Orthographies Are Typologically Āksharik but Functionally Predominantly Alphabetic.” Writing Systems Research61:41–53. 10.1080/17586801.2013.855618
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855618 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sampson, Geoffrey
    2015Writing Systems. Second. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Song, Hye Jeong, and Richard Wiese
    2010 “Resistance to Complexity Interacting with Visual Shape – German and Korean Orthography.” Writing Systems Research2(2):87–103. 10.1093/wsr/wsq010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq010 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sproat, Richard
    2000A Computational Theory of Writing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Stephens, Laurence, and John S. Justeson
    1978 “Reconstructing ‘Minoan’ Phonology: The Approach from Universals of Language and Universals of Writing Systems.” Transactions of the American Philological Association1081:271–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Taft, Marcus
    1979 “Lexical Access via an Orthographic Code: The Basic Orthographic Syllable Structure (BOSS).” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior181:21–39. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(79)90544‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90544-9 [Google Scholar]
  59. Taylor, Insup, and M. Martin Taylor
    2014Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese. Revised Ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/swll.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.14 [Google Scholar]
  60. UNESCO
    UNESCO 1986Literacy Situation in Asia and the Pacific: Country Studies: Maldives. Bankok: UNESCO Regional Office for Education in Asia and the Pacific.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Wiese, Richard
    2005 “How to Optimize Orthography.” Written Language & Literacy7(2):305–31. 10.1075/wll.7.2.08wie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.08wie [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00079.gna
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00079.gna
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error