Testing the waters

References

1. Akın, Lemi
   (2015) Konuşma dili grameri ve sözlü derlemlerden yararlanarak konuşma dili özelliklerinin tespiti. Türkiyat Mecmuası25.1: 1–28. 10.18345/tm.55272
   https://doi.org/10.18345/tm.55272 [Google Scholar]
2. Aksan, Mustafa & Yeşim Aksan
   (2018) Patterns and frequency: Evidence from the Turkish National Corpus (TNC). InMehmet A. Akıncı, & Kutlay Yağmur (eds.), The Rouen meeting: Studies on Turkic structures and language contacts (Turcologica; Vol. 114), 107–118. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. 10.2307/j.ctvcm4frz.12
   https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4frz.12 [Google Scholar]
3. Alderson, J. Charles
   (2007) Judging the frequency of English words. Applied Linguistics28.3: 383–409. 10.1093/applin/amm024
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm024 [Google Scholar]
4. Awramiuk, Elżbieta, Grażyna Krasowicz-Kupis & Magdalena Smoczyńska
   (2017) Early literacy policy and practice in Poland. InNatalia Kucirkova, Catherine E. Snow, Vibeke Grøver & Catherine McBride (eds.), The Routledge international handbook of early literacy education: A contemporary guide to literacy teaching and interventions in a global context, 139–149. Londra/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315766027‑13
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315766027-13 [Google Scholar]
5. Aydın, Özgür
   (2012) Elifbâdan alfabeye: İki yazı sisteminde yazıbirim-sesbirim etkileşimi. Middle East Technical University Studies in Development39.1: 61–86.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baayen, Harald, Richard Piepenbrock & Leon Gulikers
   (1995) CELEX 2 LDC96L14 (Web Download). Philidelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Babayiğit, Özgür
   (2019) Ortaokul altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinin sözcük düzeyinde yazım yanlışlarının incelenmesi. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi7.1: 94–114. 10.16916/aded.466685
   https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.466685 [Google Scholar]
8. Babayiğit, Selma
   (2022) Does a truly symmetrically transparent orthography exist? Spelling is more difficult than reading even in an orthography considered highly transparent for both reading and spelling. Reading and Writing351: 2453–2472. 10.1007/s11145‑022‑10259‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10259-5 [Google Scholar]
9. Babayiğit, Selma & Rhona Stainthorp
   (2007) Preliterate phonological awareness and early literacy skills in Turkish. Journal of Research in Reading30.4: 394–413. 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2007.00350.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00350.x [Google Scholar]
10. Başoğul, Duygu A. & Fatma S. Can
    (2014) Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğrenen Balkanlı öğrencilerin yazılı anlatımda yaptıkları hatalar üzerine tespitler. Dil ve Edebiyat Eğitimi Dergisi2.10: 100–119.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bayram, Ece, Özgür Aydin, Hacer I. Ergenc & Muhittin C. Akbostanci
    (2017) A picture database for verbs and nouns with different action content in Turkish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research46.4: 847–861. 10.1007/s10936‑016‑9471‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9471-x [Google Scholar]
12. Bilgin, Orhan
    (2016) Frequency effects in the processing of morphologically complex Turkish words. Master’s Thesis, Boğaziçi University.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Frauke M. Hellwig & Annette M. B. de Groot
    (2004) Word-initial entropy in five languages: Letter to sound, and sound to letter. Written Language & Literacy7.2: 165–184. 10.1075/wll.7.2.03bor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.03bor [Google Scholar]
14. Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Frauke M. Hellwig & Annette M. B. de Groot
    (2005) Onset entropy matters-letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing18.3: 211–229. 10.1007/s11145‑005‑3001‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3001-9 [Google Scholar]
15. Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Frauke M. Hellwig, Annette M. B. de Groot & Robert Licht
    (2006) Word-initial sound-spelling patterns: Cross-linguistic analyses and empirical validations of phoneme-letter feedback consistency effects. UofA Working Papers in Linguistics11. Retrieved fromhttps://goo.gl/jaPJ86
    [Google Scholar]
16. Borleffs, Elisabeth, Ben A. M. Maassen, Heikki Lyytinen & Frans Zwarts
    (2019) Cracking the code: The impact of orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity on reading and developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology91, 2534. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02534
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02534 [Google Scholar]
17. Can, Burcu & Harun Artuner
    (2013) A syllable-based Turkish speech recognition system by using time delay neural networks (TDNNs). In2013 International Conference on Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR), 219–224. IEEE. 10.1109/SOCPAR.2013.7054130
    https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCPAR.2013.7054130 [Google Scholar]
18. Caravolas, Markéta
    (2004) Spelling development in alphabetic writing systems: A cross-linguistic perspective. European Psychologist9.1: 3–14. 10.1027/1016‑9040.9.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.9.1.3 [Google Scholar]
19. Dalvean, Michael & Galbadrakh Enkhbayar
    (2018) Assessing the readability of fiction: A corpus analysis and readability ranking of 200 English fiction texts. Linguistic Research351, 137–170. 10.17250/khisli.35..201809.006
    https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.35..201809.006 [Google Scholar]
20. Demiriz, H. Neslihan & Alpaslan Okur
    (2019) Orthographic depth and orthographic depth of Turkish language. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods9.1: 86–95.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Duman Erenler, Esin
    (2009) Gazete dilinin son 60 yılda geldiği yer ve bunun Türkçe ders kitaplarının diliyle karşılaştırılması. PhD Dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University.
22. Ece, Abdulilah
    (n.d.). Abece İmla Kılavuzu. Abece. RetrievedMay 1, 2021, fromhttps://www.abecem.net/imlakilavuzu/
    [Google Scholar]
23. Emiroğlu, Selim
    (2014) Türkçe öğrenen yabancı öğrencilerin yazılı anlatımlarında Türkçenin dil bilgisi ve yazım özellikleriyle ilgili karşılaştığı zorluklar. International Journal of Language Academy2.3: 99–119. 10.18033/ijla.129
    https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.129 [Google Scholar]
24. Göksel, Aslı & Celia Kerslake
    (2005) Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Güldenoğlu, Birkan
    (2017) The effects of syllable-awareness skills on the word-reading performances of students reading in a transparent orthography. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education8.3: 425–442.
    [Google Scholar]
26. İlanbey, Özgür & Remzi Can
    (2016) Ortaokul öğrencilerinin yazılı anlatımlarında konuşma dili unsurlarının incelenmesi. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks8.2: 241–256.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Karadoğan, Ahmet
    (2002) Türkiye Türkçesinin ses varlığı ve seslerin kullanım sıklığı. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı — Belleten50.2: 57–65.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Karakılıç-Akı, Serap
    (2007) Türkçenin güncel problemleri. Master’s Thesis, Gazi University.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kartal, Günizi, & Treysi Terziyan
    (2016) Development and evaluation of game-like phonological awareness software for kindergarteners: JerenAli. Journal of Educational Computing Research53.4: 519–539. 10.1177/0735633115608397
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115608397 [Google Scholar]
30. Kartal, Günizi, Nalan Babür & Gülcan Erçetin
    (2016) Training for phonological awareness in an orthographically transparent language in two different modalities. Reading and Writing Quarterly32.6: 550–579. 10.1080/10573569.2015.1065213
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1065213 [Google Scholar]
31. Keklik, Saadettin
    (2009) On bir yaşına kadar çocukta dil edinimi. PhD Dissertation, Marmara University.
32. Kessler, Brett & Rebecca Treiman
    (2001) Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language44.4: 592–617. 10.1006/jmla.2000.2745
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2745 [Google Scholar]
33. Kornfilt, Jaklin
    (1997) Turkish. Londra/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Koşaner, Ö., Birant, Ç. C., & Aktaş, Ö.
    (2013) Improving Turkish language training materials: Grapheme-to-phoneme conversion for adding phonemic transcription into dictionary entries and course books. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1031, 473–484. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.363
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.363 [Google Scholar]
35. Landis, J. Richard & Gary G. Koch
    (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics331: 159–174. 10.2307/2529310
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
36. Leech, Geoffrey, Paul Rayson & Andrew Wilson
    (2014) Word frequencies in written and spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315840161
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840161 [Google Scholar]
37. Mei, Leilei, Gui Xue, Zhong-Lin Lu, Qinghua He, Mingxia Zhang, Feng Xue, Chuansheng Chen & Qi Dong
    (2013) Orthographic transparency modulates the functional asymmetry in the fusiform cortex: An artificial language training study. Brain and Language125.2: 165–172. 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.01.006 [Google Scholar]
38. Miller, Paul, Birkan Guldenoglu & Tevhide Kargin
    (2019) Reading failure in a completely transparent orthography representing a morphologically highly complex agglutinative language: The case of Turkish. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities31.5: 669–689. 10.1007/s10882‑019‑09667‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09667-3 [Google Scholar]
39. Nişanyan, Sevan
    (2017) Restoran. InNişanyan sözlük: Çağdaş Türkçenin etimolojisi. RetrievedAugust 14, 2022, fromhttps://www.nisanyansozluk.com/kelime/restoran
    [Google Scholar]
40. Öney, Banu & Aydin Yücesan Durgunoğlu
    (1997) Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics18.1: 1–15. 10.1017/S014271640000984X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640000984X [Google Scholar]
41. Perry, Conrad & Johannes C. Ziegler
    (2004) Beyond the two-strategy model of skilled spelling: Effects of consistency, grain size, and orthographic redundancy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology57A.21: 325–356. 10.1080/02724980343000323
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000323 [Google Scholar]
42. Protopapas, Athanassios & Eleni L. Vlahou
    (2009) A comparative quantitative analysis of Greek orthographic transparency. Behavior Research Methods41.4: 991–1008. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.991
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.991 [Google Scholar]
43. Püsküllüoğlu, Ali
    (1999) Çağdaş Türkçe sözlük (7th1vol). Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınevi.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Raman, Ilhan & Brendan Stuart Weekes
    (2005) Deep dysgraphia in Turkish. Behavioural Neurology16.2–3: 59–69. 10.1155/2005/568540
    https://doi.org/10.1155/2005/568540 [Google Scholar]
45. Rey, Arnaud, Johannes C. Ziegler & Arthur M. Jacobs
    (2000) Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition741: 1–12. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00078‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00078-5 [Google Scholar]
46. Salman, Ramazan
    (2015) Yabancı kökenli sözcüklerin yazımı sorunu ve bazı imla önerileri. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi5.10: 73–78.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Sezer, Taner
    (2017) TS corpus project: An online Turkish dictionary and TS DIY corpus. European Journal of Language and Literature9.1: 18–24. 10.26417/ejls.v9i1.p18‑24
    https://doi.org/10.26417/ejls.v9i1.p18-24 [Google Scholar]
48. Shannon, Claude Elwood
    (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal271: 379–423. 10.1002/j.1538‑7305.1948.tb01338.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x [Google Scholar]
49. Siegelman, Noam, Devin M. Kearns & Jay G. Rueckl
    (2020) Using information-theoretic measures to characterize the structure of the writing system: The case of orthographic-phonological regularities in English. Behavior Research Methods521: 1292–1312. 10.3758/s13428‑019‑01317‑y
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01317-y [Google Scholar]
50. Sloos, Marjoleine
    (2015) Accent-induced coder bias. Review of Cognitive Linguistics13.1: 59–80. 10.1075/rcl.13.1.03slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.1.03slo [Google Scholar]
51. Sönmez, Ecehan, Nalan Babür & Belma Haznedar
    (2015) Learning how to spell in Turkish. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi32.1: 34–50.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Taylan-Erguvanlı, Eser
    (2015) Turkish phonology and morphology. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Terziyan, Treysi Lusi & Gözde Demirel
    (2020) İlkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin Türkçe yazım hatalarının sınıflandırılması. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi8.3: 708–719. 10.16916/aded.679720
    https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.679720 [Google Scholar]
54. The New Oxford American Dictionary
    The New Oxford American Dictionary (2005) New York, N.Y: Oxford University Press.
55. Türk Dil Kurumu
    Türk Dil Kurumu (2004) Türkçe sözlük (1998)’teki sözlerin köklerine ait sayısal döküm. RetrievedJune 22, 2004, fromwww.tdk.gov.tr/tdksozluk/sozdil.html
    [Google Scholar]
56. Türk Dil Kurumu
    Türk Dil Kurumu (1998) Genel Türkçe sözlük. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basım Evi.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Türk Dil Kurumu
    Türk Dil Kurumu (2011) Güncel Türkçe sözlük. Retrieved fromhttps://sozluk.gov.tr/
    [Google Scholar]
58. Uluçay, Melike
    (2019) 2018 Türkçe dersi öğretim programındaki dil bilgisi öğretimi ile ilgili kazanımlara eleştirel bir bakış. EKEV Akademi Dergisi801: 303–318. 10.17753/Ekev1207
    https://doi.org/10.17753/Ekev1207 [Google Scholar]
59. Uysal, İdris Nebi
    (2017) Türkiye Türkçesindeki alıntı sözcüklerin yazım ve karşılığı üzerine bir araştırma. Milli Eğitim Dergisi46.215: 87–110.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Uzunca, Aybüke
    (2018) An acoustic approach to ‘ğ’ sound in Turkish. Language, Individual & Society121: 123–139.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Witte, Erik & Susanne Köbler
    (2019) Linguistic materials and metrics for the creation of well-controlled Swedish speech perception tests. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research62.7: 2280–2294. 10.1044/2019_JSLHR‑S‑18‑0454
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0454 [Google Scholar]
62. Yavuz, Handan
    (2011) Turkish consonants. InZülal Balpınar (eds.), Turkish phonology and morphology, 14–31. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Ziegler, Johannes C., Gregory O. Stone & Arthur M. Jacobs
    (1997) What’s the pronunciation for –OUGH and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers291: 600–618. 10.3758/BF03210615
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210615 [Google Scholar]