Perception and production of a feature correlation in Chinese characters

References

1. Albrow, Kenneth H.
   (1972) The English writing system: Notes toward a description. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allopenna, Paul D., James S. Magnuson & Michael K. Tanenhaus
   (1998) Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language38.41: 419–439. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
   https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2558 [Google Scholar]
3. Beddor, Patrice Speeter, Kevin B. McGowan, Julie E. Boland, Andries W. Coetzee & Anthony Brasher
   (2013) The time course of perception of coarticulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America133.41: 2350–2366. 10.1121/1.4794366
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4794366 [Google Scholar]
4. Beech, John R. & Kate A. Mayall
   (2005) The word shape hypothesis re-examined: evidence for an external feature advantage in visual word recognition. Journal of Research in Reading28.31: 302–319. 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2005.00271.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00271.x [Google Scholar]
5. Bishop, Tom & Richard Cook
   (2007) A character description language for CJK. Multilingual18.71: 62–68.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chang, Ya-Ning, Chun-Hsien Hsu, Jie-Li Tsai, Chien-Liang Chen & Chia-Ying Lee
   (2016) A psycholinguistic database for traditional Chinese character naming. Behavior Research Methods481: 112–122. 10.3758/s13428‑014‑0559‑7
   https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0559-7 [Google Scholar]
7. Chen, Jenn-Yeu & Rong-Ju Cherng
   (2013) The proximate unit in Chinese handwritten character production. Frontiers in Psychology41: 517. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00517
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00517 [Google Scholar]
8. Chetail, Fabienne
   (2015) Reconsidering the role of orthographic redundancy in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Psychology61: Article 645. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00645
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00645 [Google Scholar]
9. Chuang, Te-Ming & Hsien-Ying Teng
   (2009) Research and development of Chinese characters information database and its application [in Chinese]. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chung, Yeojin, Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, Vincent Dorie, Andrew Gelman & Jingchen Liu
    (2013) A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance parameters in multilevel models. Psychometrika78.41: 685–709. 10.1007/s11336‑013‑9328‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9328-2 [Google Scholar]
11. Cohen Priva, Uriel
    (2015) Informativity affects consonant duration and deletion rates. Laboratory Phonology6.21: 243–278. 10.1515/lp‑2015‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2015-0008 [Google Scholar]
12. Cutler, Anne
    (2015) Lexical stress in English pronunciation. InMarnie Reed & John M. Levis (eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation, 106–124. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118346952.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346952.ch6 [Google Scholar]
13. Ernestus, Mirjam & Anne Cutler
    (2015) BALDEY: A database of auditory lexical decisions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology68.81: 1469–1488. 10.1080/17470218.2014.984730
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.984730 [Google Scholar]
14. Evertz, Martin
    (2018) Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110583441
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441 [Google Scholar]
15. Fiset, Daniel, Caroline Blais, Catherine Ethier-Majcher, Martin Arguin, Daniel Bub & Frédéric Gosselin
    (2008) Features for identification of uppercase and lowercase letters. Psychological Science19.111: 1161–1168. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02218.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02218.x [Google Scholar]
16. Fox, John & Sanford Weisberg
    (2019) An R companion to applied regression, third edition. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Friedmann, Naama & Manar Haddad-Hanna
    (2012) Letter position dyslexia in Arabic: From form to position. Behavioural Neurology25.31: 193–203. 10.1155/2012/296974
    https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/296974 [Google Scholar]
18. Fuhrhop, Nanna, Franziska Buchmann & Kristian Berg
    (2011) The length hierarchy and the graphematic syllable: Evidence from German and English. Written Language & Literacy14.21: 275–292. 10.1075/wll.14.2.05fuh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.05fuh [Google Scholar]
19. Gnanadesikan, Amalia E.
    (2023) Segments and syllables in Hangeul and Thaana: A comparison and optimality theoretic analysis. Written Language & Literacy26.21: 238–265. 10.1075/wll.00079.gna
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00079.gna [Google Scholar]
20. Goedemans, Rob & Harry van der Hulst
    (2013) Fixed stress locations. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.4) [Data set]. Zenodo. RetrievedNovember 16, 2024, fromhttps://wals.info/chapter/14
21. Goldsmith, John
    (2000) On information theory, entropy, and phonology in the 20th century. Folia Linguistica34.11: 85–100. 10.1515/flin.2000.34.1‑2.85
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2000.34.1-2.85 [Google Scholar]
22. Hall, Kathleen Currie, Elizabeth Hume, T. Florian Jaeger & Andrew Wedel
    (2018) The role of predictability in shaping phonological patterns. Linguistics Vanguard4.s21: 20170027. 10.1515/lingvan‑2017‑0027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0027 [Google Scholar]
23. Hayes, Bruce
    (1995) Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hockett, Charles F.
    (1953) Review of The mathematical theory of communicationbyClaude L. Shannon and Warren Weaver. Language29.11: 69–93. 10.2307/410457
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410457 [Google Scholar]
25. Huang, Shuting, Yacong Zhou, Menglin Du, Ruiming Wang & Zhenguang G. Cai
    (2021) Character amnesia in Chinese handwriting: A mega-study analysis. Language Sciences851: 101383. 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101383
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101383 [Google Scholar]
26. Koshevoy, Alexey, Helena Miton & Olivier Morin
    (2023) Zipf’s law of abbreviation holds for individual characters across a broad range of writing systems. Cognition2381: 105527. 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105527
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105527 [Google Scholar]
27. Ladd, D. Robert
    (2008) Intonational phonology, second edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511808814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808814 [Google Scholar]
28. Latash, Mark L.
    (2012) Fundamentals of motor control. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lavidor, Michal
    (2011) Whole-word shape effect in dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading34.41: 443–454. 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2010.01444.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01444.x [Google Scholar]
30. Law, Sam Po & Mak Tak Leung
    (2000) Structural representations of characters in Chinese writing: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Psychologia431: 67–83.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lee, Sang-Oak
    (2009) The Korean alphabet: An optimal featural system with graphical ingenuity. Written Language & Literacy12.21: 202–212. 10.1075/wll.12.2.05lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.05lee [Google Scholar]
32. Lidz, Jeffrey and Annie Gagliardi
    (2015) How nature meets nurture: Universal grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of Linguistics1.11: 333–353. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑125236
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125236 [Google Scholar]
33. Lu, Yu-An & Sang-Im Lee-Kim
    (2021) The effect of linguistic experience on perceived vowel duration: Evidence from Taiwan Mandarin speakers. Journal of Phonetics861: 101049. 10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101049
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101049 [Google Scholar]
34. Marslen-Wilson, William D.
    (1987) Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition251: 71–102. 10.1016/0010‑0277(87)90005‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9 [Google Scholar]
35. Massaro, Dominic W. & Michael M. Cohen
    (1983) Phonological context in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics34.41: 338–348. 10.3758/BF03203046
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203046 [Google Scholar]
36. McCawley, James D.
    (1994) Some graphotactic constraints. InWilliam C. Watt (ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics, 115–127. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8285‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8285-8_7 [Google Scholar]
37. Meletis, Dimitrios
    (2019) The grapheme as a universal basic unit of writing. Writing Systems Research11.11: 26–49. 10.1080/17586801.2019.1697412
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2019.1697412 [Google Scholar]
38. Meletis, Dimitrios
    (2020) Types of allography. Open Linguistics6.11: 249–266. 10.1515/opli‑2020‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0006 [Google Scholar]
39. Myers, James
    (2019) The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthographic system. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315265971
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315265971 [Google Scholar]
40. Myers, James
    (2021) Levels of structure within Chinese character constituents. InYannis Haralambous (ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st Century: From graphemes to knowledge, Part II, 645–582. Paris: Fluxus Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Myers, James
    (2023) Nonstatistical things that linguists can do with R: A review with a case study on Chinese handwriting. InAlex Cherici, Bihua Chen & Chien-Jer Charles Lin (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-34). Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures, Indiana University Bloomington.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Myers, James
    (2024) Interactions among patterns in Chinese character form. InJames Myers & James H-Y. Tai (eds.), Looking at language from all sides, 129–152. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
43. O’Shea, Robert P.
    (1991) Thumb’s rule tested: Visual angle of thumb’s width is about 2 deg. Perception201: 415–418. 10.1068/p200415
    https://doi.org/10.1068/p200415 [Google Scholar]
44. Ooms, Jeroen
    (2024) magick: Advanced Graphics and Image-Processing in R. R package version 2.8.4. RetrievedNovember 16, 2024, fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=magick
45. Pacton, Sébastien, Pierre Perruchet, Michel Fayol & Axel Cleeremans
    (2001) Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General130.31: 401–426. 10.1037/0096‑3445.130.3.401
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.401 [Google Scholar]
46. Pau, Grégoire, Florian Fuchs, Oleg Sklyar, Michael Boutros & Wolfgang Huber
    (2010) EBImage — an R package for image processing with applications to cellular phenotypes. Bioinformatics26.71: 979–981. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq046
    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq046 [Google Scholar]
47. Peirce, Jonathan, Rebecca Hirst & Michael MacAskill
    (2022) Building experiments in PsychoPy, 2nd edition. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Peirce, Jonathan, Jeremy R. Gray, Sol Simpson, Michael MacAskill, Richard Höchenberger, Hiroyuki Sogo, Erik Kastman & Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv
    (2019) PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods511: 195–203. 10.3758/s13428‑018‑01193‑y
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y [Google Scholar]
49. Peng, Gang, James W. Minett & William S-Y. Wang
    (2010) Cultural background influences the liminal perception of Chinese characters: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics23.41: 416–426. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.03.004 [Google Scholar]
50. Penney, Joshua, Felicity Cox & Anita Szakay
    (2021) Effects of glottalisation, preceding vowel duration, and coda closure duration on the perception of coda stop voicing. Phonetica78.11: 29–63. 10.1159/000508752
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000508752 [Google Scholar]
51. Perea, Manuel & Eva Rosa
    (2002) Does “whole-word shape” play a role in visual word recognition?Perception & Psychophysics641: 785–794. 10.3758/BF03194745
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194745 [Google Scholar]
52. Primus, Beatrice
    (2004) A featural analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet. Written Language & Literacy7.21: 235–274.
    [Google Scholar]
53. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2024) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. RetrievedNovember 16, 2024, fromhttps://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
54. Reinisch, Eva, Alexandra Jesse & James M. McQueen
    (2011) Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical-stress cue. Language and Speech54.21: 147–165. 10.1177/0023830910397489
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910397489 [Google Scholar]
55. Reinken, Niklas
    (2023) Die Grammatik der Handschriften. Heidelberg: Winter. 10.33675/2023‑82538630
    https://doi.org/10.33675/2023-82538630 [Google Scholar]
56. Sumner, Meghan & Arthur G. Samuel
    (2005) Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/. Journal of Memory and Language521: 322–338. 10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.004 [Google Scholar]
57. Sze, Wei Ping, Susan J. Rickard Liow & Melvin J. Yap
    (2014) The Chinese Lexicon Project: A repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods461: 263–273. 10.3758/s13428‑013‑0355‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0355-9 [Google Scholar]
58. Taft, Marcus & Xiaoping Zhu
    (1997) Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition23.31: 761–775.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Tomaschek, Fabian, Benjamin V. Tucker, Matteo Fasiolo & R. Harald Baayen
    (2018) Practice makes perfect: The consequences of lexical proficiency for articulation. Linguistics Vanguard4.s21: 20170018. 10.1515/lingvan‑2017‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0018 [Google Scholar]
60. Treiman, Rebecca & Brett Kessler
    (2022) Statistical learning in word reading and spelling across languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading26.21: 139–149. 10.1080/10888438.2021.1920951
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1920951 [Google Scholar]
61. Tsai, Kuan-Chan & Terezinha Nunes
    (2003) The role of character schema in learning novel Chinese characters. InHsuan-Chih Chen & Catherine McBride-Chang (eds.), Reading development in Chinese children, 109–125. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Van der Kooij, Els & Onno Crasborn
    (2008) Syllables and the word-prosodic system in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Lingua118.91: 1307–1327. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.013 [Google Scholar]
63. van Rij, Jacolien
    (2015) Overview GAMM analysis of time series data. RetrievedNovember, 2024, fromhttps://jacolienvanrij.com/Tutorials/GAMM.html
64. Venezky, Richard L.
    (1970) The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110804478
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804478 [Google Scholar]
65. Wang, Jason Chia-Sheng
    (1983) Toward a generative grammar of Chinese character structure and stroke order. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Warker, Jill A. & Gary S. Dell
    (2006) Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition32.21: 387–398.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Watt, William C.
    (1975) What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? I: Desiderata. Visible Language9.41: 293–327.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Winter, Bodo & Martijn Wieling
    (2016) How to analyze linguistic change using mixed models, growth curve analysis and generalized additive modeling. Journal of Language Evolution1.11: 7–18. 10.1093/jole/lzv003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzv003 [Google Scholar]
69. Wong, Kimberly, Frempongma Wadee, Gali Ellenblum & Michael McCloskey
    (2018) The devil’s in the g-tails: Deficient letter-shape knowledge and awareness despite massive visual experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance44.91: 1324–1335.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Wood, Simon N.
    (2017) Generalized additive models: An introduction with R (2nd edition). Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. 10.1201/9781315370279
    https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370279 [Google Scholar]
71. Wu, Yan, Deyuan Mo, Yiu-Kei Tsang & Hsuan-Chih Chen
    (2012) ERPs reveal sub-lexical processing in Chinese character recognition. Neuroscience Letters514.21: 164–168. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.080
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.080 [Google Scholar]
72. Yang, Ruoxiao & William Shi Yuan Wang
    (2018) Categorical perception of Chinese characters by simplified and traditional Chinese readers. Reading and Writing31.51: 1133–1154. 10.1007/s11145‑018‑9832‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9832-y [Google Scholar]
73. Yeh, Su-Ling, Jing-Ling Li, Tatsuto Takeuchi, Vincent Sun & Wen-Ren Liu
    (2003) The role of learning experience on the perceptual organization of Chinese characters. Visual Cognition10.61: 729–764. 10.1080/13506280344000077
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280344000077 [Google Scholar]
74. Zhang, Qingfang & Chen Feng
    (2017) The interaction between central and peripheral processing in Chinese handwritten production: Evidence from the effect of lexicality and radical complexity. Frontiers in Psychology81: 334. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00334
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00334 [Google Scholar]