1887
Volume 28, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-6732
  • E-ISSN: 1570-6001

Abstract

Non-obligatory control (NOC) gerundive adjuncts (e.g. ‘By reducing the effectiveness of the treatment, patients remain contagious for a longer period’) are common in government documents and require readers to integrate syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic information to identify the subject of the gerund, a process that can be challenging for older adults and low-literacy citizens. In this self-paced reading and similarity judgment study, 47 Italian native speakers (age range 18–85, including both men and women, with varying literacy levels) evaluated whether a target sentence containing an NOC gerundive adjunct matched a probe sentence with a corresponding finite verb. Results show that 30% of older and low-literacy participants failed to comprehend NOCs, and older readers were significantly slower than younger ones. We conclude that minimizing syntactic complexity in official documents — such as avoiding NOCs — could improve access to essential information for weaker readers, particularly on critical topics such as health, employment, security, taxes, and education.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00097.ras
2026-07-02
2026-07-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/wll.00097.ras.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00097.ras&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abbot-Smith, Kirsten, & Michael Tomasello
    (2006) Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition. The Linguistic Review23(3): 275–290. 10.1515/TLR.2006.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.011 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler, Allison Nicole
    (2006) Syntax and Discourse in the Acquisition of Adjunct Control. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Cambridge MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/37417
  3. Baciu, Monica & Elise Roger
    (2024) Finding the Words: How Does the Aging Brain Process Language? A Focused Review of Brain Connectivity and Compensatory Pathways. Topics in Cognitive Sciences. 10.1111/tops.12736
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12736 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lmer. Journal of Statistical Software67(1). 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boeckx, Cedric, Norbert Hornstein & Jairo Nunes
    (2010) Control as movement. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511761997
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761997 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosse, Marie-Laine, Marie Josèphe Tainturier & Sylviane Valdois
    (2007) Developmental dyslexia: the visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition1041. 198–230. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  7. Burke, Deborah M., Meredith A. Shafto
    (2008) Language and ageing. InFergus I. M. Craik & Timothy A. Salthouse (eds.), The Handbook of Aging and Cognition (3rd ed., 373–443). Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chomsky, Noam
    (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Corcoran, Katja, Kai Epstude, Lysann Damisch & Thomas Mussweiler
    (2011) Fast similarities: efficiency advantages of similarity-focused comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition37(5): 1280. 10.1037/a0023922. PMID: 21707213
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023922 [Google Scholar]
  10. Crossley, Scott A. & Danielle S. McNamara
    (2011) Understanding text readability and its implications for understanding texts. InPaul L. Thomas (ed.), Understanding literacy and cognition, 127–148. Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dąbrowska, Eva & James Street
    (2006) Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences281: 604–615. 10.1016/j.langsci.2005.11.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2005.11.014 [Google Scholar]
  12. De Mauro, Tullio
    (1994) Come Parlano gli italiani. Firenze, La Nuova Italia.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Durrant, Philip & Norbert Schmitt
    (2009) To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations?International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching47(2): 157–177. 10.1515/iral.2009.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Egerland, Verner
    (2018) On the interpretation of gerundival null subjects and the theory of control. InFederica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds.) Null Subjects in Generative Grammar, 199–208. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Favier, Saoradh & Falk Huettig
    (2021) Long-term written language experience affects grammaticality judgements and usage but not priming of spoken sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology74(8): 1378–1395. 10.1177/17470218211005228
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211005228 [Google Scholar]
  16. Federmeyer, Kara D. & Marta Kutas
    (2019) What’s “left”? Hemispheric sensitivity to predictability and congruity during sentence reading by older adults. Neuropsychologia10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107173
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107173 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fernández-Silva, Sabela & Juan Antonio Núñez Cortés
    (2024) Exploring the Effect of Plain Terminology on Processing and Comprehension of Administrative Texts in Spanish: A Self-Paced Reading Experiment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 10.1111/ijal.12650
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12650 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fischer, Silke & Inghild Flaate Høyem
    (2021) Event Control. InAnne Mucha, Jutta M. Hartmann & Beata Trawinski (eds.), Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective, 197–222. 10.1075/la.270.07fis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.270.07fis [Google Scholar]
  19. González- Sordé, Mariona & Anna Matamala
    (2023) Empirical evaluation of Easy Language recommendations: A systematic literature review from journal research in Catalan, English, and Spanish. Universal Access in the Information Society. 10.1007/s10209‑023‑00975‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00975-2 [Google Scholar]
  20. Green, Jeffrey
    (2019) A movement theory of adjunct control. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics4(1): 87. 10.5334/gjgl.724
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.724 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hornstein, Norbert
    (1999) Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry30(1): 69–96. 10.1162/002438999553968
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999553968 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2003) On control. InRandall Hendrick (ed.), Minimalist Syntax, 6–81. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470758342.ch1
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758342.ch1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu, Yuechan, Quianxi Lv, Esther Pascual, Junying Liang & Falk Huettig
    (2021) Syntactic priming in illiterate and literate older Chinese adults. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science. 51. 10.1007/s41809‑021‑00082‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-021-00082-9 [Google Scholar]
  24. Huettig, F., Singh, L., & Mishra, R. K.
    (2011) Modelling the effect of literacy on multimodal interactions during spoken language processing. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 211–220
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ISFOL (Istituto per la Formazione professionale dei Lavoratori)
    ISFOL (Istituto per la Formazione professionale dei Lavoratori) (2013) Le competenze per vivere e lavorare oggi. ISFOL Research Paper91. https://opac.inapp.org
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jakubíček, Miloş, Adam Kilgarriff, Vojtěc Kovář, Pavel Rychlý & Vít Suchomel
    (2013, July). The TenTen corpus family. In7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference CL, 125–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jegerski, Jill & Gregory D. Keating
    (2023) Using self-paced reading in research with heritage speakers: a role for reading skill in the online processing of Spanish verb argument specifications. Frontiers in Psychology141. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1056561
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1056561 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, Dongwook, Sanjay Mishra, Ze Wang & Surendra N. Singh
    (2016) Insidious effects of syntactic complexity: Are ads targeting older adults too complex to remember?Journal of Advertising45(4): 509–518. 10.1080/00913367.2016.1262301
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1262301 [Google Scholar]
  29. Landau, Idan
    (2013) Control in Generative Grammar. A Research Companion. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061858
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061858 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2021) A Selectional Theory of Adjuncts Control. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/13925.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13925.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Langacker, Ronald W.
    (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lubello, Sergio
    (2014) Il linguaggio burocratico. Roma, Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Miller, Michelle D. & Jeffrey S. Johnson
    (2004) Phonological and lexical-semantic short-term memory and their relationship to sentence production in older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition111: 395–415. 10.1080/13825580490521331
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580490521331 [Google Scholar]
  34. Milton, James
    (2009) Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mishra, R. K., Pandey, S., Singh, L., & Huettig, F.
    (2012) The influence of literacy on visual search. Frontiers in Psychology, 31, 271
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Molinaro, Nicola, Paolo Canal, Francesco Vespignani, Francesca Pesciarelli & Cristina Cacciari
    (2013) Are complex function words processed as semantically empty strings? A reading time and ERP study of collocational complex prepositions. Language and Cognitive Processes28:6: 762–788. 10.1080/01690965.2012.665465
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.665465 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nunes, T., & Bryant, P.
    (2006) Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203969557
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969557 [Google Scholar]
  38. Paccagnella, Marco
    (2017) Age, Ageing and Skills: Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. OECD Education Working Papers1321. 10.1787/5jm0q1n38lvc‑en
    https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm0q1n38lvc-en [Google Scholar]
  39. Perfetti, Charles A., & Lesley Hart
    (2002) The lexical quality hypothesis. InLudo Vehoeven, Carsten Elbro & Pieter Reitsma (eds.), Precursors of functional literacy, 189–213. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/swll.11.14per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.11.14per [Google Scholar]
  40. Pliatsikas, Christos, João Veríssimo, Laura Babcock, Mariel Y. Pullman, Dana A. Glei, Maxine Weinstein, Noreen Goldman & Michael T. Ullman
    (2019) Working memory in older adults declines with age but is modulated by sex and education. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology72(6): 1308–1327. 10.1177/1747021818791994
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818791994 [Google Scholar]
  41. Polinski, Maria
    (2013) Raising and Control. InMarcel den Dikken, (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics 2013, 577–606. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511804571.021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804571.021 [Google Scholar]
  42. Posten, Ann-Christin & Thomas Mussweiler
    (2017) That certain something! Focusing on similarities reduces judgmental uncertainty. Cognition1651: 121–125. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  43. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2025) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.4.3). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rastelli, Stefano
    (2024) Plain Language: A Psycholinguistic Approach. 10.4324/9781003492368
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003492368 [Google Scholar]
  45. Rayner, Keith, Jinmian Yang & Monica S. Castelhano
    (2009) Eye Movements and the Perceptual Span in Older and Younger Readers. Psychology and Aging24(3): 755–760. 10.1037/a0014300
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014300 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rayner, Keith, Timothy J. Slattery & Nathalie N. Bélanger
    (2010) Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin Review17(6): 834–839. 10.3758/PBR.17.6.834
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.834 [Google Scholar]
  47. Reali, Florencia & Morten H. Christiansen
    (2007) Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language571: 1–23. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rossi, Eleonora, Michele T. Diaz
    (2016) How ageing and bilingualism influence language processing: theoretical and neural models. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism6(1–2): 9–42. 10.1075/lab.14029.ros
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.14029.ros [Google Scholar]
  49. Sabatini, John P., Yasuyo Sawaki, Jane R. Shore & Hollis S. Scarborough
    (2010) Relationships Among Reading Skills of Adults With Low Literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities43(2): 122–138. 10.1177/0022219409359343
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409359343 [Google Scholar]
  50. Schmitt, Norbert & Stephen Redwood
    (2011) Learner knowledge of phrasal verbs: A corpus-informed study. InFanny Meunier, Sylvie De Cock, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Magali Paquot (eds.), A Taste for Corpora: In honour of Sylviane Granger: 173–208. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/scl.45.12sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.45.12sch [Google Scholar]
  51. Serianni, Luca
    (2003) Il linguaggio burocratico. In Id., Italiani scritti, 123–139. Bologna, il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Shafto, Meredith A. & Loraine K. Tyler
    (2014) Language in the ageing brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science346 (6209): 583–587. 10.1126/science.1254404
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254404 [Google Scholar]
  53. Shin, Dongkwang & Paul Nation
    (2008) Beyond single words: The most frequent collocations in spoken English. ELT Journal62(4): 339–348. 10.1093/elt/ccm091
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm091 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sinclair, John M.
    (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N.
    (2011) Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27(2), 251–272. 10.1177/0267658310382068
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310382068 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sutherland, Rebekah J. & Tom Isherwood
    (2016) The evidence for easy-read for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic literature review. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 13(4), 297–310. 10.1111/jppi.12201
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12201 [Google Scholar]
  57. Van Dyk, Tonie, Henk Louw, Déogratias Nizonkiza, & Kris Van de Poel
    (2016) Productive knowledge of collocations may predict academic literacy. Per Linguam32/21: 66–81. 10.5785/32‑2‑601
    https://doi.org/10.5785/32-2-601 [Google Scholar]
  58. Vágvölgyi, Réka, Moritz Sahlender, Hannes Schröter, Benjamin Nagengast, Thomas Dresler, Josef Schrader & Hans-Christoph Nuerk
    (2024) Low literacy skills in adults can be largely explained by basic linguistic and domain-general predictors. Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1422896
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1422896 [Google Scholar]
  59. Veríssimo, João, Paul Verhaeghen, Noreen Goldman, Maxine Weinstein & Michael T. Ullman
    (2022) Evidence that ageing yields improvements as well as declines across attention and executive functions. Nature Human Behaviour61: 97–110. 10.1038/s41562‑021‑01169‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01169-7 [Google Scholar]
  60. Vespignani, Francesco, Paolo Canal, Nicola Molinaro, Sergio Fonda & Cristina Cacciari
    (2009) Predictive Mechanisms in Idiom Comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience22:8: 1682–1700. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21293
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21293 [Google Scholar]
  61. Wagner, Daniel A.
    (2018) Adult Literacy: Monitoring and Evaluation for Practice and Policy. International Review of Education541: 651–672. 10.1007/s11159‑008‑9108‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-008-9108-x [Google Scholar]
  62. Wells, Justine B., Morten H. Christiansen, David S. Race, Daniel J. Acheson & Maryellen C. MacDonald
    2009 Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology581: 250–271. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  63. Wingfield, Arthur & Murray Grossman
    (2006) Language and the Aging Brain: Patterns of Neural Compensation Revealed by Functional Brain Imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology96(6): 2830–2839. 10.1152/jn.00628.2006
    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00628.2006 [Google Scholar]
  64. Wolf, Maryanne & Tami Katzir-Cohen
    (2001) Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading5(3): 211–239. 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_2 [Google Scholar]
  65. Yi, W, Zhong, Y.
    2019 The processing advantage of multiword sequences: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2024;46(2):427–452. 10.1017/S0272263123000542
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000542 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00097.ras
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/wll.00097.ras
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error