Minimal graphematic words in English and German

References

1. Augst, Gerhard
   (1980) Die graphematische Dehnungsbezeichnung und die Möglichkeiten einer Reform. Deutsche Sprache, 4: 306–326.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baayen, R. Harald , Richard Piepenbrock & Leon Gulikers
   (1995) The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berg, Kristian
   (2012) Identifying graphematic units. Vowel and consonant letters. Written Language & Literacy15(1): 26–45.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berg, Kristian , Beatrice Primus & Lutz Wagner
   (2016) Buchstabenmerkmal, Buchstabe, Graphem. In: Beatrice Primus & Ulrike Domahs (eds.), Laut – Gebärde – Buchstabe, 337–355. Berlin/ New York: De Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carney, Edward
   (1994) A Survey of English Spelling. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cook, Vivian
   (2004) The English Writing System. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Davis, Stuart
   (1988) Syllable onsets as a factor in stress rules. Phonology5: 1–10.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Domahs, Frank , Ria de Bleser & Peter Eisenberg
   (2001) Silbische Aspekte segmentalen Schreibens – neurolinguistische Evidenz. Linguistische Berichte185: 13–30.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Domahs, Ulirke , Ingo Plag & Rebecca Carroll
   (2014) Word stress assignment in German, English and Dutch: Quantity-sensitivity and extrametricality revisited. Journal of comparative Germanic linguistics17: 59–96.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Eisenberg, Peter
    (2006) Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik. Bd. 1: Das Wort. 3 edn.Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Everett, Daniel L. & Keren Everett
    (1984) On the relevance of syllable onsets to stress placement. Linguistic Inquiry15(4): 705–711.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Evertz, Martin
    (2014) Visual Prosody – The graphematic foot in English and German. Ph.D. thesis. University of Cologne: Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Evertz, Martin
    (2016) Graphematischer Fuß und graphematisches Wort. In Beatrice Primus & Ulrike Domahs (eds.), Laut – Gebärde – Buchstabe, 377–398. Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Evertz, Martin & Beatrice Primus
    (2013) The graphematic foot in English and German. Writing Systems Research5(1): 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ewen, Colin J. & Harry van der Hulst
    (2001) The phonological Structure of Words. An introduction. Cambridge: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fronek, Josef
    (1982)  Thing as a function word. Linguistics20: 633–654.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fuhrhop, Nana
    (2008) Das graphematische Wort (im Deutschen): Eine erste Annäherung. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft27: 189–228.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fuhrhop, Nana , Franziska Buchmann & Kristian Berg
    (2011) The length hierarchy and the graphematic syllable: Evidence from German and English. Written Language & Literacy14.2: 275–292.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Giegerich, Heinz J.
    (1992) English phonology: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hall, T. Alan
    (1999) Phonotactics and the Prosodic Structure of German Function Words. In Alan T. Hall & Ursula Kleinhenz , (eds.), Studies on the Phonological Word, 99–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kabak, Bariş & René Schiering
    (2006) The Phonology and Morphology of Function Word Contractions in German. Journal of comparative Germanic linguistics9: 53–99.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kandel, Sonia , Lucie Hérault , Géraldine Grosjacques , Eric Lambert & Michel Fayol
    (2009) Orthographic vs. phonologic syllables in handwriting production. Cognition110: 440–444.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kelly, Michael H.
    (2004) Word onset patterns and lexical stress in English. Journal of memory and language50: 231–244.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Maas, Utz
    (1999) Einführung in die funktionale Phonetik des Deutschen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
25. McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince
    (1995) Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Jill Beckman , Suzanne Urbanczyk & Laura Walsh Dickey (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, 249–384. Amherst: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Neef, Martin
    (2010) Die Schreibung nicht-nativer Einheiten in einer Schriftsystemtheorie mit einem mehrschichtigen Wortschatzmodell. In Carmen Scherer & Anke Holler (eds.), Strategien der Integration und Isolation nicht-nativer Einheiten und Strukturen, 11–29. Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Primus, Beatrice
    (2000) Suprasegmentale Graphematik und Phonologie: Die Dehnungszeichen im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte181: 5–30.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Primus, Beatrice
    (2003) Zum Silbenbegriff in der Schrift-, Laut- und Gebärdensprache – Versuch einer mediumübergreifenden Fundierung. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft22: 3–55.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Primus, Beatrice
    (2004) A featural analysis of the modern Roman alphabet. Written Language & Literacy7.2: 235–274.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Primus, Beatrice
    (2010) Strukturelle Grundlagen des deutschen Schriftsystems. In Ursula Bredel , Astrid Müller & Gabriele Hinney (eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch – didaktisch – empirisch, 9–45. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
    (1993) Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Rutgers University (= Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report 2).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ramers, Karl Heinz
    (1998) Minimale Wörter: Prosodische Beschränkungen graphischer Wortstrukturen. In Bernd J. Kröger , Christine Riek & Georg Sachse (eds.), Festschrift für Georg Heike, 25–39. Frankfurt am Main: Forum Phoneticum66.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Roemheld, Friedrich
    (1955) Die Längenbezeichnung in der deutschen Rechtschreibung. Der Deutschunterricht7, 71–82.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Rollings, Aandrew G.
    (2004) The spelling patterns of English. München: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Roubah, Aïcha & Marcus Taft
    (2001) The functional role of syllabic structure in French visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition29: 373–381.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Röttger, Timo B , Ulrike Domahs , Marion Grande & Frank Domahs
    (2012) Structural factors affecting the assignment of word stress in German. Journal of Germanic linguistics24(1): 53–94.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Selkirk, Elisabeth. O.
    (1984) Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Selkirk, Elisabeth. O.
    (1996) The prosodic structure of function words. In James L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to Syntax, 187–213. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]