Volume 29, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139


This paper explores the possibility of expanding the focus group interview into the field of English as a Second Language (ESL), where this research methodology is yet to be thoroughly explored. Specifically, it aims to challenge popular criticisms about the reliability and validity of the focus group as a qualitative research methodology. It does this by first setting up a list of five main criticisms of the focus group interview drawn from current literature on research methodology within the social sciences and education. Based on transcripts of interactional data gathered from focus group interviews carried out among ESL students in a formal ESL context, it then provides a direct and detailed response to each criticism. The arguments put forward demonstrate that the focus group interview, as a method of data collection, may be particularly relevant in gathering the viewpoints and opinions of participants who have traditionally not been well represented through the more conventional and common methods currently employed in ESL research studies. Furthermore, the paper raises conscious awareness about the potential of the focus group as a viable and verifiable tool in qualitative research methodology.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Agar, Michael ; MacDonald, James
    1995 ‘Focus groups and ethnography’. Human organization54: 78–86. doi: 10.17730/humo.54.1.x102372362631282
    https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.54.1.x102372362631282 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baetens-Beardsmore, Hugo
    1995 ‘Reconciling content acquisition and language acquisition in bilingual classrooms’. Paper presented at theSymposium on bilingualism through the classroom: Strategies and practices, Bandar Seri Begawan: Brunei.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbour, Rosaline S. ; Kitzinger, Jenny
    editors 1999Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208857
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208857 [Google Scholar]
  4. Basch, Charles E.
    1987 ‘Focus group interview: An underutilised research technique for improving theory and practice in health education’. Health education quarterly14: 411–448. doi: 10.1177/109019818701400404
    https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818701400404 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bellenger, Danny N. ; Bernhardt, Kenneth L. ; Goldstucker, Jac L.
    1976 ‘Qualitative research techniques: Focus group interviews’. InQualitative research in marketing, edited by Hayes, Thomas J. ; Tathum, Carol B. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheah, Yin Mee
    1998 ‘The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: The case of Singapore’. Language and education12 (3): 192–209. doi: 10.1080/09500789808666748
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789808666748 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellis, Rod
    1992 ‘Learning to communicate in the classroom’. Studies in second language acquisition14: 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100010445
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010445 [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldman, Alfred E. ; MacDonald, Susan S.
    1987The group depth interview: Principles and practice. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gorsuch, Greta J.
    2000 ‘EFL educational policies and education cultures: Influences on teachers’ approval of communicative activities’. TESOL quarterly34 (4): 675–705. doi: 10.2307/3587781
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587781 [Google Scholar]
  10. Green, Judith ; Hart, Laura
    1999 ‘The impact of context on data’. InDeveloping focus group research, edited by Barbour, Rosaline S. ; Kitzinger, Jenny . London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208857.n2
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208857.n2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Greenbaum, Tom L.
    1993The practical handbook and guide to focus group research. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hammersley, Martyn ; Woods, Peter
    1984Life in school. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hargreaves, David
    1967Social relations in a secondary school. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. doi: 10.4324/9780203001837
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203001837 [Google Scholar]
  14. Heslep, Robert
    2001 ‘Habermas on communication in teaching’. Educational theory51 (2): 191–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1741‑5446.2001.00191.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2001.00191.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Janis, Irving L.
    1982Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson, Alan
    1996 ‘It’s good to talk: The focus group and the sociological imagination’. The sociological review44 (3): 517–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑954X.1996.tb00435.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1996.tb00435.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Kirk, Jerome ; Miller, Mark L.
    1986Reliability and validity of quantitative research. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781412985659
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985659 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kitzinger, Jenny
    1994 ‘The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants’. Sociology of health and illness76: 103–121. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9566.ep11347023
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023 [Google Scholar]
  19. 1994b ‘Focus groups: Method or madness’. InChallenge and innovation: Methodological advances in social research on HIV/AIDS, edited by Boulton, Mary . New York: Taylor and Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kitzinger, Jenny ; Farquhar, Clare
    1999 ‘The analytical potential of ‘sensitive moments’ in focus group discussions’. InDeveloping focus group research, edited by Barbour, Rosaline S. ; Kitzinger, Jenny . London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208857.n11
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208857.n11 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kitzinger, Jenny ; Hunt, Kate
    1993Evaluation of Edinburgh Council’s zero tolerance campaign. Edinburgh: Edinburgh District Council Women’s Committee.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kramsch, Claire
    1998Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Krueger, Richard A.
    1994Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Krueger, Richard A. ; Casey, Mary A.
    2000Focus groups. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. doi: 10.1037/10518‑189
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10518-189 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kumaravadivelu, B.
    1993 ‘Maximising learning potential in the communicative classroom’. ELT journal47 (1): 12–19. doi: 10.1093/elt/47.1.12
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.1.12 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lazaraton, Anne
    2000 ‘Current trends in research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics’. TESOL quarterly34: 175–181. doi: 10.2307/3588103
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588103 [Google Scholar]
  27. Litosseliti, Lia
    2003Using focus groups in research. London, New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Littlewood, William
    1981Communicative language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mayall, Berry
    1993 ‘Keeping healthy at home and school: It’s my body, so it’s my job’. Sociology of health and illness15: 464–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9566.1993.tb00356.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.1993.tb00356.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Michell, Lynn
    1999 ‘Combining focus groups and interviews: Telling how it is; telling how it feels’. InDeveloping focus group research, edited by Barbour, Rosaline S. ; Kitzinger, Jenny . London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208857.n3
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208857.n3 [Google Scholar]
  31. Miller, David ; Kitzinger, Jenny ; Williams, Kevin ; Beharrell, Peter
    1998The circuit of mass communication, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Morgan, David L.
    1993Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781483349008
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349008 [Google Scholar]
  33. 1996 ‘Focus groups’. Annual review of sociology22: 129–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129 [Google Scholar]
  34. 1997Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781412984287
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984287 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nunan, David
    1987 ‘Communicative language teaching: Making it work’. ELT journal41(2): 136–145. doi: 10.1093/elt/41.2.136
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/41.2.136 [Google Scholar]
  36. Seedhouse, Paul
    2005 ‘“Task” as research construct’. Language learning55 (3): 533–570. doi: 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00314.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00314.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Stewart, David W. ; Shamdasani, Prem N.
    1990Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Strauss, Anselm ; Corbin, Juliet
    1990Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory and procedures and techniques. Newbury Park CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sussman, Steven ; Burton, Dee ; Dent, Clyde ; Stacy, Alan ; Flay, Brian
    1991 ‘Use of focus groups in developing an adolescent tobacco use cessation program: Collective norm effects’. Journal of applied social psychology21: 1772–1782. doi: 10.1111/j.1559‑1816.1991.tb00503.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00503.x [Google Scholar]
  40. van Lier, Leo
    1988The classroom and the language learner. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Vaughn, Sharon ; Schumm, Jeanne ; Sinagub, Jane
    1996Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781452243641
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243641 [Google Scholar]
  42. Williams, Kayleen
    2001 ‘Towards a rationale for foreign language education: Restating my reservations’. Australian language learning24: 43–47. doi: 10.1080/09571730185200231
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730185200231 [Google Scholar]
  43. Willis, Paul
    1977Learning to labour. London: Gower Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error