oa Review of Simpson, P. (2004) Stylistics

References

1. Clark, U.
   2005 Social cognition and the future of stylistics, or ‘What is cognitive stylistics and why are people saying such good things about it?!’. Accessed6 October 2006. Available from: www.hud.ac.uk/mh/pala25/abstracts.htm.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cronquist, U.
   2006 ‘Review of Joanna Gavins and Gerard Steen, Cognitive poetics in practice’. Language and Literature15 (2): 203–208. doi: 10.1177/096394700601500206
   https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700601500206 [Google Scholar]
3. Gavins, J.
   2005 ‘The year’s work in stylistics 2004’. Language and literature14 (4): 397–409. doi: 10.1177/0963947005058856
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005058856 [Google Scholar]
4. Halliday, M.
   1985 Introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Lecercle, J.-J.
   1993 ‘The current state of stylistics.’ The European English messenger21: 14–18
   [Google Scholar]
6. PALA
   2006 The state of stylistics. The Poetics and Linguistics Association PALA. Joensuu, Finland. Accessed6 October 2006. Available from: www.pala.ac.uk/.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Pope, R.
   2005 ‘The return of creativity: Common, singular and otherwise’. Language and literature144: 376–390. doi: 10.1177/0963947005058841
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005058841 [Google Scholar]
8. Short, M.
   2006 Stylistics website. Lancaster: Lancaster University. Accessed6 October 2006. Available from: www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/stylistics/introduction/outline.htm.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Stockwell, P.
   2005 ‘Texture and identification’. European Journal of English Studies9 (2) August: 143–154. doi: 10.1080/13825570500171937
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13825570500171937 [Google Scholar]
10. Tucker, D.
    2001 Embodied meaning: An evolutionary-developmental analysis of adaptive semantics. University of Oregon, Electrical Geodesics Inc. Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]