1887
Language as Action
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

In this paper we use membership category analysis to examine the way an interviewee utilises category work in order to resist the possible accusation of being a bad mother and instead posit her mothering as ordinary. Through our analysis we explore the interactional work of ascribing and resisting categorisation organised through claims and counter-claims making procedures routinely grounded in descriptions and accounts, and embedded in shifts between individual and categorial actions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2104/aral0736
2007-01-01
2019-09-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkinson, J. M. ; Heritage, J.
    editors 1984Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cuff, E. C.
    1993Problems of Versions in Everyday Situations. International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America, Washington D.C., previously published as: 1980. Some Issues in Studying the Problem of Versions in Everyday Life. Occasional Paper, Department of Sociology, University of Manchester.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Day, D.
    1998 ‘Being ascribed and resisting, membership of an ethnic group’. InIdentities in Talk, edited by Antaki, C. ; Widdicombe, S. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Drew, P. ; Atkinson, M.
    1979Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards, D.
    2006 ‘Discourse, cognition and social practices: The rich surface of language and social interaction’. Discourse Studies8 (1): 41–49. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059551
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059551 [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards, D. ; Potter, J.
    2005 ‘Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions’. InConversation and Cognition, Discourse, Mind and Social Interaction, edited by Te Molder, H. ; Potter, J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511489990.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489990.012 [Google Scholar]
  7. Fitzgerald, R. ; Housley, W.
    2002 ‘Identity, categorisation and sequential organisation: The sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in’. Discourse and Society13: 579–602. doi: 10.1177/0957926502013005275
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013005275 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2006 ‘Categorisation, accounts and motives. “Letters-to-the-editor” and devolution in Wales’. InDevolution and Identity, edited by Wilson, J. ; Stapleton, K. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hester, S. ; Eglin, P.
    editors 1997Culture in Action, Studies in Membership Categorisation Analysis. Lanham, MD: University Press of America and International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Housley, W. ; Fitzgerald, R.
    2002 ‘The reconsidered model of Membership Categorisation’. Qualitative Research2: 59–74. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200104 [Google Scholar]
  11. (Forthcoming). ‘Motives and social organisation: Sociological amnesia, psychological description and the analysis of accounts’. Qualitative Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jayyusi, L.
    1984Categorisation and the Moral OrderLondon: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Juhulia, K.
    2004 ‘Talking back to stigmatised identities: Negotiation of culturally dominant categorisation in interviews with shelter residents’. Qualitative Social Work3 (3): 259–275. doi: 10.1177/1473325004045665
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325004045665 [Google Scholar]
  14. Leudar, I. ; Nekvapil, J.
    2000 ‘Presentations of Romanies in the Czech media: On category work in television debates’. Discourse and Society11: 487–513. doi: 10.1177/0957926500011004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011004003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Lynch, M.
    2006 ‘Cognitive activities without cognition? Ethnomethodological investigations of selected “cognitive” topics’. Discourse Studies8 (1): 95–104. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059559
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059559 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lynch, M. ; Bogen D.
    2005 ‘“My memory has been shredded”: A non-cognitivist investigation of “mental” phenomena’. InConversation and Cognition, Discourse, Mind and Social Interaction, edited by Te Molder, H. ; Potter, J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511489990.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489990.011 [Google Scholar]
  17. McHoul, A. ; Watson, R.
    1984 ‘Two axes for the analysis of “commonsense” and “formal” geographical knowledge and classroom talk’. British Journal of the Sociology of Education5: 281–302. doi: 10.1080/0142569840050305
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569840050305 [Google Scholar]
  18. Nikander, P.
    2002Age in Action: Membership Work and Stage of Life Categories in Talk. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Science and Letters.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Osvaldsson, K.
    2004 ‘I don’t have no damn cultures. Doing normality in a deviant setting’. Qualitative Research in Psychology1: 239–264. doi: 10.1191/1478088704qp016oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088704qp016oa [Google Scholar]
  20. Parry, R.
    2004 ‘The interactional management of patients’ physical incompetence: A conversation analytic study of physiotherapy interactions’. Sociology of Health and Illness26 (7): 976–1007. doi: 10.1111/j.0141‑9889.2004.00425.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00425.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Potter, J.
    2006 ‘Cognition and conversation’. Discourse Studies8 (1): 131–140. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059562
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059562 [Google Scholar]
  22. Roth, A.
    1998 ‘Who makes the news? Descriptions of television news interviewees’ public personae’. Media Culture and Society20: 79–107. doi: 10.1177/016344398020001006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016344398020001006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Sacks, H.
    1974 ‘On the analyzability of stories by children’. InEthnomethodology: Selected Readings, edited by Turner, R. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1995Lectures on Conversation Vol I and II, edited by Jefferson, G. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444328301
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  25. Watson, D. R.
    1997 ‘Some general reflections of “categorisation” and “sequence” in the analysis of conversation’. InCulture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorisation Analysis, edited by Hester, S. ; Eglin, P. Lanham, MD: University Press of America and International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Widdicombe, S. ; Wooffitt, R.
    1995The Language of Youth Subcultures: Social Identity in Action. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2104/aral0736
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error