oa Examining negotiation in peer group oral assessment

References

1. Alderson, J. C.
   (2001) Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atkinson, J. M. ; Heritage, J.
   (Eds (1984) Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bachman, L. F. ; Palmer, A. S.
   (1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bannink, A.
   (2002) Negotiating the paradoxes of spontaneous talk in advanced L2 classes. In Kramsch, C. (Ed.). Language Acquisition and Language Socialization. 266–288. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Black, P.
   (2001) Formative assessment and curriculum consequences. In Scott, D. (Ed.). Curriculum and assessment.7–23. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brouwer, C. ; Wagner, J.
   (2004) Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1, 29–47. doi: 10.1558/japl.1.1.29.55873
   https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.29.55873 [Google Scholar]
7. Brown, A.
   (2004) Discourse analysis and the oral interview: Competence or performance?In Boxer, D. ; Cohen, A. D. (Eds.). Studying speaking to inform second language learning, 253–282. NY: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, G. ; Anderson, A. ; Shillcock, R. ; Yule, G.
   (1984) Teaching talk: strategies for production and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Canale, M. ; Swain, M.
   (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1, 1–47. doi: 10.1093/applin/I.1.1
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1 [Google Scholar]
10. Chalhoub-Deville, M.
    (2003) Second language interaction: Current perspectives and future trends. Language Testing 20, 369–383. doi: 10.1191/0265532203lt264oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt264oa [Google Scholar]
11. Davison, C.
    (2007) Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly 4, 37–68. doi: 10.1080/15434300701348359
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701348359 [Google Scholar]
12. Drew, P. ; Heritage, J.
    (1992) Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Filipi, A.
    (1994) Interaction in an Italian oral test: The role of some expansion sequence. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 11, 119–136.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Foster, P. ; Ohta, A. S.
    (2005) Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied linguistics 26, 402–430. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami014 [Google Scholar]
15. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1994) An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd Edn. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Halliday, M. A. K. ; Hasan, R.
    (1989) Language, context and text: A social semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. He, L. ; Dai, Y.
    (2006) A corpus-based investigation into the validity of the CET–SET group discussion. Language Testing 23, 370–401. doi: 10.1191/0265532206lt333oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt333oa [Google Scholar]
18. Iwashita, N.
    (1999) The validity of the paired interview format in oral performance assessment. Melboune Papers in Language Testing 8, 51–66.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Johnson, M. ; Tyler, A.
    (1998) Re-analyzing the OPI: How much does it look like natural conversation?’ In Young, R. ; He, A. (Eds.). Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency, 27–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.14.04joh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.04joh [Google Scholar]
20. Jones, E. E. ; Gerard, H. B.
    (1967) Foundations of social psychology. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Katona, L.
    (1998) Meaning negotiation in the Hungarian Oral Proficiency Examination. In Young, R. ; He, A. (Eds.). Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency, 239–267. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.14.14kat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.14kat [Google Scholar]
22. Lazaraton, A.
    (2002) A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Leung, C. ; Mohan, B.
    (2004) Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts – assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing 20, 335–359. doi: 10.1191/0265532204lt287oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt287oa [Google Scholar]
24. Levinson, S. C.
    (1983) Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Long, M.
    (1985) Input and second language acquisition theory. In Gass, S. ; Madden, C. (Eds.). Input and second language acquisition, 377–393. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Long, M.
    (1996) The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition’. In Richie, W. C. ; Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition, 413–468. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. McNamara, T.
    (1997) ‘Interaction’ in second language performance assessment: Whose performance?Applied Linguistics18: 446–466. doi: 10.1093/applin/18.4.446
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.4.446 [Google Scholar]
28. McNamara, T. ; Hill, K. ; May, L.
    (2002) Discourse and assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22, 221–242.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mercer, N.
    (1996) The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and instruction 6, 359–377. doi: 10.1016/S0959‑4752(96)00021‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7 [Google Scholar]
30. Mercer, N. ; Wegerif, R.
    (1999) Is exploratory talk productive talk?In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.). Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction, 79–101. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Moder, C. ; Halleck, G.
    (1998) Framing the language proficiency interview as a speech event: Native and non-native speakers’ questions. In Young, R. ; He, A. (Eds.). Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency, 117–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.14.09mod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.09mod [Google Scholar]
32. Mori, J.
    (2004) Pursuit of understanding: Rethinking ‘negotiation of meaning’ in view of projected action. In Gardner, R. ; Wagner, J. (Eds.). Second language conversation, 157–177. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nakahama, Y. ; Tyler, A. ; van Lier, L.
    (2001) Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly 35, 377–405. doi: 10.2307/3588028
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588028 [Google Scholar]
34. Nassaji, H. ; Wells, G.
    (2000) What’s the use of “Triadic Dialogue”?: An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics 21, 376–406. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.3.376
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.376 [Google Scholar]
35. Naughton, D.
    (2006) Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: Enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal 90, 169–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2006.00391.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00391.x [Google Scholar]
36. Ogden, L.
    (2000) Collaborative tasks, collaborative children: An analysis of reciprocity during peer interaction at Key Stage 1. British Educational Research Journal26 (2), 211–226. doi: 10.1080/01411920050000953
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920050000953 [Google Scholar]
37. Pica, T.
    (1994) Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes?Language Learning44: 493–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1994.tb01115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x [Google Scholar]
38. Pomerantz, A. ; Fehr, B. J.
    (1997) Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action and sense-making practices. In Dijk, T. V. (Ed.). Discourse as a social interaction, 64–91. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Psathas, G.
    (1995) Conversation analysis – The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781412983792
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983792 [Google Scholar]
40. Rea-Dickins, P.
    (2006) Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: A learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics16 (2), 163–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2006.00112.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00112.x [Google Scholar]
41. Ross, S. ; Berwick, R.
    (1992) The discourse of accommodation in oral proficiency Interviews. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14, 159–176. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100010809
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010809 [Google Scholar]
42. School-Based Assessment Consultancy Team
    School-Based Assessment Consultancy Team (2005) 2007 HKCEE English examination: Introduction to the school-based assessment component. Hong Kong: HKEAA.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Schegloff, E. A. ; Jefferson, G. ; Sacks, H.
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53, 361–382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
44. Schrimshaw, P. ; Perkins, G.
    (1997) Tinker town: Working together. In Wegerif, R. ; Schrimshaw, P. (Eds.). Computers and Talk in the Primary Classroom. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Skehan, P.
    (2002) A non-marginal role for tasks. ELT Journal 56, 289–295. doi: 10.1093/elt/56.3.289
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.3.289 [Google Scholar]
46. Stansfield, C. W. ; Kenyon, D. M.
    (1992) Research on the comparability of the oral proficiency interview and the simulated oral proficiency interview. System 20, 347–364. doi: 10.1016/0346‑251X(92)90045‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(92)90045-5 [Google Scholar]
47. Swain, M.
    (2001) Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing18 (3), 275–302.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Tsui, Amy B. M.
    (1994) English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Tomlinson, B.
    (2005) Testing to learn: A personal view of language testing. ELT Journal19 (1), 39–46. doi: 10.1093/elt/cci005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci005 [Google Scholar]
50. Tudge, J.
    (2000) Theory, method, and analysis in research on the relations between peer collaboration and cognitive development. Journal of Experimental Education 69, 98–112. doi: 10.1080/00220970009600651
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600651 [Google Scholar]
51. Van Moere, A.
    (2006) Validity evidence in a university group oral test. Language Testing 23, 411–440. doi: 10.1191/0265532206lt336oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt336oa [Google Scholar]
52. Van Lier, L.
    (1989) Reeling, writing, drawing, stretching, and fainting in coils: Oral proficiency interviews as conversation. TESOL Quarterly 23, 489–507. doi: 10.2307/3586922
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586922 [Google Scholar]
53. Vygotsky, L. S.
    (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
    [Google Scholar]