Volume 31, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139


Research into the acquisition of L2 German word order has provided strong evidence for a sequence of incremental stages of development. Studies of the acquisition of German verb morphology so far have focused on establishing a correlation between the acquisition of word order and of verb morphology, neglecting the question how verb morphology per se is acquired. This article discusses the latter question on the basis of a qualitative analysis of longitudinal written data produced by 15 anglophone university students. It confirms some of the results of earlier studies involving tutored learners of German, such as Pienemann (1987) and Diehl et al. (2000), and provides evidence for a sequence of acquisition, as well as for a more holistic development for certain verb classes. Although most of the subjects produce perfect tense before preterite, the article suggests that teaching the preterite before the perfect tense may be feasible. It also draws attention to the importance of morphosyntactic features affecting subject-verb agreement, and calls for more research in that area.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Blackshire-Belay, C.
    (1991) Language contact. Verb morphology in German of foreign workers. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (1994) Variability in grammatical analysis: On recognizing verbal markers in foreign workers’ German. In C. Blackshire-Belay (ed.), Current issues in second language acquisition and development (pp.167–185). Lanham: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boss, B.
    (1996) German grammar for beginners – the Teachability Hypothesis and its relevance to the classroom. In C. Arbonez-Sola & J. Rolin-Ianziti (eds), Who’s afraid of teaching grammar?Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 1 (pp. 93–100). University of Queensland.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2004) Wann ich habe Freizeit, ich koche gern: Zum Erwerb der deutschen Inversion und Nebensatzwortstellung durch australische Studierende. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 41 (1), 28–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2005) Ist der Erwerb der deutschen Verbalflexion mit dem der Wortstellung verbunden? Beiträge der Sektion F6. Grammatik, Erwerb & Vermittlung. XIII.IDT GRAZ. Accessed16/02/08. Available from: www.idt-2005.at/downloads/Resolutionen/F5_Boss.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boss, B. ; Jansen, L.M.
    (2003) Do our students learn what we teach them?BABEL, 23 (2), 26–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Clahsen, H.
    (1988) Parametrized grammatical theory and language acquisition: A study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults. In S. Flynn & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 47–75). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2733‑9_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_4 [Google Scholar]
  8. Clahsen, H. ; Meisel, J. ; Pienemann, M.
    (1983) Deutsch als Zweitsprache: der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Diehl, E. , Christen, H. ; Leuenberger, S. ; Pelvat, I. ; Studer, T.
    (2000) Grammatikunterricht: Alles für der Katz? Untersuchungen zum Zweitsprachenerwerb Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, R.
    (1989) Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 305–328. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100008159
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100008159 [Google Scholar]
  11. Jordens, P.
    (1988) The acquisition of word order in L2 Dutch and German. In P. Jordens & J. Lalleman (eds), Language development (pp. 149–180). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110854817
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854817 [Google Scholar]
  12. Köpcke, K.-M.
    (1987) Der Erwerb morphologischer Ausdrucksmittel durch L2-Lerner am Beispiel der Personalflexion. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 6 (2),186–205. doi: 10.1515/zfsw.1987.6.2.186
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.1987.6.2.186 [Google Scholar]
  13. Parodi, T.
    (1998) Der Erwerb funktionaler Kategorien im Deutschen. Eine Untersuchung zum biligualen Erstspracherwerb und zum Zweitspracherwerb. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Parodi T.
    (2000) Finiteness and verb placement in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 16 (4), 355–381.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pienemann, M.
    (1987) Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 10 (2), 83–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), 52–79. doi: 10.1093/applin/10.1.52
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.52 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15 [Google Scholar]
  18. Tschirner, E.
    (1999) Lernergrammatiken und Grammatikprogression. In Skibitzki, B ; Wotjak, B. (Eds.), Linguistik und Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Festschrift für Gerhard Helbig (pp. 227–240). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error