1887
English as an International Language
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Language testing and English as an international language, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/aral.31.3.07eld-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2104/aral0834
2008-01-01
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berry, V.
    (2007) Ethical considerations when assessing oral proficiency in pairs. In A. Huhta , V. Kohonen , L. Kurki-Suonio and S. Luoma (Eds), Current developments and alternatives in language assessment – Proceedings of LTRC 96 (pp.107–123). Jyväskalä: University of Jyväskalä and University of Tampere.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks, L.
    (2009) Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance. Language Testing, 26 (3), 341–366. doi: 10.1177/0265532209104666
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104666 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, A. ; Lumley, T.
    (1998) Linguistic and cultural norms in language testing: A case study. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 7 (1), 80–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Canagarajah, S.
    (2006) Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3, 229–242. doi: 10.1207/s15434311laq0303_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0303_1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chapelle, C. A. ; Enright, M. K. ; Jamieson, J. M.
    (Eds) (2008) Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, L.
    (2009) The influence of interlocutor proficiency in a paired oral assessment. Language Testing, 26 (3), 367–396. doi: 10.1177/0265532209104667
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104667 [Google Scholar]
  7. Douglas, D.
    (2000) Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ducasse, A. ; Brown, A.
    (2009) Assessing paired orals: Raters’ orientation to interaction. Language Testing, 26 (3), 423–444. doi: 10.1177/0265532209104669
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104669 [Google Scholar]
  9. Elder, C. ; Davies, A.
    (2006) Assessing English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 282–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Graddol, D.
    (1997) The future of English? A guide to forecasting the popularity of the English language in the 21st century. London: British Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harding, L.
    (2008) The use of speakers with L2 accents in academic English listening assessment: A validation study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. He, D. ; Li, D.
    (2009) Language attitudes and linguistic features in the China English debate. World Englishes, 28 (1), 70–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2008.01570.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.01570.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Hill, K.
    (1996) Who should be the judge? The use of non-native speakers as raters on a test of English as an international language. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 5 (2), 29–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Iwashita, N.
    (1998) The validity of the paired interview format in oral performance assessment. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 5 (2), 51–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jenkins, J.
    (2006) The spread of EIL: A testing time for testers. ELT Journal, 60 (1), 42–50. doi: 10.1093/elt/cci080
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci080 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2007) English as a lingua franca: attitude and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, Y.
    (2009) An investigation into native and non-native teachers’ judgments of oral English performance: A mixed methods approach. Language Testing, 26 (2), 187–217. doi: 10.1177/0265532208101010
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208101010 [Google Scholar]
  18. Llurda, E.
    (2004) Non-native-speaker teachers and English as an International Language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (3), 314–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2004.00068.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00068.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Lazaraton, A.
    (2005) Non-native speakers as language assessors: Recent research and implications for assessment practice. Paper presented at theBAAL, Bristol.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lowenberg, P.
    (2002) Assessing English proficiency in the Expanding Circle. World Englishes, 21 (3), 431–435. doi: 10.1111/1467‑971X.00261
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00261 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lumley, T. ; Qian, D.
    (2003) Assessing English for employment in Hong Kong. In C. A. Coombe and N. Hubley (Eds), Assessment practices: Case studies in TESOL. Practice Series (pp.135–147). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Macqueen, S. ; Harding, L.
    (2009) Review of the Certificate of Proficiency in English (CPE) Speaking test. Language Testing, 26 (3), 467–476. doi: 10.1177/0265532209104671
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104671 [Google Scholar]
  23. Major, R. C. , Fitzmaurice, S. F. , Bunta, F. , & Balasubramanian, C.
    (2002) The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 36 (2), 173–190. doi: 10.2307/3588329
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588329 [Google Scholar]
  24. Major, R. C. ; Fitzmaurice, S. F. ; Bunta, F. ; Balasubramanian, C.
    (2005) Testing the effects of regional, ethnic and international dialects of English on listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55 (1), 37–69. doi: 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00289.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00289.x [Google Scholar]
  25. May, L.
    (2009) Co-constructed interaction in a paired speaking test. The rater’s perspective. Language Testing, 26 (3), 397–422. doi: 10.1177/0265532209104668
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104668 [Google Scholar]
  26. O’Sullivan, B.
    (2000) Exploring gender and oral proficiency interview performance. System, 28, 373–386. doi: 10.1016/S0346‑251X(00)00018‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00018-X [Google Scholar]
  27. Sawaki, Y. ; Stricker, L. J. ; Oranje, A. H.
    (2009) Factor structure of the TOEFL Internet-based test. Language Testing, 26 (1), 5–30. doi: 10.1177/0265532208097335
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208097335 [Google Scholar]
  28. Seidlhofer, B.
    (2001) Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11 (2), 133–58. doi: 10.1111/1473‑4192.00011
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00011 [Google Scholar]
  29. Taylor, L.
    (2006) The changing landscape of English: Implications for language assessment. ELT Journal, 60 (1), 51–60. doi: 10.1093/elt/cci081
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci081 [Google Scholar]
  30. Taylor, L. & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2009) Are two heads better than one? Pairwork in L2 assessment contexts. Language Testing, 26 (3), 325–340. doi: 10.1177/0265532209104665
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104665 [Google Scholar]
  31. Weir, C. J. ; Milanovic, M.
    (Eds) (2003) Continuity and innovation: The history of the CPE 1913-2002. Studies in Language Testing 15, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/UCLES.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Zafar Khan, S.
    (2009) Imperialism of international tests: An EIL perspective. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues (pp.190–205). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, Y. ; Elder, C.
    (2009) Native and non-native teachers’ evaluation of oral English proficiency in the CET-SET of China. Paper presented at theannual meeting of American Association of Applied Linguistics, Denver, CO.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2009, in press). Measuring the speaking proficiency of advanced EFL learners in China: the CET-SET solution. Language Assessment Quarterly. doi: 10.1080/15434300902990967
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300902990967 [Google Scholar]
  35. Zheng, Y. & Cheng, L.
    (2008) Test review: College English Test (CET) in China. Language Testing, 25 (3), 408–417. doi: 10.1177/0265532208092433
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208092433 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2104/aral0834
Loading
  • Article Type: Other
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error