1887
Volume 32, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

The paper presents preliminary findings of a project which investigated whether learner background, in terms of instruction mode (i.e., school or intensive first-year course at university) and first language (i.e., character based or non-character based), has an impact on the development of writing skills in Japanese as a second language (JSL). Many students in second-year Japanese at university are post-secondary (i.e., they completed Year 12 Japanese at school). They are in class with students who started Japanese at university (i.e., are post-beginners). The intensity of instruction that the two groups have received is very different. A large number of the students learning Japanese at tertiary institutions in Australia are also native speakers of character-based languages (e.g., Chinese). Although there is a substantial volume of studies comparing the effects of instruction mode on L2 development, little is known of how instruction mode and L1 background together may affect L2 development in adult L2 learning settings. The data for the present study include writing samples collected on two occasions from 34 students from a variety of backgrounds. The samples were analysed in terms of length, grammatical complexity and schematic structures, use of kanji (Chinese characters), and vocabulary. The results were compared in terms of study experience and first language. In general, the performance of post-beginner learners from character-based language backgrounds was higher on kanji use and a few other areas, but their superior performance was derived from the interaction of two background factors (L1 and study background). The results show complexity in how different backgrounds affect L2 writing task performance. The study has strong pedagogical implications for teaching a character-based language to students from diverse study backgrounds.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2104/aral0903
2009-01-01
2019-08-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amlund, J. T. ; Kardash, C. A. M. ; Kulhavy, R. W.
    (1986) Repetitive reading and recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly21, 49–58. doi: 10.2307/747959
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747959 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, A. ; Iwashita, N.
    (1996) Language background and item difficulty: The development of a computer-adaptive test of JapaneseSystem24(2), 199–206. doi: 10.1016/0346‑251X(96)00004‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(96)00004-8 [Google Scholar]
  3. (1998) The role of language background in the validation of a computer-adaptive test. In Kunnan, A. (ed.), Issues in language testing research: Conventional validity and beyond (pp.195–207). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins, L. ; Halter, R. H. ; Lightbown, P. ; Spada, N.
    (1999) Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 655–680. doi: 10.2307/3587881
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587881 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cumming, A.
    (1990) Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language Testing, 7(1), 31–51. doi: 10.1177/026553229000700104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229000700104 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dempster, F. N.
    (1987) Effects of encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 162–170. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.79.2.162
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.162 [Google Scholar]
  7. (1991) Synthesis of research on reviews and tests. Journal of Educational Leadership, 48(7), 71–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1996) Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (eds), Memory (pp.317–344). San Diego: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978‑012102570‑0/50011‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012102570-0/50011-2 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fromkin, V. ; Rodman, R. ; Collins, P. ; Blair, D.
    (1990) An introduction to language: Second Australian edition. Sydney: Rolt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gamage, G. H.
    (2003) Perceptions of kanji learning strategies: Do they differ among Chinese character and alphabetic background learners?Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 17–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Iwashita, N. ; Liem, I.
    (2005) Factors affecting second language achievement in primary school. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 36–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Koda, K. ; Takahashi, E. ; Fender, M.
    (1998) Effects of L1 processing experience on L2 morphological awareness. Ilha do Desterro, 35, 59–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lapkin, S. ; Hart, D. ; Harley, B.
    (1998) Case study of compact core French models: Attitudes and achievement. In S. Lapkin (ed.), French second language education in Canada: Empirical studies (pp.3–30). Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lightbown, P. M.
    (1989) Intensive ESL Programmes in Quebec Primary Schools. TESL Canada Journal, 7(1), 11–32. doi: 10.18806/tesl.v7i1.557
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v7i1.557 [Google Scholar]
  15. Lightbown, P. M. ; Spada, N.
    (1991) Étude des effets à long terme de l’apprentissage intensif de l’anglais language seconde, au primaire. Canadian Modern Language Review, 48(1), 90–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MacWhinney, B.
    (1995) The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk [2nd edition.] Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. McNamara, T. ; Hill, K. ; Iwashita, N.
    (2002) Evaluation of the enhanced mode Japanese language program draft final report for 2001. Language Testing Research Centre, The University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Minami, M. ; Morikawa, T.
    (1995) How to transcribe morphemes in main line. In Oshima-Takane, Y. & MacWhinney, B. (eds), CHILDES Manual for Japanese (pp.53–71). Montreal: McGill University.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Martin, S.
    (2004) A reference grammar of Japanese. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Turnbull, M. ; Lapkin, S. ; Hart, D. ; Swain, M.
    (1998) Time on task and immersion graduates’ French Proficiency. In Lapking, S. (Ed.), French second language education in Canada: Empirical studies (pp.31–55): Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2104/aral0903
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error