1887
Volume 32, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

This paper examines multiple-response sequences (MRSs), occurring in adult Korean TESOL classrooms, to show the responses produced by students in the language classroom are not always confined within the boundaries of a single response, but are likely to be seen as mutually orienting to, and collaborating to produce a comprehensible outcome to the sequence. To analyse and consider what types of multiple response (MR) can be identified, and how the different types occur within those MRSs, this study adopts Conversation Analysis principles. By using conversation analytic perspectives, this study identifies four major types of MR (identical, complementary, collaborative and competitive).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2104/aral0904
2009-01-01
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brooks, F.
    (1992) Communicative competence and the conversation course: A social interaction perspective. Linguistics and Learning, 4, 219–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Donato, R.
    (1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp.33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gardner, R.
    (2001) When listeners talk: Response token and listener stance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.92
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.92 [Google Scholar]
  4. He, A.W.
    (2004) CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 519–535. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑19‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-19-.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Jefferson, G.
    (1984) Transcription notation. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds), Structures of ordinary action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.ix–xvi). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ko, S.
    (2005) Multiple-response sequences in adult Korean TESOL classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lazaraton, A.
    (2003) Incidental displays of cultural knowledge in the no-native-English-speaking teacher’s classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 213–245. doi: 10.2307/3588503
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588503 [Google Scholar]
  8. Lerner, G.H.
    (1993) Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text, 13, 213–245.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1995) Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19, 111–131. doi: 10.1080/01638539109544907
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544907 [Google Scholar]
  10. Lerner, G. H.
    (2002) Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In C.E. Ford , B.A. Fox and S.A. Thomson (Eds), The language of turn and sequence (pp.225–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lerner, G.H. ; Takagi, T.
    (1999) On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 49–75. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00051‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00051-4 [Google Scholar]
  12. Markee, N.
    (2000) Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2004) Zones of interactional transition in ESL classes. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 583–596. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑20‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-20-.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Markee, N. ; Kasper, G.
    (2004) Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 491–500. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑14‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Mondada, L. ; Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2004) Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 501–518. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑15‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Mori, J.
    (2004) Negotiating sequential Boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 536–550. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑17‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-17-.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Ohta, A.S.
    (2001) Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Parker, R.
    (1984) Conversational grouping and fragmentation: A preliminary investigation. Semiotica, 50, 43–68. doi: 10.1515/semi.1984.50.1‑2.43
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1984.50.1-2.43 [Google Scholar]
  19. Pomerantz, A.
    (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp.57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schegloff, E.A.
    (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defence of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295–1345. doi: 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1995) Parties and talking together: Two ways in which numbers are significant for talk-in-interaction. In P. ten Have and G. Psathas , Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp.31–42). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schegloff, E.A. ; Jefferson, G. ; Sacks, H.
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  23. Seedhouse, P.
    (2004) The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Language Learning, 54, (Supplement 1).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sinclair, J.McH. ; Coulthard, M.
    (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tannen, D.
    (1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imaginary in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ten Have, P.
    (1999) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2104/aral0904
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error