oa Multiple-response sequences in classroom talk

References

1. Brooks, F.
   (1992) Communicative competence and the conversation course: A social interaction perspective. Linguistics and Learning, 4, 219–46.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Donato, R.
   (1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp.33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Gardner, R.
   (2001) When listeners talk: Response token and listener stance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.92
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.92 [Google Scholar]
4. He, A.W.
   (2004) CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 519–535. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑19‑.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-19-.x [Google Scholar]
5. Jefferson, G.
   (1984) Transcription notation. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds), Structures of ordinary action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.ix–xvi). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ko, S.
   (2005) Multiple-response sequences in adult Korean TESOL classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Lazaraton, A.
   (2003) Incidental displays of cultural knowledge in the no-native-English-speaking teacher’s classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 213–245. doi: 10.2307/3588503
   https://doi.org/10.2307/3588503 [Google Scholar]
8. Lerner, G.H.
   (1993) Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text, 13, 213–245.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lerner, G.H.
   (1995) Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19, 111–131. doi: 10.1080/01638539109544907
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544907 [Google Scholar]
10. Lerner, G. H.
    (2002) Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In C.E. Ford , B.A. Fox and S.A. Thomson (Eds), The language of turn and sequence (pp.225–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Lerner, G.H. ; Takagi, T.
    (1999) On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 49–75. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00051‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00051-4 [Google Scholar]
12. Markee, N.
    (2000) Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Markee, N.
    (2004) Zones of interactional transition in ESL classes. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 583–596. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑20‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-20-.x [Google Scholar]
14. Markee, N. ; Kasper, G.
    (2004) Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 491–500. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑14‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x [Google Scholar]
15. Mondada, L. ; Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2004) Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 501–518. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑15‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x [Google Scholar]
16. Mori, J.
    (2004) Negotiating sequential Boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 536–550. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑17‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-17-.x [Google Scholar]
17. Ohta, A.S.
    (2001) Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Parker, R.
    (1984) Conversational grouping and fragmentation: A preliminary investigation. Semiotica, 50, 43–68. doi: 10.1515/semi.1984.50.1‑2.43
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1984.50.1-2.43 [Google Scholar]
19. Pomerantz, A.
    (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp.57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Schegloff, E.A.
    (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defence of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295–1345. doi: 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
21. Schegloff, E.A.
    (1995) Parties and talking together: Two ways in which numbers are significant for talk-in-interaction. In P. ten Have and G. Psathas , Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp.31–42). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Schegloff, E.A. ; Jefferson, G. ; Sacks, H.
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
23. Seedhouse, P.
    (2004) The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Language Learning, 54, (Supplement 1).
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sinclair, J.McH. ; Coulthard, M.
    (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Tannen, D.
    (1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imaginary in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. ten Have, P.
    (1999) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]